| 研究生: |
趙建勛 Chao, Chien-Hsun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
修正分配模式繁衍短延時序率降雨過程之研究 Applying Modified Disaggregation Model to Generate Short-Duration Rainfall Process |
| 指導教授: |
周乃昉
Chou, N.-F Frederick |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 水利及海洋工程學系 Department of Hydraulic & Ocean Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2015 |
| 畢業學年度: | 103 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 47 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 合成雨量序列 、Thomas-Fiering模式 、Lane分配模式 、修正Lane分配模式 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Synthesis of rainfall series, Thomas-Fiering model, Lane disaggregation model, modified disaggregation model |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:80 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
完整而可靠的水文紀錄,為水資源規劃及運用之重要憑藉,因設站時間晚、災害造成的損害、經費的限制及其他自然、人為的因素等,使得水文資料記錄年限太短或中間有脫誤,無法有效評估水資源開發方案之水源運用及缺水特性,提高替代方案之風險。為了彌補水文紀錄的不足,有必要利用合適的序率模式繁衍與歷史統計特性相符之水文過程以延長水文資料年限。
本研究先應用Thomas-Fiering (T-F)模式繁衍月雨量序列,再推導修正Lane分配模式(disaggregation model),應用其將時間上相對較大尺度的合成月雨量分配至旬雨量序列,並與Lane分配模式比較兩者所繁衍旬雨量序列在統計性質上之差異。
針對台灣北部新店溪上游北勢溪流域44年歷史雨量序列之統計特性,本研究利用T-F模式繁衍月雨量序列,其平均值、標準差、相關係數及偏態係數均與歷史頗為吻合,再分別以Lane分配模式及修正Lane分配模式繁衍旬雨量序列,經與歷史旬雨量過程比較其統計特性,結果發現雖然兩者之平均值、標準差及偏態係數尚符合歷史趨勢,但修正Lane模式之各項統計特性皆較Lane模式與歷史資料接近,而Lane模式的相關係數則與歷史資料有顯著差異。若未來在氣候變遷下,降雨量之時間序列特性仍受到傳統大氣的相同物理機制影響,則本研究提出之修正分配模式可應用於降尺度分析,得到正確合理的小尺度時間降雨量過程。
A complete and reliable hydrographic data is an important basis for water planning. Therefore, The lack of hydrographic data from human and nature factors including fund shortage, the lack of rainfall observation institution in the past, and un-precise data during nature disaster may result in a wrong analysis in hydrographic research and increase the risk of water planning. In order to overcome the lack of hydrographic data, using an appropriate mode to generate the similar historical date is necessary in our research.
In theory, we can use Thomas-Fiering (T-F) mode to generate the date of monthly rainfall, and combined with Lane disaggregation model and modified disaggregation model to get the data of ten days rainfall. By using Lane disaggregation model and modified Lane disaggregation model, we can generate two data and analyze the difference between them to get the information we need.
To get the 44 years statistics date of Peishih watershed in the north of Taiwan, the research used T-F model to generate the Mean, Standard Deviation, Coefficient of Correlation, and Skewness, finding these data is similar to historical monthly rainfall. The second step is using Lane disaggregation model and modified disaggregation model to generate ten days rainfall. Although both the two data from Lane disaggregation model and modified disaggregation model are similar to historical ten days rainfall, we need find out which one is better. By comparing the two data, we found the data from modified Lane disaggregation model is more close to ten days historical rainfall than Lane disaggregation model. As a result, the data generated from modified Lane disaggregation model in the research can be used to appropriately forecast ten days rainfall in the future if the atmosphere environment is similar.
1.楊豐榮,序率水文模擬之檢定與分配模式之研究,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文(1984)。
2.李方中,河川流量分配模式應用研究,國立中興大學土木工程研究所碩士論文(1986)。
3.孫永信,河川旬流量之合成與預測,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文(1988)。
4.林軍廷,月至旬流量分配及相加性修正之研究,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文(1990)。
5.李方中,分配與積累觀念於週期性流量序列模擬之研究,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所博士論文(1991)。
6.郭振泰、朱文生、徐年盛、陳昶憲、林永禎、孫永信,淡水河流域水庫系統即時優選操作模式之發展與應用(三):小時模式研究,經濟部水資源局統一規劃委員會,80水利科技八(二)3(10)014第078號(1991)。
7.林茂文,時間數列分析與預測,華泰書局(1992)。
8.易任、王如意,應用水文學,國立編譯館(1992)。
9.徐世忠,中短期月需水量預測模式之建立,國立海洋大學河海工程學系碩士論文(1996)。
10.陳昶憲、黃偉民、朱益辰,烏溪流量洪流時序分析,台灣水利,45(3):72-82 (1997)。
11.陳昶憲、李姗燁,洪流之多變量時須分析,中華土木保持學報,29(3):199-209 (1998)。
12.李方中、林國峰,積累的ARMA(1,1)模式於年歷史稽延共變方保持能力之研究,中國土木水利工程學刊,第11卷,第4期,pp. 881-817 (1999)。
13.游山峰,石門水庫運轉規線之研究,國立海洋大學河海工程學系碩士論文(1999)。
14.游保衫、王毓麒,水庫式電廠可靠發電量不確定之研究,中興工程科技研究(2000)。
15.溫漢章,利用合成流量進行水資源系統分析,國立台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文(2001)。
16.Box, G. E. P. and G. M. Jenkins, Times Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Holden-Day, Inc., San Francisci, 1976.
17.Harms, A. A. and T. H. Campbell,“An Extension to The Thomas-Fiering Model for The Sequential Generation of Streamflow,”Water Resources Research, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 653-661, 1967.
18.Hoshi, K. and J. Burges,“Disaggregation of Streamflow Volumes,”Jour. of The Hydr. Div., ASCE. 105, HY1, pp. 27-41, 1979.
19.Lane, W. L., Applied Stochastic Techniques (LAST Computer Package), User Manual, Division of Planning Technical Services, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado, Dec. 1979.
20.Mejia, J. M. and J. Rouselle,“Disaggregation Models in Hydrology Revisited,”Water Resources Research, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 185-186, 1976.
21.Stedinger, J. R. and R. M. Vogel,“Dissaggregation Procedures for Generating Serially Flow Vectors,”Water Resources Research, Vol. 20, NO. 1, PP. 47-56, 1984.
22.Salas, J. D., J. W. Delleur, V. Yevjevich and W. L. Lane, Applied Modeling of hydrologie Time Series, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado, 1980.
23.Valencia, D. R. and J. C. Schaake, Jr“Disaggregation Processes in Stochastic Hydrology,”Water Resources Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 580-585, 1973.