因應綠能環保浪潮興起，政府原先訂下2035年禁售燃油機車政策，展現推展交通綠能化之決心；而後在與各家機車廠商斡旋後決議暫緩，改以鼓勵方式推廣電動機車之發展。在現今快速變動步調下，企業不能再僅提供顧客單一商品及服務；應該針對顧客需求及痛點，提供一整套解決方案。對於企業來說，形塑屬於自己的生態系統得以整合所有利害關係人之能力及資源，並在彼此協作下共創出最大價值，以提供顧客更全面性之解決方案，且企業也應以生態系統觀點取代單一產業觀點進行策略思考。本研究主要以「光陽」為個案研究對象，研究目的旨在以價值共創理論觀點，探討綠能電動機車生態系統之形塑實務狀況，以及價值主張如何作為串連所有利害關係人之核心，使得所有參與者之價值創造對整個系統產生價值，進而形塑出生態系統雛型，以做為未來相關研究參考。
本研究將透過質性研究之單一個案研究法，並以「光陽」為研究標的，藉由「生態系統」、「價值共創」、「價值主張」以及「治理機制」之理論基礎，配合實際訪談以及大量次級資料分析「光陽綠能電動機車生態系統」之形塑過程。
根據本研究結果發現，生態系統中參與者彼此間互動產生並不容易，中心企業應精準掌握個別利害關係人之知識及能力，刺激參與者在互動時追求自利同時形成互利並培養系統集體性，居中擔任「指揮家」角色協助彼此交流，整合個別參與者之互補能力，建置出屬於自己的生態系統。

In response to the rise of green energy environmental protection, the government initially set a policy of prohibiting the sale of fuel scooters in 2035. However, after mediation with various scooter manufacturers, the decision was made to suspend the policy and changed to encourage the development of electric scooters. With the rapid pace of change, companies should provide a complete set of solutions based on customer needs instead of a single product and service. For enterprises, shaping their own ecosystem can integrate the capabilities and resources of all actors and create maximum value in collaboration. Companies should also use an ecosystem perspective to replace a single industry perspective for strategic thinking. The purposes of the research are to explore the practical status of shaping the ecosystem from the theoretical point of view of value co-creation, and how value proposition serves as the link of all actors. It enables the value creation of all actors to generate co-value for the entire system, and then shapes the prototype of the ecosystem.

This research takes qualitative research methods with a single case: Kymco. Based on the theoretical basis of "ecosystem", "value co-creation", "value proposition" and "governance mechanism", the reseach analyzes the shaping process of the "Kymco Green Electric Vehicle Ecosystem".

The result of the research explains that it is not easy for actors in the ecosystem to interact, so hub should accurately grasp the knowledge and capabilities of individual actors and stimulate them to pursue self-interest while forming mutual benefits and fostering the collectiveness of the system. Hub should play the role of "orchestrator" to help actors communicate with each other, integrate the complementary capabilities of individual actors, and build their own ecosystem.

中文參考文獻
John Roach（民103年4月23日）。地球日：世界地球日的由來。國家地理雜誌中文網。民108年9月5日，取自：https://www.natgeomedia.com/environment/article/content-5992.html
Michael G. Jacobides（民108年9月）。迎接生態系統經濟，企業有何策略？哈佛商業評論。民109年1月20日。
姜善鑫（民80年）。台灣的暴雨洪水。防災科技通訊，第9卷第4期，49-53。民108年9月5日，取自：http://gis.geo.ncu.edu.tw/gis/globalc/CHAP14.html
陳明哲（民102年3月1日）。商業生態系統：超越產業疆界的競爭。哈佛商業評論。民109年4月28日，取自：https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0002281.html
方世杰、李慶芳（民106年4月28日）。價值共創的三要件：互信、互動、互惠。價值共創社群（VCC）社群。民108年10月2日，取自：http://teamwork0035.blogspot.com/2017/04/blog-post.html
方世杰（民105年4月14日）。價值共創的五個思維邏輯。價值共創社群（VCC）社群。民108年10月2日，取自：http://teamwork0035.blogspot.com/2016/04/blog-post_14.html
方世杰、李慶芳（民105年4月14日）。釐清「價值共創」的三個質問。價值共創社群（VCC）社群。民108年10月3日，取自：http://teamwork0035.blogspot.com/2016/04/blog-post.html
方世杰（民105年4月14日）。價值為基礎的策略觀(VBS, Value_Based Strategic Perspetive) 。價值共創社群（VCC）社群。民108年10月3日，取自：http://teamwork0035.blogspot.com/2016/04/vbs-valuebased-strategic-perspetive.html
方世杰、李慶芳（民105年4月14日）。「價值共創模式」之運作。價值共創社群（VCC）社群。民108年10月3日，取自：http://teamwork0035.blogspot.com/2016/04/blog-post_73.html
李慶芳（民106年8月9日）。價值共創價值的三個概念：使用價值、共同決定、經常互動。價值共創社群（VCC）社群。民108年10月3日，取自：http://teamwork0035.blogspot.com/2017/08/blog-post_9.html
方世杰（民109年2月6日）。價值共創的迷思與省思。金屬情報網MII大師與智庫專欄。民109年3月2日。
方世杰（民109年4月7日）。生態系統的概念與實務意涵。金屬情報網MII大師與智庫專欄。民109年4月28日。

