都市地區因具有人口、土地密集利用、社會經濟高度發展之特性，導致都市地區受到洪災的衝擊時往往會造成更災難性的損失。面對氣候變遷極端強降雨更頻繁之情形，應更積極進行洪災管理。為能提出有效解決洪災之策略，經常透過風險評估作為災害管理依據，針對不同的風險程度及形成風險之原因擬定相關對策與因應措施。然而，災害管理資源之投入是否對症下藥，將影響災害管理資源投入對於地區災害風險損失降低的程度。
爰此，本研究即以風險評估與災害管理為討論標的，檢視兩者於空間分布之關係。驗證結果分為兩大部分，首先為洪災風險評估，從分析結果中掌握鹽埕、鼓山、左營、三民、苓雅、前鎮、旗津等區之部分里為洪災風險極高之里別，應為後續災害管理投入著重之地區；第二部分，本研究將風險程度與災害管理進行雙變量空間相關性分析，檢視高雄市災害管理資源與風險程度於空間上投入配置之關係，由分析結果發現，風險程度與災害管理之間於部分地區呈現負相關，反映目前高雄市災害管理投入之資源未依照風險程度進行配置，而有災害管理資源投入不效率之疑慮。而本研究進一步將災害管理策略分別與危害衝擊面向、社會經濟面向以及危害衝擊與社會經濟乘積進行雙變量空間相關性分析，掌握各策略投入不效率之區位，給予災害管理策略改進之建議。

Due to the characteristics of intensive use and highly development, urban areas often lead to more catastrophic losses by the impact of floods. In the face of climate change, local government should be more active in flood management. In order to put forward the effective strategies to minimize the flood disaster, risk assessment is often used as the basis of disaster management, and the relevant measures and measures should be formulated for different risk levels and risk reasons. However, whether the investment in disaster management resources is symptomatic will affect the extent to which disaster management resource inputs reduce the disaster risk.
In this study, the relationship between risk assessment and disaster management is discussed, and the relationship between is analyzed. The results are divided into two parts. First is the risk of flood disaster. From the results, we can grasp the high risk of flooding in the part of Yancheng, Gushan, Zuoying, Sanmin, Lingya, Qianzhen and Qijin. Second, this paper will analyze the relationship between the risk level and the disaster management. It was found that there was a negative correlation between risk level and disaster management in some areas, which indicated that the resources of disaster management in Kaohsiung were not configured according to the degree of risk, and the investment of disaster management resource was inefficient. In this study, the disaster management strategy is further analyzed by the bivariate spatial correlation of hazard, socio-economic and hazard double with socio-economic. The result is to give the suggestions to improve the disaster management strategy.

吳杰穎、江宜錦(2008)。臺灣天然災害統計指標體系建構與分析。地理學報， 51，65–84。
吳杰穎、李玉生（2010）。非結構式減災措施運用於空間規劃與管理之研究。建築學報，72，169-186。
吳杰穎、邵珮君、林文苑、柯于璋、洪鴻智、陳天健、陳亮全、黃智彥、詹士樑、薩支平(2007)。災害管理學辭典。台北市：五南圖書出版有限公司。
吳憲雄（1999）。水災之防治。水利季刊，9，15-26。
李欣輯、楊惠萱、廖楷民、蕭代基(2010)。水災社會脆弱性指標之建立。建築與規劃學報，10(3)，163–182。
李天浩(1999)。瑞伯颱風汐止淹水原因探討與臺北防洪計畫之評析。土木水利，25(4)，89-99。
林文苑(2011)。「天然災害老人弱勢族群社經脆弱度評估指標」之建立與空間聚集性分析應用。都市與計劃，38(3)，219–243。
殷傑、尹占娥、許世遠、陳振樓、王軍(2009)。災害風險理論與風險管理方法研究。災害學，24(2)，7-11。
陳亮全、陳海立（2007）。易致災都市空間發展之探討：以臺北盆地都市水災形成為例。都市與計劃，34(3)，293-315。
陳慈仁、林峰田、何燦群(2001)。空間自相關聚集分析。改寫自 [陳慈仁 (2001) 台北市資訊軟體業與網際網路服務業區位分佈之研究(第三章)] 碩士論文。國立台灣大學，台北市。
張芝苓、楊惠萱、李香潔(2014)。推動縣市政府之災害風險管理。國家災害防救科技中心電子報，112，1-9。
張倉榮、許銘熙、林國峰、賴進松、潘宗毅(2009)。脆弱度及風險地圖分析方法之研究。經濟部水利署。
