營建工程的施工過程中，品質都會有不合格之處，也都會要求補正，到最後各工作項目總會驗收合格。但如此理所當然的作法，似乎並未掌握「第一次就做對」的精神。

　　初次合格率為績效指標之一種，其定義為在檢查工作項目時，初次合格通過項目佔總檢查項目的比率。業主可針對專案特性、品質需求，搭配工程進度表，選取重點施工作業檢驗，檢驗點的合格標準依合約或規範規定。檢驗點的範圍涵蓋施工中工作的材料/設備查驗，施工/安裝檢驗。

　　接續之前初次合格率在施工上之應用，本研究驗證初次合格率在建築施工之有效性。利用實際工程案例，深入探討檢驗點的選取、檢驗點數量的多寡及檢驗點權重分配。

　　將初次合格率應用於8個建築施工案例，統計案例相關的施工作業檢驗項目及數量、權重分配、檢驗及查驗合格與不合格點內容及數量，並分別針對各施工作業，例如開挖、鋼筋、模板、混凝土，以及各施工單元，如基礎、結構、裝修、水電，在各時間階段的初次合格率。分析各階段初次合格率呈現的訊息，了解不同階段相同作業施工品質變化，進而瞭解其變化原因，亦可分辨出各項施工作業或各施工單元，達成所要求品質標準的難易程度。

　　Poor qualitiy is often found in construction products. It will be corrected any way and final inspection will grant a “pass.” However, this common situation seems to disobey the principle of “getting it right the first time.”

　　“First time pass ratio” (FTPR) is a performance measurre of construction quality, and is equal to the proportion of the first time pass number to total inspection number. One can use this ratio to measure the quality of chosen items or activities according to project work characteristics, quality requirements and schedule. There are two FTPR´s: material/equipment verification before and construction/installation inspection during construction. Moreover, the items should meet specification standards to get a pass.

　　This research validated that FTPR is an effective quality measure for building projects. applying FTPR on eight building projects, this study searched and collected related inspection, assigned weights, examined contents and amounts of passed and not-passed inspection of construction activities and items, FTPR was calculated in project periods for various items and activities, such as excavation, rebar, formwork, concrete, and units such as foundation, structure, fitting, and electricity. FTPR figures of each period indicate quality and its variations. FTPR also helps identify the reasons for poor quality and difficulties in meeting quality requirements for items or activities.

一、英文部份
1.Bassioni, H. A., Price, A. D. F. and Hassan, T. M. (2004). “Performance Measurement in Construction.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 42-50.
2.Bubshait, A. A. and Al-Atiq, T. H. (1999). “ISO 9000 Quality Standards in Construction.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 41-46.
3.Josephson, P. E. and Hammarlund, Y. (1998). “The Causes and Costs of Defects in Construction, A Study of Seven Building Projects.” Automation in Construction, 8, pp. 681-687.
4.Josephson, P. E., Larsson, B. and Li, H. (2002). “Illustrative Benchmarking Rework and Rework Costs in Swedish Construction Industry.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 76-83.
5.Love, P. E. D. and Smith, J. (2003) “Benchmarking, Benchaction, and Benchlearning: Rework Mitigation in Projects.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 147-159.
6.Yasamis, F., Arditi, D. and Mohammadi, J. (2002). “Assessing Contractor Quality Performance.” Construction Management and Economics, 20, pp. 211-223.
7.Ramirez, R. R., Alarcon, L. F. C. and Knights, P. (2004) “Benchmarking System for Evaluating Management Practices in the Construction Industry.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 110-117.
8.Stevens‚ J. D. (1996) “Blueprint for Measuring Project Quality.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 34-39.
9.Woodward‚ J‚ F. (1997) Construction Project Management:Getting It Right First Time‚ Thomas Telford‚ London.
10.Glagola‚ C., Ledbetter, W, B. and Stevens‚ J. D. (1992) Quality Performance Measurements of The EPC Process:Current Practices ‚ Lexington‚ Kentucky.

二、中文部份
1.吳疏勳，營建業品質經營管理，詹氏書局，台北市，民國八十二年。
2.何記文，營造業ISO 9002應用與實務，詹氏書局，台北市，民國八十六年。
3.鍾育恆，營造業成功導入ISO 9002之路，詠光文化事業有限公司，台北市，民國八十七年。
4.林耿毅，ISO 9002 營造手冊，科技圖書股份有限公司，台北市，民國八十七年。
5.胡偉良，營建勝經(上)(下)，羽鋼國際股份有限公司，台中市，民國八十七年。
6.謝亞定，建築工程實務專輯，詹氏書局，台北市，民國八十九年。
7.許士軍，績效評估之導讀「走向創新時代的組織績效評估」，天下遠見出版股份有限公司，高翠霜譯，杜拉克等著，台北市，民國八十九年。
8.曾文忠，營造業管理實務，黃氏出版社，台北市，民國九十年。
9.林進生，品質指標初次合格率在施工上的應用，成功大學碩士論文，民國九十四年。
10.林翔，公共工程品質制度檢討，成功大學碩士論文，民國九十四年。
11.郭信成，施工績效評估工具之建立，成功大學碩士論文，民國九十二年。
12.陳宗儀，施工績效回饋機制之建立，成功大學碩士論文，民國九十二年。
13.行政院公共工程委員會，公共工程施工品質管理制度，民國八十二年。
14.行政院公共工程委員會，工程施工查核小組作業辦法，民國九十一年。
15.行政院公共工程委員會(a)，工程施工查核作業參考基準，民國九十二年九月。
16.行政院公共工程委員會(b)，工程品質常見缺失說明，民國九十二年六月。
17.段賢麟，軍事工程績效評估模式建立之研究，台灣科技大學碩士論文，民國九十年。
18.林俊良，ISO 9001-2000版簡介，技師報，No. 258，民國九十年。
19.洪建興，三級品管常見缺失 工程會查核公共工程品質績效良好，技師報，No. 337，民國九十二年。
20.鄭進南，高鐵土建工程之品質保證/品質管制(QA/QC)， 技師報，No. 408，民國九十三年
21.鄭進南，三談高鐵土建工程的〝ISO品管〞與傳統〝三級品管〞， 技師報，No. 435,民國九十四年
22.行政院公共工程委員會全球資訊(http://www.pcc.gov.tw/content/engmanagement/engmanagerule /qualitymanagerule/920723.htm)，民國九十二年七月