減碳、循環、永續，是本世紀人類面對最大的課題之一，臺灣身為全球供應鏈下重要的參與者，不得不面對減碳的轉型。本研究以循環經濟模式的面向重新檢視以產業及工業區物質驅動下可能的機會，從材料、流程、服務模式的觀點探尋當代以在地循環達成減碳的議題。
在循環經濟模式中，物質流與資訊流是同等重要的面向，研究選擇以中華紙漿公司與成大 C-Cube 團隊所開發的 CHP 磚為真實的研究對象，以拆解回復及資訊回復的角度探討從一個循環物件出發的回復系統，梳理在循環經濟模式下，數位孿生回復模式的架構。設計的研究建構在「丹麥卡倫堡循環工業區」的真實案例與陳必晟與陳雅君(2018)「中華紙漿廠物質流與循環系統」的研究之下，本設計論文提出以花蓮的工業區物質流作為驅動，運用數位孿生的概念，提出農業與工業、產業與生活的花蓮區域循環城市架構。另一方面，參考成大 C-Cube 團隊研發成果，提出以鹼激發材料構成花蓮都市礦區的藍圖及循環回復的流程。
本設計論文的研究討論對象-中華紙漿公司花蓮廠，近年面臨減碳轉型的壓力及餘料處理問題。本研究從側面觀察與實際參與研發討論，體認到企業對於轉型本身帶來自明性的重視。在後段設計的部分，以中華紙漿公司的角色，在 ESG 轉型為目標的前提下，提出實驗循環廠區計畫，材料使用自身餘料作示範，並結合研發、體驗學習與推廣的價值。其建築形式展現模矩化、可變動、可延展的空間特質，為可回復式循環建築的原型提案。本論文藉由在地案例應用的探索，期望能將設計視為一種改變的方法，並引發更多對於循環材料、建築到城市更多的討論。

On meaning and material in architecture, Louis Kahn once said, “Even a brick wants to be something.” Years later, what could the significance of bricks be in the contemporary era? Under the circumstances of globalization, Taiwan is a critical partner in the world’s supply chain. The goal of being sustainable and cutting carbon emissions is a very urgent agenda for every corporation. The circular economy model provides a fresh idea for rethinking material usage, design workflow and services in the architecture industry.
There should be no waste under the concept of circular economy, only if materials are misplaced. This thesis explores the method of reversible design through two perspectives: first, through the dismantlable system, and second, through the information system. The design thesis is based on the research and understanding of material flow of the Chung Hua Pulp Corporation (CHP) in the Hualien area, and re-examines the possibility driven by material flows of the industrial area. The final design proposal applies the concept of the digital twin, outlines a circular path in the Hualien area, and develops a workflow of the CHP as a circular experimenting field, as well as a prototype of reversible architecture.
The situtation of CHP is a localized example of a prevalent condition in Taiwan, where corporations are under pressure to transform their practices to address issues of waste and sustainability. This thesis serves as a case study and expects to amplify issues of material, circular workflow and innovative solutions into these discussions.

一、循環經濟
1. 循環臺灣基金會（2021）。《後疫情時代以循環經濟打造韌性未來》。亞太循環經濟論壇線上特別場成果報告，臺北。
2. 循環臺灣基金會（2021）。 臺灣現況。上網日期: 2022年4月。檢自https://www.circular-taiwan.tw/taiwan-progress
3. 循環臺灣基金會（2021）。 循環經濟沿革。上網日期: 2021年11月。檢自https://circular-taiwan.org/know/history/
4. 黃玉徵（2017）。《循環經濟》。臺北：天下雜誌。
5. 臺北市政府產業發展局（2020）。臺北市循環城市白皮書。臺北市政府產業發展局，臺北。
6. 劉舜仁（2018）。《循環經濟的設計挑戰》。臺灣建築學會建築會刊雜誌，91，50－59。
7. Arup (2016). Circular Economy In The Built Environment. Retrieved from https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/circular-economy-in-the-built-environment
8. Arup (2018). First Steps Towards A Circular Built Environment. Retrieved from https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/first-steps-towards-a-circular-built-environment
9. Arup and BAM (2017). Circular Business Models For The Built Environment. Retrieved from https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/circular-business-models-for-the-built-environment
10. Circle Economy, TNO, FABRIC (2018). Circular Amsterdam. Retrieved from https://www.antonioserranoacitores.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Circular-Amsterdam-EN-small-210316.pdf
11. Durmisevic, E. (2018). Reversible Building design guidelines and protocol. BAMB document, University of Twente. Retrieved from https://www.bamb2020.eu/topics/reversible-building-design/
12. Durmisevic, E. (2019). Design strategies for reversible buildings. BAMB document, University of Twente. Retrieved from https://www.bamb2020.eu/topics/reversible-building-design/
