簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝世婷
Hsieh, Shih-Tyng
論文名稱: 醫用語音電腦輔助系統之設計研究——以輸尿管鏡手術為例
Voice User Interface Design of Computer Aided Surgery System Applied to Ureteroscopy
指導教授: 謝孟達
Shieh, Meng-Dar
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系
Department of Industrial Design
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 92
中文關鍵詞: 泌尿科輸尿管鏡手術語音介面電腦輔助手術設計使用性
外文關鍵詞: Urology, Ureteroscopic Surgery, Voice User Interface, Computer Aided Surgery, Design, Usability
相關次數: 點閱:180下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究設計與探討於手術室使用之醫用語音電腦輔助系統,取名為Sami,並進行輸尿管鏡手術之使用性測試以瞭解Sami與目前成大醫院使用之一般介面之差異。本研究首先搜集六種語音介面設計方針,並藉由觀察與訪談瞭解成大醫院泌尿科醫師的需求。在問卷調查醫師們對於需求的重要程度後,萃取出符合醫師需求之設計目標以開始設計流程。在第一設計階段,本研究基於設計方針設計第一版本的Sami。第二設計階段邀請了三位跨領域的專家參與啓發式評估(Heuristic Evaluation),專家們將以Nielsen的十項使用性準則與語音介面設計方針作為評估的基礎。評估後,針對專家的使用性評估結果改良完成第二版本的Sami。接著第三設計階段實施綠野仙蹤法 (Wizard of Oz Test),受試對象為三位成大醫院泌尿科的手術醫師,醫師們將使用平常習慣的英文會話置入完成器材控制任務之語音指令資料庫。並在實驗完成後,參與訪談以表達對於Sami語音介面的建議。在最後的設計流程中確立系統架構與萃取出的語音指令關鍵字,並且經由Java程式語言完成Sami的實驗模型設計。
    在使用性測試中,本研究邀請三位手術醫師參加測試。於使用性測試結果我們發現,縱然測試過程中未曾發生辨識錯誤的問題,但醫師們仍對於語音辨識技術層面持保守態度。此外,Sami確實可以幫助醫生專注於凝視病灶並進行醫療行為。在方便性與快速性兩項評估標準中,醫師們認為Sami語音介面相較於一般介面擁有較佳評價得分。

    In this research, there will be a design of computer aided surgery (CAS) system with voice user interface (VUI). Through a whole design process, this research will propose Sami, the designed CAS system with VUI. Then, usability test will be applied to Ureteroscopic surgery to realize the comparison result of conventional UI in National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH) and VUI of Sami.
    First, this research collected six VUI design guidelines. Then, by implementing observations and interviews, requirements of the surgeons from Urology department in NCKUH were realized. After the results of important requirements were investigated by questionnaires, the design objects were defined, and the design process was started. In the first step of the design process, the preliminary design of system framework was accomplished. Three experts from three different academic fields were invited to join the second step, Heuristic Evaluation. Experts would examine the designed system framework with Nielsen's 10 usability principles and VUI design guidelines. Then, the revision design of Sami was proposed based on the results of Heuristic Evaluation. In the third step, three surgeons from NCKUH were invited to Wizard of Oz test (WOZ test). During the WOZ test, surgeons used voice commands to complete tasks of controlling devices by English. Furthermore, interviews were applied to realize the satisfaction issues for Sami. In the end of the design process, the system framework of Sami, as well as keywords of voice commands, were defined. Also, the experimental prototype of Sami was constructed using Java Language.
    In the usability test, three surgeons were invited. Though there was no error in voice recognition during usability test, surgeons had conservative attitude about the technology of voice recognition in CAS system. However, Sami could provide an opportunity for surgeons to control interface without their hands, which lets surgeons gaze at the nidus of the patient and execute the treatment. In the comparison result, surgeons considered that two evaluation criteria of VUI had a higher score than conventional UI, which are convenience and quickness.

    摘要...................i ABSTRACT.................ii 致謝...................iv TABLE OF CONTENTS.............v LIST OF TABLES ...............vii LIST OF FIGURES..............viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION..........1 1.1 Background..............1 1.2 Motivation...............2 1.3 Purpose................5 1.4 Scope.................6 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW........7 2.1 Ureteroscopy..............7 2.2 Computer Aided Surgery (CAS) System....8 2.2.1 Voice User Interface...........8 2.2.2 Other User Interface..........10 2.3 Voice User Interface (VUI).........11 2.4 Related Research of CAS System.......11 CHAPTER 3 METHOD............13 3.1 Guideline Review............13 3.1.1 VUI Design Guideline..........13 3.1.2 CAS System Design Guideline.......16 3.2 Usability Engineering...........17 3.2.1 Definition of Usability..........17 3.2.2 Evaluations of Usability.........17 3.3 Wizard of Oz Test............21 CHAPTER 4 REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS.......22 4.1 Research Framework...........22 4.2 Pilot Study...............25 4.3 Scenario................26 4.4 Requirements..............28 4.5 Design Objects.............35 4.5.1 Summarization of Commercial CAS system..35 4.5.2 Screening Result............38 CHAPTER 5 VUI DESIGN OF SAMI........40 5.1 Preliminary Design............40 5.2 Heuristic Evaluation...........41 5.2.1 Arrangements of Heuristic Evaluation....42 5.2.2 Result................43 5.2.3 Revision Design............47 5.3 Wizard of Oz Test............54 5.3.1 Arrangements of WOZ Test........54 5.3.2 Results................56 5.3.3 Final Design..............56 5.4 Usability Test..............67 5.4.1 Arrangement of Usability Test.......67 5.4.2 Results................69 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION...........72 6.1 Research Review.............72 6.2 Research Finding.............73 6.3 Research Limitations and Future Work.....73 REFERENCES................75 Appendix A VUI DESIGN GUIDELINES.......79 Appendix B SOURCE CODE OF SAMI.......84 Appendix C TASK OF USABILITY TEST.......89 Appendix D QUESTIONNAIRE OF USABILITY TEST...90

