| 研究生: |
許婷婷 Hsu, Ting-Ting |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
企業於不同生命週期下之評價模型適用度 Comparison of Valuation Models under Different Life Cycle Stages |
| 指導教授: |
林軒竹
Lin, Hsuan-Chu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所 Graduate Institute of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2010 |
| 畢業學年度: | 98 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 43 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 生命週期 、超額盈餘法 、現金流量折現法 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Life cycle, AE model, DCF model |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:64 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
通常對公司進行基本面分析,最主要的目的為衡量公司的價值。而實務上最常使用的評價模型為超額盈餘法和現金流量折現法。然而企業會因為市場上的競爭或是目標的改變進而去影響公司的營運策略,而使得企業在不同階段下會有不同的特徵,因此有了企業生命週期理論。當企業處於不同的生命週期之下,因營運的策略不同,影響公司價值的因素也會跟隨著改變,在此情況下如果持續使用同一種評價模型做評價,可能會增加預估的偏誤。因此本篇研究主要是納入生命週期因子,探討在不同企業命週期之下,評價模型的適用度。本篇主要是以美國上市公司為研究對象,並且採用Anthony and Ramesh (1992) 所提出的分類法對樣本進行生命週期的分類。
實證結果顯示,當考慮生命週期因子後,評價模型的預估誤差普遍降低。而在T檢定中,我們發現在成長期與衰退期之下,超額盈餘法的預估誤差和現金流量折現法的預估誤差並沒有顯著差異;然而在成熟期階段的公司,兩個評價模型的誤差是顯著不同的,且超額盈餘法的預估誤差低於現金流量法的預估誤差。因此本篇研究的結論為: 考慮生命週期後,會提升評價模型的預估能力;而企業在成長期及衰退期的階段下,超額盈餘法和現金流量折現法的預估能力是一樣好的;然而成熟期的企業,較適合使用超額盈餘法。
In practical, the abnormal earnings model (AE) and the discounted free cash flow model (DCF) are two common models for people to estimate the firm value. However, Adize (1988) mentions that elasticity and control power are the two key factors which affect the firm life cycle. According to the balance of these two factors, each firm will progress through various stages during their life cycle. Under different stages, the operation style and the factors that affect the firm value will also change. Therefore, there will be errors if we still use the same valuation model for different life cycle stages firms. So, in this paper, we want to know which valuation model is more appropriate under each life cycle stages. We adopt the firms in COMPUSTAT as our samples and apply the method of Anthony and Ramesh (1992) to classify samples into different stages.
According to the empirical results, the errors of the valuation models by considering the life cycle factors are generally lower than those not consider the life cycle factors. The tests also reveal that the predicted errors between the AE model and the DCF model are not significant different under the growth stage and stagnant stage. However, the errors of the two models are significant different under mature stage. Therefore, we have the conclusions as follow: (1) Life cycle factors will affect the accuracy of the valuation models. (2) Under the growth stage and stagnant stage, the AE model is at least as well as the DCF model. (3) Under the mature stage, the AE model is more suitable than the DCF model.
Aharony, J., H. Falk, and N. Yehuda, 2006, Corporate Life Cycle and the Relative Value-Relevance of Cash Flow versus Accrual Financial Information, Working paper.
Ahmed, A. S., R. M. Morton, and T. F. Schaefer, 1998, Accounting Conservatism and the Valuation of Accounting Numbers: Evidence on the Feltham-Ohlson (1996) Model, Working Paper Series.
Anthony, J. H., and K. Ramesh, 1992, Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices : A test of the life cycle hypothesis, Journal of Accounting and Economics 15, 203-227.
Black, E. L., 1998, Which is More Value-Relevant: Earnings or Cash Flows?, Working Paper Series.
Bruner, R. F., Eades, K., Harris, R., and Higgins, R.,1998, Best practices in estimating the cost of capital: Survey and synthesis. Financial Practice and Education, 8(1), 13– 28.
Bruner , Eades, and Schill, 2009, Case Studies in Finance: Managing for Corporate Value Creation, McGraw-Hill.
Copeland, T., T. Koller, and J. Murrin., 1994, Valuation :measuring and managing the value of companies, Wiley frontiers in finance.
Crawford, A. J., J. R. Ezzell, and J. A. Miles, 1995, Bank CEO Pay-Performance Relations and the Effects of Deregulation, The Journal of Business 68, 231-256.
Damodaran, A., 2002, Investment valuation :tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset, Wiley frontiers in finance.
Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson, 1995, Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities, Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 689-731.
Fernandez, P., 2007, Valuing companies by cash flow discounting: ten methods and nine theories, Managerial Finance 33, 853-876.
