| 研究生: |
陳詩文 Chen, Shi-Wen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
掃描離子電導顯微鏡於鑑別異質表面電荷分布之應用 Characterize Surface Charges with Heterogeneous Distributions Using Pulse Mode Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy |
| 指導教授: |
陳巧貞
Chen, Chiao-Chen |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
理學院 - 化學系 Department of Chemistry |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 148 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 掃描式離子電導顯微鏡 、3-氨基丙基三乙氧基矽烷(APTES) 、11-硫醇-1-十一醇(MCU) 、11-硫基十一烷酸(MUA) 、4-氨基苯硫酚(PATP) 、自組裝單分子層(SAM) 、異質表面電荷 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | SICM, APTES, MCU, MUA, PATP, SAM, heterogeneously charged surface |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:166 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
掃描離子電導顯微鏡(scanning ion conductance microscopy,SICM)為一種掃描式探針顯微技術(scanning probe microscopy,SPM),使用奈米滴管作為掃描探針,能夠在完全不接觸材料的條件下,對表面進行形貌掃描取得表面結構,採用跳躍回饋模式(hopping mode)進行掃描時,可以防止探針在快速掃描下,觸碰到有著劇烈形貌變化的表面而導致表面損傷。影響界面平衡、表面反應的要素除了材料表面的組成與結構外,表面自身的電荷密度亦扮演重要角色,本實驗使用脈衝式SICM(pulse-mode SICM)對於具有異質電荷密度的材料表面進行掃描,可同時得到形貌圖及歸一化電流(normalized current)掃描圖,藉此判斷出帶電表面的極性。液相環境下進行掃描時,材料會因自身表面電荷於固-液界面形成電雙層(electric double layers,EDLs),當奈米滴管進入此區域,樣品表面電荷與探針離子電流交互作用下,產生表面誘導整流效應(surface induced rectification,SIR),將影響奈米滴管內工作電極(working electrodes)量測到的離子電流值。為了突顯表面電荷對於探針電流值的影響,透過脈衝施加較大偏壓將表面誘導整流效應放大,所量測到的電流值與探針位於本體溶液中但遠離表面,即表面誘導整流效應趨零時,相同脈衝偏壓下取得的基準電流值相除,進行電流訊號歸一化,利用歸一化電流值之變化評估材料表面的電荷差異。
本實驗使用氣相修飾方式將3-氨基丙基三乙氧基矽烷(APTES)修飾於玻璃基板表面特定區域以創造出單純矽醇基(silanol group)表面及胺基(amino group)表面作為異質表面電荷材料,也分別將11-硫醇-1-十一醇(MCU)、11-硫基十一烷酸(MUA)及4-氨基苯硫酚(PATP)修飾於金薄膜形成自組裝單分子層(self-assembled monolayer,SAM)產生以羥基(hydroxyl group,-OH)、羧基(carboxylic acid,-COOH)及胺基(amino group,-NH2)為主的異質表面電荷材料,藉由SICM同步進行形貌掃描及歸一化電流掃描,並改變脈衝偏壓觀察正電荷表面、負電荷表面及中性電荷表面歸一化電流變化,最後透過調整溶液酸鹼度推測修飾程度。
Scanning ion conductance microscopy (SICM) is a form of scanning probe microscopy (SPM) that uses a nanopipette filled with electrolyte solution as probe to obtain noncontact image of surface topography at nanometer scale resolution. In hopping mode, one of feedback mode in SICM, is adopted in complex surface features scanning to avoid substrate damage because the nanopipette is withdrawn and repositioned at next pixel after approaching above substrate surface to take topographical information. In addition to surface structure and atomic arrangement, surface charge density is known to play a key role in interfacial processes and chemical reaction such as colloidal science, crystal growth and nutrients uptaking in living cell surface. The trifunctional aminosilane (3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, APTES) is modified on specific area of glass by vapor deposition to synthesize heterogeneously charged substrate which amino group is on one side and silanol group is on the other side. Self-assembly monolayer of 11-mercapto-1-undecanol (MCU) and 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) are coated on gold thin film respectively to produce hydroxyl group (-OH) and carboxylic group (-COOH) heterogeneously charged surface. When a substrate is immersed in electrolyte solution, charged surface attracts counter ions to form an electrical double layers (EDLs). Once the nanopipette is located at the close point of charged surface, a potential pulse would be applied to amplify the ionic current response influenced by the surface-induced rectification (SIR) phenomena. Normalize the current of substrate and bulk solution pulse current, we can analyze the surface charge polarity. In this study, we demonstrate the pulse-mode measurements could record substrate topographical image and surface charge density mapping simultaneously.
