簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林佑庭
Lin, Yu-Ting
論文名稱: 萬那杜北部Lapita早期陶器來源分析—以萬那杜Makué遺址為例
The Provenance of Early Period Lapita Pottery in the Northern Vanuatu: A Case from Makué site, Aore Island, Vanuatu
指導教授: 邱斯嘉
Chiu, Scarlett
劉益昌
Liu, I-chang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 文學院 - 考古學研究所
Institute of Archaeology
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 117
中文關鍵詞: 萬那杜Makué遺址Lapita文化叢陶器岩相分析來源分析交換
外文關鍵詞: Vanuatu, Makué site, Lapita cultural complex, ceramic petrography, provenance analysis, exchange
相關次數: 點閱:119下載:47
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Lapita文化叢指在1410-1290 B.C.間出現於俾斯麥群島的大洋洲史前文化,其範圍涵蓋俾斯麥群島至索羅門群島、萬那杜、新喀里多尼亞,最遠至斐濟、東加和薩摩亞。本研究的Makué遺址位於萬那杜北部的Aore島上,為目前萬那杜定年最早的遺址,同時也是Santa Cruz群島以南出土最多黑曜石的遺址。
    根據過去Makué遺址的相關研究,其黑曜石的來源最多來自俾斯麥群島的Willaumez半島,從此推測Makué遺址可能和俾斯麥群島有長距離的交換現象,並且遺址中的黑曜石的重量、大小,與Santa Cruz群島出土的十分相近,推測Makué遺址可能和Santa Cruz群島一樣,是作為遠大洋洲的黑曜石的中繼站。但透過黑曜石研究僅能了解其來源,無法知道其中的交換歷程或其他規模的交換網絡。藉著釐清Makué遺址Lapita早期的交換狀態,對於Lapita人群初期殖民萬那杜的社會網路和人群的擴散會有更進一步的認識,有助於建立萬那杜的區域考古的基礎。
    本研究以Makué遺址Lapita早期的陶器遺留作為研究對象,並著重陶器操作鍊中的「原料取得」階段進行探討,以岩相分析作為研究方法並對照地質資訊和Dickinson教授所分析的萬那杜摻和料類型,推測Makué遺址的陶器來源,藉此釐清Makué遺址在Lapita早期與對外的關係,和其交換網絡形成的因素,為Makué遺址提供不同的尺度的交換網絡,嘗試勾勒出Lapita人初期殖民萬那杜的社會樣態。
    經由岩相分析和對照當地地質資料,Makué遺址Lapita早期的陶器切片,可分為六個岩相群和一個Loner,且各岩相群中皆含有火山岩屑,符合萬那杜火山群島的地質狀況。後對照Dickinson教授的萬那杜摻和料類型特徵,得出多數陶器切片樣本皆來自Makué遺址的周遭島嶼 (Snato-Malo/Malakula),並嘗試以遺址功能特性和殖民時間推論形成此現象的原因。並根據Lapita人群的擴散路線、黑曜石研究和陶器紋飾相關研究,皆顯示Makué遺址和Santa Cruz/Reef群島有一定程度的關聯,運用目前現有Santa Cruz/Reef群島 (SZ8)的岩相資料進行比對,得出Makué遺址和Santa Cruz/Reef群島的陶器沒有交流的狀況,但目前仍需要更多Santa Cruz群島遺址的岩相資訊,才能更完善討論Makué遺址和Santa Cruz/Reef群島之間的關聯。

    This research attempts to understand the ancient Lapita society, specifically the possible movement and exchange of pottery, by examining the composition of Lapita pottery sherds. Makué site, is located on the Aore Island in northern Vanuatu. It is considered to be part of the Lapita cultural complex and has the earliest dating in Vanuatu as of now. A large quantity of obsidians (largest among all the Lapita sites in south of Santa Cruz islands) has been unearthed from Makué site and their origins could be traced back to Willaumez Peninsula, Lou island and Banks island. While the evidence of obsidians attests to the existence of long-distance exchange in the past, the routes and other information of the exchange system still elude us.
