| 研究生: |
邱俊雄 Chiu, Chun-Hsiung |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
企業轉型策略之個案探討 ─ 以G公司為例 Business Transformation Planning — A Case Study of G Company |
| 指導教授: |
王明隆
Wang, Ming-Long |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2016 |
| 畢業學年度: | 104 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 66 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 企業轉型 、生技產業 、保健食品 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Business Transformation, Biotechnology, Dietary Supplement |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:144 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來時代快速的變遷及科技迅速進步,企業必須因應環境的變化維持營運獲利,企業轉型成為提升競爭力及成長的方式之一,轉型能讓企業獲得新的核心競爭力及市場佔有率….等,但是轉型改革前中後期、變換過程、執行規劃往往是困難重重,轉型的評估分析作業如對於市場預測或環境變化有所誤差,可能導致整個企業轉型的失敗,甚至是企業的倒閉,企業轉型會立即遭遇到各項問題的挑戰,企業轉型事前的評估預測關係到轉型做業的成功與失敗,因故企業轉型前的預測評估及決策分析是非常重要,本研究主要探討生技產業的企業轉型的策略研討,以G公司為研究的企業個案,研究方式運用個案研究法,經由研究及訪談中取得的企業資料進行分析探討,期望能讓生技公司進行企業轉型策略運用時能有所助益。
經由本論文研究分析個案如何從轉型初期到轉型後的預測分析與執行過程,如何利用企業的轉型,獲得新的市場利基及市占率並提升公司作業效率與降低管理成本,讓轉型後的企業能迅速獲得創新的市場競爭力與維持既有優勢,研究資料顯示台灣生技產業環境越來越嚴峻,生技產業須隨時掌握景氣的變化及環境的動向,避免造成企業營運虧損及決策失誤。
生技產業轉型策略的成功要素是由了解產業的專業團隊來評估執行,以便累積複製成功的轉型經驗。由於生技公司企業轉型的成功案例並不多,所以企業轉型作業必須有最壞的情況之考量,以便執行轉型時能隨時因應各種突發的情況變化,更容易促成企業轉型案件的成功,此個案值得作為生技產業執行轉型策略對於轉型預測評估與提升營運效率之建議標的。
SUMMARY
The rapid development in technology and market condition in 21th century has made adaptation a requirement for businesses to profit, hence transitions of enterprise have become one major way to boost a company’s competitive edge and maintain sustainable growth. Successful transition can grant an enterprise new advantages in competitions and improve market share; yet the process of transition and the conditions followed after initial transition are often difficult to be planned and executed and failed market analysis and bad market forecasting can easily result in failure in entrepreneurial transition or the fiasco of the company. Companies which seek transition will have immediate challenges such as technical requirement, allocation of resources and fund, adjustment and shakeups among human resources, re-defining company’s position in a market, and other serious challenges. The analysis and calculation before transition start usually are responsible for the success or failure entrepreneurial transitions hence an accurate market prediction and a solid decision making process are very important for companies who seek change. This research will primarily focus on the transition strategy for Biotech firms and use company G as subject of our case study. The research will also analyze company data acquired through our research to offer practical help for future bio-tech firms which seek smooth and successful traditions.
INTRODUCTION
The survival of enterprise and corporation heavily relies on being able to adapt according to the change in market conditions and era; and being willing to learn in a long term. Only companies that are willing to continue to learn and develop can maintain a perpetual survival and growth. The success of business transitions come from transition management, which means not just “what to be changed” but also “how to make change happen”. After the initial honeymoon period, decline in revenue is almost inevitable for any enterprise and company unless it is willing and able to create new opportunity for renewed growth; and being able to identify new growth opportunities adds life span of a business. Most of companies will face bottleneck in growth when facing the cruel and unpredictable challenges from the free market, but why some companies can successful transform themselves and maintain perpetual growth while some companies fail to adapt?
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study, through collecting text information, summarizing and comparing available information, and the personal experience of the researcher in related fields, seeks to understand the prediction, analyzation and execution process during the initial stages of transition and the post transition stage, as well as how companies take advantage of transitions to acquire new market standing, new market share, improved company performance and lowered management cost in order to help the business to maintain new advantages while keep the existing ones. Our information shows that the market condition has been becoming more and more critical to biotech firms in Taiwan; and it is important for biotech firms in Taiwan to be able to recognize the slightest change in market conditions to avoid strategic error and business loss.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The studied company is one of the oldest biotech firm in Taiwan which has had a history of nearly half a century. Many major companies will hit a development celling at some point and company G is no exception. In 1969 the company was a proxy for Japanese pharmaceutical companies, at the time the competitions in both Japanese and Taiwanese pharmaceutical industries were rapidly becoming intense and the company felt the pressure from competitors hence it began to look for alternatives. The company saw the trend that functional/sport drinks were on the rise, hence in 1971 the company began its first major transition to functional drink market; the company’s major revenue has relied on selling functional and sport drink for the next three decades, and such strategy was finally halted because new comers entered with similar products and much lower unit prices. In 1991, the company underwent its second major transition and introduced a new biotech center. The biotech center devoted most of its effort in developing and manufacturing biotechnologies and health products, yet because the company lacked professional sales and market experts in the biotech field, the company revenue stagnated and the company initiated its 3rd transition to become a direct selling company and build an independent supply chain to manufacture health products and other diet-related medical tablets. In 2010, this country had its 4th major transition in management level, which aimed to introduce young and innovative business leaders to revitalize the company and provide customers a fresh, renewed image.
