| 研究生: |
王嘉琳 Wang, Chia-Lin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
是誰在說話?—公益廣告中的文字與圖像分析 Who's Talking?—Texts and Images Analysis in Public Service Advertisements |
| 指導教授: |
高實玫
Kao, Shin-mei |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
文學院 - 外國語文學系碩士在職專班 Department of Foreign Languages and Literature (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2005 |
| 畢業學年度: | 93 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 119 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 公益廣告 、紐約廣告獎 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | New York Festivals, Public Service Advertisements |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:82 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究試圖從文字與圖像兩方面分析國外印行的公益廣告,探求其中是否會有共通的文字與圖像的表達方式,足可作為未來台灣公益廣告的參考與借鏡。
本研究以紐約廣告獎第十二輯獲獎之四十八件公益廣告為樣本,並邀請一名從事商業設計與另一名從事英語教學之評量員共同利用研究者製作之量表,評析並統計廣告樣本中文字的敘事觀點與敘事語氣;圖像的視角與構圖(包括訊息價值、強調手法、與框架)。主要發現如下:
1.廣告文字的敘事觀點以第一人稱為最多,其次為第三人稱之敘事觀點,戲劇對白式的敘事方式在樣本中並未出現。
2.廣告文字的敘事語氣以「逗趣式」的語氣為最,至於「說理式」的語氣則出現頻率較低。
3.廣告圖像的視角則以與觀者相對等的居多,其次是高視角,低視角最少。
4.廣告圖像的訊息價值以「已知-創新」為最高;強調方式以「色彩」與「對比」兩大方式為主;廣告圖像的框架則以「連結」為主。
依據以上的研究結果,本研究有以下的建議:
1.公益廣告的敘事方式宜採第一人稱並以幽默的逗趣式語氣表現。
2.公益廣告的圖像宜以與讀者平等的視角,並以「已知-創新」的圖像佈局配以「色彩」或「對比」為要,圖像元素以「連結」的方式呈現為佳。
3.對於讀者的文化背景與社會地位結構的認識,在公益廣告製作時,宜多加考量。
This study aimed to analyze the texts and images of printed public service advertisements and to explore the potentiality of the intercommunity on expressing these advertisements. There were forty-eight awarded public service advertisements of New York Festivals Annual Twelve as the data for investigation. The researcher invited two raters to co-work with him to evaluate these ads based on a scoring system developed by this researcher. The system contained evaluation on two main parts, the text and the image. There are two categories, to investigate narrations and tones of the text. The two categories, used to discuss the images are viewing angles and image composition. The image composition is further divided into information value, salience, and framing. Based on the data analyses, the findings of the study are summarized as follows:
1. The first-person narrator appeared highly frequent on the forty-eight PSA samples, and the third-person narrator comes the second in its appearance. A dramatic character of expression has not been found.
2. A “tickle” tone of expression was most likely used in PSA texts.
3. An equal viewing angle is preferred by these ads in the sample PSAs rather than a high or low angle.
4. Regarding image composition, the study found a given-new information value, a colorful and tonal contrast, and connected framing were most preferable among the ad creators.
Based on the above findings, this study suggests that:
1. We may express a public service advertisement with the first-person narrator and a “tickle” tone.
2. We may compose the images with an equal viewing angle, a given-new information value, a colorful, or tonal contrast objects in a connected framing.
3. While we edit a PSA, the cultural differences and social constructed roles should be taken into consideration.
It is hoped that my research can provide some baselines for a comparative on Taiwanese public service advertisements with those discussed in this study.
Arnheim, R. (1997). A plea for visual thinking. In W. J. T. Mitchell (Ed.), The language of images (pp. 171-180). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Barthes, R. (1978). Image, music, text. (S. Heath, Trans.) New York: Hill and Wong. (Original work published 1977).
Charon, J. M. (1995). Symbolic interactionism: an introduction, an interpretation, an integration. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
Cook, G. (1992). The discourse of advertising. London: Routledge.
Faulkner, W. (1950). The Human heart in conflict with itself. In X. J. Kennedy & D. Gioia (Eds.), An introduction to fiction (6th ed., pp. 575-576). New York: Harper Collins.
Fenichel, M. (2005). The new 42nd street and 8th avenue. Available from Worldisround Web site, http://www.worldisround.com/articles/12740/photo11. html.
Goddard, C. (1998) Semantic analysis: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Grow, G. O., (1994). Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful: A commercial in context. In R. F. Fox (Ed.), Images in language, media, and mind (pp. 170-180). Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
Gwyn, R. (1999). Captain of my own ship: Metaphor and the discourse of chronic illness. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Ed.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp.203-220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harman, W., & and Holman C.H. (1996). A handbook to literature. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hirschman, E. C., Scott, L., & Wells, W. B. (1998). A model of product discourse: linking consumer practice to cultural texts. Journal of Advertising, spring, 27, 33-50.
Hovanec, C. P. & Freund, D. (1994). Photographs, writing, and critical thinking. In R. J. Fox (Ed.), Images in language, media, and mind. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
Jewitt, C. & Oyama, R. (2001). Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 134-165). London: Sage.
Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language & Communication, 23, 409-425.
Kover, A. J. (1995). Copywriters’ implicit theories of communication: An exploration. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 596-611.
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images. London: Routledge.
Lancaster, A. R. & Lancaster, K.M. (2002). Reaching insomniacs with television PSAs: Poor placement of important message. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36(2), 150-170.
McQuarrie, E. F. & Mick, D. G. (1999). Visual rhetoric in advertising: Text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses. Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (1), 37-54.
Monaco, J. (2000). How to read a film: the world of movies, media, and multimedia: art, technology, language, history, theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nemerov, H. (1980). On poetry and painting, with a thought of music. In Mitchell, W. J. T. (Ed.), The langue of images (pp. 12-13). Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Plous S. & Neptune, D. (1997). Racial and gender biases in magazine advertising. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 627-644.
Rushkoff, D. (1999). Coercion: Why we listen to what “they” say. New York: Riverhead Books.
Scott, L. M. (1994). Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 252-273.
Simpson, P. (2001). ‘Reason’ and ‘tickle’ as pragmatic constructs in the discourse of advertising. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 589-607.
Stern, B. B. (1988). How does an ad mean? Language in service advertising. Journal of Advertising, 17(2), 3-14.
Stern, B. B. (1991). Who talks in advertising? Literary theory and narrative “point of view”. Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 9-22.
The New York Festivals. (2003) New York Festival international advertising awards annual 12. New York: Author.
Tinic, S. A. (1997). United colors and united meanings: Benetton and the commodification of social issues. Journal of Communication, 47 (3), 3-26.
West, J. (2002). Public service advertising in the 21st century: Exploration of unintended effects of domestic violence campaigns. Dissertation Abstracts International. (UMI No. 3049494)