本研究以《身體訂單》作為反思媒介，以現代環境的破壞與人類中心主義背後的探討作為本論文之研究背景，旨在破除二元論的固有框架而帶出後人類中心主義。在後人類的定義分為不同的流派，其中以Braidotti做為支持本論文對後人類主義的想法，由身體變異作為出發點，使觀者自身出發到脫離主體中心化的意識與「自然」結合，帶出混種物的價值與存在。本文之創作目標將放在對後人類物種的呈現上，在混種物的背後也探討出人類作為主體的框架限制，去挑戰身體的原有界線。再藉由希臘故事的轉譯方式，予以輔助形塑後人類物種背後的意義及器官功能框架上的突破，提供不同的思考角度。
本研究分析了四個作品：Stelarc的《Ear on Arm》對器官固有功能的突破創造與對身體界線的重新定義，模糊了對身體的功能框架，以人體作為對破除框架的詮釋介面。在混種物的塑造上，Piccinini的《The Young Family》透過生物與人類之間所塑造的情感與平衡點是本研究想要與混種物上價值的探討，觀者如何在人類、怪物、混種物上建立連結。李小鏡透過對未來環境想像所創作出的《Next》，在人魚物種上以不同的媒材呈現未來人類的海洋生活，展呈所採用的科學角度也是本研究所參考的其中一個環節。Serafini的《Codex Seraphinianus》在內容也與混種物的創造上息息相關，而其中在該抄本的創作手法以開放式的方式作為與觀者的連接，為作品產生無限的想像空間。以上四個作品的概念與元素將提供我對後人類物種創作發想與參考。
創作過程會先藉由科學的角度作為訂單的呈現。透過生物知識的機制建立後人類物種，在海洋生物與人類的機制上進行結合，接著以希臘神話之轉譯代入後人類物種的象徵。創作分為手繪、3D建模與實體裝置。手繪創作分為三部分建構五種後人類物種及身體變異之過程，再以建模方式將五種後人類物種創作出來並透過光固化方式製成實體模型，結合裝置機構形成能與觀者互動之造型型態。本作品包含了視覺與實體裝置兩個部分。實體裝置是與觀者連結的最直接方式，藉由生物知識輔助的「訂單」方式與人體改造，最後呈現的主體讓觀者在「觀看」的過程中，引發無限想像並使觀者真正思考對人與動物之間的界線關係，最終帶到人類對自然現今的影響。透過本作品提問人類：當陸地消失後，我們是否能擺脫人類中心，與海洋生物結合以另外不同的角度生存在海洋裡？
最終展現方式，結合了以上參考之元素，透過研究室（research laboratory）的空間作為主要呈現。並在最後的關卡以互動式網站的形式使觀者進行投票，扣合本研究標題《身體訂單》讓觀者下訂，蒐集觀者對後人類物種之關聯性與引發的主觀想法。在研究結果呈現上仍然有部分觀眾對於與作品的連結性不大，未來可進一步優化後人類物種的詮釋方式，以不同的方式來探討觀者與混合物種的何種呈現上能達到更好的互動連結與反思。

This study discusses the pressing issues of environmental degradation and anthropocentrism by aiming to dismantle the entrenched dualistic frameworks and introduce a posthumanist perspective grounded in Rosi Braidotti’s theoretical approach. Starting from the concept of bodily transformation, the work encourages viewers to move beyond subject-centered consciousness and reconnect with nature, thereby revealing the value and existence of hybrid entities. The methodology of this study operates on two levels: first, the reinterpretation of Greek mythology in relation to posthuman species combines biological knowledge to construct posthuman species by merging marine organism mechanisms with human anatomical elements; and second, the three procedures of the physical artworks: sketches, 3D models and installations. The final work, Ordre du Corps, was designed to simulate a laboratory environment, being presented to the audience. And their feedback through the website designed for this study showed the outcome of the interaction between the audience and the posthuman species artworks and the connection between them. This study demonstrates how abstract narratives presented through physical installations can stimulate open-ended reflection among audiences, leading to a deeper understanding of the underlying motivations.

Akdeniz, D. (2017). Oyster symbolism in the art of painting. International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 4(10), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.64
Artsy.net. (n.d.). Patricia Piccinini, The Young Family, 2002 [Artwork]. Artsy. Retrieved August 27, 2025, from https://www.artsy.net/artwork/patricia-piccinini-the-young-family-3
Atzori, P., & Woolford, K. (1995). Extended-Body: Interview with Stelarc. CTheory, Articles. https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14658
Bjorndal, K. A. (1980). Nutrition and grazing behavior of the green turtle Chelonia mydas. Marine Biology, 56(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397131
Braidotti, R. (2013). Post-Anthropocentrism: Life beyond the Species. In The Posthuman (pp. 55–104). Polity.