    The analytical framework of the research is based on the concept of Chaînes Opératoires with a special focus on the acquisition of raw material (temper). And using petrographic analysis of the pottery sherds from the bottom cultural layer was conducted to understand the relation between Makué and other islands in the initial phase of colonization, in order to have a better understanding of the role of Makué in the exchange system and to map out an overall picture of the ancient Lapita society.
    The provenience is demonstrated by the tempers in the thin sections samples, which match the characteristics of the volcanic bedrock of Vanuatu. And more than half of the thin sections are distinguished from islands near Aore Island by temper types of Vanuatu that analysed by Dr. Dickinson. We suggest that the Lapita people in Makué had a closer relationship with nearby islands in northern Vanuatu and much tenuous connection with southern Vanuatu or the area further to the south. Through the study of different kinds of artifact, the Lapita exchange system not a single centralization trade network, but a series of multiple networks that had different scales and dynamic.

    中文摘要 i The Provenance of Early Period Lapita Pottery in Northern Vanuatu: A Case from Makué site, Aore Island, Vanuatu ii 誌謝 ix 目錄 xi 表目錄 xiv 圖目錄 i 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 前言 1 第二節 研究旨趣 2 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 前言 4 第二節 操作鍊 (Chaînes Opératoires) 5 一、起源 5 二、操作鍊的定義和內涵 5 三、操作鍊在陶器研究上的應用 8 第三節 岩相分析 (Petrographic Analysis) 10 一、岩相分析的起源和簡史 10 二、岩相分析的操作原理 11 三、岩相分析在考古學上的應用 15 四、岩相分析於Lapita陶器上的應用 16 第四節 Lapita文化叢的交換模式 17 第五節 小結 20 第三章 研究對象 21 第一節 前言 21 第二節 Lapita文化 22 一、Lapita文化的發現和界定 22 二、Lapita文化叢的原鄉和擴散 24 三、Lapita的交換 26 四、Lapita文化陶器的意義 26 第三節 萬那杜群島 29 一、萬那杜地理與地質概況 29 二、萬那杜考古研究史 31 第四節 Makué遺址 33 一、遺址位置 33 二、Makué遺址的文化內涵 34 三、目前Makué遺址的研究成果 35 第四章 研究方法 39 第一節 陶器資料登錄 39 第二節 樣本抽樣方法 39 一、母體樣本抽樣 39 二、分類方法 40 第五章 分析與結果 43 第一節 陶片基本資料 43 第二節 分類結果 43 一、第一階段分類結果 43 二、第二階段分類結果 43 三、第三階段分類結果 45 四、小結 56 第三節 Dickinson的萬那杜摻和料分析 60 第四節 Makué遺址陶器切片和Dickinson萬那杜摻和料類型比較 65 一、第四區 (Santo-Malo-Malakula): 65 二、第五區Efate (Teuoma遺址) 69 三、第六區 (Erromango和Aneityum) 69 四、萬那杜群島的外來物—變質區礦物 69 五、其他面向的觀察 70 第五節 Makué遺址早期Lapita時期的陶器來源 72 一、「原料取得」— 黏土 72 二、「原料取得」— 摻和料 73 第六章 討論 75 第一節 前言 75 第二節 Makué遺址Lapita早期對外關係的形成因素 75 第三節 Makué遺址的交換模式 78 第四節 Santa Cruz/Reef群島(SZ8)與Makué遺址陶器之間的關係 81 第五節 小結 85 第七章 結語 86 參考文獻 89 附錄 107

    中文文獻
    王仲群
    2017 〈植物園文化之製陶技術選擇兼論縞狀陶製作〉,台北:國立台灣大學
    人類學系碩士論文
    邱斯嘉
    2011 〈太平洋史前 Lapita 陶器: 線上數位資料庫的建置與其對後期深化研
