簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 陳品璇
Chen, Pin-Hsuan
論文名稱： 女性主義 PDFi 設計方法：以更年期研究為例
Feminist PDFi Design Method: A Case Study of Menopause
指導教授： 張婉鈴
Chang, Wan-Ling
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系
Department of Industrial Design
論文出版年： 2026
畢業學年度： 114
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 382
中文關鍵詞： 設計方法 、女性主義 、參與式設計 、設計幻象 、更年期
外文關鍵詞： Design method, Feminist HCI, Participatory design, Design fiction, Menopause
相關次數： 點閱：2  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 本研究旨在發展並初步檢視一套結合女性主義觀點的創新設計研究方法「女性主義參與式設計幻象」（Feminist Participatory Design Fiction, 簡稱 PDFi）。本設計方法融合女性主義人機互動（Feminist HCI）的批判視角、參與式設計（Participatory Design）的共創實踐，以及設計幻象（Design Fiction）的未來想像特質，透過設計過程回應更年期女性在生理、情緒、社會與文化層面的多層次需求，並探索去醫療化與去污名化的科技設計策略。研究流程包含前測訪談、兩場 PDFi 工作坊與後續深度訪談。結果顯示，在東亞文化脈絡中，女性多以「關係性自我」理解自身，Feminist PDFi 因而需從西方女性主義強調「個人賦權」的預設，轉向「在關係中為自己騰出空間」的賦權形式。另一方面，研究亦指出現有更年期科技多以症狀管理與數據監控為導向；本研究提出的 Hóo 系列原型則以光、溫度、氣味與觸感為媒介，主張以「感官照護與生活節奏」為核心的溫柔科技觀（gentle tech），作為對主流自我追蹤模式的女性主義回應。最終，透過品牌敘事、影片與三折頁等敘事物件，Feminist PDFi 不僅促使更年期經驗被重新看見，更將其從私人困擾轉化為可被社會共同討論的公共議題。綜合而言，本研究的貢獻在於：（一）提出一套將「場域與氛圍設計」納入方法核心的 Feminist PDFi 架構；（二）揭示東亞文化脈絡下「關係性賦權」的可能性；（三）建立以感官療癒與節奏照護為核心的更年期科技觀；（四）展示敘事原型如何作為「讓更年期被看見」的公共化設計策略。本方法未來亦可延伸應用於青春期、產後或長照等女性身體經驗議題，作為促進性別正義與包容性科技發展的重要研究途徑。

    This study develops and preliminarily examines Feminist Participatory Design Fiction (Feminist PDFi), a design research method integrating Feminist HCI, participatory design, and design fiction. Menopause in Taiwan was used as a situated case to explore how women can express embodied, emotional, and social experiences and transform them into discussable future scenarios and design concepts. The study included five pre-study interviews, two approximately three-hour workshops with four participants, and six evaluation interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis identified four connected concerns: healing, privacy and subjectivity, emotional and relational support, and the publicization of menopause through gentle technology. The Hóo concepts used light, temperature, scent, sound, and touch rather than continuous monitoring, showing an alternative to symptom-centered menopause technologies. The findings also indicate that empowerment in an East Asian context may be relational and negotiated rather than highly individualistic. The contribution is a situated method that combines participation, future narrative, and feminist reflection while recognizing limits in sample, duration, and transferability.

    摘要 i ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF TABLES ix LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.1.1 Menopause and Health 2 1.1.2 Medicalization of Menopause 2 1.1.3 Social Marginalization of Menopause 3 1.1.4 Key Issues 3 1.2 Research Motivation 3 1.2.1 Why a New Design Method Is Needed 4 1.2.2 Feminism and Empowerment 4 1.2.3 Foundation in Participatory Design 5 1.2.4 Design Fiction as Deconstruction and Reconstruction 5 1.3 Research Purpose and Questions 6 1.4 Research Limitations 6 1.5 Thesis Structure 7 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 8 2.1 Menopausal Experiences: Medicalization, Sociocultural Contexts, and Design Challenges 8 2.1.1 Historical and Sociocultural Context 8 2.1.2 Life Stages and Multiple Experiences 9 2.1.3 Medicalization and Limitations of Technology Design 10 2.1.4 Challenging Medicalization: Possibilities for Design Intervention 10 2.2 Feminist HCI: Knowledge, Gender, and Design 11 2.2.1 Development and Core Concerns of Feminist HCI 11 2.2.2 Limitations of Conventional HCI for Menopause 11 2.2.3 Potential in Health and Care 12 2.3 Participatory Design 12 2.3.1 Core Concepts 13 2.3.2 Applications in Women’s Health 13 2.4 Theoretical Basis and Research Positioning of Feminist PDFi 14 2.4.1 Integrating Design Fiction and Participatory Design 14 2.4.2 Research Potential and Contribution 14 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH DESIGN 16 3.1 Positioning the Method 16 3.1.1 Roles of Feminist HCI, Participatory Design, and Design Fiction 16 3.2 Research Process Overview 17 3.3 Participants and Data Sources 18 3.3.1 Data Sources and Research Stages 20 3.3.2 Coding and Transcript Notation 21 3.4 Preliminary Exploration 22 3.4.1 Pre-study Interview Design 22 3.4.2 Main Findings 24 3.4.3 How Findings Shaped Workshop Design 25 3.5 Feminist PDFi Workshop Design 25 3.5.1 Method Overview 25 3.5.2 Research Process 26 3.5.3 Workshop 1: Shared Stories and Future Fragments 26 3.5.4 Workshop 2: A Day in 2034 28 3.6 Follow-up Interviews and Analysis 30 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS 33 4.1 From