 
英文參考文獻
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 625-648.
Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A., & Van Rossum, W. (2006). Customer value propositions in business markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 90.
Boudreau, K. J. (2012). Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1409-1427.
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! The case of enterprise software. MIS quarterly, 263-290.
Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. (2013). Platform competition: Strategic trade‐offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11), 1331-1350.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92.
Fjeldstad, Ø. D., Snow, C. C., Miles, R. E., & Lettl, C. (2012). The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 734-750.
Frow, P., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Hilton, T., Davidson, A., Payne, A., & Brozovic, D. (2014). Value propositions: A service ecosystems perspective. Marketing theory, 14(3), 327-351.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation (Vol. 5): Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA.
Gouillart, F., & Billings, D. (2013). Community-powered problem solving. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 70-77, 140.
Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1977). Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3(2), 115-151.
Hagel, J., & Brown, J. S. (2005). The only sustainable edge: Why business strategy depends on productive friction and dynamic specialization: Harvard Business Press.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004a). The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability: Harvard Business Press.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004b). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68-78, 126.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276. doi:10.1002/smj.2904
Kapoor, R. (2018). Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1). doi:10.1186/s41469-018-0035-4
Kotler, P., & Gertner, D. (2002). Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of brand management, 9(4), 249-261.
Kowalkowski, C., Persson Ridell, O., Röndell, J. G., & Sörhammar, D. (2012). The co-creative practice of forming a value proposition. Journal of marketing management, 28(13-14), 1553-1570.
Lanning, M. J., & Michaels, E. G. (1988). A business is a value delivery system. McKinsey staff paper, 41(July).
Leclercq, T., Hammedi, W., & Poncin, I. (2016). Ten years of value cocreation: An integrative review. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 31(3), 26-60.
McAllister, M., Payne, K., MacLeod, R., Nicholls, S., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. (2008). Patient empowerment in clinical genetics services. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(7), 895-905.
Messerschmitt, D. G., & Szyperski, C. (2003). Software Ecosystem: Understanding an Indispensable Technology and Industry (Chapter 6: Organization of the Software Value Chain. In: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 75–86.
Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems: HarperBusiness New York.
Myers, J. L., Well, A. D., & Lorch Jr, R. F. (2013). Research design and statistical analysis: Routledge.
Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. (1994). Designing Interactive Strategy: From Value Chain to Value Constellation, Chichester-New York, Wiley.
Payne, A. (2014). Developing superior value propositions: a strategic marketing imperative. Journal of Service Management, 25(2), 213-227. doi:10.1108/JOSM-01-2014-0036
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2003). The new frontier of experience innovation. MIT Sloan management review, 44(4), 12.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004a). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004b). Co‐creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
Ramaswamy, V., & Gouillart, F. (2010). Building the co-creative enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 88(10), 100-109.
Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284-307.
Teece, D. (2014). Business ecosystems. Entry in. In (Vol. 10): DOI.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Research commentary—Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Information systems research, 21(4), 748-759.
Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 54-62.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). The four service marketing myths: remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. Journal of service research, 6(4), 324-335.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2010). From repeat patronage to value co-creation in service ecosystems: a transcending conceptualization of relationship. Journal of Business Market Management, 4(4), 169-179.
Wareham, J., Bjørn‐Andersen, N., & Neergaard, P. (1998). Reinterpreting the demise of hierarchy: a case study in information technology, empowerment and incomplete contracts. Information Systems Journal, 8(4), 257-272.
Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195-1215.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York, 2630.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation practice, 15(3), 283-290.