    究的效益〉,《考古人類學刊》 (75):123-157。
    2016 〈從Lapita陶器文是探討創造與維繫史前社群認同感的物質表現〉,劉
    益昌編,《台灣史前專論》,台北:聯經出版,頁429-466。
    洪瑞恬
    2019 〈索羅門群島出土 Lapita 陶器的來源與製作技術分析—以 Nendö 島
    SZ8 遺址為例〉,台北:國立台灣大學人類學系碩士論文。
    國分直一
    1942 〈澎湖島良文港に於けるる先史遺跡に就いて〉,《南方民族》6.4:50-56
    陳虹、沈辰
    2009 〈石器研究中“操作練”的概念、內涵與應用〉,《人類學學報》28(2):201-
    214。
    陳淳、沈辰、陳萬勇、湯英俊 (陳淳等人2002)
    2002 〈小長梁石工業研究〉,《人類學學報》21(1):23-40。
    曾廣策、朱云海、葉德隆 (曾廣策等人2006)
    2006 《晶體光學及光性礦物學》,武漢:中國地質大學出版社。

    陳瑪玲
    2006 〈考古學陶器化學成分分析方法的運用:以墾丁地區為例〉,《台灣人類學
    刊》4(2):1-36
    郭夢
    2013 〈操作鍊理論與陶器製作做技術研究〉,《考古》(4):96-104。
    趙怡凱
    2019 〈綠島的石器技術組織—論史前人群移動性的變化〉,台南:國立成功
    大學考古學研究所碩士論文。
    劉益昌
    2015 〈玉器的交換體系研究-製造與資源控制〉,劉益昌編,《台灣史前專論》,
    台北:聯經出版,頁83-112。
    劉瑩三、劉益昌
    2002 〈臺灣東部地區考古遺址出土玉器—預料材質來源之初步研究〉,「2002
    『台灣的考古學研究』學術研討會」,中央研究院歷史語言研究所主辦,南
    港,91年12月9-10日。
    劉瑩三
    2002 《台灣地區史前遺址出土玉器材料來源之研究》,行政院國家科學委員會委
    託國立花蓮教育大學鄉土文化研究所之研究報告。
    2003 《台灣北部地區史前遺址出土玉器材料來源之研究》,行政院國家科學委員
    會委託國立花蓮教育大學鄉土文化研究所之研究報告。
    2004 《台灣中南部地區史前遺址出土玉器材料來源之研究》,行政院國家科學委
    員會委託國立花蓮教育大學鄉土文化研究所之研究報告。
    2005 《台灣與鄰近地區閃玉礦及古玉器之地球化學特徵研究》,行政院國家科學
    委員會委託國立花蓮教育大學鄉土文化研究所之研究報告。

    鍾國風
    2014 〈祭壺器的社會生命史-阿美族東昌村的民族學調查與靜浦文化的考古
    學研究〉,台北:國立政治大學民族學系博士論文。
    臧振華
    2015 〈澎湖七美島史前玄武岩石器工業與其貿易體系〉,劉益昌編,《台灣史前
    專論》,台北:聯經出版,頁59-82。
    太平洋史前Lapita陶器線上數位資料庫
    http://lapita.rchss.sinica.edu.tw/web/。2010年上線


    英文文獻
    Allen, Jim
    1984 “In search of the Lapita Homeland: Reconsructing the prehistory of the Bismarck
    Archipelag.” The Journal of Pacific History 19(4):186-201.
    2007 “Three millennia of human and sea turtle interactions in remote Oceania. ”Coral
    Reefs 26(4): 959-970.
    Allen, Jim, and J Peter White
    1989 “The Lapita homeland: some new data and an interpretation. ”The Journal of the
    Polynesian Society 98(2):129-146.
    Ambrose, Wallace Raymond
    1975 Obsidian and its prehistoric distribution in Melanesia.
    1999 “Curves, tines, scutes and Lapita ware. ” In The Pacific from 5000 to 2000 BP:
    colonisation and transformations, edited by Galipaud Jean-Christophe and
    Lilley: 119-126
    Anson, Dimitri
    1986 “Lapita pottery of the Bismarck Archipelago and its affinities.” Archaeology in
    Oceania 21(3):157-165.
    1990 “Aspiring to paradise. Lapita Design,” Form and Composition:53-58.
    2000 “Reber-Rakival dentate-stamped motifs: documentation and comparative
    implications.” New Zealand Journal of Archaeology 20(1998):119-35.
    Anthony, David W
    1990 “Migration in archeology: the baby and the bathwater.” American
    anthropologist 92(4):895-914.