CONCLUSION
Despite early success, 25 years after foundation, the company was trapped in a trend of decline in earnings per share, after 30 years after the establishment of the firm it experienced losses in revenue in three consecutive years. The company has experienced 4 major transitions in order to break development bottleneck. In year 2009, the company’s stock price per share as NTD 14, but by the end of June, 2016, the price has grown 13 times and is now 210 NTD per share. Company G has been able to confront challenges from newcomers by correctly analyzing market condition and making necessary adjustment amid operational difficulties; hence the ultimate result of its 4 major transitions was a grandiose success. The key to successful transitions for biotech firms is to carry out the execution of transition by professional teams and accumulate duplicable experience in transition. Because success transitions are uncommon in the biotech industry, biotech firms must be ready for the worst case scenario in order to calmly face unexpected circumstances and increase the probability of a successful transition. This case study should provide a valuable analysis that can serve as a reference for future biotech firms’ transition strategy and evaluation processes before transition taking place in order to improve the success rate of business traditions.
一、中文部分
1.王享元(2002),企業學習能力對企業轉型升級策略選擇的影響─以鴻海與神通為例, 给立政治大學EMBA碩士論文。
2.司徒達賢(2001),策略管理新論,智勝文化出版社。
3.林溫正(2001),台灣傳統集團企業轉型策略之研究,國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
4.徐瑞廷(2015),提出一個明確的價值主張,員工才會支持企業轉型的方向,經理人網站,10月25日。http://goo.gl/estSz5
5.袁素萍(2003),企業轉型成功關鍵因素之研究,國立成功大學管理學院高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
6.常宗翼(2012),企業轉型的質性研究─以台灣傳統中小型企業為例,國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
7.陳明璋(1995),企業轉型的經營策略與作法,扭轉乾坤─台灣企業突變的成功實力,中華民國管理科學學會。
8.經濟部工業局(2015)2015生技產業白皮書
9.經濟部中小企業處(2015),2015中小企業白皮書。
10.路‧葛絲納(2003),誰說大象不會跳舞─葛斯納親撰IBM成功關鍵, 時報文化出版社,羅耀宗譯。
11.蔡昌(2011),企業的生命週期與價值創造,東方出版社
12.盧永昌(2008),企業轉型策略之研究以勝華收購瀚宇彩晶生產線為例,國立交通大學管理學院國際經貿學程碩士論文。
13.賴進林(2001),我國中小企業轉型的個案研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
14.蘇國材(2004),中小型企業轉型策略之研究─以扣件業S公司為例,國立中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士在職專班碩士論文。
二、英文部分
1.Blumenthal, B. and Haspeslagh, P.(1994),Toward a Definition of Corporate Transformation, Sloan Management Review, 35(3), pp.101-106.
2.Donald B. Bibeault(1982),Corporate Turnaround, How managers turn Losers into Winners,McGraw- Hill Book Company.
3.Ichak Adizes(1990),Corporate LifeCycles: How and Why Corporations Grow and Die and What to Do About It,The Adizes Institute.
4.Jonathan, D. D.(2000),Corporate transformation without a crisis,The McKinsey
5.Kalakota, R., and Robinson, M.(1999),e-Business: Roadmap for Success,Addison-Wesley,Reading,Massachusetts.
6.Levy, A., & MERRY, U.(1986),Organizational Transformation,New York: Praeger.
Quarterly, 4, 116-128.
7.Shaheen, G.T.(1994),Approach To Transformation,Chief Executive,March,2-5.
三、網站部分
1.公開資訊觀測站 http://mops.twse.com.tw/mops/web/index
2.社團法人國家生技醫療產業策進會http://www.ibmi.org.tw/client/index.php
3.財團法人食品工業發展研究所 http://www.firdi.org.tw
4.財團法人國家實驗研究院科技產業資訊室 http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/
5.cnYES鉅亨網 http://www.cnyes.com
6.BioInsight網站 http://bioinsight.blogspot.tw/
7.MBA智庫百科網站 http://wiki.mbalib.com/wiki/
校內:2021-07-09公開