本研究旨在探討研究法人運用本身擁有之研發能量及科技專案研究累積之研發成果，促成產業通過政府各項聯盟型輔導計畫之成功關鍵因素。以工研院南分院促成之24案研發聯盟作為研究焦點，利用層級分析法(AHP)架構三階層39項之衡量準則，比較分析和歸納我國研究法人以第三人角色協助整合併促成研發聯盟之成功關鍵因素。
本實證研究結果為： 法人推動和政府計畫支持是促成研發聯盟計畫最主要之成功關鍵因素。法人在研發聯盟籌組過程中協助整合、媒合角色最為重要。法人專家重視擔任整合之角色；而廠商認為法人協助其申請政府研發輔導資源為最重要。政府經費的實質支持是廠商認為參與研發聯盟最重要之誘因，而透過政府研發輔導計畫的管理機制，能將權利、義務和聯盟成員間的智財權定義清楚，給予廠商充份的信任感是關鍵的。重視外部協助的高法人及政府協助群認為組織內部之策略目標重要性較低。
本研究專家資料推導出之各項因素權重、與廠商認知達成之差異性，可做為法人日後推動政府研發聯盟與廠商溝通、策略和做法上之參考調整及做為將來組織內後續擴大推動聯盟及訂定產業服務策略之參考。

The aim of this thesis is to investigate the key factors responsible for the success of research institutions in utilizing their own research capacity and their existing results from past research projects to assist industrial companies in securing specific R&D alliance projects from government. The focus of this study is on the 24 successful cases of R&D alliances assisted by the South Branch of the Industrial Technology Research Institute. The three levels of 39 measurement criteria from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework is employed to study and analysis the key factors of succeeding in the integration and establishment of R & D alliances that were assisted and facilitated by research institutions in Taiwan.
The results of this study show that the two most important players for a successful formation of R&D alliances are research institutes and the government. Research institutes, especially their technical experts, play the most important role as an indispensible agent in the assistance and coordination between the industrial companies and governments. Consequently, industrial companies repute the assistance from research institutes as the most important factor to secure government's research funding and resources. Government's funding is in face the most important incentives for industrial companies to participate in R&D alliances. Joining R&D alliances will give each member a clear definition in their rights, obligations, and associated intellectual properties, and thus establish a mutual trust among each member.
The results of this study, obtained from the weighting factors and different opinions of many companies, can be used as a guideline for research institutions in promoting the construction of various government's R&D alliances, and also as a reference for industrial companies in their communication methods, decision making, and working principle to participate in these R&D alliances and their future expansion.

一、英文參考文獻
1.Aalbers, R. (2010). The role of contracts and trust in R & D alliance in the Dutch biotech sector. Management, Polocy & Practice, 12, 311-329.
2.Alic, J.A.(1990). Cooperation in R&D. Technovation, 10, 319-332.
3.Arnold, E., Rush, H., Bessant, J. & Hobday, M.(1998). Strategic planning in research and technology institutes. R& D Management, 28(2), 89-100
4.Arnold, E. and Guy, K. (1998). Technology diffusion programmes and the challenge for evaluation. Policy Evaluation in Innovation and Technology:Towards Best Practices, Paris: OECD. 65-87.
5.Badaracco, J.L. (1991). The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
6.Balsano T., Goodrich N., Lee R., Miley J., Morse T., & Roberts D. A. (2008). Identify your innovation enablers and inhibitors. Research Technology Management, 51(6), 23-33.
7.Barringer, B. R. & Harrison J. S. (2000). Walking a tightrope: creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 26(3), 367-403.
8.Chen, S.H., Lee, H.T. & Wu, Y. F. (2008). Applying ANP approach to partner selection for strategic alliance. Management Decision, 46(3), 449-465.
9.Chang, S.H., Chen, S. S., & Lai, R.H.(2008). The effect of alliance experience and intellectual capital on the value creation of international strategic alliances. OMEGA- The International Journal of Management Science, 36, 298-316.
10.Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J.L., & Sakano, T. (2000). Success through commitment and trust: The soft side of strategic alliance management. Journal of World Business, 35(3) , 223~240.
11.Daniel, D.R. (1961). Management information crisis. Harvard Business Review, 111-121.
12.Dinneen, G. P. (1988). R&D Consortia: Are they working?. Research and Development, June, 62-66.
13.Doz, Y. L. & Hamel, G. (1998). Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering. Harvard Business School Press, 4~9.
14.Doz, Y.L., Olk. P.M. & Ring, P.S. (2000). Formation processes of R&D consortia: Which path to take? Where does it lead?. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 239-266.
15.Eisenhardt, K.M. & Schoonhoven, C.B.(1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, March-April, 136-150.