    Arnaud, Noury, and Jean-Christophe Galipaud
    2011 Les Lapita, nomades du Pacifique. IRD/orstom.
    Balfet, Hélène
    1991 Observer l'action technique: des chaînes opératoires, pour quoi faire: Editions
    du Centre national de la recherche scientifique.
    Ballard, Chris, and Bronwen Douglas
    2008 Foreign Bodies: Oceania and the Science of Race 1750-1940: ANU Press.
    Bedford, Stuart
    2007 Pieces of the Vanuatu puzzle: Archaeology of the north, south and centre.
    Volume 23: ANU Press.
    Bedford, Stuart, and Matthew Spriggs
    2019 Debating Lapita: ANU Press
    Bellwood, Peter
    1979 Man's conquestof the Pacific. Oxford University Press, New York.
    Best, Simon
    1987 “Long distance obsidian travel and possible implications for the settlement
    of Fiji.” Archaeology in Oceania 22(1):31-32.
    Bishop, Ronald L, Robert L Rands, and George R Holley
    1982 “Ceramic compositional analysis in archaeological perspective.” In Advances
    in archaeological method and theory. Pp. 275-330: Elsevier.
    Bonnemaison, J.
    1996 Arts of Vanuatu. University of Hawaii Press.
    Brézillon, Michel N
    1968 La dénomination des objets de pierre taillée.
    Claridge, G. G. C.
    1987 The ceramic clay resources of Vanuatu. Vol. 73. Committee for Co-ordination of
    Joint Prospecting for Mineral Resources in South Pacific Offshore Areas.
    Chiu, Scarlett
    2003 The Socio-economic Functions of Lapita Ceramic Production and Exchange: A
    Case Study from Site WKO-013A, Koné, New Caledonia. Volume 1: University
    of California, Berkeley.
    Courty, Marie-Agnès, and Valentine Roux
    1995 “Identification of wheel throwing on the basis of ceramic surface features
    and microfabrics.” Journal of Archaeological Science 22(1):17-50.
    Cresswell, R.
    1976 “Avant-propos.” Techniques et culture 1:5-6.
    Day, Peter M, and David E Wilson
    1998 “Consuming power: Kamares ware in protopalatial Knossos.” Antiquity
    72(276):350-358.
    Day, Peter M, David E Wilson, and Evangelia Kiriatzi
    1997 Reassessing specialization in Prepalatial Cretan ceramic production.
    Den Hartog, Deanne N, et al.
    1999 “Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership
    theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally
    endorsed”. The leadership quarterly 10(2):219-256.
    Desrosiers, Pierre M
    2007 “Palaeoeskimo lithic technology: constraints and adaptation.”Lithic
    Technology 32(1):17-38.
    Dickinson, William R
    1998 “Petrographic temper provinces of prehistoric pottery in Oceania.” RECORDS-
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 50:263-276.
    2006 Temper sands in prehistoric Oceanian pottery: geotectonics, sedimentology, petrography, provenance. Volume 406: Geological Society of America.
    Dickinson, William R, Stuart Bedford, and Matthew Spriggs
    2013 “Petrography of temper sands in 112 reconstructed Lapita pottery vessels
    from Teouma (Efate): Archaeological implications and relations to other
    Vanuatu tempers.” Journal of Pacific Archaeology 4(2):1-20.
    Dickinson, William R, and Richard Shutler Jr
    1968 “Insular sand tempers of prehistoric pottery from the southwest Pacific.”
    Prehistoric culture in Oceania:29-37.
    1971 “Temper sands in prehistoric pottery of the Pacific islands.” Archaeology &
    Physical Anthropology in Oceania 6(3):191-203.
    1979 “Petrography of sand tempers in Pacific Islands potsherds.” Geological
    Society of America Bulletin 90(11_Part_II):1644-1701.
    Deane W
    1921 Fijian society. MacMillian and Co, London
    Dye, T., and Steadman, D. W.
    1990 “Polynesian ancestors and their animal world.” American Scientist 78(3): 207-
    215.
    Felts, Wayne M
    1942 “A Petrographic examination of potsherds from Ancient Troy.” American
    Journal of Archaeology 46(2):237-244.
    Fouqué, Ferdinand
    1879 Santorin et ses éruptions: G. Masson.
    Freestone, Ian C
    1995 “The petrographic examination of ceramics.” AM J Archaeol 99(1):111-115.