Clark, C. A. (2011). Forms of Astonishment. Greek Myths of Metamorphosis. Mnemosyne, 64(4), 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852511X548379
Clements, J. C., & Comeau, L. A. (2019). Nitrogen removal potential of shellfish aquaculture harvests in eastern Canada: A comparison of culture methods. Aquaculture Reports, 13, 100183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2019.100183
delcarmat. (2021). argus: tokenized art. HIVE BLOG. https://hive.blog/art/@delcarmat/argus--tokenized-art
Deleuze, Gilles., & Guattari, F. (1972). Les machines désirantes. In L’anti-Œdipe (pp. 7–59). Les Éditions de Minuit.
Doyle, T. K., Hays, G. C., Harrod, C., & Houghton, J. D. R. (2014). Ecological and Societal Benefits of Jellyfish. In K. A. Pitt & C. H. Lucas (Eds.), Jellyfish Blooms (pp. 105–127). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7015-7_5
Drew, G. A. (1906). Nervous System. In The Habits, Anatomy, and Embryology of the Giant Scallop, (Pecten tenuicostatus, Mighels) (pp. 43–48). Orono, Me. https://archive.org/details/habitsanatomyemb00drewrich
EnchantedLearning.com. (2018). Scallop. https://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/invertebrates/bivalve/Scallopprintout.shtml
Fernández Guerrero, O. (2014). Cronos Y Las Moiras. Lecturas De La Temporalidad En La Mitología Griega. Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica, 70(263), 307. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v70.i263.y2014.004
Girolami, A. (2013, October 25). Look inside the extremely rare Codex Seraphinianus, the weirdest encyclopedia ever. WIRED. https://www.wired.com/2013/10/codex-seraphinianus-interview/
Guo, Z. (2021). The Art of Patricia Piccinini. Frontiers in Art Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.25236/FAR.2021.030213
Hall, B. K., & Hallgrímsson, B. (2007). From water to land to air: Amphibians and Amniotes. In Strickberger’s Evolution (4th ed., pp. 425–463). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). A Cyborg Manifesto. In Manifestly Haraway (pp. 3–90). University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816650477.003.0001
Hightower, N. (2012, September 11). Patricia Piccinini’s Mythic Imagination. Weird Fiction Review. https://weirdfictionreview.com/2012/09/patricia-piccininis-mythic-imagination/
Kerr, S. C., Weigel, E., Spencer, C. C., Garton, D., Richards, R., Birol, O., & Green, L. E. (2025). Nervous systems. In Organismal Biology (2025 edition). School of Biological Sciences at Georgia Tech. https://organismalbio.biosci.gatech.edu/chemical-and-electrical-signals/nervous-systems/
Kirk, S. (2012). The Ambivalent Nature of Gaia and the Human Condition in the Poems of Hesiod. Language and Culture: The Journal of the Institute for Language and Culture, 16, 57–87. https://doi.org/10.14990/00000523
Koizumi, O. (2016). Origin and evolution of the nervous system considered from the diffuse nervous system of Cnidarians. In S. Goffredo & Z. Dubinsky (Eds.), The Cnidaria, Past, Present and Future: The World of Medusa and Her Sisters (pp. 73–91). Springer.
Kyriakides, T. (2022). Epidemic Strangeness and the Need for Myth in the Anthropocene. Anthropocenes – Human, Inhuman, Posthuman, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.16997/ahip.1090
Lebrato, M., Iglesias-Rodríguez, D., Feely, R. A., Greeley, D., Jones, D. O. B., Suarez-Bosche, N., Lampitt, R. S., Cartes, J. E., Green, D. R. H., & Alker, B. (2010). Global contribution of echinoderms to the marine carbon cycle: CaCO3 budget and benthic compartments. Ecological Monographs, 80(3), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0553.1
Lutz, S. (2021, June 3). Ocean rewilding and animating the marine carbon cycle. Animating the Carbon Cycle. https://animatingcarbon.earth/ocean-rewilding-and-animating-the-marine-carbon-cycle/
Mah, C. L. (2010, April 13). Starfish “Bones”! Understanding evolution & adaptation from starfish ossicles! The Echinoblog. https://echinoblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/starfish-bones-understanding-evolution.html
Michael, L. (2003). “We Are Family”, Australian Pavillion, Biennale of Venice, Italy, 2003. Patricia Piccinini. https://www.patriciapiccinini.net/a-show.php?id=2003-Venice
Minshew, A. (n.d.). Decoding Greek Eye Mythology. Museum of the Eye. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.aao.org/museum-blog/detail/decoding-greek-eye-mythology
Nerlich, B. (2017, February 3). Hybrids and chimeras: Mythology, history and science. UoN Blogs / Making Science Public. https://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/makingsciencepublic/2017/02/03/hybrids-chimeras-mythology-history-science/
Ottmann, D., Daniël van Denderen, P., Visser, A., & Andersen, K. H. (2024). Impact of increased fishing on long-term sequestration of carbon by cephalopods. Current Biology, 34(11), R526–R527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.04.023
Park, C. S. (2005). Theology of judgment in Genesis 6–9 [PhD Dissertation, Andrews University]. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. https://www.proquest.com/docview/305382613
Piccinini, P. (2002). The Young Family [Artist statements]. Patricia Piccinini. https://www.patriciapiccinini.net/writing/51
Plato. (n.d.). Timaeus (B. Jowett, Trans.). The Internet Classics Archive; The Internet Classics Archive. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://classics.mit.edu/Plato/timaeus.html
Schwenger, P. (2012). Codex Seraphinianus: Hallucinatory Encyclopedia. scriptjr.nl. https://scriptjr.nl/special-sections/cryptotexts/codex-seraphinianus-hallucinatory-encyclopedia-peter-schwenger/
Sellaturay, S., Nair, R., Dickinson, I., & Sriprasad, S. (2012). Proteus: Mythology to modern times. Indian Journal of Urology, 28(4), 388. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.105748
Serafini, L. (2013). Codex Seraphinianus. Rizzoli International Publications.
Stelarc. (2019). Extra Ear: Alternate Anatomical Architectures. stelarc.org. http://stelarc.org/
Stephen Ongpin Fine Art. (n.d.). The Head of Medusa. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://www.stephenongpin.com/object/791224/0/the-head-of-medusa
Szabados, K. (2021). Transhumanism as a Thin-centred Ideology [PhD Dissertation, Corvinus University of Budapest]. https://doi.org/10.14267/phd.2021020
Taylor, J. (2007, May 1). The Codex Seraphinianus. The Believer, 44. https://www.thebeliever.net/the-codex-seraphinianus/
van Zyl, S. H. (2008). Crossing the boundaries: Stelarc’s artworks and the reclaiming of the obsolete body [MA Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand]. http://hdl.handle.net/10539/7944
Vint, S. (2019). Long Live the New Flesh: Race and the Posthuman in Westworld. In A. Goody & A. Mackay (Eds.), Reading Westworld (pp. 141–160). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14515-6_8
Walton, K. L. (1991). Precis of Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 51(2), 379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108134
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Narcissus (mythology). Wikipedia. Retrieved August 28, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissus_(mythology)
Wyneken, J. (2007). Reptilian Neurology: Anatomy and Function. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice, 10(3), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2007.05.004
Zelinová, Z., & Škvrnda, F. (2023). Anthropomorphic Motifs in Ancient Greek Ideas on the Origin of the Cosmos. Human Affairs, 33(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2022-1003
李小鏡（2016）。NEXT。Daniel Lee Studio。http://www.daniellee.com/zh/projects/next
狄克森（2006）。萬物的歷史。節錄自《After Man：人類滅絕後支配地球的奇異動物》（陳芝儀 譯，頁92–99）。如何出版社有限公司。（原著出版於1981年）。
非池中藝術網（2016）。 藝文直擊─國立臺灣美術館：【李小鏡：N。E。X。T】李小鏡個展［Video］. 非池中藝術網。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azBc9CWLqG8
國立臺灣美術館（2016）。《李小鏡NEXT》。國家文化記憶庫。 https://cmsdb.culture.tw/object/6CECADA2-3EFE-4475-920E-EA367CCE232F
黃皓陽（編譯）（1999）。《生物學（下冊）》。藝軒圖書出版社。
董家齊（2022, April 4）。The Young Family。BioArt Database 生物藝術資料庫。https://bioart.iaa.nycu.edu.tw/2022/04/04/the-young-family/
鄧恩、拉比（2019）。設計即批判。節錄自《推測設計：設計、想像與社會夢想》（洪世民 譯，頁57–70）。何樵暐工作室有限公司。（原著出版於2013年）。
蔣興儀（2004）。源自於想像性同化的「自我」形塑過程：拉崗「鏡子階段」理論之分析。《新竹師院學報》，18，229–258。https://doi.org/10.7044/JNHCTC.200406.0229
羅宜柔（2012）後人類：越界的新人類觀。《修平人文社會學報》，19，21–37。https://doi.org/10.29547/ZHWHGX.201209.0002