| 研究生: |
鄭元碩 Cheng, Yuan-Shuo |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
滑航艇姿態對操縱性與耐海性之影響分析 The Effect of Planing Hull Attitude on the Characteristics of Manoeuvring and Seakeeping |
| 指導教授: |
方銘川
Fang, Ming-Chung 吳炳承 Wu, Ping-Chen |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 系統及船舶機電工程學系 Department of Systems and Naval Mechatronic Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 94 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 滑航艇 、耐海性 、操縱性 、二維截片理論 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Planing Hull, Seakeeping, Manoeuvring, Two-dimensional Strip Theory |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:96 下載:15 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究之目的分成兩大部分,第一部分是考慮滑航艇的滑航俯仰角變化結合船體六度運動公式,進行船舶迴旋圈測試,了解船體操縱性能的變化。第二部分是以二維截片理論模擬船體運動,將滑航艇的滑航行為加入考慮,了解高速艇滑航時的姿態對耐海性的影響。
本研究假設滑航艇之穩態動升角即為該船速之俯仰角,以此姿態來進行平面運動機構實驗(Planar Motion Mechanism),得到滑航艇不同滑航姿態的流體動力係數。利用這些流體動力係數進行迴歸分析,導入船舶運動方程式,進行迴旋圈測試。
其次耐海性部分使用二維截片理論在頻率領域進行計算,建立不同穩態動升角狀態下不同船速、吃水、波頻、波向下的耐海流體動力係數資料庫。使用此資料庫,內插出任何時刻船體所受之相關流體動力,在時程領域進行四階Runge-Kutta數值方法計算,進而得到船體在波浪中時程領域中的運動量。
由本研究之結果可以得知,考慮滑航姿態之迴旋圈模擬與使用排水量型船舶假設之迴旋圈大小差異極大,完成迴旋圈的速度也大不同。考慮滑航姿態之時域耐海模擬也顯示若以排水量型船舶假設進行滑航艇的耐海性能研究,將會高估滑航艇之運動量。因此滑航艇之姿態對於船體操縱性與耐海性之影響須謹慎評估,不可忽略。
This study is divided into two parts, which both take planing hull attitude into the ship motion equation. The hull attitude is meant to represent the dynamic lift angle and running trim that were generated as the planing hull accelerates.
The first part assumes that the hydrodynamic coefficients varied as the planing hull attitude changes, which also differs as the ship speed changes. Thus the PMM(Planar Motion Mechanism) test under three attitude conditions are performed to measure the hydrodynamic coefficients. Then we do the regression analysis on these coefficients to make sure that the coefficients cover the range of ship speed we are going to simulate. Then the turning circle test is simulated by the 4th Runge-Kutta approach with the 4DOF ship motion equation.
Based on the two-dimensional strip theory, the latter part establishes a seakeeping hydrodynamic coefficients database with a previously developed seakeeping motion program running in frequency domain. A variety of ship speeds, drafts, wave frequencies, wave directions are considered. Then, combining the foregoing attitude assumption and the database, ship motion are calculated by 4th Runge-Kutta approach.
Based on the results of current work, planing hull performs different motion characteristics compared to displacement ship. The turning circle results considering planing attitude is smaller than that with even keel waterline.The ship speed drops more, and the steady roll angle during turning remains the same.
The frequency-domain value shows a overall overestimating tendency on the value calculated with even keel waterline. But ship motion appears to be underestimated on heave at 20 knots and in head sea at 35 knots, which also happens on yaw motion in following sea. The time-domain seakeeping motion results also shows that the calculation of frequency domain had an generally overestimating trend on planing hull. When ship is not at rest, ship motion in waves is normally lower in the time-domain simulation. And the larger the wave amplitude is, the lower the non-dimensional ship motion is going to be. The exception is the non-dimensional motion of ship speed 35 knots, which the non-dimensional heave and pitch motion are larger than the frequency-domain value.
Roberto Algarín and Antonio Bula. A numeric study of the maneuverability of planinghulls with six degrees of freedom.Ocean Engineering, 221:108514, 2021.
GS Baker and GH Millar. Some experiments in connection with the design of floats forhydro-aeroplanes.ARC R&M, (70), 1912.
Ermina Begovic, Carlo Bertorello, and Silvia Pennino. Planing hull seakeeping inirregular head seas.Transactions of FAMENA, 38(3):1–12, 2014.
Donald L Blount, Louis T Codega, et al. Dynamic stability of planing boats.MarineTechnology, 29(1):4–12, 1992.
