簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 卓昱綸
Cho, Yu-Lun
論文名稱: 審計委員會設置動機對於盈餘管理之長期影響
The Long-Term Impact of the Audit Committee's Forming Motivation on Earnings Management
指導教授: 林囿成
Lin, Yu-Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accountancy
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 68
中文關鍵詞: 審計委員會設置動機長期研究盈餘品質
外文關鍵詞: Audit committee, Forming motivation, Long-term research, Earnings quality
相關次數: 點閱:94下載:24
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要係探討審計委員會及其設置動機對於盈餘管理行為之長期影響。此外,本研究亦針對審計委員會運作品質,探討各類運作品質是否因設置年數或設置動機而改變對於盈餘管理之影響。
    本研究採用我國2004年至2019年排除金融業之上市櫃公司為全部樣本,於假說一檢視設置審計委員會與否對於盈餘管理之影響,結果顯示有設置審計委員會之公司相較於無設置者,更能抑制盈餘管理,此結果與先前研究結果一致(Dechow et al.,1996;McMullen,1996;許文馨,2014)。接著於假說二分別針對有設置審計委員會之樣本及設置審計委員會以後之樣本,檢視審計委員會設置年數對於盈餘管理之影響。結果顯示,設置審計委員會以後相較於設置前更能抑制盈餘管理,且隨著設置年數增加,相較於設置前期更能抑制盈餘管理,顯示審計委員會隨著設置時間越長,將持續增進監管效益。然而於假說三,本研究發現僅有自願設置審計委員會之公司會隨著設置年數增加持續強化抑制盈餘管理之能力,相較之下,強制設置審計委員會之公司則無持續進步之效果。於假說四亦發現自願設置審計委員會之公司,相較於強制設置者,更能夠透過提升部分運作品質以增進監管效力。
    本研究透過檢視審計委員會設置動機差異對於盈餘管理之長期影響趨勢,發現自願設置之審計委員會能夠隨著設置年數增加持續增進監管能力,相較於強制設置之審計委員會更有能力持續強化公司治理效益,亦更符合金管會之期許,因此本研究建議金管會應以鼓勵自願設置之方式推動審計委員會制度。

    The primary purpose of this study is to inspect the long-term effects of audit committee’s forming motivation on earnings management. Moreover, this study also investigates the association between the audit committee’s operating quality and earnings quality, taking the forming year and forming motivation into consideration.
    This study first examines the effects of the audit committee’s establishment on earnings management, using the sample of all the listed companies in the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE) in the period of 2004-2019. The result shows that audit committees can reduce earnings management, which is consistent with prior research (Dechow et al., 1996; McMullen, 1996; Hsu, 2014). This study also considers the effect of forming year, and the result shows that audit committees will keep strengthening the skill of reducing earnings management as time goes on. While including the effect of the forming motivation, this study discovers that the contribution of improvement only lies in the category of voluntary formation. In the mandatory formation category, however, audit committees do not have the ability to keep improving their monitoring skill. This study also observes that audit committees in voluntary formation, compared with those in mandatory formation, restrain earnings management by increasing the operating quality of the audit committee.
    Overall, the results suggest that voluntary formation performs better at enhancing corporate governance in the long-term period. As a result, this study suggests that FSC should promote the audit committee system through voluntary formation instead of mandatory formation.

    摘要 I 誌謝 VI 目錄 VII 表目錄 IX 圖目錄 X 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 1 第貳章 文獻探討及假說建立 3 第一節 我國審計委員會相關法規歷程 3 第二節 文獻探討與假說建立 4 (一) 設置審計委員會與盈餘品質 4 (二) 審計委員會設置年數對盈餘管理之影響 6 (三) 審計委員會設置動機對盈餘管理之影響 7 (四) 審計委員會運作品質對盈餘管理之影響 9 第參章 研究設計 12 第一節 樣本選取 12 第二節 應變數—盈餘品質之衡量 13 第三節 主要自變數之衡量 14 (一) 審計委員會設置與否(ACit) 14 (二) 審計委員會設置年數長短(LONGTERMit) 15 (三) 審計委員會設置動機(VOLUNi) 15 (四) 審計委員會運作品質 16 第四節 控制變數之衡量 17 第五節 模型建立 19 (一) 假說一:探討設置審計委員會對於盈餘品質之影響 19 (二) 假說二:探討審計委員會設置年數對於盈餘品質之影響 19 (三) 假說三:探討審計委員會設置動機對於盈餘品質之影響 19 (四) 假說四:探討審計委員會運作品質對於盈餘品質之影響 20 第肆章 實證結果 22 第一節 敘述性統計 22 第二節 相關係數分析 30 第三節 迴歸分析 36 (一) 假說一之迴歸分析 36 (二) 假說二之迴歸分析 36 (三) 假說三之迴歸分析 40 (四) 假說四之迴歸分析 46 第伍章 結論與建議 60 第一節 結論 60 第二節 研究限制與建議 61 參考文獻 63