    Galipaud, Jean-Christophe
    1996 “Pottery and potters of Vanuatu.” Arts of Vanuatu: 94-99.
    1998 “The Lapita site of Atanoasao, Malo, Vanuatu.” World Archaeological Bulletin
    12: 41-55.
    2011 “The prehistory of Santo.” The Natural History of Santo, Muséum national
    d'histoire naturelle 469-475.
    Galipaud, Jean-Christophe and Scarlett Chiu
    2015 “Lapita styles and occupation history: the Makué Lapita design assemblage and
    its affinities”, paper presented at The Eighth Lapita Conference, Port Vila,
    Vanuatu: The College of Arts and Social Sciences, The Australian National
    University and the Vanuatu Cultural Centre, 2015-07-05 ~ 2015-07-10.
    Galipaud, Jean-Christophe, and Mary Clare Swete Kelly
    2007a “Makué (Aore Island, Santo, Vanuatu): A new Lapita site in the ambit of New
    Britain obsidian distribution.” Oceanic Explorations: Lapita and Western Pacific
    Settlement 26:51.
    2007b “New evidence relating to the transport of obsidian from New Britain to
    Vanuatu.” Antiquity 81(312).
    Galipaud, Jean‐Christophe, et al.
    2014 “Long‐distance connections in Vanuatu: New obsidian characterisations for
    the Makué site, Aore Island.” Archaeology in Oceania 49(2):110-116.
    Geneste, J-M
    1991 Systèmes techniques de production lithique: variations techno-économiques dans
    les processus de réalisation des outillages paléolithiques. Techniques & culture
    (17-18):1-35.

    Golson, Jack
    1959 L'archéologie du Pacifique sud: résultats et perspectives.
    1961 “D. Report on New Zealand, Western Polynesia, New Caledonia, and Fiji.”
    Asian Perspectives 5(2):166-180.
    1971 “Both sides of the Wallace line: Australia, New Guinea, and Asian prehistory.”
    Archaeology & Physical Anthropology in Oceania 6(2):124-144.
    Goodenough, W
    1982 “Ban Chiang in world ethnological perspective.” Ban Chiang: Discovery of a
    Lost Bronze Age, Philadelphia:52-53.
    Green, Roger C
    1978 New sites with Lapita pottery: and their implications for an understanding
    of the settlement of the western Pacific: University of Auckland, Department of
    Anthropology.
    1979 Lapita. The Prehistory of Polynesia, J. Jennings Ed: Harvard University Press.
    1985 An Interpretation of Source Allocations for Obsidian from Three Lapita Sites in
    the Reef and Santa Cruz Island Group, Southeast Solomons.Manuscript on file at
    the Dep. of Anthropology, University of Auckland.
    1987 “Obsidian results from the Lapita sites of the Reef/Santa Cruz Islands.”
    Archaeometry: further Australasian studies:239-249.
    2000 “Lapita and the cultural model for intrusion, integration and innovation.”
    Australian archaeologist: collected papers in honour of Jim Allen:372-392.
    Green, Roger C, and Patrick V Kirch
    1997 “Lapita exchange systems and their Polynesian transformations: Seeking
    explanatory models.” Prehistoric long-distance interaction in Oceania: an
    interdisciplinary approach:19-37.
    Hamer, Frank, and Janet Hamer
    2004 The potter's dictionary of materials and techniques: University of Pennsylvania
    Press.
    Hickey, F. R., and Petro, G.
    2005 Documentation of Wan Smolbag’s Vanua-tai Resource Monitors Program in
    Vanuatu. Unpublished report.
    Hung, Hsian-chun
    2005 “Neolithic Interaction between Taiwan and Northern Luzon: The pottery and
    Jade Evidences from the Cagayan Vally.”南島研究學報,1(1), 109-133.
    2008 Migration and cultural interaction in southern coastal China, Taiwan and the
    northern Philippines, 3000 BC to AD 100: the early history of the Austronesian-
    speaking populations. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.
    Huffman, K.
    1996 “Trading, cultural exchange and copyright: Important aspects of Vanuatu arts.”
    Arts of Vanuatu, 182-194.
    Hunt, T. L.
