| 研究生: |
余家綾 Yu, Chia-Ling |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
多取代乙烯合菲和 Stone-Wales 缺陷片段:合成、結構分析和物性探討 Highly Substituted Acephenanthrylenes and the Fragment of Stone-Wales Defect: Syntheses, Structural Analyses, and Properties |
| 指導教授: |
吳耀庭
Wu, Yao-Ting |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
理學院 - 化學系 Department of Chemistry |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 168 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 非交替多環芳香烴 、乙烯合菲 、鈀催化反應 、Stone-Wales 缺陷 、雙茚二酮 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Nonalternant Polyarene, Acephenanthrylene, Palladium-Catalyzed Reaction, Stone-Wales Defect, Biindenedione |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:162 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本論文介紹了近年來合成各種非交替多環芳香烴的策略,像是高度取代的乙烯合
菲和具有5−7−7−5 員環的Stone-Wales 缺陷片段-7b,17b-dihydrodiindeno[1,2,3-
ef:1',2',3'-kl]dinaphtho-[1,8-bc: 1',8'-hi]heptalene 19。
第一章節中,透過鈀催化的芳香合環反應製備了一系列的多取代乙烯合菲4 與苯
並[l]乙烯合菲5。2,3-二乙炔基聯苯3 在鈀碳及氯三甲矽烷混合物的催化下,可形成
五員環及六員環,並且探討了此反應條件的合成範疇與要求,得知起始物並不受限於
取代基,可以包含多電子或缺電子取代基,有效地生成目標取代乙烯合菲。本文也針
對反應機構做解釋,根據氘代反應及理論計算,此反應透過二價鈀及四價鈀的催化循
環進行,並以催化循環中二價鈀物質的再生為速率決定步驟。
第二章節中,為了針對單一個拓撲Stone-Wales 缺陷,本論文嘗試合成具有5−7−7−5 員環的Stone-Wales 缺陷片段,成功了得到有此特徵的化合物19,並對於此化合物進行物性探討。接著,本文提出了π延伸5−7−7−5 結構的合成策略,雖然無法利用傅里德-克拉夫茨反應得到六員環化產物,但幸運的是,本論文最後提出新穎的合成策略,並成功地在雙茚二酮的八號碳上進行官能化,對於π延伸5−7−7−5 結構的
合成可說是一大進展。
This thesis presents recent efforts to synthesize various important nonalternant
polyarenes, such as highly substituted acephenanthrylenes 4 and the fragment of Stone-Wales defect (SW defect) with five-seven-seven-five (5−7−7−5)-membered rings, 7b,17bdihydrodiindeno[1,2,3-ef:1',2',3'-kl]dinaphtho-[1,8-bc: 1',8'-hi]heptalene 19.
In the first chapter, a series of substituted acephenanthrylene 4 and
benzo[l]acephenanthrylene 5 were prepared by the palladium-catalyzed cycloaromatization.
The cycloaromatization of 2,3-diethynylbiphenyl derivatives 3 under catalysis with Pd/C and Me3SiCl results in the formation of five- and six-membered rings, and the synthetic scope and requirements are explored. The reaction mechanism proceeds via a Pd(II)/Pd(IV) catalytic cycle, and the rate-determining step is regeneration of active Pd(II) species.
In chapter 2, in order to identify individual topological SW defect, the fragment of
Stone-Wales defect with 5−7−7−5-membered rings 19 was synthesized and characterized.
Additionally, the synthetic methods of π-Extended 5−7−7−5 structure were presented, but the hexaannulation through Friedel-Crafts cyclization was unsuccessful. Fortunately, the functionalization of biindenedione at C8 position was feasible to explore further synthesis.
1. Z. Mansurov, Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 2005, 41, 727-744.
2. Z.-Y. Chen; M.-J. Wu, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 475-477.
3. N. D. Marsh; M. J. Wornat, J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 5399-5407.
4. J. D. Wood; J. L. Jellison; A. D. Finke; L. Wang; K. N. Plunkett, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15783-15789.
5. C. Schierl; W. Alex; L. M. Mateo; B. Ballesteros; D. Shimizu; A. Osuka; T. Torres; D. M. Guldi; G. Bottari, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (41), 14644-14652.
6. P. P. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8901-8902.
7. Y.-T. Wu; J. S. Siegel, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4843-4867.
8. S. R. Bheemireddy; P. C. Ubaldo; P. W. Rose; A. D. Finke; J. Zhuang; L. Wang; K. N. Plunkett, Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 15988-15992.
9. L. T. Scott; N. H. Roelofs, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5461-5465.
10. M. Sarobe; L. W. Jenneskens; J. Wesseling; J. D. Snoeijer; J. W. Zwikker, Liebigs Annalen 1997, 1997, 1207-1213.
11. S. Amin; G. Balanikas; K. Huie; N. Hussain; J. E. Geddie; S. S. Hecht, J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 4642-4646.
12. L. T. Scott; G. Reinhardt; N. H. Roelofs, J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5886-5887.
13. Y. S. Chung; H. Kruk; O. M. Barizo; M. Katz; E. Lee-Ruff, J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1284-1288.
14. J. L. Scott; S. R. Parkin; J. E. Anthony, Synlett 2004, 2004, 161-164.
15. E. C. Liu; M. K. Chen; J. Y. Li; Y. T. Wu, Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 4755-4761.
16. M. Ackermann; J. Freudenberg; D. Jänsch; F. Rominger; U. H. Bunz; K. Müllen, Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3758-3761.