MS Chislett and J Strom-Tejsen. A model testing technique and method of analysis forthe prediction of steering and manoeuvring qualities of surface vessels. 1966.
Abbas Dashtimanesh, Hossein Enshaei, and Sasan Tavakoli. Oblique-asymmetric 2d1tmodel to compute hydrodynamic forces and moments in coupled sway, roll, and yaw motions of planing hulls.Journal of Ship Research, 63(1):1 – 15, 2019.
Stephen B Denny and E Nadine Hubble. Prediction of craft turning characteristics.Marine Technology and SNAME News, 28(01):1–13, 1991.
Ming-Chung Fang and Tse-Yin Chen. Motions and wave loads for a trimaran shiptraveling in waves. InTEAM Conference 2005, Singapore, 2005.
Ming-Chung Fang and Tse-Yin Chen. A parametric study of wave loads on trimaranships traveling in waves.Ocean engineering, 35(8-9):749–762, 2008.87
Ming-Chung Fang, Ming-Ling Lee, and Chwang-Kuo Lee. Time simulation of watershipping for a ship advancing in large longitudinal waves.Journal of ship research,37(02):126–137, 1993.
Ming-Chung Fang, Ming-Ling Lee, and Jhih-Hong Luo. On the roll reduction byusing a hydrodynamic model with rudder control. InHydrodynamics VI: Theory andApplications: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Hydrodynamics,Perth, Western Australia, 24-26 November 2004, page 45. CRC Press, 2004.
Ming-Chung Fang and Jhih-Hong Luo. The nonlinear hydroyanmic model for simulatinga ship steering in waves with autopilot system.Ocean Engineering, 32, 2005.
Ming-Chung Fang and Jhih-Hong Luo. A combined control system with roll reductionand track keeping for the ship moving in waves.Journal of Ship Research, 50(4):344–354, 2006.
Ming-Chung Fang and Jhih-Hong Luo. On the track keeping and roll reduction of theship in random waves using different sliding mode controllers.Ocean Engineering, 34,2007.
Ming-Chung Fang, Jhih-Hong Luo, and Ming-Ling Lee. A nonlinear mathematicalmodel for ship turning circle.Journal of ship research, 49(2):69–79, 2005.
Ming-Chung Fang, SP Yen, and ZY Lee. The time simulation for the motion of thewave-piercing catamaran ship in longitudinal waves.Journal of Taiwan Society of NavalArchitects and Marine Engineers, 33(2):93–100, 2014.88
Gerard Fridsma. A systematic study of the rough-water performance of planing boats.irregular waves-part 2. Technical report, STEVENS INST OF TECH HOBOKEN NJDAVIDSON LAB, 1971.
Thomas C Fu, Thomas T O’Shea, Carolyn Q Judge, D Dommermuth, K Brucker, andDonald C Wyatt. A detailed assessment of numerical flow analysis (nfa) to predictthe hydrodynamics of a deep-v planing hull.International Shipbuilding Progress,60(1-4):143–169, 2013.
GE Gadd. A method of computing the flow and surface wave pattern around full forms.1976.
Masami Hamamoto and Yoon-Soo Kim. A new coordinate system and the equationsdescribing manoeuvring motion of a ship in waves.Journal of the Society of NavalArchitects of Japan, 1993(173):209–220, 1993.
Masami Hamamoto, Akihiko Matsuda, and Yashushi Ise. Ship motion and the dangerouszone of a ship in severe following seas.Journal of the Society of Naval Architects ofJapan, 1994(175):69–78, 1994.
John D Hicks, Armin W Troesch, and Changben Jiang. Simulation and nonlineardynamics analysis of planing hulls. 1995.
A Iafrati and R Broglia. Comparisons between 2d+ t potential flow models and 3drans for planing hull hydrodynamics. InInternational Workshop on Water Waves andFloating Bodies, Harbin (China). Citeseer, 2010.
Shosuke Inoue, Masayoshi Hirano, and Katsuro Kijima. Hydrodynamic derivatives onship manoeuvring.International Shipbuilding Progress, 28(321):112–125, 1981.89
F. W. S. Locke Jr. Tests of flat a flat bottom planing surface to determine the inceptionof planing. Technical report, Navy Department, BuAer, Research Division Report No.1096, December 1948.
Katsuro Kijima, Toshiyuki Katsuno, Yasuaki Nakiri, and Yoshitaka Furukawa. On themanoeuvring performance of a ship with theparameter of loading condition.Journal ofthe society of naval architects of Japan, 1990(168):141–148, 1990.