Preliminary Findings to Workshop Materials 33 4.2 Workshop 1 Results 35 4.2.1 Qualitative Materials and Core Themes 35 4.2.2 Co-constructing 2034 Future Scenarios 37 4.3 Workshop 2 Results 38 4.3.1 Constructing the 2034 Future Narrative 39 4.4 Diegetic Prototype Outcomes 40 4.5 Evaluation Interview Results 44 4.5.1 Sleep and Emotion 44 4.5.2 Acceptance and Social Negotiation 44 4.5.3 Social Values and Design Suggestions 45 4.5.4 Feminist PDFi Questionnaire 45 4.6 Summary 46 CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION 47 5.1 Major Findings and Answers to the Research Questions 47 5.1.1 Responses to the Research Questions 48 5.2 How Participants’ Experiences Were Transformed into Future Scenarios and Design Imaginaries 49 5.2.1 Preserving Different Experiences and Forming Collective Discussion 50 5.2.2 Renaming Embodied Experiences Through Situated Narratives 51 5.2.3 How Critique Emerged in Gentle and Situated Ways 52 5.3 Cultural Challenges: The East Asian “Relational Self” and Western “Individual Empowerment” 53 5.4 From “Symptom Management” to Gentle Technology for Emotion and Daily Rhythm 54 5.5 Making Menopause a Public Issue 55 5.6 Methodological Limits as a Feminist Contribution 55 5.7 Future Research 56 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57 REFERENCES 59 APPENDIX A PRE-STUDY INTERVIEW GUIDE 65 APPENDIX B 2034 FUTURE-WORLD SCENARIO 68 APPENDIX C NARRATIVE OBJECT 1 69 APPENDIX D NARRATIVE OBJECT 2 70 APPENDIX E NARRATIVE OBJECT 3: TRI-FOLD BROCHURE 71 APPENDIX F WORKSHOP 1 STICKY-NOTE MATERIALS 72 APPENDIX G WORKSHOP 1 SUBTHEMES 73 APPENDIX H WORKSHOP 2 SCENARIOS 74 APPENDIX I EVALUATION TRANSCRIPT CODING TABLE 81 APPENDIX J FEMINIST PDFi EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE 82 APPENDIX K QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS 83 APPENDIX L EVALUATION INTERVIEW GUIDE 84 APPENDIX M PRE-STUDY INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS 85 APPENDIX N 論文中文版 86

    Afshari, F., Bahri, B., Sajjadi, N., Mansoorian, M. R., & Tohidinik, H. R. (2020). Menopause uncertainty: The impact of two educational interventions among women during menopausal transition and beyond. Menopause Review, 19(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2020.95305
    Bahri, N., & Roudsari, R. L. (2020). “Moving from uncertainty toward acceptance”: A grounded theory study on exploring Iranian women’s experiences of encountering menopause. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 14(2), 154–164.
    Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2011). Towards a feminist HCI methodology: Social science, feminism, and HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 675–684. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979041
    Bleecker, J. (2009). Design fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact, and fiction. Near Future Laboratory. http://blog.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2009/03/17/design-fiction-a-short-essay-on-design-science-fact-and-fiction/
    Blythe, M., Andersen, K., Clarke, R., & Wright, P. (2016). Anti-solutionist strategies: Seriously silly design fiction. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4968–4978. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858482
    Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women. (2018). Intersectional feminist discussion toolkit. https://actionaid.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/FeministDiscussionTOOLKIT-FINAL2018-2.pdf
    Cowell, C., Gilmour, A., & Atkinson, L. (2023). Social support and stigma during menopause: Global perspectives and challenges. Women, 4(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/women4010005
    Dourish, P., & Bell, G. (2014). “Resistance is futile”: Reading science fiction alongside ubiquitous computing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(4), 769–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0678-7
    Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press.
    Dutta, R., Dcruze, L., Anuradha, R., Rao, S., & Rashmi, M. R. (2012). Population-based study on the menopausal symptoms in a rural area of Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 4, 597–601.
    Fry, T. (1999). New design philosophy: An introduction to defuturing. University of New South Wales Press.
    Goodman, N. F., Cobin, R. H., Ginzburg, S. B., Katz, I. A., & Woode, D. E. (2011). American association of clinical endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of menopause. Endocrine Practice, 17(1), 1–25.
    Gunter, J. (2021). The menopause manifesto: Own your health with facts and feminism. Hachette UK.
