由於環境數位環境的風潮在全球環境成為風潮，在台灣也同樣面對了數位轉型、數位世代、數位社群與創新等趨勢的出現，不僅對於大眾而言帶來影響，對於企業的影響亦越劇深遠，面臨客戶之需求、講求快速、創新客製化等需求，企業如何透過教育訓練與創新社群的建立，使員工得以與企業共同面對環境的變遷與浪潮，同時對於企業而言，員工亦同屬於企業之客戶，如何同時使員工得以參與創新和社群並滿足企業所服務之客戶，而企業又如何將這些要素綁定在一起後並找出跨產業領域的相互借鏡與學習，皆成為企業的議題之一。本研究所提出透過將創新與社群作為構面形成模型進行歸納，透過選定五項產業公司，深入的訪談與次級資料的相互搭配以形成訪談對象所座落之象限，以創新、社群與員工教育訓練三者關係發展出企業對於創新種類的歸納與產業比較與學習，透過模型的推演使企業得以為此理解自身企業目前創新社群策略的走向，同時理解不同產業之間的創新種類與作為，提供未來跨領域學習相關領域研究參考。本研究採用以質性研究之多個案研究法，以五個不同產業公司進行研究之對象進行訪談與深入探討，使本研究結果得以層面廣度增加，並藉由「創新發展」、「社群建構」、「員工教育訓練與員工發展」為基礎，分析該五種產業之企業如何發展創新以及操作社群。
本研究結果發現，企業發展創新時，也將連帶影響社群的建構規模與社群目的；而社群的建構將影響企業如何促使員工發展創新，其中兩者之間存在著共同潛在因素為「員工之教育訓練」以及近期新趨勢之「員工體驗」的運用，歸納完成後出現單一企業同時可能坐落於多個象限之中，經本研究分析後，訪談對象在模型象限的座落結果不僅是靜態地歸納在模型之中，亦產生了為動態性的歸納結果，也成為學術與實務上帶來更多跨領域創新與社群操作下，員工體驗之研究之參考依據的可能性。

Innovation and Community had been developed for years, so that become important in nowadays. Besides, consumer electronics is popular among global consumers. Customer’s demand is changing faster than before. Therefore, companies had to come up with methods to strengthen their employees' capabilities through community building and development innovation and keep consumers be satisfied. In the past, researches are point out innovation are important for enterprise operation, and build a community will help enterprise to announce information and gather employee’s voices. Few literatures indicate that linking innovation and community will lead to more strategies for employee innovation. So that this study will propose the relationship between innovation, community, training.

This research takes qualitative research method with multiple cases by five industries, including Insurance, Information, LED Lighting, Material, and Social Media Marketing industries. To discuss how enterprise, operate innovation communities and increase the breadth of research in this way. In this study, a matrix model of innovative development methods and community openness will be established. Different industries may also be located in the same quadrant, and it is found that the use of employee experience will also affect the choice of two dimensions. It was found that when a company has multiple communities, but without innovative solutions and training, the relationship between community and innovation does not show up on the matrix.

Future research can use the matrix model proposed in this research as a cross-domain analysis study, and also provide companies with the ability to analyze the innovation and development of different industries.

中文部分
1.紀詩瑩（2002），企業員工自我導向學習傾向與知識分享意願關係之研究。暨南大學成人與繼續教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，南投縣。
2.陳向明（2002），社會科學質的研究，10-20頁。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
3.劉穎馥（2015），企業教育訓練對員工創新影響之探討。中原大學國際經營與貿易研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園市。
4.鈕文英(2013)，研究方法與論文寫作。雙葉書廊。
5.鈕文英、吳裕益(2015)，單一個案研究法:研究設計與後設分析，237-242頁。心理出版社股份有限公司。

英文部分
1.Arensberg, Conrad M. Industry and the community, American journal of Sociology, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 1-12（1942）

2.Hillery, G. Definitions of Community: Areas of Agreement, Rural Sociology, 111-123(1955)

3.Lorenz, Edward The Organization of work, education and training, and innovation（1983）

4.Cohen, Wesley M., and Daniel A. Levinthal. Absorptive Capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1 - Vol. 61, No. 4(1990)

5.McMillan, David W., and David M. Chavis. Sense of community: a definition and theory, Journal of Community Psychology, Volume 14, Issue 1(1986)

6.Goffee, Rob, and Gareth Jones. What holds the modern company together?. Harvard Business Review Home, November–December 1996 Issue, 133-148(1986)

7.Fujimoto, Takahiro, and K. Clark. "Product development performance." Strategy, Organisation and Management in the World Auto Industry (1991)

8.Brown, John Seely, and Paul Duguid. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation, Organization science 2.1, 40-57(1991)

9.Sanchez, Ron, and Joseph T. Mahoney. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design, Strategic management journal 17.S2, 63-76(1996)

10.Lynn, Leonard H., N. Mohan Reddy, and John D. Aram, Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework, Research policy 25.1, 91-106(1996)

11.Bianchi, Patrizio V., and Lee M. Miller. Innovation and collective action: The dynamics of change, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 7.2, 193-206(1996)

12.Dunphy, Steven M., Paul R. Herbig, and Mary E. Howes. The innovation funnel, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 53.3, 279-292(1996)

13.Hughey, Aaron W., and Kenneth J. Mussnug. Designing effective employee training programmes, Training for Quality(1997).