17. S.-Y. Chow; G. J. Palmer; D. M. Bowles; J. E. Anthony, Org. lett. 2000, 2, 961-963.
18. I. V. Alabugin; M. Manoharan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4495-4509.
19. T. Yao; M. A. Campo; R. C. Larock, Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2677-2680.
20. Y. Saga; R. Motoki; S. Makino; Y. Shimizu; M. Kanai; M. Shibasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7905-7907.
21. K. M. Pelzer; L. Cheng; L. A. Curtiss, J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 237-245.
22. Harris, P. J. F. Carbon Nanotubes and Related Structures; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U. K., 1999.
23. L. Forro; J.-P. Salvetat; J.-M. Bonard; R. Bacsa; N. Thomson; S. Garaj; L. Thien-Nga; R. Gaal; A. Kulik; B. Ruzicka. In Science and Application of Nanotubes, Springer: 2002, 297-320.
24. E. Pop; D. Mann; Q. Wang; K. Goodson; H. Dai, Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 96-100.
25. A. Konishi; K. Horii; D. Shiomi; K. Sato; T. Takui; M. Yasuda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 10165-10170.
26. Y. Morita; S. Suzuki; K. Sato; T. Takui, Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 197.
27. M.-F. Yu; O. Lourie; M. J. Dyer; K. Moloni; T. F. Kelly; R. S. Ruoff, Science 2000, 287, 637-640.
28. P. Ravinder; V. Subramanian, J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 16815-16822.
29. A. J. Stone; D. J. Wales, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 128, 501-503.
30. M. B. Nardelli; B. I. Yakobson; J. Bernholc, Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, R4277.
31. J.-C. Charlier; H. Amara; P. Lambin, Acs Nano 2007, 1, 202-207.
32. K. Suenaga; H. Wakabayashi; M. Koshino; Y. Sato; K. Urita; S. Iijima, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 358-360.
33. A. Hashimoto; K. Suenaga; A. Gloter; K. Urita; S. Iijima, Nature 2004, 430, 870-873.
34. J. Liu; S. Mishra; C. A. Pignedoli; D. Passerone; J. I. Urgel; A. Fabrizio; T. G. Lohr; J. Ma; H. Komber; M. Baumgarten, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 12011-12020.
35. Y. Fei; Y. Fu; X. Bai; L. Du; Z. Li; H. Komber; K.-H. Low; S. Zhou; D. L. Phillips; X. Feng, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2353-2360.
36. Y. Han; Z. Xue; G. Li; Y. Gu; Y. Ni; S. Dong; C. Chi, Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 9111-9116.
37. S. Gabriel; E. Leupold, Chem. Ges 1898, 31, 1159.
38. L. Dou; Y. Zheng; X. Shen; G. Wu; K. Fields; W.-C. Hsu; H. Zhou; Y. Yang; F. Wudl, Science 2014, 343, 272-277.
49. S. Matsumoto; M. Naito; T. Oseki; M. Akazome; Y. Otani, Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 7254-7259.
40. T. Fujita; I. Takahashi; M. Hayashi; J. Wang; K. Fuchibe; J. Ichikawa, Eur.J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2017, 262-265.
41. W. Li; J. Li; D. DeVincentis; T. S. Mansour, Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45 (5), 1071-1074.
42. C. A. Malapit; J. R. Bour; S. R. Laursen; M. S. Sanford, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 17322-17330.
43. S. Staniland; R. W. Adams; J. J. McDouall; I. Maffucci; A. Contini; D. M. Grainger; N. J. Turner; J. Clayden, Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 10913-10917.
44. R. C. Fuson; W. R. Hatchard; R. H. Kottke; J. L. Fedrick, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 4330-4333.
45. M. Korb; H. Lang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2829-2882.
46. I. Majerz; T. Dziembowska, J. Phys Chem. A 2017, 121, 2627-2635.
47. R. M. Al-Zoubi; H. Al-Mughaid; R. McDonald, Aust. J. Chem. 2015, 68, 912-918.
48. T. Igarashi; E. Tayama; H. Iwamoto; E. Hasegawa, Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 6874-6877.
49. S. b. Dilly; A. l. Fotso Fotso; N. Lejal; G. Zedda; M. Chebbo; F. Rahman; S. Companys; H. l. n. C. Bertrand; J. Vidic; M. Noiray, J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 7202-7217.
50. M. A. Ali; X. Yao; H. Sun; H. Lu, Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 1513-1516.
51. M. Uchiyama; Y. Kobayashi; T. Furuyama; S. Nakamura; Y. Kajihara; T. Miyoshi; T. Sakamoto; Y. Kondo; K. Morokuma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 472-480.
52. L. Bonnafoux; F. R. Leroux; F. Colobert, Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 1278-1287.
53. I. Hisaki; N. Manabe; K. Osaka; A. Saeki; S. Seki; N. Tohnai; M. Miyata, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2014, 87, 323-333.
54. S. Das; A. Pramanik; R. Fröhlich; A. Patra, Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 10197-10205.
55. Y. Wang; Z. Lin; H. Fan; X. Peng, Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 10382-10386.
56. A. V. Malkov; P. Ramirez-Lopez; L. Biedermannová; L. Rulíšek; L. Dufkova; M. Kotora; F. Zhu; P. Kočovský, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5341-5348.