簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 廖婉妤
Liao, Wan-Yu
論文名稱: 人格特質與創意發展間關係之研究-以敢為性及交易型領導為調節變數
The relationship of personality and creativity development: moderating by social boldness and transactional leadership
指導教授: 史習安
Shih, Hsi-An
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 經營管理碩士學位學程(AMBA)
Advanced Master of Business Administration (AMBA)
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 92
中文關鍵詞: 經驗開放性自我效能成長需求強度創意產生創意執行
外文關鍵詞: openness to experience, self-efficacy, growth need strength, creativity generation, creativity implementation
相關次數: 點閱:167下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   本研究的目的為探討員工的人格特質與創意產生的關聯性,並進一步分析在創意產生直到實際執行的過程中,敢為性及交易型領導對創意產生及創意執行間的關係之調節作用。
      現代社會發展日新月異,商品更迭速度飛快,商場上的成敗,往往只在轉瞬之間。如何在不斷變動的商業環境中保持競爭優勢,創意是致勝的關鍵點。因此,尋找創意人才,為企業創造有價值的創新商品,是希望能在紅海廝殺中脫穎而出的企業必須學習的重要課題。
      本研究以台灣企業三人以上之工作團隊為主要樣本來源,總計131組,477份樣本。設計A、B兩份問卷,以郵寄、電子郵件、親自交送等方式發放問卷,並藉由層級迴歸分析對於本研究所提出的假設進行驗證,分析結果如下:
    (一)經驗開放性與創意產生呈現正向關係。亦即,當經驗開放性程度越高時,則創意產生的表現也會越好。
    (二)自我效能與創意產生呈現正向關係。亦即,當自我效能程度越高時,則創意產生的表現也會越好。
    (三)成長需求強度與創意產生呈現正向關係。亦即,當成長需求強度越高時,則創意產生的表現也會越好。
    (四)創意產生與創意執行之間呈現正向關係。亦即,創意產生的表現越好時,創意執行的表現也會越好。
      本研究之貢獻分述如下:首先,本研究探討經驗開放性、自我效能以及成長需求強度與創意產生的關聯性,證實此三種人格特質對創意產生有正向顯著之影響;另外,本研究證實了創意產生與創意執行的關係十分顯著,亦即創意執行的表現會受到創意產生影響。

    The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship of personality and creativity generation, and how the social boldness and transactional leadership moderate the relationship of creativity generation and implementation.
    In this study, we investigate the work team with three or more persons in Taiwanese enterprises, using data from 477 samples. We designed two different questionnaire A and B, delivered by post, email and personal, and verified all hypothesis by hierarchical regression analysis. The results are as follow:
    1. Openness experience is positive related to creativity generation.
    2. Self-efficacy is positive related to creativity generation.
    3. Growth need strength is positive related to creativity generation.
    4. Creativity generation is positive related to creativity implementation.
    First, this study proved the three personality trait: openness to experience, self-efficacy, and growth need strength have significant positive relationship with creativity. In addition, we proved the positive relationship of creativity generation and creativity implementation is very significant, the performance of creativity implementation will be influenced by creativity generation.
    Key words: openness to experience, self-efficacy, growth need strength, creativity generation, creativity implementation.

    目 錄 摘 要 I 誌 謝 V 圖目錄 XII 表目錄 XII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 章節架構 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 創意產生(Creativity Generation)5 一、創意的定義 5 二、影響創意產生之因素 6 第二節 經驗開放性(Openness to Experience) 8 第三節 自我效能(Self-Efficacy)9 一、自我效能的定義 9 二、自我效能對創意產生的影響 10 第四節 成長需求強度(Growth Need Strength) 12 一、成長需求的定義 12 二、成長需求強度對創意產生的影響 12 第五節 創意執行(Creative Implementation) 13 一、創新與創意的區別 13 二、創意產生到創意執行的過程 14 三、影響創意執行的因素 15 第六節 敢為性(Social Boldness)18 一、敢為性的定義 18 二、敢為性對創意執行的影響 18 第七節 交易型領導(Transactional Leadership)19 一、交易型領導的定義 19 二、交易型領導對創意執行的影響 20 第三章 研究方法 21 第一節 研究架構 21 第二節 研究假設 22 一、經驗開放性、自我效能、成長需求強度與創意產生 22 二、創意產生與創意執行 22 三、敢為性、交易型領導與創意執行 22 第三節 研究變數 23 一、創意產生(Creativity Generation)23 二、經驗開放性(Openness to Experience)23 三、自我效能(Self-Efficacy)23 四、成長需求強度(Growth Need Strength)24 五、創意執行(Creative Implementation)24 六、敢為性(Social Boldness)24 七、交易型領導(Transactional Leadership)24 八、控制變數 25 第四節 問卷設計 26 一、創意產生(Creativity Generation)26 二、經驗開放性(Openness to Experience)27 三、自我效能(Self-Efficacy)28 四、成長需求強度(Growth Need Strength)28 五、創意執行(Creative Implementation)29 六、敢為性(Social Boldness)30 七、交易型領導(Transactional Leadership)31 八、控制變數 32 第五節 抽樣方法 34 一、研究對象與樣本來源 34 二、問卷發放及回收情形 35 三、無反應偏差檢定(Non-response Bias)36 第六節 資料分析方法 37 一、敘述性統計分析 37 二、信度分析(Reliability Analysis)37 三、效度分析(Validity Analysis)37 四、相關性分析 38 五、層級迴歸分析(Hierarchical Regression Analysis)38 第四章 實證分析結果 39 第一節 樣本基本資料分析 39 一、性別比例 39 二、年齡分佈 40 三、教育程度 40 四、個人年資 41 五、團隊年資 41 六、團隊人數 42 七、共同變異方法(Common Method Variance, CMV)42 第二節 信度分析 42 一、創意產生 43 二、經驗開放性 43 三、自我效能 44 四、成長需求強度 45 四、創意執行 45 六、敢為性 46 七、交易型領導 47 八、創業導向 48 九、高層型與促進型控制 49 第三節 建構效度分析 50 一、收斂效度分析 50 二、區別效度分析 53 第四節 相關係數分析 53 第五節 層級迴歸分析 56 一、經驗開放性、自我效能、成長需求強度與創意產生 56 二、創意產生、敢為性、交易型領導與創意執行 58 第六節 研究結果整理 60 第五章 結論與建議 62 第一節 研究結論 62 一、經驗開放性與創意產生 62 二、自我效能與創意產生 63 三、成長需求強度及創意產生 63 四、創意產生與創意執行 64 五、以敢為性作為創意產生及創意執行之調節效果 64 六、以交易型領導作為創意產生及創意執行之調節效果 65 第二節 研究貢獻與限制 66 一、研究貢獻 66 二、研究限制 67 第三節 研究建議 69 一、對後續研究之建議 69 二、對實務界之建議 70 參考文獻 71 附錄Ⅰ 82 附錄Ⅱ 87

    Amabile, T. M. 1983. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(2): 357-376.
    Amabile, T. & S. S. Gryskiewicz 1987. Creativity in the R&D laboratory, Center for Creative Leadership.
    Amabile, T. M. 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations.Research in Organizational Behavior, 10: 123-167.
    Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity and innovation in organizations, Harvard Business School Boston.
    Amabile, T. M., R. Conti, H. Coon, J. Lazenby and M. Herron 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal 39(5): 1154-1184.
    Anderson, N., C. K. De Dreu and B. A. Nijstad 2004. The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state‐of‐the‐science. Journal of organizational Behavior 25(2): 147-173.
    Avolio, B. J., B. M. Bass and D. I. Jung 1999. Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology 72(4): 441-462.
    Axtell, C. M., D. J. Holman, K. L. Unsworth, T. D. Wall, P. E. Waterson and E. Harrington 2000. Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology 73(3): 265-285.
    Baer, M. 2010. The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of applied psychology 95(3): 592.
    Baer, M. 2012. Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 55(5): 1102-1119.
    Baer, M., R. T. A. Leenders, G. R. Oldham and A. K. Vadera 2010. Win or lose the battle for creativity: The power and perils of intergroup competition. Academy of Management Journal 53(4): 827-845.
    Bagozzi, R. P. and Y. Yi 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science 16(1): 74-94.
    Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review 84(2): 191.
    Bandura, A. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist 37(2): 122.
    Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall.
    Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, Macmillan.
    Bandura, A. 2001. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology 52(1): 1-26.
    Barron, F. and D. M. Harrington 1981. Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual review of psychology 32(1): 439-476.
    Barry, B. and R. A. Friedman 1998. Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(2): 345.
    Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations, Collier Macmillan.
    Bass, B. M. 1990. From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics 18(3): 19-31.
    Bazerman, M. H. (1994). Judgment in management decision making, New York: Wiley.
    Bottger, P. C. and I. K. Chew 1986. The job characteristics model and growth satisfaction: Main effects of assimilation of work experience and context satisfaction. Human Relations 39(6): 575-594.
    Cattell, H. E. and J. M. Schuerger 2003. Essentials of 16PF assessment, John Wiley & Sons.
    Cattell, R. B. 1971. Abilities: their structure, growth, and action.
    Cattell, R.B., Cattell, A.K. and Cattell, H.E. 1994, Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, 5th ed., Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Champaign, IL.
    Cattell, R. B. and H. E. Cattell 1995. Personality structure and the new fifth edition of the 16PF. Educational and Psychological Measurement 55(6): 926-937.
    Chen, G., S. M. Gully and D. Eden 2001. Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational research methods 4(1): 62-83.
    Clegg, C., K. Unsworth, O. Epitropaki and G. Parker 2002. Implicating trust in the innovation process†. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 75(4): 409-422.
    Collins, J. and D. K. Cooke 2013. Creative role models, personality and performance. Journal of Management Development 32(4): 336-350.
    Costa, P. T. and R. R. McCrae 1992. Professional manual: revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
    Covin, J. G. and D. P. Slevin 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic management journal 10(1): 75-87.
    Damanpour, F. 1988. Innovation type, radicalness, and the adoption process. Communication research 15(5): 545-567.
    Damanpour, F. 1991. ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS OF DETERMINANTS AND MODERATORS. Academy of Management Journal 34(3): 555-590.
    Deci, E. L. and R. M. Ryan 1987. The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(6): 1024-1037.
    Digman, J. M. and J. Inouye 1986. Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. Journal of personality and social psychology 50(1): 116.
    Donnellan, M. B., F. L. Oswald, B. M. Baird and R. E. Lucas 2006. The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological assessment 18(2): 192.
    Dutton, J. E. and S. J. Ashford 1993. Selling issues to top management. Academy of management review 18(3): 397-428.
    Elias, S. M. 2009. Restrictive versus promotive control and employee work outcomes: the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Management 35(2): 369-392.
    Farmer, S. M., P. Tierney and K. Kung-Mcintyre 2003. Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal 46(5): 618-630.
    Feldhusen, J. F. and B. E. Goh 1995. Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal 8(3): 231-247.
    Frost, P. J. and C. P. Egri 1991. The political-process of innovation. Research in organizational behavior 13: 229-295.
    Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind (rev. ed.), New York: Basic Books.
    George, J. M. and J. Zhou 2001. When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: an interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(3): 513.
    Goldberg, L. R. 1990. An alternative" description of personality": the big-five factor structure. Journal of personality and social psychology 59(6): 1216.
    Gough, H. G. 1979. A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of personality and social psychology 37(8): 1398.
    Green, S. G., M. A. Welsh and G. E. Dehler 2003. Advocacy, performance, and threshold influences on decisions to terminate new product development. Academy of Management Journal 46(4): 419-434.
    Guilford, J. P. 1950. CREATIVITY. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 5(9): 444-454.
    Guilford, J. P. 1967. The nature of human intelligence.
    Hackman, J. R. and G. R. Oldham 1980. Work redesign.
    Hair, J. F. 2010. Multivariate data analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall, c2010.7th ed.
    Hambrick, D. C. and P. A. Mason 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review 9(2): 193-206.
    Hammond, M. M., N. L. Neff, J. L. Farr, A. R. Schwall and X. Zhao 2011. Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5(1): 90.
    Howell, J. M. and C. A. Higgins 1990. Champions of technological innovation. Administrative science quarterly: 317-341.
    Jansen, J. J., D. Vera and M. Crossan 2009. Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly 20(1): 5-18.
    Kanter, R. M. 1983. The Change Masters: Binnovation and Entrepreneturship in the American Corporation, Touchstone Book.
    Kris, E. 1952. Psychoanalytic explorations in art / Ernst Kris, N. Y. : International Univ. Press, c1952. 1979 printing.