16.Evan, W. & Olk, P.(1990). R&D consortia: A new U.S. organizational form. Sloan Management Review, 37-46.
17.Gassmann, O. & Bader, M.A.(2006). Property management in inter-firm R&D collaborations.Taiwan Academy of Management Journal, 6(2), P217-P236
18.Geringer, J. M. & Louis, H.(1991). Measuring performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2), 249-263.
19.Greve, H. R. & Joel, A.C.(2010) Built to last but falling apart: cohesion, friction, and withdrawal from interfirm alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 302-322.
20.Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational model of cooperation and Sectoral difference. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371-385.
21.Hagedoorn, J., Kranenburg, H.V., & Osborn, R.N.(2003). Joint patenting amongst companies－exploring the effects of inter firm R&D partnering and experience. Management and Decision Economics, 24, 71-84.
22.Hagedoorn, J. & Narula, R.(1996). Choosing organizational modes of strategic technology partnering: International sect oral differences. Journal of international Business Studies, 265-284.
23.Harrigan, K.R.(1986). Joint ventures and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2),141-158
24.Hoetker, G. & Mellewigt, T. (2009). Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: Matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1025-1044.
25.Hummel, E., Slowinski, G., Mathews, S., & Gilmont, E.(2010). Business models for collaborative research . Research Technology Management, November, 51~53.
26.Kamien, M. I., Muller, E. & Zang, I. (1992). Research joint ventures and R & D cartels. American Economic Review, 82, 1293-1305.
27.Kanter, R.M.(1990). When giants learn cooperative strategies. Planning Review, 1, 15-22.
28.Katz, M.L. & Ordover, J.A.. (1990). R & D cooperation and competition. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Special Issue, 137~191.
29.Katz, R., RebentiSch, E. S., & Allen, T. J. (1996). A Study of technology transfer in multinational cooperative joint venture. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 43(1), 97-105.
30.Ketelhöhn, W. (1998). What is a key success factor?. European Management Journal, 16(3), June, 335-340.
31.Kim, C.S. & Inkpen, A.C.(2006). Cross-border R&D alliance, absorptive capacity and technology learning. Journal of International Management, 11, 313-329.
32.Lee, M.K. & Lee, M.K.(1992). High technology consortia: A panacea for America's technological competitiveness problems?. High Technology Law Journal, 6(2), 335-362.
33.Lin, W.B. (2007). Factors affecting the correlation between interactive mechanism of strategic alliance and technological knowledge transfer performance, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17, 139-155.
34.Littler, D., Leverick, F., & Bruce, M. (1995). Facter affecting the process of collaborative product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 16-32.
35.Mandell, M.(1990). The Consortium: An idea whose time has gone? Across The Board, 30-35.
36.Medcof, J.W.(1997). Why too many alliances end in divorce. Long Range Planning, 30(5), 718-732.
37.Mitchell, W., Dussauge, P., & Garrette, B.( 2002). Alliances with competitors: How to combine and protect key resources. Journal of Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(3), 203 – 223.
38.Mody, A.(1992). Staying in the loop: International alliance for sharing technology. World Bank Discussion, 1-16.
39.Mothe, C. & Queilin, B.V.(2001). Resource creation and partnership in R&D consortia. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(1), 113-138.
40.Murraya, J. Y. & Kotabeb, M. (2005). Performance implications of strategic fit between alliance attributes and alliance forms. Journal of Business Research, 58(11), 1525-1533.
41.Nickerson, J.A. & Zenger, T.R.( 2004), A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617 - 632.
42.Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794-829.
43.Park, S.H. & Ungson, G.R.(2001). Interfirm rivalry and managerial complesity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization Science, 12(1), 37-53.
44.Pinto, J. K. & Prescott, J. E.( 1990). Planning and tactical factors in the project implementation process. Journal of Management , 3, 305-327.
45.Porter, M. E. & Fuller, M.B.(1986). Coalition and global strategy: Competition in global industries. Harvard Business School Press, 322-325.
46.Porter, M. E. (1990). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press: N.Y.
47.Rai, A., Borah, B., & Ramaprasad, A. (1996). Critical success factors for stategic alliances in the information technology indudtry: An empirical study. Decision Science, 27( 1), 141-155.
48.Rese, A. & Baier, D. (2011). Success factors for innovation management in networks of small and medium enterprises. R&D management, 41( 2), 138-155.
49.Rockart, J. F. (1979). Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review, 81.
50.Rothermeal, F. & Deeds, D. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, March, 201-221.
51.Rule, E. & Keown, S. (2000). Competencies of high-performing strategic alliances. Strategy & Leadership, 26(4): P36-38.
