因全球氣候治理發展趨勢驅動著全球諸國訂下2050淨零目標，更伴隨著2020年新冠疫情爆發和2021年世界多國陷入缺電危機，全球更是興起綠色復甦的浪潮。也因減碳趨勢開啟全球電動車浪潮之序，使碳中和、潔淨能源和新能源議題再度成為市場關注焦點。面臨全球暖化與氣候變遷之衝擊，降低能源耗用與強化溫室氣體排放管理已成為當前企業追求永續發展的必要策略。不僅如此也因2050淨零目標，減碳目標亦從環保面向擴及能源與產業轉型，與此同時，台灣企業順應全球電動車之發展，台灣汽車電子零組件廠商也開啟跨企業及跨產業合作，專業分工、開放平台和資源整合的市場發展模式，透過價值主張吸引多利害關係人的參與，揮別過往線性價值創造並以創造集體協作之新價值創造系統模式。因此，本研究旨在探討「台達電」建構生態系統之歷程，並進一步剖析此生態系統結構取向與建構，最終得出企業自身之競爭優勢與生態系統之佈局完整性程度。
本研究採用質性研究中的單一個案研究法，並以「台達電」作為研究標的，透過「價值共創」與「生態系統」之理論基礎，逐步分析台達電所建構的生態系統之演變過程，以及處於電動車產業中，身為汽車電子零組件廠商的自身競爭優勢。根據本研究結果發現，台達電產業生態系統建構之歷程，首先，是由中心企業在互惠共榮的基礎之下提出的價值主張來吸引互補參與者加入，接著再透過參與者進行資源交換與分享，從而為自身與整個生態系統創造出更多的價值。並於相互協作之過程，透過治理機制之設置來確保生態系統得以順利運作進行，最終將達成參與者集體協作以共創價值之成果。然而，個案也透過自身節能整合解決方案提供者之角色，展開相對應之策略行動與產業佈局，創造屬於自身的核心價值與競爭優勢進而形塑其共生共榮之生態系統永續發展。

As the development trend of global climate governance drives countries around the world to set the net-zero target by 2050. The goal of carbon reduction has also expanded from environmental protection to energy and industrial transformation. Besides, more Taiwanese auto electronic components manufacturers carry out cooperation with cross-enterprise, cross-industry, and cross-value chain. The ecosystem is alos a new value creation system which overturns the past linear value creation and instead attracts a group of multilateral complementary participants through value proposition. Therefore, the purpose of study is to explore the process of "Delta" in constructing an ecosystem, and to further analyze the construction of this ecosystem, and finally obtain the company's own competitive advantage and the completeness of the ecosystem.
This research takes qualitative research methods with single case: Delta and gradually analyzes the process of the construction of Delta ecosystem by the theoretical basis of "value co-creation", and"ecosystem". The results of this research found that Delta industry ecosystem follow the principles mentioned in the literature review. However, the most difference is the case also uses its role as a provider of energy-saving integrated solutions to carry out corresponding strategic actions and targets arrangement. To create its own core values and competitive advantages and shape its symbiotic and co-prosperous ecosystem for sustainable development.

工研院IEK、財團法人中技社. (2014). 台灣電動車產業鏈與主要廠商.
方世杰. (2020). 生態系統的概念與實務意涵.
台灣物聯網產業技術協會. (2020). [趨勢情報] 強化新能源汽車發展 中國大陸國務院發布《新能源汽車產業發展規劃（2021—2035年）》.
台達官網. 產品解決方案. Retrieved from https://www.deltaww.com/zh-TW/solutions/EV-Charging-Solutions/ALL/
台達官網. (解決方案). Retrieved from https://www.deltaww.com/zh-TW/solutions/EV-Charging-Solutions/ALL/
台達新聞稿. (2021). 台達電動車充電樁進駐北基國際全台57座加油站 提供最佳化充電服務 描繪公共充電站未來樣貌. Retrieved from https://www.deltaww.com/zh-tw/news/24081
行政部環境環保署. (2021). 節能減碳政策. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov.tw/Page/9AF4E3B600088167
吳廷勻. (2021). 台達電打敗一階供應商「平鎮夜市」研發的祕密武器攻進未來車心臟.
官網, D. (2021). 台達充電樁獲國道首座 電動車快充站 選用，快速充電服務吹響加油站轉型號角. Retrieved from https://blog.deltaww.com/energyinfrastructuresolutions/evcharging/delta-dc-200kw-charger-in-highway-charging-station/

官網, D. (2022a). 台達動態負載分配技術 智慧調配電力 提高充電服務品質與周轉率. Retrieved from https://blog.deltaww.com/energyinfrastructuresolutions/evcharging/dynamicloaddistribution/
官網, D. (2022b). 台達電動車充電方案導入首座 計程車充電 服務示範站. Retrieved from https://blog.deltaww.com/energyinfrastructuresolutions/success-cases/dazhi-taxi-station-fleet-charging/
官網, D. (2022c). 隨時充電需求帶動 商用充電 佈建熱潮，台達協助商用場域創造營運優勢. Retrieved from https://blog.deltaww.com/energyinfrastructuresolutions/evcharging/delta-commercial-charging/
陳信榮. (2022). 電動化車夯 今年市占挑戰20%.
陳映璇. (2021). 台達電、鴻海MIH助陣！國際智慧移動展10月登場，台灣如何搶下電動車時代話語權？.
張漢綺. (2022). 深耕多年 台達電今年電動車營收看飆. 中時新聞網. Retrieved from https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20220421002650-260410?chdtv
張玉圓. (2021). 車電產業戰國時代華麗揭幕. Retrieved from https://college.itri.org.tw/en/82-special-topic-learning/new-technology/598-article062101.html
林子傑. (2021). 汽車零件製造業發展趨勢. Retrieved from https://www.twtrend.com/trend-detail/manufacture-of-parts-for-motor-vehicles-2021/
勤業眾信, D. (2021). 汽車產業趨勢與展望:電車產業新世代-汽車電動化革命. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/consumer- business/articles/rp210126-2021-electric-vehicles-trends.html
熊毅晰. (2014). 台達電董事長海英俊：太容易做的東西，不要做. Retrieved from https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5063178
產業節能減碳資訊網. 能源管理資訊系統. Retrieved from https://ghg.tgpf.org.tw/Counseling/counseling_sm8_2
葉卉軒. (2021). 電動車產值 今年挑戰百億.
謝育錚, 閻. (2019). 國際電動車產業發展現況與發展.
錢玉紘. (2020). 電動車靠這4大關鍵崛起，10年後將突破3千萬輛！. Retrieved from https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/59412/2030-electricvehicle-trends
Edison. (2017). ISO/TS 16949 即將轉變為 IATF 16949：2016，改版進度總整理. Retrieved from https://isoedisonwang.pixnet.net/blog/post/342400975-ISO/TS%2016949%20即將轉變為%20IATF%2016949：2016，改版進度總整理
Adner, R. (2016). Ecosystem as Structure. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. doi:10.1177/0149206316678451
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. doi:10.1177/0149206316678451
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306-333. doi:10.1002/smj.821

Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018). Maneuvering in Poor Visibility: How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game when Uncertainty is High. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 466-498. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0869
Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating Innovation Networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659-669. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318923
Fjeldstad, Ø. D., Snow, C. C., Miles, R. E., & Lettl, C. (2012). The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 734-750.
Frow, P., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Payne, A. (2016). Co-creation practices: Their role in shaping a health care ecosystem. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 24-39.
Gulati, R., Thomas, L. D. W., & Tushman, M. (2012). Meta‐organization design Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts.
Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. In: Harvard Business Review Reprint Service.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14. doi:10.1002/dir.20015
Puranam, P., Raveendran, M., & Knudsen, T. (2012). Organization Design: The Epistemic Interdependence Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 419-440. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0535
Raab, J., & Kenis, P. (2009). Heading toward a society of networks: Empirical developments and theoretical challenges. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(3), 198-210.
Ramani, G., & Kumar, V. (2008). Interaction Orientation and Firm Performance. Journal of
Marketing, 72(1), 27-45.
Ramaswamy, V., & Gouillart, F. (2010). Building the co-creative enterprise. Havard business review, 88(10), 100-109.
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 84, 196-205. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018a). Offerings as Digitalized Interactive Platforms: A
Conceptual Framework and Implications. Journal of Marketing, 82(4), 19-31. doi:10.1509/jm.15.0365
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. . Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. doi:10.1002
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. . (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
Vargo, S. L., Lusch, Robert F. (2015). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23. doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. . (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. . European Management Journal, 26(3), 145-152. doi:10.1016
Yin, R. K. (1994a). Case study research: Design and methods, applied social research.