都市園道出現於16~17 世紀，發展至今仍為許多都市中提供休憩空間、環境綠美化以及補充其他都市機能的多功能廊帶，為常見的都市設計手法。但國內對於都市地區園道缺乏明確的規劃機制，加上早期忽略使用者、以汽車導向為主的規劃概念，不僅使園道喪失許多重要的機能，也造成園道品質的不穩定性。
本研究以台南市東豐路園道做為實證地區，以使用者角度分析其對東豐路園道環境知覺、以及各實質規劃設計項目的偏好與滿意度，做為園道改善方向的基本資訊，並給予具民意基礎的改善建議，期待為都市園道品質的改善有所貢獻。
本研究透過問卷調查，將園道實質規劃項目分為「周邊環境」、「生態與植栽」、「休憩空間與設施」與「人性化交通機能」四類型，分析後發現，民眾對各類型規劃項目多屬重視，與都市園道重要的規劃概念契合。滿意度方面，民眾對於東豐路園道滿意程度並不高，平均值多分佈於「普通」至「滿意」間，其中以人性化交通機能」類型之項目滿意度較低，而在植栽綠化方面滿意度較高。此外本研究發現部分實質空間規劃項目滿意度較高時，與特定環境知覺感受有顯著相關性，可提供規劃設計者參考；另一方，不同屬性使用者在部分園道環境知覺、偏好與滿意度有顯著差異，一般而言，具非鄰里居民特徵之使用者對園道環境偏好程度高且滿意度較低，並較為注重友善的交通環境以及商業活動等面向；此外由於實證地區現況功能較為單調，造成不同屬性使用者滿意度顯著的差異。

Urban parkways appearance in 16~17 century, it's a common method for urban planning. Parkways not only offer recreational space, environmental green and beautification but also provide other urban multi-functional corridor of function bring in many cities until now. However urban parkways lack of the explicit plan mechanism in Taiwan, especially in early days usually ignore user and planning the city by automobile guidance plan concept primarily, it not only causes the parkway to lose many important functions but also creates the parkway quality the instability.
This research is base on a case of Dong-Fong Parkway in Tainan City as the real example area. In this research it through analysing users' environment erception,environment preference and satisfaction to every substantive environmental attributes,in this way it can make a basic information of improving the direction of parkways and give improvement suggestions base on public opinion, expect through those method is contribute to urban parkways.
This research is manipulation by questionnaire survey, parkways is concrete environmental attributes into four type including “peripheral nvironment”,“ecological
environment and planting”, “recreational space and facilities” and “human-oriented traffic”. After analyzing general people pay attention to all kinds of planned project,agree with an important planning concept of urban parkways. In satisfaction, people are not satisfy with Dong-Fong Parkway's planning, result show it average distribute among on “average” and “satisfactory”, project of degree of satisfaction the type is low by” human-oriented traffic” but is high by “ecological environment and planting”.In addition this research discovery partial essence space planned project degree of
highly satisfaction has the remarkable relevance with the specific environment consciousness feeling, it may provide plans the designer to refer; On the other hand different group of users have significant difference with environment perception, environment preference and satisfaction, generally speaking user of the non-neighborhood resident is characteristic highly environment preference to parkway but with lower satisfaction, and pays great attention the friendly transportation environment and business activity etc. Besides in this case Dong-Fong Parkway present situation function is monotonous, cause the different attribute users'
significant difference.