52.Sampson, R.T.(2004). Organizational choice in R&D alliances: Knowledge-based and transaction cost perspectives. Managerial and Decision Ecomomics, 25, 421-436
53.Similor, R. & Gibson, D.(1991). Accelerating technology transfer in R&D consortia. Research Technology Management, 35(1), 44-49.
54.Soh, P. (2003). The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implications for new product performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 727–744.
55.Souder, W.E. & Nassar, S.(1990). Managing R&D consortia for success. Research Technology Management, 35-41, 44-50,
56.Todeva, E. & Knoke, D.(2005). Strategic alliances and models of collaboration. Management Decision, 43(1), 123-148
57.Tyler, B. B. & Steensma, S. K. (1995). Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: A cognitive modeling perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 43-70.
58.Wang, M. K. & Hwan,K.P.(2007). Key factors for successful evaluation and screening of strategic alliance: A case study in the telecommunications industry, Asia Pacific Management Review, 12(3), 151-160.
59.Weck, M.(2006). Knowledge creation and exploitation in collaborative R&D projects: Lessons learned on success factors. Knowledge and Process Management, 113(4), 252-263.
60.Werner, J. & J. Bremer.(1991). Hard Lessons in cooperative research. Science &Technology, 7(3), 44-49.
61.Whippl, J. M. & Frankel, R. (2000). Strategic alliance success factors. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36(3), 21-28
62.Wu, W. Y., Shih, H. A., & Chan, H. C. (2009). The analytic network process for partner selection criteria in strategic alliances. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4646~4653.
63.Zhang, H., Shu, H., Xu, J., & Malter, A. J.(2010). Managing knowledge for innovation: The role of cooperation, competition, and alliance nationality. Journal of International Marketing, 18(4), 74-94.

二、中文參考文獻
1. 方世傑 (民88a)。企業技術合作策略影響因素之研究— 以電子業為例。輔仁管理評論，6(1)，1-20。
2. 方世傑、曾獻惠，(民88b)。研發聯盟動機類型與績效之研究－電子資訊業之實證。 亞太管理評論。
3. 王健全(民81)。產業特性對研發策略聯盟之影響。臺灣經濟研究月刊，15(5)， 32-35。
4. 司徒達賢 (民92)。中小企業成功升級轉型案例。中華民國管理科學學會。
5. 朱文儀 (民80)，高科技產業從事共同研究發展之實證研討－以資訊電子業為例。台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
6. 吳青松 ( 民81)。產業策略聯盟之國際發展型能與趨勢。 臺灣經濟研究月刊， 15(5)，23-27。
7. 吳萬益(民90)。高階經營團隊特質與科技聯盟模式對高科技產業競爭優勢之影響研究。行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(報告編號NSC89-2416-H006-
055-SSS)，未出版。
8. 吳萬益、陳淑惠(民91)。技術聯盟與技術移轉之策略性選擇模式—以台灣半導體產業之實證為例。行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(報告編號NSC90-
2416-H006-009-SSS)，未出版。
9. 李仁芳(民82)。研究發展聯盟組織過程管理之研究。行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(報告編號NSC82-0301-H030-003)，未出版。。
10. 李文瑞、曹為忠、林志豪(民89)。策略聯盟類型與績效影響因素之研究。中山管理評論，8(2)，73-302。
11. 孟德芸(民77)。企業成功關鍵因素之研究-以個人電腦產業為實證。中興大學企管所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
12. 洪鉛財、盧秀卿(民91)。研發聯盟類型、知識流通機制與聯盟績效關係之研究：以工研院主導之研發聯盟為例。90學年度第四屆管理學院學術及實務研討會論文集下冊，實踐大學。
13. 徐木蘭、朱文儀(民81)。產業聯盟管理面的挑戰從國內企業共同研發談起。台灣經濟研究月刊，15(5)，41-43。
14. 曹為忠(民92)。信任的決定因素及其對聯盟績效與未來合作意願之影響－中小企業策略聯盟之實證分析。企業管理學報，58，105-132。
15. 陳淑惠(民91)。Strategic Choice Model for Technology Alliance: An Empirical Study of the Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan。成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文，未出版，台南市。
16. 陳瑞隆(民95)。我國產業發展中政府之角色。國家菁英季刊，2(3) ，17-38。
17. 黃國平、陳邦誠、王明坤(民96)。應用模糊層級分析法於電信產業策略聯盟夥伴評選。 Jouranl of e-business，10(3)，545~572。