Francis, J., P. Olsson, and D. R. Oswald, 2000, Comparing the Accuracy and Explainability of Dividend, Free Cash Flow, and Abnormal Earnings Equity Value Estimates, Journal of Accounting Research 38, 45-70.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., 1992, Structure and process of diversification, compensation strategy, and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal 13, 381-397.
Graham, J. R., and Harvey, C. R., 2001, The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field, Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1–2), 187– 243.
Jenkins, D. S., G. D. Kane, and U. Velury, 2004, The Impact of the Corporate Life-Cycle on the Value-Relevance of Disaggregated Earnings Components, Review of Accounting and Finance 3, 5-20.
Kallunki, J.-P., and H. Silvola, 2008, The effect of organizational life cycle stage on the use of activity-based costing, Management Accounting Research 19, 62-79.
Kaplan, S. N., and R. S. Ruback, 1995, The Valuation of Cash Flow Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Finance 50, 1059-1093.
Kazanjian, R. K., and R. Drazin, 1989, An Empirical Test of A Stage of Growth Progression Model, Management Science 35, 1489-1503.
Lester, D. L., J. A. Parnell, and S. Carraher, 2003, Organizational Life Cycle: A Five-Stage Empirical Scale, International Journal of Organizational Analysis (2003) 11, 339-354.
Lippitt, G. L., and W. H. Schmidt, 1967, Crises in a Developing Organization, Harvard Business Rev. 45, 102-112.
Miller, D., and P. H. Friesen, 1984, A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle, Management Science 30, 1161-1183.
Modigliani, F., and H. M. Merton, 1963, Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction, The American Economic Review 53, 433-443.
Ohlson, J. A., 2001, Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation: An Empirical Perspective, Contemporary Accounting Research 18, 107-120.
Pashley, M. M., and G. C. Philippatos, 1990, Voluntary divestitures and corporate life-cycle: some empirical evidence, Applied Economics 22, 1181.
Penman, S. H., 2001, On Comparing Cash Flow and Accrual Accounting Models for Use in Equity Valuation: A Response to Lundholm and O'Keefe (CAR, Summer 2001), Contemporary Accounting Research 18, 681-692.
Penman, S. H., and T. Sougiannis, 1998, A Comparison of Dividend, Cash Flow, and Earnings Approaches to Equity Valuation, Contemporary Accounting Research 15, 343-383.
Smith, K. G., T. R. Mitchell, and C. E. Summer, 1985, Top Level Management Priorities in Different Stages of the Organizational Life Cycle, The Academy of Management Journal 28, 799-820.
Yan, Z., and Y. Zhao, 2009, A New Methodology of Measuring Firm Life-Cycle Stages, International Journal of Economic Perspectives, Forthcoming.
伊恰克.阿迪茲(Adizes, I., 徐聯恩譯), 1988, 企業生命週期, 長河經營叢書.
吳博欽, and 鄭哲惠(Po-Chin Wu and Che-Hui Cheng), 2006, 企業生命週期、產業別與股權評價:Real Option與Ohlson Model之比較 會計評論 43期, 95-121.
周文賢(Wen-Hsien Chou), 2001, 多變量統計分析 :SAS/STAT使用方法, 智勝文化出版.
周庭楷(Ting-Kai Chou), 2002, 會計保守原則對權益評價影響之實證研究, 國立成功大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文.
金成隆, 林修葳, and 邱煒恒(Chen-Lung Chin, Hsiou-wei William Lin and Woei Herng Chiou), 2005, 研究發展支出與資本支出的價值攸關性:以企業生命週期論析 中山管理評論 13卷, 617-643.
邱垂昌, and 洪福讚(Chei-Chang Chiou and Fu-Tsan Hung), 2008, 在不同企業生命週期下智慧資本與企業價值關聯性之研究 當代會計 第9卷, 201-236.
洪永昌(Cliff-Hong), 2004, 企業生命週期與融資策略, 國立大學台灣科技大學財務金融所未出版碩士論文..
許明雄(Ming-Shiung, Shiu), 2001, 企業生命週期特性與股利政策關聯性之探討, 國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文.
管玉儷(Yuh-Lih Kuan), 2003, 經濟附加價值、異常盈餘和異常現金流量與公司權益價值之關聯性研究, 私立中原大學會計學系未出版碩士論文.
藍心梅(Hsin-Mei Lan), 2001, 會計基礎評價模式在台灣股市適用性之研究, 私立中原大學會計學系未出版碩士論文.
蘇宸霆(Chen-Ting Su), 2006, 融入效率衡量於評價模式之研究---以台灣電子產業為例, 國立中央大學企業管理所未出版碩士論文.
校內:2020-12-31公開