一、外文文獻
1.Allan B. Jacobs, Elizabeth Macdonald .2003.“The boulevard book :history, evolution, design of multiway boulevards”，MIT Press
2.Ahern, J. (1995). Greenways as a planning strategy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33, 131-155.
3.Anthony Walmsley(2006) “Greenways: multiplying and diversifying in the 21st century”, Landscape and Urban Planning,76,252–290
4.Danald Appleyard，“Livable Street”， Berkeley :Univsersity of California Press,c19181. P.147
5.Dorfman, P. W. (1979). Measurement and meaning of recreation satisfaction: A case study of camping. Environment and Behavior, 11(4), 483-510.
6.Forman, R.T.T., Gogron, M., 1986, Landscape Ecology, New York: Johnwiley and Sons.
7.Fruin,J.J.(1971) Pedstrian : planning and Design . Mobile, Ala. :Elevator World,c19187
8.J.G. Fábos (2004). “Greenway planning in the United States: its origins and recent case studies”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 618, 321–342.
9.John R. Gold (1998). The Death of the Boulevard
10.Kaplan, S., “Aesthetic, Affect and Cognition: Environmental Preference from an Evolutionary Perspective,” Environment and Behavior, Vol.19, No.1, pp.3-32 (19187).
11.Kiat W. Tan, “A greenway network for singapore”. Landscape and Urban Planning,76(2006),45-66
12.Little, C. (1990). Greenways for America. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
13.Mark Girouard (1985). “A Social & Architectural History” by Pothecary Ltd.
14.Paul H. Gobster, Lynne M. Westphal, “The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences”, Landscape and Urban Planning,68(2004),147-165
15.Richard T.T. Forman, Michel Godron “Landscape Ecology”，Authorized translation from English language edition published by John Wiely & Sons Inc ，1986
16.Searns, R. M. (1995). The revolution of greenways as an adaptive urban landscape form. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33, 65-180
17.Sheila S. Mitra-Sarkar. ,” A method for evaluation of urban pedestrian spaces” ,Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 1994.
18.Wang, H.L.(1996). A Riview of The Landscape of A Parkway-Case Study of Parkway in Taichung.In “8th IFLA Regional Conference 1996” Hong Kong, p.61-66
19.Zube, E.H., Sell, J.L. & Tayolr, J.G., “Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, Vol.9, pp.1-33 (1982).

二、中文文獻
1.王小璘，林園大道-都市人性空 間的再生。建築師，191818，五
月號，p.65-71
2.王小璘、詹欣琪，都市綠園道遊憩活動特性與環境屬性之研究-
以台中經國園道為例，造園學報，Vol.6 ，No.1， p.1-118
3.王小璘、增詠宜，都市生態公園綠地區位景觀生態評估之研究，
造園學報，Vol.18 No.3
4.李素馨，都市視覺景觀偏好之研究。都市與計劃，Vol.26，
No.1，1999，p.19-40
5.凌德麟、洪得娟，使用者之都市公園綠覆地體驗影響因素之研
究，戶外遊憩研究Vol.11 NO.1，19918，p.43-64
6.劉康立、林晏州，鄰里公園實質環境屬性與情緒體驗關係之研
究，台灣園藝，53(1):127-1318 2007
7.陳昭蓉、林晏州，鄰里公園使用者滿意度影響因素之探討，戶外
遊憩研究Vol.9 NO.(2/3)，1996，p.1-22
8.陳惠美、林晏州，「景觀知覺與景觀品質關係之研究」，造園學
報，第四卷，第一期，第1-16 頁(1997)
9.郭瓊瑩，1998，「內政部城鄉景觀風貌改造運動—推動公園綠地
系統計畫、親水計畫、景觀道路計畫研討會」文集
10.許添本，2003，人本交通與綠色交通的發展理念。都市交通季
刊，第118卷，第三期，pp.41-52
11.許添本，1994，人性化交通系統的發展理念。交通安全月刊
12.許添本、趙晉緯，人行空間服務水準綜合評估之研究，規劃學
報，Vol.37，2007，p189-112
13.蔡厚男，1997，綠帶在都市景觀生網絡規劃策略上之潛力與應
用：以台北都會區為例，中國園藝(J.Chinese Soc.Hort.Sci.)
43(2):92-102
14.林憲德，2005，生態城鄉，詹氏書局
15.徐磊青、楊公俠，2005，環境心理學 :環境、知覺知行為，五南
出版社
16.內政部營建署，2006，市道路生態綠廊道整體建構計畫期末報告
書
17.交通部運輸研究所，2004，永續的道路規劃與設計規範之研究
18.台灣省住宅及都市發展局，1986，植物與環境設計
19.台南市政府，2005，台南市公園道系統改善計畫暨自行車道系統
規劃設計
20.台南市政府，2003，「變更台南市主要計畫(第四次通盤檢討)
案」
21.台南市政府，2008，「變更台南市北區都市計畫(主要計畫)通盤
檢討案說明書」
22.翁金山，2001，台南市都市設計規劃綱要之研究，財團法人成大
建築文教基金會。
23.施翠芸，2007，「綠園道功能與滿意度關係之研究」，國立臺灣
大學生物資源暨農學院園藝學系碩士論文
24.陳文淵，2008，傳統聚落居民在觀光發展下之環境知覺偏好-以
北埔傳統聚落為例，中華大學建築與都市計畫研究所碩士論文
25.方維宏、吳剛立，2007，都市綠園道空間形式之研究，2007台灣
造園景觀學術研討會