    李建然、廖秀梅與蔡佳育,2016,上市櫃公司自願設置審計委員會及審計委員會品質之決定因素,當代會計,第17卷第1期:1-34。
    林以玄,2019,審計委員會的設置及運作品質是否能提升盈餘的品質—從自結損益與會計師損益查核數探討,國立台北大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    袁銳,2016,設置審計委員會對盈餘管理影響之探討,國立臺灣大學會計研究所學位論文。
    許文馨,2014,審計委員會是否較監察人更能提升盈餘品質,臺大管理論叢,第24卷第S1期:203-232。
    陳逸仲,2009,審計委員會與資訊透明度、財務報導品質與股價反應之探討,國立成功大學會計研究所學位論文。
    張瑀珊與張懷源,2018,金融業設置審計委員會之必要性?兼論審計委員會之特性影響,當代會計,第19卷第2期:139-173。
    葉銀華與李存修,2003,台灣之獨立董監制度的改革-政策性建議,會計研究月刊,第213期:66-85。
    葉銀華與林志豪,2014,上市櫃公司要設置審計委員會?審計委員會與盈餘管理之研究,輔仁管理評論,第21卷第3期:1-22。
    葉庭佳,2016,強制設置審計委員會之實質功效研究-以盈餘品質與公司績效分析,國立高雄應用科技大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    蘇裕惠、楊孟萍與許聖偉,2018,公司增加獨立董事席次及設置審計委員會與盈餘品質之研究-法規擴大強制範圍之影響,當代會計,第19卷第2期:241-268。
    Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., and G. F. Peters. 2004. Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 69–87.
    Abdul Rahman, R. and F. Haneem Mohamed Ali. 2006. Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal 21 (7):783-804.
    Anand, A. I., Milne, F., and L. D. Purda. 2006. An Analysis of Enabling vs. Mandatory Corporate Governance post Sarbanes-Oxley. The Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 31 (1):229-252.
    Bartov, E., Gul, F. A., and J. S. L. Tsui. 2000. Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (3): 421–452.
    Baxter, P. and J. Cotter. 2009. Audit committees and earnings quality. Accounting and Finance 49 (1):267-290.
    Beasley, M. S. 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review 71 (4):443-465.
    Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (1):1-24.
    Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC). 1999. Report and Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees. The Business Lawyer 54 (3): 1067-1095.
    Bradbury, M., Mak, Y. T., and S. M. Tan. 2006. Board Characteristics, Audit Committee Characteristics and Abnormal Accruals. Pacific Accounting Review 18 (2):47-68.
    Burgstahler, D. and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 99–126.
    Chiu, P. C., Teoh, S. H., and F. Tian. 2013. Board Interlocks and Earnings Management Contagion. The Accounting Review 88 (3):915-944.
    Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulations: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (1):1–36.
    Defond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1-2): 145-176.
    De Vlaminck, N. and G. Sarens. 2015. The relationship between audit committee characteristics and financial statement quality: evidence from Belgium. Journal of Management & Governance 19 (1):145–166.
    Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2):301-325.
    Ghafran, C. and N. O’Sullivan. 2013. The Governance Role of Audit Committees: Reviewing a Decade of Evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews 15 (4):381–407.
    Ghosh, A., Marra, A., and D. Moon. 2010. Corporate Boards, Audit Committees, and Earnings Management: Pre- and Post- SOX Evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 37 (9-10):1145-1176.
    Hribar, P. and D. Nichols. 2007. The use of unsigned earnings quality measures in tests of earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (5): 1017-1053.
    Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4):305-360.
    Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (2):193-228.
    Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1): 163–197.
    Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review 80 (2):649-675.
    Lin, J. W., Li, J. F., and J. S. Yang. 2006. The effect of audit committee performance on earnings quality. Managerial Auditing Journal 21 (9):921-933.
    McMullen, D. 1996. Audit committee performance: an investigation of the consequences associated with audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 15 (1): 87–103.
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1999. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. OECD Report.
    Park, B. J. 2019. Audit Committees and Managerial Influence on Audit Quality: ‘Voluntary’ versus ‘Mandatory’ Approach to Corporate Governance. Australian Accounting Review 29 (1):266-280.
    Petroni, K. and M. Beasley. 1996. Errors in Accounting Estimates and Their Relation to Audit Firm Type. Journal of Accounting Research 34 (1):151-171.
    Qamhan, M. A., Che Haat, M. H., Hashim, H. A., and Z. Salleh. 2018. Earnings management: do attendance and changes of audit committee members matter? Managerial Auditing Journal 33 (8/9):760-778.
    Rajan, R. G. and L. Zingales. 1998. Which Capitalism? Lessons from the Last East Asian Crisis. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 11 (3):40-48.
    Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2003. Standards Relating to Listed Company Audit Committees Final Rule, Release No. 33-8220.
    Sharma, V. D. and E. R. Iselin. 2012. The Association between Audit Committee Multiple-Directorships, Tenure, and Financial Misstatements. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31 (3): 149–175.
    Tanyi, P. N. and D. B. Smith. 2015. Busyness, Expertise, and Financial Reporting Quality of Audit Committee Chairs and Financial Experts. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 34 (2): 59–89.
    Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance:the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9 (3):295–316.
    Yang, J. S. and J. Krishnan. 2005. Audit Committees and Quarterly Earnings Management. International Journal of Auditing 9 (3):201-219.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE