| 研究生: |
楊宗効 Yang, Tsung-Hsiao |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
基於手機多感測器整合輔助不定向PDR行人室內導航應用 Pedestrian Indoor Navigation By Mobile Sensors Integration Aided PDR With Arbitrary Orientation |
| 指導教授: |
張秀雯
Chang, Hsiu-Wen |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 測量及空間資訊學系 Department of Geomatics |
| 論文出版年: | 2017 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 153 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 慣性導航 、行人航位推算 、室內導航 、微機電系統 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | inertial navigation, pedestrian dead reckoning, indoor navigation, MEMS |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:95 下載:9 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來衛星定位系統以及個人攜帶裝置的發展,使得個人導航系統漸漸普及於社會大眾,個人導航系統讓使用者可以方便攜帶裝置於戶外進行導航,使用者在戶外進行定位時,大部分所使用工具來自於GNSS系統,GNSS系統為GPS(美國)、GLONASS(俄羅斯)、BeiDou(中國)以及Galileo(歐盟)等衛星系統的總稱,利用衛星之間傳遞的訊號可讓在地球上的使用者進行個人定位,但是在室內時,因訊號遮蔽、多路徑效應等影響,使得GNSS系統在室內定位時成果不佳,鑒於此現象,人們研究出於室內定位的另外辦法。
如Wi-Fi、藍芽或是Beacon等,都可輔助使用者進行室內定位,然而這些需外部裝置方可使用的技術需要消耗若干的成本與人力布置,再者,使用者使用接收器於佈置後的空間進行定位時可能會有訊號衰減的情況。相對於這幾個主要的缺點,PDR(行人航位推算)並無這些情況。
PDR主要藉由慣性測量元件(加速度計、陀螺儀)來進行定位,由於科技的發展,在近期加入磁力計以及氣壓計,讓使用者不單只是使用原本的感測器進行室內定位。近年來由於MEMS(微機電系統)晶片的發展,使得智慧型手機亦可作為室內定位的工具。PDR依賴陀螺儀或是磁力計給定的方位角計算使用者的定位結果,該情況中使用者手持手機時使用者須固定手機姿態,若隨意水平轉動會使手機的方位角計算與實際行走的方向產生誤差,其誤差計算為該研究的主軸,使用主成分分析消除隨意水平轉動手機產生的誤差,消除後便可得到理想的定位成果。
本研究以主成分分析為主,以其他如:使用兩種感測器整合方位角、擴增卡曼濾波計算口袋型式手機姿態以及類神經探討分析當使用者行走軌跡為三維時這些為研究次要部分,藉由這些對室內定位進行初步的探討以及分析,以期對未來室內定位發展有幫助。
Navigation has been used by civilians for couples of years. Navigation is composed of GNSS and inertial sensors. Two kinds of techniques are used to aid with each other for the outside navigation. The advantage of GNSS is that it can calculate the reference solutions, on the other hand inertial sensors are used to calculate the integrated results which are relative solutions.
When the users are in the buildings the signals will be blocked so that the GNSS solutions would be not accurate. As a result, using inertial sensor doing the indoor positioning is one of the methods whose name is called “Pedestrian Dead Reckoning (PDR)”. To make the resolutions more accurate researchers have been focus on the accuracy of resolutions. Thanks to the improvement of inertial sensors their volumes have become small enough so that they can be installed in portable devices like smartphones. Meanwhile, the smartphones have gradually become one of the important belongings to the civilians. Our research will use smartphones as tools in the PDR experiments.
In PDR research, the pedestrian’s heading is the most important factor for the users. If the heading is not close to the true pedestrian’s heading it will be hard to know the users’ positions exactly. There are various factors which will influence the heading such as sensors’ bias, magnetometer and arbitrary orientation. In here, the arbitrary orientation means rotating sensors on hand horizontally. On the other hand, the judgement of how users take smartphones is also an important topic. There are many different methods used to judge the movements which contain walking-upstairs, walking-downstairs and walking-flat.
The research will mention and talk about three parts, one is about introduction of PDR which contains artificial neural network, another is about smartphone sensor in navigation and its calibration and the other is talking about using certain method to compute true
heading when the platform is rotated.
1. Afzal, M.H., Renaudin, V. and Lachapelle, G. (2011): Use of Earth's magnetic field for mitigating gyroscope errors regardless of magnetic perturbation, Sensors, Vol. 11, Issue. 12, pp. 11390-11414.
2. Aggarwal, P., Syed, Z., Noureldin, A. and El-Sheimy, N. (2010): MEMS-Based Integrated Navigation, Artech House.
3. Bamberg, S.J., Benbasat, A.Y., Scarborough, D.M., Krebs, D.E. and Paradiso, J.A. (2008): Gait analysis using a shoe-integrated wireless sensor system, IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 413-423.
4. Billauer, E (2005): Peak detection using MATLAB, from http://billauer.co.il/peakdet.html.
5. Brown, R.G. and Hwang, P.Y.C (1992): Introduction to random signals, John Wiley and Sons, San Francisco, New York, USA.
6. Chiang, K.W. (2004): INS/GPS Integration Using Neural Networks for Land Vehicular Navigation Applications, Department of Geomatics Engineering, the University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
7. Chang, H.W. (2009): The Development of self-growing Neural Network Embedded POS Determination Scheme for MEMS INS/GPS Integrated Systems, Master's thesis, Department of Geomatics, National Cheng Kung University.
8. Chen, R., Pei, L. and Chen, Y. (2011): A Smart Phone Based PDR Solution for Indoor Navigation, In Proceedings of ION GNSS 2011 Conference, pp.1404-1408, Portland, Oregon, USA.
9. Deng, Z.A., Wang, G., Hu, Y., and Wu, D. (2015): Heading Estimation for Indoor Pedestrian Navigation Using a Smartphone in the Pocket, Sensors, Vol. 15, Issue. 9, pp. 21518-21536.
10. El-Diasty, M. (2014): An Accurate Heading Solution using MEMS-based Gyroscope and Magnetometer Integrated System (Preliminary Results), ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. II-2, pp. 75-78.
11. Elhoushi, M., Georgy, J., Noureldin, A., and Korenberg, M.J. (2016): Motion Mode Recognition for Indoor Pedestrian Navigation Using Portable Devices, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2016, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 208-221.
12. Foxlin, E. (2005): Pedestrian Tracking with Shoe-Mounted Inertial Sensors, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 38-46.
13. Győrbíró, N., Fábián, Á., and Hományi, G. (2008): An Activity Recognition System For Mobile Phones, Mobile Networks and Applications, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 82-91.
14. Grewal, M.S. and Andrew, A.P. (2008): Kalman Filtering Theory and Practice Using MATLAB, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
15. Gelb, A. (1974): Applied Optimal Estimation, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
16. Hemminki, S., Nurmi, P., and Tarkoma, S. (2013): Accelerometer-based transportation mode detection on smartphones, pp. 1-14.
17. Ho, N.H., Truong, P.H., and Jeong, G.M. (2016): Step-Detection and Adaptive Step-Length Estimation for Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning at Various Walking Speeds Using a Smartphone, Sensors, Vol. 16, Issue. 9.
18. Huang, C., Liao, Z., and Zhao, L. (2010): Synergism of INS and PDR in Self-Contained Pedestrian Tracking With a Miniature Sensor Module, IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 1349-1359.
19. Honeywell. : Compass Heading Using Magnetometers, Application Note AN-203.
20. Honavar, V.G. and Uhr, L. (1994): Artifical Intelligence and Neural Networks; Steps toward Principled Integration, Acedemic Press, Orlando, FL, USA.
21. Jiménez, A.R., Seco, F., Prieto, C. and Guevara, J. (2009): A comparison of Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning algorithms using a low-cost MEMS IMU, pp. 37-42.
22. Jolliffe, I.T. (2002): Principal Component Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
23. Kim, J.W., Jang, H.J., Hwang, D.-H., and Park, C. (2004): A Step, Stride and Heading Determination for the Pedestrian Navigation System, Journal of Global Positioning Systems, Vol.3, No. 1-2, pp. 273-279.
24. Kalman, R.E. (1960): A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problem, ASME Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 82, pp.34-35.
25. Li, Y., Georgy, J., Niu, X., Li, Q., and El-Sheimy, N. (2015): Autonomous Calibration of MEMS Gyros in Consumer Portable Devices, IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp. 4062-4072.
26. Mei, W., Yunchun, Y., Hatch, R.R., and Yanhua, Z. (2004): Adaptive filter for a miniature MEMS based attitude and heading reference system, pp. 193-200.
27. Maier, J., Reinfelder, S., Barth, J., Klucken, Jochen and Eskofier, B. (2013): Automatic detection of inertial sensor orientation for movement analysis in Parkinson'sdisease Parkinson.
28. Nieminen, T., Kangas, J., Suuriniemi, S., and Kettunen, L. (2010): An enhanced multi-position calibration method for consumer-grade inertial measurement units applied and tested, Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 10.
29. Niu, X., Li, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, Q., and Ban, Y. (2013): Fast thermal calibration of low-grade inertial sensors and inertial measurement units, Sensors, Vol. 13, Issue. 9, pp. 12192-12217.
30. Noureldin, A., Karamat, T.B., and Georgy, J. (2013): Basic Navigational Mathematics, Reference Frames and the Earth’s Geometry, pp. 21-63.
31. Oniga, S., and Sütö, J. (2014): Human activity recognition using neural networks, pp. 403-406.
32. Woodman, O.J. (2007): An introduction to inertial navigation, Computer Laboratory, the University of Cambridge, London, England.
33. Renaudin, V., Afzal, M.H., and Lachapelle, G. (2010): Complete Triaxis Magnetometer Calibration in the Magnetic Domain, Journal of Sensors, Vol. 2010, pp. 1-10.
34. Renaudin, V., Susi, M., and Lachapelle, G. (2012): Step length estimation using handheld inertial sensors, Sensors, Vol. 12, Issue. 7, pp. 8507-8525.
35. Roy, S.H., Cole, B.T., Gilmore, L.D., De Luca, C.J., Thomas, C.A., Saint-Hilaire, M.M., and Nawab, S.H. (2013): High-resolution tracking of motor disorders in Parkinson's disease during unconstrained activity, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 1080-1087.
32. Reinštein, M. (2011): Evaluation of Fine Alignment Algorithm for inertial navigation, Przeglad Elektrotechniczny (Electrical Review), Vol. 87, No. 7, pp. 255-258.
33. Sabatini, A.M. (2006): Quaternion-based extended Kalman filter for determining orientation by inertial and magnetic sensing, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, Vol. 53, No. 7, pp. 1346-1356.
34. Saeedi, S., and El-Sheimy, N. (2015): Activity Recognition Using Fusion of Low-Cost Sensors on a Smartphone for Mobile Navigation Application, Micromachines, Vol. 6, Issue. 8, pp. 1100-1134.
35. Saxena, A., Gupta, G., Gerasimov, V., and Ourselin, S. (2005): In Use Parameter Estimation of Inertial Sensors by Detecting Multilevel Quasi-static States, Vol. 3684, pp. 595-601.
36. Shin, E.H. (2001): ‘Accuracy Improvement of Low Cost INS/GPS for Land Applications’, Department of Geomatics Engineering, the University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
37. Suresh, R. and Elwell, J. (1999): Inertial navigation for the urban warrior, Vol. 3709, pp. 196-204.
38. Skog, I. and Handel, P. (2006): Calibration of A MEMS inertial measurement unit, XVII Imeko World Congress, Metrology for a sustainable development, Rio, Brazil.
39. Sutton, E.: Inertial Navigation Mechanization and error Equations, from http://www.ecsutton.ece.ufl.edu/ens/handouts/inertialnav_v2.pdf.
40. Smith, L.I. (2002): A tutorial on Principal Component Analysis, Cornell University, NY, USA.
41. Titterton, D.H. and Weston, J.L. (1997): Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology, Peter Peregrinus Ltd.
42. Wang, M., Yang, Y., Hatch, R.R. and Zhang, Y. (2004): Adaptive Filter for a Miniature MEMS Based Attitude and Heading Reference System, Position Location and Navigation Symposium, 2004. PLANS 2004, IEEE.