    Mackinnon, D. W. 1962. The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist 17(7): 484-495.
    Mayer, R. E. and V. K. Sims 1994. For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of educational psychology 86(3): 389.
    McCrae, R. R. 1987. Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of personality and social psychology 52(6): 1258.
    McCrae, R. R. and P. T. Costa Jr 1997. Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience.
    McCrae, R. R. and P. T. Costa 1985. Updating Norman's" adequacy taxonomy": Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of personality and social psychology 49(3): 710.
    Moss Kanter, R. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, eds. Staw BM and Cummings LL 10.
    Mumford, M. D. 2000. Managing creative people: strategies and tactics for innovation. Human resource management review 10(3): 313-351.
    Mumford, M. D. and S. B. Gustafson 1988. Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological bulletin 103(1): 27.
    Obstfeld, D. 2005. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative science quarterly 50(1): 100-130.
    Oldham, G. R. and A. Cummings 1996. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of management journal 39(3): 607-634.
    Patterson, F. 2002. Great minds don't think alike? Person-level predictors of innovation at work. International review of industrial and organizational psychology 17: 115-144.
    Pelz, D. C. 1985. Innovation complexity and the sequence of innovating stages. Science Communication 6(3): 261-291.
    Perkins, D. N. 1986. Thinking frames. Educational Leadership 43(8): 4-10.
    Pieterse, A. N., D. van Knippenberg, M. Schippers and D. Stam 2010. Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior 31(4): 609-623.
    Podolny, J. M. and J. N. Baron 1997. Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American sociological review: 673-693.
    Richter, A. W., G. Hirst, D. van Knippenberg and M. Baer 2012. Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: Cross-level interactions with team informational resources. Journal of Applied Psychology 97(6): 1282.
    Scholl, W. 1999. Restrictive control and information pathologies in organizations. Journal of Social Issues 55(1): 101-118.
    Scholl, W. 2001. Effects of promotive and restrictive control on economic performance. Social influence in social reality. Promoting individual and social change: 75-86.
    Scott, R. K. 1995. Creative employees: a challenge to managers. The Journal of Creative Behavior 29(1): 64-71.
    Scott, S. G. and R. A. Bruce 1994. Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal 37(3): 580-607.
    Shalley, C. E. and L. L. Gilson 2004. What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly 15(1): 33-53.
    Shalley, C. E., L. L. Gilson and T. C. Blum 2009. Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal 52(3): 489-505.
    Shalley, C. E., J. Zhou and G. R. Oldham 2004. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of management 30(6): 933-958.
    Shin, S. J., T.-Y. Kim, J.-Y. Lee and L. Bian 2012. Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal 55(1): 197-212.
    Simon, H. A. 1985. What we know about the creative process. Frontiers in creative and innovative management 4: 3-22.
    Spector, P. E. 1985. Higher‐order need strength as a moderator of the job scope‐employee outcome relationship: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology 58(2): 119-127.
    Stein, K. B. 1967. Correlates of the ideational preference dimension among prison inmates. Psychological reports 21(2): 553-562.
    Tesluk, P. E., J. L. Farr and S. R. Klein 1997. Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior 31(1): 27-41.
    Tierney, P. and S. M. Farmer 2002. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal 45(6): 1137-1148.
    Trice, H. M. and J. M. Beyer 1993. The cultures of work organizations, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Tyler, L. E. 1978. Individuality.
    Unsworth, K. 2001. Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review 26(2): 289-297.
    Van de Ven, A. H. 1986. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science 32(5): 590-607.
    Waldman, D. A., G. G. Ramirez, R. J. House and P. Puranam 2001. Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal 44(1): 134-143.
    Weisberg, R. W. 1999. I2 Creativity and Knowledge: A Challenge t0 The0ries. Handbook of creativity: 226.
    Wolfe, R. A. 1995. Human resource management innovations: Determinants of their adoption and implementation. Human Resource Management 34(2): 313-327.
    Wood, R. and A. Bandura 1989. Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of personality and social psychology 56(3): 407.
    Woodman, R. W., J. E. Sawyer and R. W. Griffin 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review 18(2): 293-321.
    Yuan, F. and R. W. Woodman 2010. Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal 53(2): 323-342.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2019-09-09公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE