| 研究生: |
蔡翔宇 Tsai, Hsiang-Yu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以新產品屬性、知覺價值、知覺風險與品牌偏好探討消費者對純電車的購買意願 Exploring Consumer Purchase Intentions for Battery Electric Vehicles: A Study on the Relationships among New Product Attributes, Perceived Value, Perceived Risk, and Brand Preference |
| 指導教授: |
賴孟寬
Lai, Meng-Kuan |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系碩士在職專班 Department of Business Administration (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2024 |
| 畢業學年度: | 112 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 93 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 新產品屬性 、知覺價值 、知覺風險 、品牌偏好 、購買意願 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | new product attributes, perceived value, perceived risk, brand preference, purchase intentions |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:104 下載:31 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在個人交通運輸上,隨著聯合國對淨零碳排的政策及各車廠對企業永續經營的目標,目前各車廠都已經投入電動車的研發生產,更提出將轉型為純電車廠的願景。而國發會也訂出台灣2030年新售電動車要達到30%,2040年達到全面市售電動車的目標。在市售電動車中,又以純電車在行駛過程中為更環保、無廢氣產生的最佳代表,因此本研究以問卷調查方式,針對消費者對純電車的購買意願來研究,並根據文獻理論探討新產品屬性、知覺價值、知覺風險、品牌偏好等理論,說明對消費者的購買意願。調查對象為18歲以上有能力之購車族群進行受測,共計回收358份問卷,有效問卷為303份,並以有效樣本透過描述性統計、因素分析、信度分析及迴歸方法進行驗證。研究結果發現(1)新產品屬性對知覺價值有正向影響。(2)新產品屬性對知覺風險有負向影響。(3)知覺價值對購買意願有正向影響。(4)知覺風險對購買意願有負向影響。(5)品牌偏好會提升知覺價值對購買意願之影響。(6) 品牌偏好會降低知覺風險對購買意願之影響。由此可知消費者對純電車的主觀評價、不確定性風險、特定品牌的喜好,都會成為購買純電車的關鍵因素。最後根據驗證結果,提出實務應用及未來研究建議。
With the United Nations advocating for policies on net-zero carbon emissions and various automotive manufacturers focusing on sustainable operational goals. Electric vehicles are gradually gaining prominence, especially pure electric vehicles. The purpose of this study is to explore the factors that impact the evaluation of consumers' purchase intention concerning battery electric vehicles (BEVs). With reference to previous research, scholars primarily focused on technology acceptance models or examined individual aspects of new product attributes, such as relative advantages, complexity, compatibility, etc. It is believed that future research can move towards the innovative adoption level, functional aspects, and economic considerations of electric vehicles. In the past, domestic scholars have conducted research on the purchase intention of electric vehicles, but there have been few studies specifically focusing on battery electric vehicles. Based on this, it is proposed to employ the conceptual framework for battery electric vehicles to scrutinize the degree of interaction and relationships among new product attributes, perceived value, perceived risk, brand preference, and purchase intention. Through the research analysis, it is verified that new product attributes have a significant positive effect on perceived value and concurrently have a significant negative effect on perceived risk. Perceived value has a significant positive impact on purchase intention, while perceived risk has a significant negative impact on purchase intention. Brand preference strengthens the influence of perceived value on purchase intention and mitigates the impact of perceived risk on purchase intention.
王業竣. (2014). 從產品屬性、產品形象、產品知識探討消費者的知覺價值與購買意願的關係─以油電混合⾞為例 國⽴彰化師範⼤學]. 彰化縣.
周敬烈. (2014). 結合計畫⾏為理論與新產品採⽤模型 探討消費者對純電動⾞之使⽤意圖 國⽴交通大學]. 新⽵市.
財團法⼈⾞輛研究測試中心. (2023). 2022 年主要電動⾞銷售國家市場概況.
國家發展委員會 . (2022). 臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明. p38-40.
傅從陽. (2015). 創新產品屬性對購買意願之影響—以油電混合動⼒⾞為例 開南⼤學 ]. 桃園縣.
Aaker, D. A., & Moorman, C. (2017). Strategic market management. John Wiley & Sons.
Al Kailani, M., & Kumar, R. (2011). Investigating uncertainty avoidance and perceived risk for impacting Internet buying: A study in three national cultures. international Journal of Business and Management, 6(5), 76.
Alreck, P. L., & Settle, R. B. (1999). Strategies for building consumer brand preference.Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(2), 130-144.
Assael, H. (1984). Consumer behavior and marketing action. Kent Pub. Co.
Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management science, 15(5), 215-227.
Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer Behavior as Risk-taking. In Dynamic Marketing for a
Changing World Chicago:American Marketing Association, 389-393.
Boyd, T. C., & Mason, C. H. (1999). The link between attractiveness of “extrabrand”attributes and the adoption of innovations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 306-319.
Byun, D.-H. (2001). The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model. Information & management, 38(5), 289-297.
Carley, S., Krause, R. M., Lane, B. W., & Graham, J. D. (2013). Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 18, 39-45.
Chang, H. H., Fu, C. S., & Jain, H. T. (2016). Modifying UTAUT and innovation diffusion theory to reveal online shopping behavior: Familiarity and perceived risk as mediators. Information Development, 32(5), 1757-1773.
Chang, H. H., & Liu, Y. M. (2009). The impact of brand equity on brand preference and purchase intentions in the service industries. The Service Industries Journal, 29(12), 1687-1706.
Cox, D. F. (1967). Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior. Boston, MA: Boston University. Press., 34-81.
Cunningham, M. S. (1967). The major dimensions of perceived risk. Risk taking and
information handling in consumer behavior.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store
information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3),
307-319.
Ebrahim, R. S. (2013). A study of brand preference: an experiential view Brunel University Brunel Business School PhD Theses].
Featherman, M., Jia, S., Califf, C. B., & Hajli, N. (2021a). The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120847.
Featherman, M., Jia, S. J., Califf, C. B., & Hajli, N. (2021b). The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120847.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2).
Hasan, S., & Simsekoglu, Ö. (2020). The role of psychological factors on vehicle kilometer travelled (VKT) for battery electric vehicle (BEV) users. Research in Transportation 83 Economics, 82, 100880.
Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., & Rickard, J. A. (2003). Customer repurchase
intention: A general structural equation model. European Journal of marketing.
Helmbrecht, M., Olaverri-Monreal, C., Bengler, K., Vilimek, R., & Keinath, A. (2014). How electric vehicles affect driving behavioral patterns. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 6(3), 22-32.
Hjorthol, R. (2013). Attitudes, ownership and use of Electric Vehicles–a review of literature. TØI report, 1261(2013), 1-38.
Holak, S. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (1990). Purchase intentions and the dimensions of
innovation: An exploratory model. Journal of Product Innovation Management: an
international publication of the product development & management association,
7(1), 59-73.
Hoyer, W. D., & Brown, S. P. (1990). Effects of Brand Awareness on Choice for a Common, Repeat-Purchase Product. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 141–148.
Junquera, B., Moreno, B., & Álvarez, R. (2016). Analyzing consumer attitudes towards electric vehicle purchasing intentions in Spain: Technological limitations and vehicle confidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 109, 6-14.
Kamakura, W. A., & Balasubramanian, S. K. (1988). Long-term view of the diffusion of durables. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 5(1), 1-13.
Khazaei, H. (2019). The influence of personal innovativeness and price value on intention to use of electric vehicles in Malaysia. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 8(3), pp. 483-494.
Kim, M.-K., Oh, J., Park, J.-H., & Joo, C. (2018). Perceived value and adoption intention for electric vehicles in Korea: Moderating effects of environmental traits and government supports. Energy, 159, 799-809.
Koller, M., Floh, A., & Zauner, A. (2011). Further insights into perceived value and consumer loyalty: A “green” perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 28(12), 1154-1176.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing management 12e. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pears Education.
Kottler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2009). Marketing management. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Liebermann, Y., & Stashevsky, S. (2002). Perceived risks as barriers to Internet and ecommerce usage. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal.
Long, Z., Axsen, J., Miller, I., & Kormos, C. (2019). What does Tesla mean to car buyers? Exploring the role of automotive brand in perceptions of battery electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 129, 185-204.
Morgan-Thomas, A., & Veloutsou, C. (2013). Beyond technology acceptance: Brand
relationships and online brand experience. Journal of business research, 66(1), 21-
27.
Munnukka, J. (2007). Characteristics of early adopters in mobile communications markets. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 25(7), 719-731.
Murray, K. B., & Schlacter, J. L. (1990). The impact of services versus goods on consumers’assessment of perceived risk and variability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(1), 51-65.
Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and
satisfaction in transactions: A field survey approach. Journal of marketing, 53(2), 21-35.
Ordanini, A., Parasuraman, A., & Rubera, G. (2014). When the recipe is more important than the ingredients: A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurations. Journal of service research, 17(2), 134-149.
Peter, J. P., & Tarpey Sr, L. X. (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1), 29-37.
Petschnig, M., Heidenreich, S., & Spieth, P. (2014). Innovative alternatives take action–Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 61, 68-83.
Qian, L., & Yin, J. (2017). Linking Chinese cultural values and the adoption of electric
vehicles: The mediating role of ethical evaluation. Transportation research part D:
84 transport and environment, 56, 175-188.
Robertson, J., Botha, E., Ferreira, C., & Pitt, L. (2022). How deep is your love? The brand love-loyalty matrix in consumer-brand relationships. Journal of business research, 149, 651-662.
Rogers. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed). Free Press, New York.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3rd ed). New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental,
hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39-49.
Shanmugavel, N., & Micheal, M. (2022). Exploring the marketing related stimuli and
personal innovativeness on the purchase intention of electric vehicles through
Technology Acceptance Model. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 3, 100029.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of business research, 22(2), 159-170.
Sweeney, J. C., and Geoffrey N. Soutar. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
Taylor, J. W. (1974). The role of risk in consumer behavior: A comprehensive and
operational theory of risk taking in consumer behavior. Journal of marketing, 38(2),
54-60.
Teas, R. K., & Agarwal, S. (2000). The effects of extrinsic product cues on consumers’perceptions of quality, sacrifice, and value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 278-290.
Thanasuta, K., Patoomsuwan, T., Chaimahawong, V., & Chiaravutthi, Y. (2009). Brand and country of origin valuations of automobiles. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(3), 355-375.
Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Wong, T.-K., Hanifah, H., Teoh, A. P., & Nawaser, K. (2022). Modelling electric vehicle purchase intention among generation Y consumers in Malaysia. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 43, 100784.
Wang, S., Li, J., & Zhao, D. (2017). The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 105, 14-26.
Wang, S., Wang, J., Li, J., Wang, J., & Liang, L. (2018). Policy implications for promoting the adoption of electric vehicles: do consumer’s knowledge, perceived risk and financial incentive policy matter? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 58-69.
Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139-153.
Yu, J., Lee, H., Ha, I., & Zo, H. (2017). User acceptance of media tablets: An empirical
examination of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 206-223.
Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 123-131.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
Zolkepli, I. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2015). Social media adoption: The role of media needs and innovation characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 189-209.