Cheung Hun Kim, Frank S Chou, and David Tien. Motions and hydrodynamic loads ofa ship advancing in oblique waves. Technical report, 1980.
Dong Jin Kim and Sun Young Kim. Turning characteristics of waterjet propelled planingboat at semi-planing speeds.Ocean Engineering, 143:24–33, 2017.
CA Lyster and HL Knights. Prediction equations for ships’turning circles.North EastCoast Inst of Eng & Shipbuilders Trans, 95(4), 1979.
M Morabito, M Pavkov, C Timmins, and B Beaver. Experiments on directional stabilityof stepped planing hulls. InProceedings of the 4th Chesapeake Power Boat Symposium,Annapolis, MD, US, 2014.
Michael G Morabito. Empirical equations for planing hull bottom pressures.Journalof Ship research, 58(4), 2014.
Michael Gorts Morabito. Prediction of planing hull side forces in yaw using slenderbody oblique impact theory.Ocean Engineering, 101:47–57, 2015.
D Nakos and P Sclavounos. Ship motions by a three-dimensional rankine panel method.1991.90
DE Nakos, DC Kring, and PD Sclavounos. Rankine panel methods for time-domainfree surface flows, 6th int. InConf. on Numer. Ship Hydrodyn, 1993.
Nils Salvesen, EO Tuck, and Odd Faltinsen. Ship motions and sea loads. 1970.[36] A. Sambraus. Planing surface tests at large froude numbers–airfoil comparison. Technical report, NACA TM No. 848, February 1938.
Daniel Savitsky. Hydrodynamic design of planing hull.Marine Technology, 1(1):71–95,1964.
Daniel Savitsky. On the Seakeeping of Planing Hulls.Marine Technology and SNAMENews, 5(02):164–174, 04 1968.
L. I. Sedov. Scale effect and optimum relarion for sea surface planing. Technical report,NACA TM No. 1097, February 1947.
J. M. Shoemaker. Tank tests of flat and vee-bottom planing surfaces. Technical report,NACA TM 509, 1934.
Robert F Smiley. The application of planing characteristics to the calculation of thewater-landing loads and motions of seaplanes of arbitrary constant cross section. Technical report, NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASH-INGTON DC, 1952.
W. Sottorf. Experiments with planing surfaces. Technical report, NACA TM 661 andTM739, 1932,1934.91
Sasan Tavakoli, Rasul Niazmand Bilandi, Simone Mancini, Fabio De Luca, and AbbasDashtimanesh. Dynamic of a planing hull in regular waves: Comparison of experimen-tal, numerical and mathematical methods.Ocean Engineering, 217:107959, 2020.
Sasan Tavakoli and Abbas Dashtimanesh. Mathematical simulation of planar motionmechanism test for planing hulls by using 2d+t theory.Ocean Engineering, 169:651–672, 2018.
Sasan Tavakoli, Parviz Ghadimi, and Abbas Dashtimanesh. A nonlinear mathematicalmodel for coupled heave, pitch, and roll motions of a high-speed planing hull.Journalof Engineering Mathematics, 104(1):157–194, 2017.
Armin W Troesch. On the hydrodynamics of vertically oscillating planing hulls.Journalof Ship Research, 36(04):317–331, 1992.
Armin W Troesch and Jeffrey M Falzarano. Modern nonlinear dynamical analysis ofvertical plane motion of planing hulls.Journal of ship research, 37(03):189–199, 1993.
Ernest E Zarnick. A nonlinear mathematical model of motions of a planing boat inregular waves. Technical report, DAVID W TAYLOR NAVAL SHIP RESEARCHAND DEVELOPMENT CENTER BETHESDA MD, 1978.
廖正民.大波中船舶波浪負荷之探討.國立成功大學, 1995.
方銘川、李子宜.高海象抗浪控制律設計與強健性分析. Technical report, 2018.
羅志宏.船舶在波浪中之非線性運動操控模式之探討.成功大學系統及船舶機電工程學系學位論文, pages 1–155, 2006.92
蔡坤遠.船舶在不同海洋環境下操航與避碰安全e化輔助系統之研究. PhD thesis,國立成功大學, Jan 2020.
蔡芳諺.以平面運動機構(pmm)量測船舶不同姿態之操縱性導數與操船性能之研究.成功大學系統及船舶機電工程學系學位論文, pages 1–93, 2016.
陳宣宇.船舶於斜向波中之非線性運動暨穩度計算.成功大學系統及船舶機電工程學系學位論文, 1994.