    1989 Lapita Ceramic Exchange in the Mussau Islands, Papua New Guinea. PhD
    dissertation, University of Washington.
    Kerr, Paul F
    1977 Optical mineralogy 4th ed: New York: Mc-Graw Hill.
    Kirch, Patrick V
    1987 “Lapita and Oceanic Cultural Origins: Excavations in the Mussau Islands,
    Bismarck Archipelago, 1985.” Journal of Field Archaeology 14(2): 163-180.
    1988a “Long-Distance Exchange and Island Colonization: The Lapita Case.” Norwegian
    Archaeological Review 21(2): 103-117.
    1988b Niuatoputapu. The Prehistory of a Polynesian Chiefdom. Thomas Burke
    Memorial Washington State Museum Monograph No.5. Seattle: Burke Museum.
    1989 “Second millennium BC arboriculture in Melanesia: Archaeological evidence
    from the Mussau Islands.” Economic Botany 43(2):225-240.
    1990 “Specialization and Exchange in the Lapita Complex of Oceania (1600-500 B.
    C.).” Asian Perspectives 29(2): 117-133.
    1991 “Prehistoric Exchange in Western Melanesia.” Annual Review of Anthropology 20(1): 141-165.
    1997 The Lapita peoples: ancestors of the oceanic world. The Peoples of South-East
    Asia and the Pacific: Cambridge: Blackwell.
    2001 “Three Lapita villages: Excavations at Talepakemalai (ECA), Etakosarai (ECB),
    and Etapakengaroasa (EHB), Eloaua and Emananus Islands.” Lapita and its
    transformations in near Oceania: 68-145.
    2017 On the road of the winds: an archaeological history of the Pacific Islands
    before European contact: Univ of California Press.
    Kirch, P. V., and Hunt, T. L.
    1988. “Radiocarbon dates from the Mussau Islands and the Lapita colonization of the
    southwestern Pacific.” Radiocarbon 30(2), 161-169
    Kirch, P. V., and Yen, D. E.
    1982 “Tikopia. The prehistory and ecology of a Polynesian outlier.”Bernice P. Bishop
    Museum Bulletin Honolulu (238): 1-396
    Latour, Bruno, and Pierre Lemonnier
    1994 “Introduction: Genèse sociale des techniques, genèse technique des humains”.
    De la préhistoire aux missiles balistiques: L’intelligence sociale des techniques.
    Paris, la Découverte.
    Leclerc, M.
    2020 “The natural variability of clay and its impact on provenance study of
    pottery in Vanuatu and further afield.”Geoarchaeology 35(4): 562-590.
    Lemonnier, Pierre
    1976 “La description des chaînes opératoires: contribution à l’analyse des systèmes
    techniques.” Techniques et culture 1(1).
    1993 “Introduction to Technological choices: Transformation in Material Cultures
    since the Neolithic.” Technological Choices: Transformations in Material
    Cultures Since the Neolitic:1-35.
    2016 Mundane objects: Materiality and non-verbal communication: Routledge.
    Leroi-Gourhan, André
    1964 Les religions de la préhistoire: paléolithique. Volume 51: Presses univ. de
    France.
    Livingstone-Smith, Alexandre, Dominique Bosquet, and Rémi Martineau
    2005 Pottery Manufacturing Processes: Reconstitution and Interpretation: Actes
    Du XIVème Congrès UISPP, Université de Liège, Belgique, 2-8 Septembre
    2001 Archaeometry; Pottery Manufacturing Processess: Archaeopress.
    Iizuka, Y., and Hung, H. C.
    2005 “Archaeomineralogy of Taiwan nephrite: Sourcing study of nephritic artifacts
    from the Philippines.”南島研究學報,1(1), 35-81.
    Yoshiyuki Iizuka, Peter Bellwood, Hsiao-Chun Hung, and Eusebio Z. Dizon (Iizuka en al.)
    2005 “A Non-destructive Mineralogical Study of Nephritic Artifacts from Itbayat
    Island, Batanes, northern Philippines.”南島研究學報,1(1),80-105.
    MacKenzie, William Scott, Anthony E Adams, and Katharine H Brodie
    2017 Rocks and Minerals in Thin Section: A Colour Atlas: CRC Press.
    Malinowski, B.
    2020[1922] Argonauts of the western Pacific. BoD–Books on Demand.
    Martineau, Rémi
    2001 “Identification of the" beater and anvil" technique in neolithic contexts:
    experimental approach: na.
    Matson, Frederick R
    1942 “Technological ceramic studies.” College Art Journal 1(2):25-28.
    Mauss, Marcel
    1954 The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic society. London:
    Cohen & West.
    Mead, Sidney M, et al.
    1975 “The decorative system of the Lapita potters of Sigatoka, Fiji.” The Lapita
    pottery style of Fiji and its associations:19-43.
    Munn, Nancy D
    1970 The transformation of subjects into objects in Walbiri and Pitjantjatjara myth:
    University of Western Australia Press Perth, Australia.
    Nordenskiöld, Gustaf, and Derec Llwyd Morgan
    1893 Ruiner af klippboninger i Mesa Verde's cañons. English.
    Peacock, DPS
    1969 “Neolithic pottery production in Cornwall.” Antiquity 43(170):145-149.
    Pelegrin, Jacques
    1990 “Prehistoric lithic technology: some aspects of research.” Archaeological
    review from Cambridge 9(1):116-125.
    Pelegrin, Jacques, Claudine Karlin, and Pierre Bodu
    1988 “Chaînes opératoires: un outil pour le préhistorien.” Technologie
    préhistorique 25:55-62.

    Petro, G., Hickey, F. R., and Mackay, K.
    2007 “Leatherback turtles in Vanuatu.”Chelonian Conservation and Biology 6(1), 135-
    137.
    Pfaffenberger, Bryan
    1992 “Social anthropology of technology.” Annual review of Anthropology
    21(1):491-516.
    Quinn, Patrick Sean
    2013 Ceramic petrography: the interpretation of archaeological pottery & related
    artefacts in thin section: Archaeopress.
    Rice, Prudence M
    2015 Pottery analysis: a sourcebook: University of Chicago Press.
    Riley, JA
    1983 “The contribution of ceramic petrology to our understanding of Minoan society.”
    IN KRZYSZKOWSKA, O. & NIXON, L.(Eds.) Minoan Society: Proceedings of
    the Cambridge Colloquium 1981: Bristol, Bristol Classical Press.
    Rolett BV
    1986 “Turtles, priests, and the afterworld: a study in the iconographic interpretation of
    Polynesian petroglyphs.” In: Kirch PV (ed) Island societies: archaeological
    approaches to evolution and transformation. Cambridge University Press,
    Cambridge, pp 78–87
    Roux, Valentine
    2016 “Ceramic manufacture: the chaîne opératoire approach.” Oxford Handbook
    of Archaeological Ceramic Analysis:101-113.
    Rye, Owen S
    1981 Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Volume 4: Taraxacum.
    Santacreu, Daniel Albero
    2014 Materiality, techniques and society in pottery production: the technological
    study of archaeological ceramics through paste analysis: Walter de Gruyter
    GmbH & Co KG.
    Sand, Christophe
    2007 “Looking at the big motifs: a typology of the central band decorations of the
    Lapita ceramic tradition of New Caledonia (Southern Melanesia) and
    preliminary regional comparisons.” In Oceanic explorations: Lapita and
    western Pacific settlement. Pp. 265-287: ANU E Press Canberra.
    Sellers, George Escol
    1886 Observations on stone-chipping: Smithsonian institution.
    Sellet, Frederic
    1993 “Chaîne opératoire; the concept and its applications.” Lithic technology 18(1-
    2):106-112.
    Shepard, Anna Osler
    1942 Rio Grande glaze paint ware: a study illustrating the place of ceramic
    technological analysis in archaeological research: na.
    Sheppard, Peter J
    1993 “Lapita lithics: trade/exchange and technology. A view from the Reefs/Santa
    Cruz.” Archaeology in Oceania 28(3):121-137.
    Sheppard, Peter J, Scarlett Chiu, and Richard Walter
    2015 “Re-dating Lapita movement into remote Oceania.” Journal of Pacific
    Archaeology 6(1):26-36.
    Shutler, M. E.
