簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 洪義鈞
Hung, Yi-Chun
論文名稱: 評估設計構想新穎性的基礎研究
Fundamental study on novelty metric of evaluating design ideas
指導教授: 周君瑞
Chou, Chun-Juei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系
Department of Industrial Design
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 78
中文關鍵詞: 新穎性尺度評估尺度設計構想
外文關鍵詞: Novelty scale, evaluation scale, design concept
相關次數: 點閱:101下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘要 ii Thesis/Dissertation Title iii 誌謝 vii 目錄 viii 表目錄 x 圖目錄 xi 第1章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機 2 1.3 研究目的 3 1.4 研究限制與範圍 5 第2章 文獻探討 9 2.1 產生構想的方法論 9 2.2 以非尺度方法評估構想之相關研究 14 2.3 量測設計構想新穎性的四種尺度方法 19 2.4 探討設計構想新穎性常用的統計分析方法 23 第3章 探討新穎性尺度的研究步驟與分析方法 28 第4章 研究結果與分析 32 4.1 邀請專家與學生為設計作品評分 32 4.2 探討新穎性尺度的屬性與權重 32 4.3 調查新穎性尺度的屬性與權重 34 4.3.1 問卷調查新穎性尺度的屬性與權重 34 4.3.2 新穎性尺度的屬性調查結果 34 4.3.3 專家與學生新穎性尺度屬性調查結果比較 34 4.4 挑選二組新穎性尺度 38 4.5 評估作品並計算新穎性分數 38 4.6 比較分析新穎性尺度與作品評分的相關性 38 4.6.1專家評分與學生評分的相關性 42 4.6.2 新穎性尺度與學生評分的相關性 42 4.7 調查草圖內容是否能呈現新穎性屬性 43 4.8 應用多元回歸分析新穎性的四個屬性權種 44 第5章 結論與建議 46 5.1 結論 46 5.2 建議 47 參考文獻 48 附錄A 其它評估設計構想的非尺度與類尺度方法 54 A.1 其它以非尺度方法評估構想的理論 54 A.2 以類尺度方法評估構想之相關研究 59 附錄B 其它評估設計構想的非尺度與類尺度方法 64 附錄C 新穎性屬性調查問卷 69 附錄D 新穎性屬性MPCA調查問卷 73 附錄E 各產品新穎性分數、學生評分及專家評分皮爾森相關性 74

    陳順宇(1997)。統計學(二版),華泰書局。
    陳順宇(1998)。多變量分析,華泰書局,8-15~17。
    黃俊英(1998)。多變量分析(六版),中國經濟企業研究所。
    楊忠祥(2018)。體育與運動測驗信度考驗:組內相關係數,麋研筆墨有限公司,32-52。
    Altshuller , G. (2002). 40 principles: TRIZ keys to innovation (Vol. 1). Technical Innovation Center, Inc..
    Amabile, TM (1982). Social Psychology of Creativity: A Consensual Assessment Technique, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(4), p.997-1013.
    Andriopoulos , C. (2001). Determinants of organisational creativity: a literature review. Management decision
    Belton, V., & Gear, T. (1983). On a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies. Omega, 11(3), 228-230.
    Blessing, LTM & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, A Design Research Methodology, Verlag: Springer.
    Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2003). The Mind Map Book: Radiant Thinking-Major Evolution in Human Thought. 3rd.
    Bytheway , CW (2007). FAST creativity and innovation: Rapidly improving processes, product development and solving complex problems. J. Ross Publishing.
    Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma , B., & Nataraju , BS (2005). A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. Ai Edam, 19(2), 113-1
    Chulvi , V., Mulet , E., Chakrabarti, A., López-Mesa, B., & González-Cruz, C. (2012). Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 241-269.
    Coelho, DA & Vieira, FL (2018): The effect of previous group interaction on individual ideation novelty and variety, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 6(1-2), 80-92
    Cronbach, LJ (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
    Cropley , DH, & Kaufman, JC (2012). Measuring functional creativity: Non‐expert raters and the Creative Solution Diagnosis Scale. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(2), 119-137.
    Cross, N. (2008). Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, 4th Edition, Wiley.
    Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons LT
    Dean, DL, Hender , JM, Rodgers, TL, & Santanen , EL (2006). Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(30) , 646-698.
    Elizondo, LA, Kisselburgh , LG, Hirleman , ED, Cipra , RJ, Ramani, K., Yang, M., & Carleton, T. (2010, January). Understanding innovation in student design projects. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 44144, pp. 805-810).
