| 研究生: |
張郁婕 Chang, Yu-Chieh |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
工安事件與審計公費之關聯性 The Association between Industrial Safety Incidents and Audit Fees |
| 指導教授: |
黃華瑋
Huang, Hua-Wei |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 會計學系 Department of Accountancy |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 42 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 工安事件 、職業安全 、審計公費 、風險評估 、社會責任 、社會議題 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Industrial Safety Incidents, Occupational Safety, Audit Fees, Risk Assessment, Corporate Social Responsibility,, Social Pillar |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:34 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以台灣上市櫃公司為研究對象,在當前全球勞動力轉移、少子化衝擊及多元移工引進的社會轉型浪潮下,探討具社會衝擊性的工安事件對審計公費之影響。過去審計定價文獻多關注環境違規或整體ESG表現,本研究則聚焦於社會(Social)構面中涉及勞工安全與生命風險的具體負面事件,分析此類事件作為企業治理品質與內部控制訊號,如何影響審計公費之訂定。
在研究方法上,本研究採多元迴歸模型進行分析,並以資產規模建構配對樣本,進行實證分析。實證結果顯示,工安事件與審計公費之間存在顯著的正向關聯,即當企業發生工安事故時,次一年度之審計公費將顯著提升。此結果說明非財務資訊中的職安負面事件,確實會納入會計師對受查客戶之風險評估與定價考量中。此外,進一步分析也發現,審計公費會因工安事件的類別而有差異。本研究擴展了ESG審計研究領域,證實社會構面風險對審計定價的實質影響,並透過配對樣本分析,提供實證證據顯示工安事件具備風險預警價值,能協助大眾與監管機構在勞動力結構劇烈變動的時代下,具備前瞻地評估企業潛在的經營風險與治理品質。研究結論亦提醒企業管理階層,職場安全管理不僅關乎社會責任,更會反映於企業的審計成本,具備高度實務參考價值。
Amid global labor migration, demographic declines, and Taiwan’s active recruitment of diverse foreign workers, this study examines the impact of socially impactful industrial safety incidents on audit fees. While prior literature predominantly focuses on environmental violations or overall ESG performance, this research centers on the "Social" pillar—specifically negative events involving labor safety and life risks—to analyze how these incidents, as signals of corporate governance and internal control quality, influence audit pricing.
Employing a multiple regression model and a size-matched sample analysis, the empirical results demonstrate a significant positive correlation between industrial safety incidents and audit fees, with affected firms facing significantly higher fees in the subsequent year. This indicates that negative occupational safety events, as non-financial information, are incorporated into auditors’ risk assessments. Additional analysis further reveals that this impact varies by incident category.
This study extends the ESG auditing literature by confirming the material impact of social dimension risks on audit pricing. Through size-matched analysis, it demonstrates that industrial safety incidents offer important risk-warning value, helping the public and regulators proactively evaluate potential operational risks and governance quality amid drastic labor transitions. Ultimately, the findings remind management that workplace safety is not merely a social responsibility but is directly reflected in corporate audit costs, offering high practical value.
Asthana, S. C., & Kalelkar, R. (2014). Effect of client reputation on audit fees at the office level: An examination of S&P 500 index membership. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50572
Brown, K. A., Willis, P. G., & Prussia, G. E. (2000). Predicting safe employee behavior in the steel industry: Development and test of a sociotechnical model. Journal of Operations management, 18(4), 445-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00033-4.
Bell. (2001). Auditors’ perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research., 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00002
Brooks, L. L. Z., Gill, S., & Wong‐On‐Wing, B. (2019). Corporate social responsibility risk and auditor–client retention. International Journal of auditing, 23(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12148
Burke, J. J., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2019). Auditor response to negative media coverage of client environmental, social, and governance practices. Accounting Horizons, 33(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52450
Bae, G. S., Choi, S. U., Lamoreaux, P. T., & Lee, J. E. (2021). Auditors' fee premiums and low‐quality internal controls. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(1), 586-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12602
Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management journal, 56(3), 758-781. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0744
Garrett, J. B., Hoitash, R., & Prawitt, D. F. (2022). Perceptions of tone at the top from the inside: insights into audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 41(1), 115-141. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2020-058
Houston. (1999). The audit risk model, business risk and audit‐planning decisions. The Accounting Review., 74(3). https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.1999.74.3.281
Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary accounting research, 23(1), 141-191. https://doi.org/10.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GX
Jha, A., & Chen, Y. (2015). Audit fees and social capital. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 611-639. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50878
Karpoff, J. M., Lott, Jr, J. R., & Wehrly, E. W. (2005). The reputational penalties for environmental violations: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 653-675. https://doi.org/10.1086/430806
Kölbel, J. F., Busch, T., & Jancso, L. M. (2017). How media coverage of corporate social irresponsibility increases financial risk. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2266-2284. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2647
Kabir, Q. S., Watson, K., & Somaratna, T. (2018). Workplace safety events and firm performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(1), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2017-0133
Lyon, J. D., & Maher, M. W. (2005). The importance of business risk in setting audit fees: Evidence from cases of client misconduct. Journal of Accounting research, 43(1), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00165.x
Li, Y., Simunic, D. A., & Ye, M. (2025). Do auditors consider clients’ compliance with environmental regulations?. Managerial Auditing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-04-2024-4315
Mayhew, B. W. (2001). Auditor reputation building. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3), 599-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00030
Mindak, M., & Heltzer, W. (2011). Corporate environmental responsibility and audit risk. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(8), 697-733. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901111161340
Moffitt, J. S., Patin, J. C. A., & Watson, L. (2024). Corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and the internal control environment. Accounting Horizons, 38(3), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-2020-172
Owusu, A., Atif, M., Holmes, M., & Omoteso, K. (2025). Audit fees-audit quality relationship: Does employee board representation matter?. The British Accounting Review, 101766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101766
Raghunandan, A. (2021). Financial misconduct and employee mistreatment: Evidence from wage theft. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 867-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09602-y
Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of accounting research, 161-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490397
Seetharaman, A., Gul, F. A., & Lynn, S. G. (2002). Litigation risk and audit fees: Evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets. Journal of accounting and economics, 33(1), 91-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00046-5
Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. The journal of Politics, 68(2), 372-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00413.x
Wang, X., Song, X., & Sun, M. (2023). How does a company’s ESG performance affect the issuance of an audit opinion? the moderating role of auditor experience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 3878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053878
Wang, B., Wu, Q., Yang, R., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Employee power and audit Fees: Worldwide evidence. The British Accounting Review, 101727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101727
Wu, P., & Zhang, Z. (2025). CEO‐to‐Employee Pay Ratio and Audit Pricing. Corporate Governance: An International Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12663
Xu, X. D., Zeng, S. X., Zou, H. L., & Shi, J. J. (2016). The impact of corporate environmental violation on shareholders' wealth: A perspective taken from media coverage. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(2), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1858
Yi Xiong, Sicheng Li, & Yang Gao. (2021). Executive Pay Gap and Audit Fees: Evidence from China. Transformations in Business & Economics, 20(3), 183–203. https://research.ebsco.com/plink/7289d7ac-99ff-3eda-aec4-17f9b9095f48
Yao, S., Wei, S., & Chen, L. (2023). Do clients’ environmental risks affect audit pricing? Evidence from environmental violations in China. Managerial Auditing Journal, 38(5), 634-658. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2021-3282
Zou, H. L., Zeng, R. C., Zeng, S. X., & Shi, J. J. (2015). How do environmental violation events harm corporate reputation?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 836-854. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1849
Zhang, H., Zhang, H., Tian, L., Yuan, S., & Tu, Y. (2024). ESG performance and litigation risk. Finance Research Letters, 63, 105311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105311
李碩敏、陳振祥(2025)。從訊息生命週期觀點探討一則網路訊息引發企業危機事態:以A公司為例。臺大管理論叢,35(2),53-83。https://doi.org/10.6226/NTUMR.202510_35(2).0002
林孝倫、林嬋娟(2013)。臺灣審計研究之回顧與前瞻。會計審計論叢,3(1),1-47。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=22219374-201306-201306070017-201306070017-1-47
陳坤志、黃祥宇、陳又瑄(2024)。臺灣與亞洲鄰近市場審計公費水準以及決定因子之比較。會計審計論叢,14(1),1-32。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=22219374-N202406140008-00001