    1971 “Pottery making in Espiritu Santo.”Asian Perspectives 14, 81-83.
    Shutler, Mary E, Richard Shutler Jr, and Stuart Bedford
    2002 “Further detail on the archaeological explorations in the Southern New Hebrides,
    1963–1964.” Fifty Years in the Field: Essays in Honour and Celebration of
    Richard Shutler Jr’s Archaeological Career:189-206.
    Sillar, Bill, and Michael S Tite
    2000 “The challenge of 'technological choices' for materials science approaches in
    aechaeology.” Archaeometry 42(1):2-20.
    Sorby, Henry Clifton
    1851 “On the microscopical structure of the Calcareous Grit of the Yorkshire Coast.”
    Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 7(1-2):1-6.
    Soressi, Marie, and Jean-Michel Geneste
    2011 “The history and efficacy of the chaîne opératoire approach to lithic analysis:
    studying techniques to reveal past societies in an evolutionary perspective.”
    PaleoAnthropology :334-350.
    Specht, Jim
    2002 “Obsidian, colonising and exchange.” Fifty years in the field. Essays in Honour
    and celebration of Richard Shutler Jr’s Archaeological Career:37-49.
    2007 “Small islands in the big picture: The formative period of Lapita in the
    Bismarck Archipelago.”Oceanic Explorations:1-19.
    Speiser, Felix
    1996 Ethnology of Vanuatu: an early twentieth century study: University of Hawaii
    Press.
    Spriggs, Matthew
    1996 “What is southeast Asian about Lapita.” Prehistoric mongoloid dispersals:324-
    48.
    Spriggs, Matthew, PJC Dark, and RG Rose
    1993 “How much of the Lapita design system represents the human face.” Artistic
    heritage in a changing Pacific:7-14.
    Summerhayes, Glenn R
    2003 “Modelling differences between Lapita obsidian and pottery distribution patterns
    in the Bismarck Archipelago, Papua New Guinea.” Pacific Archaeology:
    Assessments and Prospects, 135-145.
    2009 “Obsidian network patterns in Melanesia-sources, characterisation and
    distribution.” Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 29:109-123.
    2015 “Trade and exchange, archaeology of trade and exchange.” International
    Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 2: 481-4.
    Su, Yu-yin
    2016 The Investigation of Pottery Technological Reconstruction and Correlation
    Between Decoration and Manufacture in Lapita Site SZ8. Master Thesis.
    Deprtmant of Archaeology, University of Sheffield.
    Terrell, J. E. and Schechter, E. M.
    2007 “Deciphering the Lapita code: the Aitape ceramic sequence and late survival of
    the'Lapita face'.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17(1): 59.
    Thomas, N.
    1990 Marquesan societies: Inequality and political transformation in eastern
    Polynesia. Oxford University Press on Demand.
    Tixier, Jacques
    1978 Méthode pour l’étude des outillages lithiques. Unpublished Doctoral
    Dissertation. Université de Paris X.
    1979 Préhistoire et technologie lithique: journées du 11-12-13 mai 1979 : Ed. du
    Centre national de la recherche scientifique.
    Tixier, Jacques, and Marie-Louise Inizian
    1980 Préhistoire de la pierre taillée. 1. Terminologie et technologie.
    Torres, Marcos Martinón
    2002 “Chaîne Opératoire: The concept and its aplications within the study of
    technology.” Gallaecia (21):29-44.
    Walter, Richard, and Peter Sheppard
    2017 Archaeology of the Solomon Islands. Honolulu : University of Hawaiʻi Press
    Walsh, Kevin L, and Alessandro Da Mommio
    2013 History and recent developments in the visual presentation of optical
    microscopy.
    Whitbread, IK
    1996 “Detection and interpretation of preferred orientation in ceramic thin sections.”
    Imaging the Past:173-181.
    Williams, David F
    1983 “Petrology of ceramics.” In The petrology of archaeological artefacts. Pp. 301-
    323.
    Woods, A
    1985 “An introductory note on the use of tangential thin sections for distinguishing
    between wheel-thrown and coil ring-built vessels.” Bulletin of the Experimental Firing Group 3:100-114.

    下載圖示 校內:2021-08-30公開
    校外:2021-08-30公開
    QR CODE