隨著全球市場競爭的白熱化，漁網具產業也呈現高度競爭情況，加上化纖技術的日新月異，使得漁網具產業的疆界更形模糊，促使領導廠商朝向經營範圍擴張。由於高度動態的產業環境，提供了研究動態競爭下漁網具廠商間相互的競合行為之絕佳機會。具體而言，本研究期望能藉由對漁網具產業之廠商的深度分析，探討以下數個重要的問題：（1）領導廠商是如何維持領先地位，將其競爭優勢成功延伸至整體漁網具產業？（2）在總體市場快速變動的環境下，漁網具產業的結構變化如何影響廠商的策略變化？（3）當漁網具產業的疆界日益模糊下，廠商如何藉由同時參與多個市場、扮演多重角色，來靈活運用競合策略主動塑造最有利於己的賽局？
本研究發現：影響產業領導成敗的關鍵，除了著眼於如何創造整體產業的效益之外，尚須考量到此平台的開發與夥伴廠商共同利益，才能達到順利推動廠商協同演進的目的。此外，觀察領導廠商發現其每一次於組織結構上的調整正是「結構追隨策略」的最佳寫照。漁網具產業在環境、法規快速變動的情況下，整體產業發展使產品生命週期縮短、價格競爭到目前跨領域的競爭，藉由每一次產品創新過程中，在品質、價格、時機、專業技術、障礙建立以及資本累積領域上超越競爭對手，進而牽一髮動全身的影響其他漁網具廠商的策略變化。從漁網具廠商的競合行為當中，可得知企業須以整體價值網來衡量定位，藉由併購、策略聯盟與專利訴訟的戰術，廠商可藉此改變與參賽者的關係，包括降低主要競爭者的威脅、爭取互補市場的合作、佈局潛在的替代市場、控制上游技術的來源，以此達到提升自身相對附加價值、主導市場遊戲規則並開發新市場的目的。

The competition of globalizing gets violent and the fishing nets industry presents competitive highly. Besides, plastic techniques are varying and boundaries are fuzzy. The leader factories expand rapidly the territory of business. The high-dynamic industry creates the best opportunity to research co-opetition each other. Pursuant to this research of deep analysis, discuss as following:（1）How to maintain the position of leading ?and how to expand the vantage of competition into whole fishing nets industry？（2）Under rapidly changing circumstance of total market, how are the strategies altered by structure modified？（3）As boundaries being fuzzy, how do the firms which play varied roles in different markets create advantageous games with the strategies of co-opetition ？
This research found that: The leadership own rights of qualifying and specifics to force others to follow. They not only consider entire benefit and individual profit, but also achieve purpose of evolution. Under competition dynamics, they overtake other competitors from creation in quality, price, timing, technique, hinder set and capitalizing, also maintain the leader position in elimination by him and ability to compete. Boundaries was broken and overlapped, competition and cooperation exist each other in the meantime. Per value net to measure position, they invent situation of advantage to change partners, value added, rule, tactics and ranges with strategies of co-opetition applied.

【中文參考文獻】
李陳國. (2012). 應用生態學方法探討產業鏈的競合關係之研究. 嶺東學報(31), 157-174.
紡拓會. (2014年2月). <htm_103-0224-2013年紡織業現況與國際紡品經貿情勢分析-v4.pdf>.
張芬芬. (2002). 質性研究的評鑑規準: 各派主張與發展趨勢.
許恩得. (2004). 競合策略. 臺灣培生教育, 民, 93.
陳萬淇. (1995). 個案研究法, 華泰書局.
葉重新. (2001). 教育研究法. 台北: 心理.
劉常勇. (2000). 後進地區科技產業發展策略探討----以台灣半導體產業與光碟機產業為研究對象.
蕭瑞麟. (2006). 不用數字的研究. 台北: 培生教育.
【英文參考文獻】
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
Bailey, E. E., & Baumol, W. J. (1983). Deregulation and the theory of contestable markets. Yale J. on Reg., 1, 111.
Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1997). Co-Opetition: A Revolution Mindset That Combines Competition And Cooperation: The Game Theory Strategy That's Changing. Currency Doubleday.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origins of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.
Day, G. S. (1990). Market driven strategy: Processes for creating value: Free Press New York.
Freeman, J., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). Niche width and the dynamics of organizational populations. American Journal of Sociology, 1116-1145.
Gephart, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454-462.
Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: Simon and Schuster.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2009). Co-opetition and Technological Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Multilevel Conceptual Model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308-330.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650-663. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.009
Hutter, K., Hautz, J., Fuller, J., Mueller, J., & Matzler, K. (2011). Communitition: The Tension between Competition and Collaboration in Community-Based Design Contests. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(1), 3-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00589.x
Johnson, E. J., & Russo, J. E. (1994). Competitive decision making: Two and a half frames. Marketing Letters, 5(3), 289-302.
Li, Y. A., Liu, Y., & Liu, H. (2011). Co-opetition, distributor's entrepreneurial orientation and manufacturer's knowledge acquisition: Evidence from China. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1-2), 128-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2010.07.006
Luo, Y. D., & Rui, H. C. (2009). An Ambidexterity Perspective Toward Multinational Enterprises From Emerging Economies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 49-70.
Neumann Von J, M. O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Prress, Princeton.
Peng, T. J. A., Pike, S., Yang, J. C. H., & Roos, G. (2012). Is Cooperation with Competitors a Good Idea? An Example in Practice. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 532-560. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00781.x
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques foranalyzing industries and competitors. FreePress, New York.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Nova.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Notions. Harvard business review.
Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard business review, 86(1), 25-40.
Raju, J. S., & Roy, A. (1997). Understanding competitive relationships (pp. 220-232): New York, John Wiley and Sons.
Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition Strategy - When is it Successful? Empirical Evidence on Innovation and Market Performance. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 307-324. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00741.x
Shapiro, C. (1989). The theory of business strategy. The Rand journal of economics, 125-137.
Wind, J. (1997). Preemptive strategies. Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy, 256-276.
Wu, Z. H., Choi, T. Y., & Rungtusanatham, M. J. (2010). Supplier-supplier relationships in buyer-supplier-supplier triads: Implications for supplier performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 115-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2009.09.002
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods Applied Social Science Research Methods series Vol. 5 Sage Beverley Hills California USA.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design And Methods (Applied Social Research Methods) Author: Robert K. Yin, Publisher: Sage Publicat: Sage Publications, Inc.