14.Dewar, Robert D., and Jane E. Dutton. The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis, Management science 32.11, 1422-1433(1986)

15.Teece, David J. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets, California management review 40.3, 55-79(1998)

16.Rogers, Mark, and Mark Rogers. The definition and measurement of innovation(1998)

17.Baptista, Rui, and Peter Swann. Do firms in clusters innovate more?. Research policy 27.5, 525-540(1998)

18.Hagel, John. Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities, Journal of interactive marketing 13.1, 55-65(1999)

19.Rifkin, Susan B., and Maria Kangere. What is participation, Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) as a participatory strategy in Africa, 37-49(2002)

20.Leifer, Richard, Gina Colarelli O'connor, and Mark Rice. Implementing radical innovation in mature firms: The role of hubs, Academy of Management Perspectives 15.3, 102-113(2001)

21.Fairbank, James F., and Scott David Williams. Motivating creativity and enhancing innovation through employee suggestion system technology, Creativity and innovation management 10.2, 68-74(2001)

22.Scott, W.R. Institutions and Organizations, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications(2001).

23.Brint, Steven. Gemeinschaft revisited: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept, Sociological theory 19.1, 1-23(2001)

24.Hargadon, Andrew B. Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation, Research in Organizational behavior 24, 41-86(2002)

25.Tether, Bruce S. Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis, Research policy 31.6, 947-967(2002)

26.Kadama, Michael. Creating new businesses through a strategic innovation community—case study of a new interactive video service in Japan. International Journal of Project Management 20.4: 289-302(2002)

27.Wenger, Etienne, Richard Arnold McDermott, and William Snyder. Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Press(2002)

28.Chesbrough, H. W, The open-innovation model, Managing innovation and change 127.3(2006)

29.Chesbrough, Henry William. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business Press, 21-40(2003)

30.Plant, Robert. Online communities, Technology in society 26.1, 51-65(2004)

31.Chesbrough, Henry. Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation, Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm 400, 0-19(2006)

32.Bhaskaran, Suku. Incremental Innovation and Business Performance: Small and Medium‐Size Food Enterprises in a Concentrated Industry Environment, Journal of Small Business Management 2006 44(1), 64–80(2006)

33.Chesbrough, Henry W., and Melissa M. Appleyard. Open innovation and strategy, California management review 50.1, 57-76(2007)

34.Maruyama, Yasushi, Makoto Nishikido, and Tetsunari Iida. The rise of community wind power in Japan: Enhanced acceptance through social innovation, Energy Policy 35.5, 2761-2769(2007)

35.Song, Michael, and Jeff Thieme. The role of suppliers in market intelligence gathering for radical and incremental innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management 26.1, 43-57(2009)

36.Tödtling, Franz, Patrick Lehner, and Alexander Kaufmann. Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions?. Technovation 29.1, 59-71(2009)

37.Filippetti, Andrea, Marion Frenz, and Grazia Ietto-Gillies. Is the innovation performance of countries related to their internationalization?. Brussels: European Commission(2009).

38.Yin, Robert K. Case study research: Design and methods 4th edition, United States: Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data(2009)

39.Heather, Douglas. Types of community, International Encyclopedia of Civil Society, 539-544(2010)

40.Dahlander, Linus, and David M. Gann. How open is innovation?. Research policy 39.6, 699-709(2010)

41.Herzog, Philipp, and Jens Leker. Open and closed innovation–different innovation cultures for different strategies, International Journal of Technology Management 52.3/4, 322-343(2010)

42.Mohr, Jakki J., Sanjit Sengupta, and Stanley F. Slater. Marketing of high-technology products and innovations, Pearson Prentice Hall(2010)

43.West, Richard E., and Michael J. Hannafin. Learning to design collaboratively: Participation of student designers in a Community of Innovation, Instructional Science 39.6, 821-841(2011)

44.Bogers, Marcel, and Stephane Lhuillery. A functional perspective on learning and innovation: Investigating the organization of absorptive capacity, Industry and innovation 18.6, 581-610(2011)

45.Shin, Shung Jae, Feirong Yuan, and Jing Zhou. When perceived innovation job requirement increases employee innovative behavior: A sensemaking perspective, Journal of Organizational Behavior 38.1, 68-86(2017)

46.Magnusson, Thomas, Göran Lindström, and Christian Berggren. Architectural or modular innovation? Managing discontinuous product development in response to challenging environmental performance targets. International journal of innovation management 7.01: 1-26(2003)

47.Chambers, Jack K., and Natalie Schilling, eds. The handbook of language variation and change, John Wiley & Sons (2018)

48.Marques, João PC. Closed versus open innovation: evolution or combination?. International Journal of Business and Management 9.3(2014)

49.Bogers, Marcel, et al. The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis, Industry and Innovation 24.1, 8-40(2017)

50.Plaskoff, Josh. Employee experience: the new human resource management approach, Strategic HR Review (2017)