1. Page, A.; Perry, D.; Young, P.; Mitchell, D.; Frenguelli, B. G.; Unwin, P. R. Fast Nanoscale Surface Charge Mapping with Pulsed-Potential Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 10854-10859, DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03744.
2. Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yu, L.; Li, Y.; Qian, G.; Chang, S. Nanopipettes: A Potential Tool for DNA Detection. Analyst 2019, 144, 5037-5047, DOI: 10.1039/C9AN00633H.
3. Xiong, T.; Zhang, K.; Jiang, Y.; Yu, P.; Mao, L. Ion Current Rectification: From Nanoscale to Microscale. Sci. China Chem. 2019, 62, 1346-1359, DOI: 10.1007/s11426-019-9526-4.
4. Experton, J.; Wu, X.; Martin, C. R. From Ion Current to Electroosmotic Flow Rectification in Asymmetric Nanopore Membranes. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, DOI: 10.3390/nano7120445.
5. Wei, C.; Bard, A. J.; Feldberg, S. W. Current Rectification at Quartz Nanopipet Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 4627-4633, DOI: 10.1021/ac970551g.
6. Grahame, D. C. The Electrical Double Layer and the Theory of Electrocapillarity. Chem. Rev. 1947, 41, 441-501, DOI: 10.1021/cr60130a002.
7. Conway, B. E. Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications, Springer, Boston, MA: 1999.
8. Friedmann, H.; Amiri, O.; Aït-Mokhtar, A. Physical Modeling of the Electrical Double Layer Effects on Multispecies Ions Transport in Cement-Based Materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38, 1394-1400, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.06.003.
9. Russel, W. B.; Saville, D. A.; Schowalter, W. R. Colloidal Dispersions, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1989.
10. Jouniaux, L.; Ishido, T. Electrokinetics in Earth Sciences: A Tutorial. Int. J. Geophys. 2012, 2012, 286107, DOI: 10.1155/2012/286107.
11. Kovarik, M. L.; Zhou, K.; Jacobson, S. C. Effect of Conical Nanopore Diameter on Ion Current Rectification. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 15960-15966, DOI: 10.1021/jp9076189.
12. Siwy, Z. S. Ion-Current Rectification in Nanopores and Nanotubes with Broken Symmetry. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 735-746, DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200500471.
13. Siwy, Z.; Fuliński, A. A Nanodevice for Rectification and Pumping Ions. Am. J. Phys. 2004, 72, 567-574, DOI: 10.1119/1.1648328.
14. Siwy, Z.; Heins, E.; Harrell, C. C.; Kohli, P.; Martin, C. R. Conical-Nanotube Ion-Current Rectifiers: The Role of Surface Charge. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10850-10851, DOI: 10.1021/ja047675c.
15. Jiang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Su, J.; Nie, J.; Cao, L.; Mao, L.; Jiang, L.; Guo, W. On the Origin of Ionic Rectification in DNA-Stuffed Nanopores: The Breaking and Retrieving Symmetry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 18739-18746, DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b11732.
16. McKelvey, K.; Kinnear, S. L.; Perry, D.; Momotenko, D.; Unwin, P. R. Surface Charge Mapping with a Nanopipette. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 13735-44, DOI: 10.1021/ja506139u.
17. Sulpizi, M.; Gaigeot, M.-P.; Sprik, M. The Silica–Water Interface: How the Silanols Determine the Surface Acidity and Modulate the Water Properties. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 1037-1047, DOI: 10.1021/ct2007154.
18. Behrens, S. H.; Grier, D. G. The Charge of Glass and Silica Surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 6716-6721, DOI: 10.1063/1.1404988.
19. Perry, D.; Momotenko, D.; Lazenby, R. A.; Kang, M.; Unwin, P. R. Characterization of Nanopipettes. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 5523-5530, DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01095.
20. Amara, M.; Kerdjoudj, H. Modification of the Cation Exchange Resin Properties by Impregnation in Polyethyleneimine Solutions: Application to the Separation of Metallic Ions. Talanta 2003, 60, 991-1001, DOI: 10.1016/S0039-9140(03)00155-3.
21. Liu, S.; Dong, Y.; Zhao, W.; Xie, X.; Ji, T.; Yin, X.; Liu, Y.; Liang, Z.; Momotenko, D.; Liang, D.; Girault, H. H.; Shao, Y. Studies of Ionic Current Rectification Using Polyethyleneimines Coated Glass Nanopipettes. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 5565-5573, DOI: 10.1021/ac3004852.
22. Chan, D. Y. C.; Pashley, R. M.; White, L. R. A Simple Algorithm for the Calculation of the Electrostatic Repulsion between Identical Charged Surfaces in Electrolyte. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1980, 77, 283-285, DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(80)90445-2.
23. Hirsch, V.; Kinnear, C.; Moniatte, M.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Clift, M. J. D.; Fink, A. Surface Charge of Polymer Coated Spions Influences the Serum Protein Adsorption, Colloidal Stability and Subsequent Cell Interaction in Vitro. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 3723-3732, DOI: 10.1039/C2NR33134A.
24. Sahın, Ö.; Nusret Bulutcu, A. Effect of Surface Charge Distribution on the Crystal Growth of Sodium Perborate Tetrahydrate. J. Cryst. Growth 2002, 241, 471-480, DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01314-3.
25. Lin, N. H.; Shih, W.-Y.; Lyster, E.; Cohen, Y. Crystallization of Calcium Sulfate on Polymeric Surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 356, 790-797, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.042.
26. Perry, D.; Paulose Nadappuram, B.; Momotenko, D.; Voyias, P. D.; Page, A.; Tripathi, G.; Frenguelli, B. G.; Unwin, P. R. Surface Charge Visualization at Viable Living Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3152-60, DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b13153.
27. Perry, D.; Al Botros, R.; Momotenko, D.; Kinnear, S. L.; Unwin, P. R. Simultaneous Nanoscale Surface Charge and Topographical Mapping. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 7266-7276, DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02095.
28. Page, A.; Perry, D.; Unwin, P. R. Multifunctional Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy. R. Soc. 2017, 473, 20160889, DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2016.0889.
29. Sa, N.; Lan, W.-J.; Shi, W.; Baker, L. A. Rectification of Ion Current in Nanopipettes by External Substrates. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 11272-11282, DOI: 10.1021/nn4050485.
30. Chen, C.-C.; Zhou, Y.; Baker, L. A. Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2012, 5, 207-228, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-062011-143203.
31. Maddar, F. M.; Perry, D.; Brooks, R.; Page, A.; Unwin, P. R. Nanoscale Surface Charge Visualization of Human Hair. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 4632-4639, DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05977.
32. Zhu, C.; Zhou, L.; Choi, M.; Baker, L. A. Mapping Surface Charge of Individual Microdomains with Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5, 2986-2990, DOI: 10.1002/celc.201800724.
33. McKelvey, K.; Perry, D.; Byers, J. C.; Colburn, A. W.; Unwin, P. R. Bias Modulated Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 3639-46, DOI: 10.1021/ac5003118.
34. Klausen, L. H.; Fuhs, T.; Dong, M. Mapping Surface Charge Density of Lipid Bilayers by Quantitative Surface Conductivity Microscopy. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12447, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12447.
35. Hansma, P. K.; Drake, B.; Marti, O.; Gould, S. A.; Prater, C. B. The Scanning Ion-Conductance Microscope. Science 1989, 243, 641, DOI: 10.1126/science.2464851.
36. Korchev, Y. E.; Bashford, C. L.; Milovanovic, M.; Vodyanoy, I.; Lab, M. J. Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy of Living Cells. Biophys. J. 1997, 73, 653-658, DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78100-1.
37. Rheinlaender, J.; Geisse, N. A.; Proksch, R.; Schäffer, T. E. Comparison of Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy with Atomic Force Microscopy for Cell Imaging. Langmuir 2011, 27, 697-704, DOI: 10.1021/la103275y.
38. Rubfiaro, A. S.; Tsegay, P. S.; Lai, Y.; Cabello, E.; Shaver, M.; Hutcheson, J.; Liu, Y.; He, J. Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy Study Reveals the Disruption of the Integrity of the Human Cell Membrane Structure by Oxidative DNA Damage. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 1632-1639, DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.0c01461.
39. Paschoalino, W. J.; Payne, N. A.; Pessanha, T. M.; Gateman, S. M.; Kubota, L. T.; Mauzeroll, J. Charge Storage in Graphene Oxide: Impact of the Cation on Ion Permeability and Interfacial Capacitance. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 10300-10307, DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00218.
40. Momotenko, D.; Page, A.; Adobes-Vidal, M.; Unwin, P. R. Write-Read 3d Patterning with a Dual-Channel Nanopipette. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 8871-8878, DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b04761.
41. Rodolfa, K. T.; Bruckbauer, A.; Zhou, D.; Korchev, Y. E.; Klenerman, D. Two-Component Graded Deposition of Biomolecules with a Double-Barreled Nanopipette. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6854-6859, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502338.
42. Rodolfa, K. T.; Bruckbauer, A.; Zhou, D.; Schevchuk, A. I.; Korchev, Y. E.; Klenerman, D. Nanoscale Pipetting for Controlled Chemistry in Small Arrayed Water Droplets Using a Double-Barrel Pipet. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 252-257, DOI: 10.1021/nl052215i.
43. Laslau, C.; Williams, D. E.; Travas-Sejdic, J. The Application of Nanopipettes to Conducting Polymer Fabrication, Imaging and Electrochemical Characterization. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1177-1191, DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.01.002.
44. Schäffer, T. E.; Anczykowski, B.; Fuchs, H. Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy. In Applied Scanning Probe Methods Ii: Scanning Probe Microscopy Techniques; Bhushan, B.; Fuchs, H., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006; pp 91-119.
45. Shevchuk, A. I.; Gorelik, J.; Harding, S. E.; Lab, M. J.; Klenerman, D.; Korchev, Y. E. Simultaneous Measurement of Ca2+ and Cellular Dynamics: Combined Scanning Ion Conductance and Optical Microscopy to Study Contracting Cardiac Myocytes. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 1759-1764, DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75826-2.
46. Gorelik, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shevchuk, A. I.; Frolenkov, G. I.; Sánchez, D.; Lab, M. J.; Vodyanoy, I.; Edwards, C. R. W.; Klenerman, D.; Korchev, Y. E. The Use of Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy to Image A6 Cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2004, 217, 101-108, DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2003.10.015.
47. Zhang, Y.; Gorelik, J.; Sanchez, D.; Shevchuk, A.; Lab, M.; Vodyanoy, I.; Klenerman, D.; Edwards, C.; Korchev, Y. Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy Reveals How a Functional Renal Epithelial Monolayer Maintains Its Integrity. Kidney Int. 2005, 68, 1071-1077, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00499.x.
48. Revenu, C.; Ubelmann, F.; Hurbain, I.; El-Marjou, F.; Dingli, F.; Loew, D.; Delacour, D.; Gilet, J.; Brot-Laroche, E.; Rivero, F.; Louvard, D.; Robine, S. A New Role for the Architecture of Microvillar Actin Bundles in Apical Retention of Membrane Proteins. Mol. Bio. Cell. 2011, 23, 324-336, DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e11-09-0765.
49. Page, A.; Kang, M.; Armitstead, A.; Perry, D.; Unwin, P. R. Quantitative Visualization of Molecular Delivery and Uptake at Living Cells with Self-Referencing Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy-Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 3021-3028, DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04629.
50. Takahashi, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Miyamoto, T.; Higashi, H.; Nakamichi, N.; Takeda, Y.; Kato, Y.; Korchev, Y.; Fukuma, T. High-Speed Sicm for the Visualization of Nanoscale Dynamic Structural Changes in Hippocampal Neurons. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 2159-2167, DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04775.
51. Shibata, M.; Watanabe, H.; Uchihashi, T.; Ando, T.; Yasuda, R. High-Speed Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging of Live Mammalian Cells. BPPB. 2017, 14, 127-135, DOI: 10.2142/biophysico.14.0_127.
52. Kim, H.; Arakawa, H.; Osada, T.; Ikai, A. Quantification of Cell Adhesion Force with Afm: Distribution of Vitronectin Receptors on a Living Mc3t3-E1 Cell. Ultramicroscopy 2003, 97, 359-363, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3991(03)00061-5.
53. Schillers, H.; Medalsy, I.; Hu, S.; Slade, A. L.; Shaw, J. E. Peakforce Tapping Resolves Individual Microvilli on Living Cells. J. Mol. Recognit. 2016, 29, 95-101, DOI: 10.1002/jmr.2510.
54. Liu, X.; Wei, Y.; Li, W.; Li, B.; Liu, L. Cytoskeleton Induced the Changes of Microvilli and Mechanical Properties in Living Cells by Atomic Force Microscopy. J. Cell. Physiol. 2021, 236, 3725-3733, DOI: 10.1002/jcp.30110.
55. Chowdhury, D. Combination of Self-Assembly and Nanolithography as an Effective Nanofabrication Methodology for Device Realization. Curr. Sci. 2009, 96, 923-932.
56. Ying, L.; Bruckbauer, A.; Zhou, D.; Gorelik, J.; Shevchuk, A.; Lab, M.; Korchev, Y.; Klenerman, D. The Scanned Nanopipette: A New Tool for High Resolution Bioimaging and Controlled Deposition of Biomolecules. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 2859-2866, DOI: 10.1039/B506743J.
57. Dulbecco, R.; Vogt, M. Plaque Formation and Isolation of Pure Lines with Poliomyelitis Viruses. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 99, 167-182, DOI: 10.1084/jem.99.2.167.
58. Yamada, K.; Yoshii, S.; Kumagai, S.; Fujiwara, I.; Nishio, K.; Okuda, M.; Matsukawa, N.; Yamashita, I. High-Density and Highly Surface Selective Adsorption of Protein–Nanoparticle Complexes by Controlling Electrostatic Interaction. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 45, 4259-4264, DOI: 10.1143/jjap.45.4259.
59. Zhu, M.; Lerum, M. Z.; Chen, W. How to Prepare Reproducible, Homogeneous, and Hydrolytically Stable Aminosilane-Derived Layers on Silica. Langmuir 2011, 28, 416-423, DOI: 10.1021/la203638g.
60. Pick, C.; Argento, C.; Drazer, G.; Frechette, J. Micropatterned Charge Heterogeneities Via Vapor Deposition of Aminosilanes. Langmuir 2015, 31, 10725-10733, DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02771.
61. Vericat, C.; Vela, M. E.; Benítez, G.; Carro, P.; Salvarezza, R. Self-Assembled Monolayers of Thiols and Dithiols on Gold: New Challenges for a Well-Known System. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39 5, 1805-34.
62. Kamra, T.; Chaudhary, S.; Xu, C.; Montelius, L.; Schnadt, J.; Ye, L. Covalent Immobilization of Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Nanoparticles on a Gold Surface Using Carbodiimide Coupling for Chemical Sensing. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 461, 1-8, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.09.009.
63. Polat, O.; Seker, E. Effect of Surface–Molecule Interactions on Molecular Loading Capacity of Nanoporous Gold Thin Films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 19189-19194, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05802.
64. Chen, C.-Y.; Li, H.-H.; Chu, H.-Y.; Wang, C.-M.; Chang, C.-W.; Lin, L.-E.; Hsu, C.-C.; Liao, W.-S. Finely Tunable Surface Wettability by Two-Dimensional Molecular Manipulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 41814-41823, DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b16424.
65. Şeker, Ş.; Elçin, A. E.; Elçin, Y. M. Real-Time Monitoring of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Responses to Biomaterial Surfaces and to a Model Drug by Using Quartz Crystal Microbalance. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016, 44, 1722-1732, DOI: 10.3109/21691401.2015.1089255.
66. Kim, E.; Park, K.; Hwang, S. Electrochemical Investigation of Chemical Lift-Off Lithography on Au and Ito. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 246, 165-172, DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.195.
67. Šimšíková, M.; Antalík, M.; Kaňuchová, M.; Škvarla, J. Anionic 11-Mercaptoundecanoic Acid Capped Zno Nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 282, 342-347, DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.05.130.
68. Akhtar, K.; Khan, S. A.; Khan, S. B.; Asiri, A. M. Scanning Electron Microscopy: Principle and Applications in Nanomaterials Characterization. In Handbook of Materials Characterization; Sharma, S. K., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 113-145.
69. Min, H.; Girard-Lauriault, P.-L.; Gross, T.; Lippitz, A.; Dietrich, P.; Unger, W. E. S. Ambient-Ageing Processes in Amine Self-Assembled Monolayers on Microarray Slides as Studied by Tof-Sims with Principal Component Analysis, Xps, and Nexafs Spectroscopy. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 403, 613-623, DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-5862-5.
70. Xiang, S.; Xing, G.; Xue, W.; Lu, C.; Lin, J.-M. Comparison of Two Different Deposition Methods of 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane on Glass Slides and Their Application in the Thinprep Cytologic Test. Analyst 2012, 137, 1669-1673, DOI: 10.1039/C2AN15983J.
71. Maaz, M.; Elzein, T.; Dragoe, D.; Bejjani, A.; Jarroux, N.; Poulard, C.; Aubry-Barroca, N.; Nsouli, B.; Roger, P. Poly(4-Vinylpyridine)-Modified Silica for Efficient Oil/Water Separation. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 1184-1196, DOI: 10.1007/s10853-018-2888-x.
72. Boksebeld, M.; Kilin, V.; Géloën, A.; Ceccone, G.; Jaffal, A.; Schmidt, C.; Alekseev, S.; Lysenko, V.; Wolf, J. P.; Bonacina, L.; Souteyrand, E.; Chevolot, Y.; Monnier, V. Folate-Modified Silicon Carbide Nanoparticles as Multiphoton Imaging Nanoprobes for Cancer-Cell-Specific Labeling. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 27361-27369, DOI: 10.1039/C7RA03961A.
73. Pop-Georgievski, O.; Kubies, D.; Zemek, J.; Neykova, N.; Demianchuk, R.; Chánová, E. M.; Šlouf, M.; Houska, M.; Rypáček, F. Self-Assembled Anchor Layers/Polysaccharide Coatings on Titanium Surfaces: A Study of Functionalization and Stability. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 617-631, DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.6.63.
74. Calam, T. T.; Hasdemir, E. g. Comparative Characteerization of Self-Assembled Monolayers of 1,6-Hexanedithiol and a-Hexanethiol Formed on Polycrystalline Gold Electrode. C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 2019, 72, 316-326, DOI: 10.7546/CRABS.2019.03.05.
75. Liu, J.; Wu, Z.; He, Q.; Tian, Q.; Wu, W.; Xiao, X.; Jiang, C. Catalytic Application and Mechanism Studies of Argentic Chloride Coupled Ag/Au Hollow Heterostructures: Considering the Interface between Ag/Au Bimetals. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 35, DOI: 10.1186/s11671-019-2862-9.
76. Štrbac, S.; Srejić, I.; Rakočević, Z. Electrocatalysis of Hydrogen Evolution Reaction on Au(111) by Spontaneously Deposited Iridium in Acid Solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, J3335-J3341, DOI: 10.1149/2.0441815jes.
77. Qu, D.; Kim, B.-C.; Lee, C.-W. J.; Ito, M.; Noguchi, H.; Uosaki, K. 1,6-Hexanedithiol Self-Assembled Monolayers on Au(111) Investigated by Electrochemical, Spectroscopic, and Molecular Mechanics Methods. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 497-505, DOI: 10.1021/jp908821b.
78. Sordello, F.; Zeb, G.; Hu, K.; Calza, P.; Minero, C.; Szkopek, T.; Cerruti, M. Tuning Tio2 Nanoparticle Morphology in Graphene–Tio2 Hybrids by Graphene Surface Modification. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 6710-6719, DOI: 10.1039/C4NR01322K.
79. Tao, C.-a.; Wang, J.; Qin, S.; Lv, Y.; Long, Y.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, Z. Fabrication of Ph-Sensitive Graphene Oxide–Drug Supramolecular Hydrogels as Controlled Release Systems. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 24856-24861, DOI: 10.1039/C2JM34461K.
80. Amadu, M.; Miadonye, A. Determination of the Point of Zero Charge Ph of Borosilicate Glass Surface Using Capillary Imbibition Method. Int. J. Chem. 2017, 9, DOI: 10.5539/ijc.v9n3p67.