    Catchpole, K., Mishra, A., Handa, A., & McCulloch, P. (2008). Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. Annals of surgery, 247(4), pp. 699-706.
    Commarford, P. M., Lewis, J. R., Smither, J. A. A., & Gentzler, M. D. (2008). A comparison of broad versus deep auditory menu structures. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(1), pp. 77-89.
    Cuschieri, A. (2006). Nature of human error: implications for surgical practice. Annals of surgery, 244(5), p. 642.
    Darre, V., & Yussupov, R. (2011). SIRI technology exploration and implementation in healthcare. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Freshman Conference, University of Pittsburgh.
    Davies, J. (2005). Team communication in the operating room. Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica, 49(7), pp. 898-901.
    El-Shallaly, G., Mohammed, B., Muhtaseb, M., Hamouda, A., & Nassar, A. (2005). Voice recognition interfaces (VRI) optimize the utilization of theatre staff and time during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 14(6), pp. 369-371.
    Grange, S., Fong, T., & Baur, C. (2004). M/ORIS: a medical/operating room interaction system. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Multimodal interfaces, State College, PA, USA.
    Grisel, I., van Dijk, E., & Ruiter, J. (2011). General guidelines and design choices for endoscopic CAS.
    Irion, K., & Novak, P. (2000). Systems workplace for endoscopic surgery. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 9(3-4), pp. 193-197.
    Kelley, J. F. (1983). An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
    Kommu, S. S., & Rane, A. (2008). Camera Holding Robotic Devices in Urology. medical Robotics.
    Kortum, P. (2008). HCI beyond the GUI: design for haptic, speech, olfactory and other nontraditional interfaces: Morgan Kaufmann.
    Nielsen, J., & Hackos, J. A. T. (1993). Usability engineering: Academic press San Diego.
    Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people.
    Nishikawa, A., Asano, S., Fujita, R., Yamaguchi, S., Yohda, T., Miyazaki, F., Takiguchi, S. (2003). Selective use of face gesture interface and instrument tracking system for control of a robotic laparoscope positioner. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2003, pp. 973-974.
    Nishikawa, A., Hosoi, T., Koara, K., Negoro, D., Hikita, A., Asano, S., Yasui, M. (2003). FAce MOUSe: A novel human-machine interface for controlling the position of a laparoscope. Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions on, 19(5), pp. 825-841.
    Nocco, U., & del Torchio, S. (2011). The integrated OR Efficiency and effectiveness evaluation after two years use, a pilot study. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 6(2), pp. 175-186.
    O'toole, M. d., Bouazza-Marouf, K., Kerr, D., Gooroochurn, M., & Vloeberghs, M. (2010). A methodology for design and appraisal of surgical robotic systems. Robotica, 28(2), p. 297.
    Perrakis, A., Hohenberger, W., & Horbach, T. (2013). Integrated operation systems and voice recognition in minimally invasive surgery: comparison of two systems. Surgical endoscopy, pp. 1-5.
    Reader, T. W., Flin, R., & Cuthbertson, B. H. (2007). Communication skills and error in the intensive care unit. Current opinion in critical care, 13(6), p. 732.
    Roe, D., & Wang, Y. (2000). A voice-controlled network for universal control of devices in the OR. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 9(3-4), pp. 185-191.
    Satar, N., Zeren, S., Bayazit, Y., ARIDOĐAN, I. A., SOYUPAK, B., & TANSUĐ, Z. (2004). Rigid ureteroscopy for the treatment of ureteral calculi in children. The Journal of urology, 172(1), pp. 298-300.
    Sexton, J. B., Thomas, E. J., & Helmreich, R. L. (2000). Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 320(7237), p. 745.
    Shackel, B. (1991). Usability-context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Human factors for informatics usability, pp. 21-37.
    Shneiderman, S. B., & Plaisant, C. (2005). Designing the user interface 4 th edition: Pearson Addison Wesley, USA.
    Sutton, E., Youssef, Y., Meenaghan, N., Godinez, C., Xiao, Y., Lee, T., Park, A. (2010). Gaze disruptions experienced by the laparoscopic operating surgeon. Surgical endoscopy, 24(6), pp. 1240-1244.
    Te'eni, D., Carey, J. M., & Zhang, P. (2005). Human-computer interaction: Developing effective organizational information systems: John Wiley & Sons.
    Van Veelen, M., Nederlof, E., Goossens, R., Schot, C., & Jakimowicz, J. (2003). Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery. Surgical endoscopy, 17(7), pp. 1077-1081.
    Wiklund, M. E., & Wilcox, S. B. (2005). Designing usability into medical products: CRC.
    Kidney Stone Clinic. (2011). Laser Stone Surgery using Flexible Pyeloscopy. Retrieved May 10, 2013, from http://www.kidneystoneclinic.com.au/flexible-pyeloscopy.html
    Wikipedia. (2012). Speech interface guideline. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_interface_guideline
    Eduardo Olvera. (2007). VUI Design Guideline. Retrieved October 2, 2012, from www.vuidesign.net
    KS Keir Surgical. (2009). Keir Surgical: an exclusive distributor of the ViKY robotic scope holder. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.keirsurgical.com/en/news/13-vikyarticle.html
    Wikipedia. (2009). Voice user interface. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice_user_interface
    Wikipedia. (2013). Wizard of Oz experiment. Retrieved February 2, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizard_of_Oz_experiment

    下載圖示
    2019-01-01公開
    QR CODE