18. 黃國峰(民99)。多重研發合作、技術探索與開發以及廠商績效之研究。 台大管理論叢， 20(S1)，213-244。
19. 劉代洋、謝戎峰、柯惠友、莊宏旻(民91)。政府研發補助措施對公司研發投入影響之研究。產業科技發展政策論文集，2002經濟部技術處學界科專非技術類領域學術研討會。
20. 鄧振源、曾國雄(民78)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)。中國統計學報， 27(7)，13707-13724。
21. 鄧振源、曾國雄 (民78)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下)。中國統計學報，27(7)，13767-13870。
22. 蕭麗芬(民94)。共同研發與聯合行為之研究－以我國政府推動研發聯盟為中心。 交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文， 新竹。
23. 賴士葆、謝龍發(民83)。研發聯盟中廠商採取同步工程管理機制之效能研究。 產業科技研究發展管理研討會。
24. 戴彗紋(民97)。企業創新活動與附加價值之影響因素分析。97年度經濟部技術處委託計畫之期中報告，台灣經濟研究院。
25. 戴彗紋(民98)。我國企業研發與創新趨勢調查分析。 98 年度經濟部技術處委託計畫之期中報告，台灣經濟研究院。
26. 謝龍發(民82)。我國廠商參與政府主導共同研究發展聯盟的動機、類型和管理機制的相關研究。政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文，台北。
27. 譚伯群(民91)。科技聯盟知識經濟及績效之相關性探討。行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(報告編號NSC90-2416-H006-039) ，未出版。

四、 書籍、報告及網站
1. Aaker, D.A. & Damien M. (1984, 2010). Strategy Market Management- Global Perspective . NJ:John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
2. Aaker, D.A. (2001). Developing Business Strategies( 16th ed.). NJ:John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
3. Backer, K.D., Vladimir L.B. & Martinez, C.(2008) Open innovation in global networks.( Policy Brief, Nov.). Paris:OECD.
4. Commons, J. R.(1934). Institutional Economics. New York: Macmillan.
5. Ernst, D. & Bleeke, J. (1994). Collaborating to compete: Using strategic alliances and acquisitions in the global marketplace. New York: John Wiley & Sons,
6. Glueck, W.F. & Jauck, L. R. (1984). Business policy: Strategy formation and management action( 2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
7. Harrigan, K.R.(1988). Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries. Strategies in international business. New York: Lexingion Books..
8. Hofer, M. A.(1991). Developing Industry. UK: Oxford University.
9. Parker, B. & Zeira, Y. (1996). Parent company characteristics and international joint ventures success in England and the U.S.A. creating and managing international joint ventures, Edited by Woodside, A.G. & Pitts, R.E., London: Quorum Books.
10. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Yoshino, M. Y. & Rangan, U.S. (1995). Strategic alliances: An entrepreneurial approach to globalization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
12. 中小企業白皮書(民99)。中小企業創新研發與市場開拓，5，140~153。台北：經濟部中小企業處。
13. 大前研一(民73)。策略家的智慧。台北：長河出版社，黃宏義譯。
14. 何雍慶(民80)。促進中小企業共同研究發展。經濟部中小企業處報告。
15. 何雍慶(民80)。實用行銷管理。台北：華泰書局。
16. 吳思華(民77)。產業政策與企業政策。中華經濟研究所。
17. 吳萬益(民97)。企業研究方法，頁510~516。台北：華泰出版社。
18. 徐作聖(民88)。策略致勝－科技產業競爭優勢策略分析的新模式。台北：遠流出版社。
19. 國科會(民88)。2008年全國科技動態調查結果。台北。
20. 陳信宏(民91)。企業研發聯盟推動計畫－國際研發聯盟趨勢之研究。資策會。
21. 陳詩欣(民94)。全球及區域大藥廠研發及策略聯盟動向及機會探討。20~24，經濟部技術處。
22. 產業技術白皮書(民99)。環境篇-我國產業研發創新現況與動向。台北：經濟部技術處。
23. 湯明哲(民92)。策略精論基礎篇。台北：天下文化出版社。
24. 褚志鵬(民98)。層級分析法(AHP)理論與實作。東華大學企業管理系教學講義。
25. 劉孟俊(民99)。研發聯盟成功案例的推動經驗與啟示。地方產業創新引擎計畫成果發表會。台灣經濟研究院。
26. 賴士葆、謝龍發、曾淑婉、陳松柏(民86)。科技管理。國立空中大學。
27. 科技產業資料室 http://iknow.stpi.org.tw/ (民99.3.10)
28. 國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心http://www.stpi.narl.org.tw (民99.2.28)
29. 經濟部小型企業創新研發計畫http://www.sbir.org.tw (民99.3.10)
30. 經濟部技術處全球資訊網http://doit.moea.gov.tw/Incentives/ (民99.3.10)
31. 經濟部業界開發產業技術計畫網站 http://innovation1.tdp.org.tw/index.php (民99.3.10)
32. Wikipedia website: http://wikipedia.org (民99.3.9)