張倉榮、許銘熙、林國峰、賴進松、潘宗毅(2010)。高屏溪、東港溪及高雄市、高雄縣、屏東縣脆弱度及風險地圖製作示範。經濟部水利署。
程衛帥、陳進、劉丹(2010)。洪災風險評估方法研究綜述。長江科學院院報， 27(9)，17–24。
詹士樑、黃書禮、王思樺(2003)。台北地區洪水災害風險分區劃設之研究。都市與計劃，30(4)，263–280。
盧鏡臣、陳永明、張志新、郭彥廉(2009)。台灣在氣候及環境變遷下之淹水風險評估─鄉鎮層級的評估。2009台灣災害管理研討會。新店:台灣災害管理學會。
經濟部水利署防災資訊服務網 http://fhy.wra.gov.tw/fhy/Disaster/Community
高雄市政府水利局網站 http://wrb.kcg.gov.tw/index.asp
內政部營建署(2013)。高雄市區域計畫規劃成果。取自：http://www.cpami.gov.tw
高雄市政府(2016)。高雄市105年度災害防救深耕第2期計畫期中報告書(修訂版)。取自：https://sites.google.com/site/nukdproject/
高雄市政府水利局(2013)。6年600億治水條例通過市府將優先爭取42億辦理水患治理。2017年3月30日，取自：http://wrb.kcg.gov.tw/news/news.asp?d_id=2219
Alexander, D. (2000). Confronting catastrophe: New perspectives on natural disasters. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anselin, L. (1989). What is special about spatial data? Alternative Perspectives on spatial data analysis. Santa Barbara: National Centers for Geographic Information and Analysis.
Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical analysis, 27(2), 93-115.
Benouar, D., & Mimi, A. (2001). Improving emergency management in Algeria. In Global Alliance International Workshop on Disaster Reduction.
Birkmann, J. (2007). Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales : Applicability , usefulness and policy implications. Environmental Hazards, 7(1), 20–31.
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. D., Carreño, M. L., Barbat, A. H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., ... & Welle, T. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Natural hazards, 67(2), 193-211.
Bloch, R., Papachristodoulou, N., Miller, R., Monroy, J., Fisseha, T., Trejos, L., ... & Pozueta, B. (2014). Lessons from urban risk assessments in Latin American and Caribbean cities. Development in Practice, 24(4), 502-513.
Bollin, C., Ca´ rdenas, C., Hahn, H., & Vatsa, K. S. (2003). Natural Disasters Network: Comprehensive Risk Management by Communities and Local Governments. Inter-American Development Bank.
Cardona, O. D. (2005). Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management: Program for Latin America and the Caribbean: Summary Report. Inter-American Development Bank.
Cardona, O.D. (2006). A system of indicators for disaster risk management in the Americas. In: Birkmann, J. (Ed.), Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards—Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. UNU- Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris
Carreño, M. L., Cardona, O. D., & Barbat, A. H. (2007). A disaster risk management performance index. Natural Hazards, 41(1), 1-20..
Cardona, O. D., & Carreño, M. L. (2011). Updating the indicators of disaster risk and risk management for the Americas. IDRiM Journal, 1(1), 27-47.
De Moel, H., Jongman, B., Kreibich, H., Merz, B., Penning-Rowsell, E., & Ward, P. J. (2015). Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20(6), 865–890.
Dickson, E., Baker, J. L., & Hoornweg, D. (2012). Urban risk assessments: understanding disaster and climate risk in cities. World Bank Publications.
Dilley, M. (2005). Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis (Vol. 5). World Bank Publications.
European Parliament, Council, Floods Directive 2007/60/EC( 2007).
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2003). Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners. USA, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Hammer, W. (1972). Handbook of system and product safety. Prentice-Hall.
Handmer, J. W., & Dovers, S. R. (1996). A typology of resilience: rethinking institutions for sustainable development. Organization & Environment, 9(4), 482-511.
Han, S. R., Kang, N. R., & Lee, C. S. (2015). Disaster Risk Evaluation for Urban Areas Under Composite Hazard Factors. Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 15(3), 33-43.
Hooijer, A., Klijn, F., Pedroli, G. B. M. & Van Os, A. G. (2004), Towards sustainable flood risk management in the Rhine and Meuse river basins: synopsis of the findings of IRMA-SPONGE. River Res. Applic., 20, 343–357. doi:10.1002/rra.781
Jones, R. N., & Preston, B. L. (2011). Adaptation and risk management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(2), 296-308.
Jonkman, S. N., Kok, M., & Vrijling, J. K. (2008). Flood risk assessment in the Netherlands: A case study for dike ring South Holland. Risk Analysis, 28(5), 1357-1374.
Kandilioti, G., & Makropoulos, C. (2012). Preliminary flood risk assessment: the case of Athens. Natural hazards, 61(2), 441-468.
Keiler, M., Sailer, R., Jörg, P., Weber, C., Fuchs, S., Zischg, A., & Sauermoser, S. (2006). Avalanche risk assessment? a multi-temporal approach, results from Galtür, Austria. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 6(4), 637-651.
Komi, K., Amisigo, B. A., & Diekkrüger, B. (2016). Integrated Flood Risk Assessment of Rural Communities in the Oti River Basin, West Africa. Hydrology, 3(4), 42.
Lee, S. I. (2001). Developing a bivariate spatial association measure: an integration of Pearson's r and Moran's I. Journal of geographical systems, 3(4), 369-385.
Merz, B., Hall, J., Disse, M., & Schumann, A. (2010). Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10(3), 509-527.
Pritchard, P. (2000). Environmental risk management. Earthscan.
Renn, O., Klinke, A., & van Asselt, M. (2011). Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: a synthesis. Ambio, 40(2), 231-246.
Sadeghi-Pouya, A., Nouri, J., Mansouri, N., & Kia-Lashaki, A. (2017). Developing an index model for flood risk assessment in the western coastal region of Mazandaran, Iran. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 65(2), 134-145.
Sayers, P. B., Hall, J. W., & Meadowcroft, I. C. (2002). Towards risk-based flood hazard management in the UK. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Civil Engineering, 150(5), 36-42.
Schanze, J. (2006). Flood risk management–a basic framework. Flood risk management: hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures, 1-20.
Smith, K. (2013). Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge, London.
United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR). (2003). A Draft Framework to Guide and Monitor Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland: UN/ISDR.
United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR). (2004). Living with Risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives. Geneva, Switzerland: UN/ISDR.
Villagrán de León, J.C. (2006). Vulnerability - a conceptual and methodological review. No. 4, UNU Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), Bonn.
White, P., Pelling, M., Sen, K., Seddon, D., Russell, S., & Few, R. (2005). Disaster risk reduction : a development concern. UK: DFID.
Yin, J., Ye, M., Yin, Z., & Xu, S. (2015). A review of advances in urban flood risk analysis over China. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 29(3), 1063-1070.
Zhou, Y., Li, N., Wu, W., Wu, J., & Shi, P. (2014). Local spatial and temporal factors influencing population and societal vulnerability to natural disasters. Risk analysis, 34(4), 614-639.