    Hickey, M., Elliott, J., & Davison, S. L. (2024). Hormonal changes and health risks in menopause. Climacteric, 27(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2023.2145678
    Homewood, S. (2019). Inaction as a design decision: Reflections on not designing self-tracking tools for menopause. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (CHI’19 Extended Abstracts), May 4–9, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3310430
    Ilankoon, I. M. S., Samarasighe, I. H., & Elgán, C. (2021). Menopause is a natural stage of aging: A qualitative study on women’s perceptions. BMC Women's Health, 21(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01164-6
    International Menopause Society (IMS). (1976). Menopause definitions and classifications.
    Christo Sims (2017). The politics of design, design as politics. Design Issues, 33(3), 71–72.https://escholarship.org/content/qt2ct6w5hw/qt2ct6w5hw_noSplash_d4009a122d168536110329c45d3f0d82.pdf
    Johnstone, K. (1981). Impro: Improvisation and the theatre. Routledge.
    Jungk, R., & Müllert, N. (1988). Future workshops: How to create desirable futures. Institute for Social Inventions.
    Kincaid, H. (1996). Philosophical foundations of the social sciences: Analyzing controversies in social research. Cambridge University Press.
    Larsen, H., Friis, P., & Heape, C. (2018). Improvising in the vulnerable encounter: Using improvised participatory theatre in change for healthcare practice. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 17(1), 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022217732872
    Lazar, A., Su, N. M., Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2019). Parting the Red Sea: Sociotechnical Systems and Lived Experiences of Menopause. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300710
    Lumsden, M. A. (2016). The NICE guideline – Menopause: diagnosis and management. Climacteric, 19(5), 426–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2016.1222483
    Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J, 8(3).
    Mattelmäki, T. (2005). Applying probes – From inspirational notes to collaborative insights. CoDesign, 1(2), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15719880500135821
    Mattelmäki, T., & Battarbee, K. (2002). Empathy probes. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, 266–271.
    Meleis, A. I. (2010). Transition theory: Middle range and situation specific theories in nursing research and practice (1st ed.). Springer.
    Meißner, J. L., Steimle, J., & Wölfel, C. (2022). Participatory design fiction for the cultural adaptation of chatbots for migrants. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability: UX research and design. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 13307, pp. 533–553). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18158-0_32
    Nägele, L. V., Ryöppy, M., & Wilde, D. (2018). Participatory design fiction with vulnerable users. Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 544–556. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240272
    Nelson, L. H. (2002). Feminist philosophy of science. In P. Machamer & M. Silberstein (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of science (pp. 261–278). Blackwell.
    Papanek, V. (1985). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. Academy Chicago Publishers.
    Ramírez Galleguillos, M. L., & Coşkun, A. (2020). How do I matter? A review of the participatory design practice with less privileged participants. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Vol 1, 1–11. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385018
    Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford University Press.
    Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits, and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
    Santoro, N. (2016). Perimenopause: From research to practice. Journal of Women's Health, 25(4), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2015.5432
    Shifren, J. L., & Gass, M. L. S. (2014). The North American Menopause Society recommendations on menopause. Menopause, 21(10), 1038–1052. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000319
    Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. University of Michigan Press.
    Sterling, B. (2005). Shaping things. MIT Press.
    Tsekleves, E., Darby, A., Whicher, A., & Swiatek, P. (2017). Co-designing design fictions: A new approach for debating and priming future healthcare technologies and services. Archives of Design Research, 30(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2017.05.30.2.5
    Williams, R. E., Kalilani, L., & DiBenedetti, D. B. (2022). Menopause transition and associated symptoms: A global perspective. Climacteric, 25(5), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2022.2145678
    Wilde, D., Underwood, J., & Nguyen, H. (2019). Participatory design fiction with diverse communities: Embracing diversity in imagining inclusive future public spaces. Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 30:1–30:12. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363399
    Søndergaard, M. L. J., Ciolfi Felice, M., & Balaam, M. (2021). Designing menstrual technologies with adolescents. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445471
    Søndergaard, M. L. J., & Hansen, L. K. (2016). PeriodShare: A bloody design fiction. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2996748
    Pihkala, S., & Karasti, H. (2022). Towards response-able PD: Putting feminist new materialisms to work in the practices of participatory design. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 (PDC ’22), Volume 1 (pp. 1–11). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3536169.3537784
    Taiwan Menopause Society. (2019). Recommendations for health management and medication for menopausal women [In Chinese]. http://www.menopause.org.tw/newsdetail.php?title_id=6&ca_id=13&news_id=730
    Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare. (n.d.). Menopause health information [In Chinese]. https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=218
    Cheng, Y.-T. (2021, March 9). What are design fiction and speculative design? [In Chinese]. Speculatizen. https://medium.com/speculatizen/%E5%92%B1%E5%80%91%E4%BE%86%E8%AB%87%E8%AB%87speculative-design-63d009fc48b5
    Cheng, Y.-T. (2021, May 4). Diegetic prototypes in science fiction and design fiction [In Chinese]. Speculatizen. https://medium.com/speculatizen/%E8%A8%AD%E5%B9%BB%E5%B8%AB%E7%9A%84%E8%83%BD%E5%8A%9B2-5-%E5%89%B5%E4%BD%9C%E6%95%98%E4%BA%8B%E7%89%A9%E4%BB%B6-2163b465fd64

    QR CODE