13. Dansk Symbiosecenter (2017). Kalundborg Symbiosis. Retrieved from www.symbiosecenter.dk.
14. Ellen Macarthur Foundation (2020). Circulytics Method Introduction. Retrieved from http://susdi.org/doc/CE/circulytics-method-introduction.pdf
15. GXN Innovation et al., (2018) Building a circular future, 3rd ed. Denmark：KLS PurePrint.
16. Joustra, D.J. (2017). Circular Implementation Gap. Retrieved July, 2022 from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/circular-implementation-gap-douwe-jan-joustra
17. Sidewalk Labs (2022).Sidewalk Toronto. Retrieved July, 2022 from https://www.sidewalklabs.com/toronto
二、數位孿生
1. Arup (2019). Digital twin: Towards a meaningful framework. Retrieved from https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/digital-twin-towards-a-meaningful-framework
2. O’Connor, C. (2017). IBM Watson Internet of Things: Introducing Digital Twin, IBM IoT Headquarters. Retrieved March 2021 from https://www.slideshare.net/IBMIoT/ibm-watson-internet-of-things-introducing-digital-twin
3. OOSGA Analytics (2021). 徹底理解工業4.0的定義、九大科技、以及八大應用領域。Retrieved March, 2021 from https://zh.oosga.com/pillars/industry40/
三、建材護照、材料平台
1. AUTODESK (2022). REVIT 2017 Model the design. Retrieved May 2021 from https://help.autodesk.com/view/RVT/2017/ENU/
2. Honic, M., Kovacic, I., and Rechberger, H. (2019). Concept for a BIM－based Material Passport for buildings. BAMB document, Vienna University of Technology. Retrieved from https://www.bamb2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/SBE19-Brussels-Concept-for-a-BIM-based-Material-Passport-for-buildings.pdf
3. Miu, I. (2020). Fundamental Characteristics and Concept of Material Passports, University of Twente. Retrieved from https://essay.utwente.nl/80682/
4. SDC (2022) An info portal for the construction sector in the Great Lakes Region. Retrieved May 2021 from http://madeingreatlakes.com/
5. SKAT (2021). Portal for Brick and Roof Tile Information. Retrieved May 2021 https://madeingreatlakes.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapTools/index.html?appid=7e4e9a0bed1e4e65984559fdcaee5b54
6. Swiss Resource Centre and Consultancies for Development (2017). Modern Brick Construction Systems, a catalogue of affordable solutions, Made in Rwanda. Retrieved from: http://madeingreatlakes.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CAT-MODERN-BRICK-SOLUTIONS-Draft-Third-Edition-Beta-Version2.pdf
四、花蓮循環城市
1. 中華紙漿公司（2022）。2021永續成果報告書，臺北。
2. 水利產業資訊網（2022）。上網日期: 2022年4月。檢自: http://km.wpeiic.ncku.edu.tw/5_industrial/reuse.aspx
3. 石材暨資源產業研究發展中心（2022）。上網日期: 2022年4月。檢自: http://www.srdc.org.tw/index.php
4. 花蓮縣水產培育所（2022）。上網日期: 2022年4月。檢自: https://hlab.hl.gov.tw/Default.aspx
5. 花蓮縣都市計畫整合查詢系統（2021）。上網日期: 2021年4月。檢自: https://map.hl.gov.tw/HLUPWeb/map/map.aspx
6. 馬鴻文（2021）。都市建築二次資源礦藏探勘-建立方法、模式與系統(第3年)。科技部補助專題研究計畫（計畫編號MOST 106-2923-E-002-010-MY3）。-
7. 陳必晟、陳雅君（2018）。中華紙漿花蓮廠建築設計與全區循環經濟策略規劃成果報告書。國立成功大學環境工程學系與成功大學C-Cube，臺南。
8. 臺灣肥料股份有限公司（2022）。上網日期: 2022年4月。檢自: https://www.taifer.com.tw/