    Fiorineschi , L., Frillici , FS, & Rotini, F. (2020a). Impact of missing attributes on the novelty metric of Shah et al., Research in Engineering Design, (2020)31, 221-234.
    Fiorineschi , L., Frillici , FS, & Rotini, F. (2020b). Subjectivity of novelty metrics based on idea decomposition, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, DOI: 10.1080/21650349.2020.1811775
    Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke- Schaub, P. (2014). What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Design studies, 35(1), 29-53.
    Guler , K., & Petrisor , DM (2021). A Pugh Matrix based product development model for increased small design team efficiency. Cogent Engineering, 8(1), 1923383.
    Hanington , B., & Martin, B. (2017). The Pocket Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas and Design Effective Solutions. Rockport.
    Hay, L., Duffy, AHB, Grealy , M., Tahsiri , M., McTeague, C., & Vuletic , T. (2020). A novel systematic approach for analysing exploratory design ideation, Journal of Engineering Design, 31:3, 127-149, DOI: 10.1080/09544828.2019.1662381
    Horn, D., & Salvendy , G. (2006). Consumer‐based assessment of product creativity: A review and reappraisal. Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries, 16(2), 155-175.
    Howell, DC (2009). Statistical Methods for Psychology, Duxbury - Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA, 177-228.
    Jagtap, S., Larsson, A., Hiort , V., Olander, E., & Warell , A. (2014). Interdependency between average novelty, individual average novelty, and variety, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation , 3(1), 43-60.
    Jagtap, S. (2019). Design creativity: refined method for novelty assessment, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 7:1-2, 99-115, DOI: 10.1080/21650349.2018.1463176
    Johnson, TA, Cheeley , A., Caldwell, BW, & Green, MG (2016). Comparison and Extension of Novelty Metrics for Problem-Solving Tasks, Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE), Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
    Kaufman, JC, & Beghetto , RA (2009). Exploring the Four-C model of creativity: Implications for giftedness. Perspectives in gifted education: Creativity, 94.
    Kemis , M., & Walker, DA (2000). The aeIou approach to program evaluation. Black Issues Book Review, 35, 42.
    Keshwani , S, Lenau , TA, Ahmed-Kristensen, S., & Chakrabarti, A. (2017) Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming, Journal of Engineering Design, 28:10-12, 654 -680, DOI: 10.1080/09544828.2017.1393504
    Kim, KH (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity research journal, 18(1), 3-14.
    Kirton, MJ (1994). Adaptors and innovators: Styles of creativity and problem solving, Routledge, London.
    Ko, YT, Chen, MS, Yang, CC, & Zheng, MC (2015). Modelling a contradiction-oriented design approach for innovative product design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 229(1_suppl), 199-211.
    Linsey, J., Clauss , E., Kurtoglu , T., Murphy, J., Wood, K., & Markman, A. (2011). An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(3), 031008.
    Lopez-Mesa, B. & Vidal, R. (2006). Novelty Metrics in Engineering Design Experiments, International Design Conference, Dubrovnik-Croatia, 557-564.
    Moss Jr, J., (1966). Measuring creative abilities in junior high school industrial arts. Washington, DC: Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, American.
    Nelson, BA, Wilson, JO, Rosen, D., & Yen, J. (2009). Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 30(6), 737-743.
    Oman, SK, Tumer , IY, Wood K., & Seepersad , C. (2013). A comparison of creativity and innovation metrics and sample validation through in-class design projects, Research in Engineering Design, 24,65-92 .
    O'Quin , K., & Besemer , SP (2006). Using the creative product semantic scale as a metric for results-oriented business. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), 34-44.
    Osborn, AF (1963) Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving (Third Revised Edition). New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.
    Ott, RL & Longnecker , MT (2015). An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis (7th Edition), Cengage Learning.
    Oulasvirta , A., Kurvinen , E., & Kankainen , T. (2003). Understanding contexts by being there: case studies in bodystorming. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 7(2), 125-134.
    Ozer, M. (2005). What do we know about new product idea selection. Center for Innovation Management Studies.
    ÖZSOY, Ö. H., & ÖZSOY, C. Y. (2019). Product design concept evaluation by using analytical hierarchy and analytical network processes. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 35(2).
    Peeters , J., Verhaegen, P.-A., Vandevenne , D., & Duflou JR (2010). Refined Metrics for Measuring Novelty in Ideation, Proceedings of Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering (IDMME) - Virtual Concept 2010, Bordeaux, France.
    Ranjan, BSC, Siddharth, L., & Chakrabarti, A. (2018). A systematic approach to assessing novelty, requirement satisfaction, and creativity. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 32, 390-414. https: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060418000148
    Redelinghuys , C., & Bahill , AT (2006). A framework for the assessment of the creativity of product design teams. Journal of Engineering Design, 17(2), 121-141.
    Rencher, AC & Christensen, WF (2012). Methods of Multivariate Analysis (3rd Edition), Wiley.
    Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi delta kappan , 42(7), 305-310.
    Sarkar, P. & Chakrabarti, A. (2011). Assessing design creativity, Design Studies, 32(2011), 348-383.
    Saunders M, Seepersad C et al (2009) The characteristics of innovative, mechanical products. In: ASME 2009 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference, IDETC/CIE 2009, SanDiego , CA
    Shah, JJ, Vargas-Hernandez, N., & Smith, SM (2003). Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness, Design Studies, 24(2), p.111-134.
    Sluis-Thiescheffer , W., Bekker , T., Eggen, B., Vermeeren , A., De Ridder, H., (2016). Measuring and comparing novelty for design solutions generated by young children through different design methods, Design Studies, 43(2016), 48-73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.01.001
    Srinivasan, V., & Chakrabarti, A. (2010). Investigating novelty–outcome relationships in engineering design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24(2), 161-178.
    Srivathsavai , R., Genco, N., & Katja Hölttä -Otto, K. (2010). Study of Existing Metrics Used in Measurement of Ideation Effectiveness, Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
    Stefanic , N., & Randles , C. (2015). Examining the reliability of scores from the consensual assessment technique in the measurement of individual and small group creativity. Music Education Research, 17(3), 278-295.
    Toh , CA, Miller, SR, & Okudan Kremer, GE (2014). The Impact of Team-Based Product Dissection on Design Novelty, Journal of Mechanical Design, APR 2014, Vol. 136/041004-1~10.
    Torrance, EP (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual: Verbal tests, forms a and b: Figural tests, forms a and b. Personal Press, Incorporated.
    Ulrich K. & Eppinger S. (2019). Product Design and Development, 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill Education.
    Van der Lugt , R. (2000). Developing a graphic tool for creative problem solving in design groups. Design studies, 21(5), 505-522.
    Vandevenne , D., Pieters T., & Duflou , JR (2016). Enhancing novelty with knowledge-based support for Biologically-Inspired Design, Design Studies, 46(2016), 152-173.
    Vargas-Hernandez, N., Schmidt, LC, & Okudan , GE (2013). Systematic Ideation Effectiveness Study of TRIZ, Journal of Mechanical Design, OCT 2013, Vol.135/101009, 1-10.
    Vargas-Hernandez, N., Shah JJ, & Smith, SM, (2010). Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies, Design Studies, 31(4), 382-410.
    Verhaegen, PA, Vandevenne , D., Peeters , J., & Duflou , JR (2013). Refinements to the variety metric for idea evaluation. Design Studies, 34, 243-263.
    Vidal, R., Mulet , E., & Gómez- Senent , E. (2004). Effectiveness of the means of expression in creative problem-solving in design groups. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(3), 285- 298.
    Viswanathan, VK & Linsey, JS (2012). Physical models and design thinking: A study of functionality, novelty and variety of ideas, Journal of Mechanical Design, SEP 2012, Vol.134/091004-1~13.
    Weaver, MB, Caldwell, BW, & Sheafer , V. (2019). Interpreting Measures of Rarity and Novelty: Investigating Correlations between Relative Infrequency and Perceived Ratings, Proceedings of the ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE 2019), Anaheim, CA, USA.
    Wilson, JO, Rosen, D., Nelson, BA, & Yen, J. (2010). The effects of biological examples in idea generation, Design Studies, 31(2), 169-186.
    Wilson JO, Rosen D., Nelson, BA, & Yen, J. (2010). The effects of biological examples in idea generation, Design Studies, 31(2), 169-186.
    Worinkeng , E., Joshi, S., & Joshua D. Summers, JD (2015). An experimental study: analyzing requirement type influence on novelty and variety of generated solutions, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 3(2 ), 61-77.
    Zwicky, F. (1948). Morphological astronomy. The observatory, 68, 121-143.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2027-07-01公開
    校外:2027-07-01公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE