近年來，新創事業蓬勃發展，引發了學術界與實務界的關注，這可能與全球化風潮、政府及社會鼓勵之下有關聯。但創業在學術上仍是相當年輕的領域，仍有許多議題值得被探討。自2000年以來，越來越多專家學者研究創業的質性個案，特別是資源與創業歷程中的行動，兩者有著密切的關聯性，而在面對資源缺乏的情況下，創業家該如何啟動創業正是本研究欲探討的重點，資源如何拼湊關係著創業的啟動是否順利。因此本研究將以資源拼湊的觀點，來比較與探討不同企業在創業過程中如何運用拼湊概念來啟動創業，以及如何運用拼湊的特色來面對困難與挑戰。
本研究採取雙個案比較的研究方法，研究發現兩間企業在創業初期，都面臨了資源缺乏的問題，因此運用手中既有資源來創業形成了創業初期的關鍵，透過兩個案的比較，發覺在不同創業過程中存在著相同或與相異的資源拼湊概念，值得來探討。
最後本研究根據結論欲給予日研究創業現象、或是欲進行創業的創業家們一些理論及實務上的建議，以增進現有知識對於創業的了解。

In recent years, new ventures increased attention has been paid to research of entrepreneurship. This surge of entrepreneurship in research as well in practice can be ascribed to globalization and promotion from government and society. However, entrepreneurship in the research field is still relatively young, and there are still many issues worth studying. Since 2000, more and more experts do entrepreneurship research by using qualitative case. Resources are the key to the entrepreneurial process, especially in the condition of lack of resources. How entrepreneurs make resource- bricolage in entrepreneurial process? Therefore, this study will compare and explore different enterprises in the different entrepreneurial process and discuss their action to resources facing the difficulties and challenges.
Using multiple cases study, this study investigates two enterprises. The findings reveal that two enterprises initially facing the shortage of resources in the start-up stage. Comparing two cases, the key point in the start-up stage is using resources at hand. This study finding something different in different entrepreneurial process in two cases, especially in bricolage. This research provides managerial implications and directions for future research.

中文文獻
汪青河. (1991). 創業家創業行為與環境個人特徵關係之研究. 國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文.
林家五, 黃國隆, & 鄭伯壎. (2004). 從認同到開創: 創業家的動態釋意歷程. 中山管理評論, 12(2), 337-397.
陳松柏. (1982). 青年創業與輔導制度之研究. 國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文.
陳耀宗. (1984). 青年創業決策之研究. 國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文.
蕭富峰. (2009). 創新與創業精神 : 管理大師彼得.杜拉克談創新實務與策略.
謝國雄. (1993). 事頭, 頭家與立業基之活化: 台灣小型製造單位創立及存活過程之研究. 臺灣社會研究(15), 93-129.
英文文獻
Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32, 255-276.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
Copper, A. C. (1973). Technical entrepreneurship: What do we know? Research and Development Management, 3, 59-64.
Cunha, M. P. (2005). Bricolage in organization. FUENL Working Paper Series, No.474.
Drucker, P. F. (1999). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York, NY:Harper Collins.
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-300.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1968). The savage mind: University of Chicago Press.
Lies, P. (1974). Who are the Entrepreneurship? MSU business Topics, 5-14.
Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship:Past Research and Future Challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2), 139-161.
Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management: Sage.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences: Suny Press.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 8(1), 5-23.
Reynolds, P. D., Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Greene, P. G. (2004). The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics, 23(4), 263-284.
Senyard, J., Baker, T., & Davidsson, P. (2009). Entrepreneurial bricolage: towards systematic empirical testing. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(5), 5.
Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a Path to Innovativeness for Resource‐Constrained New Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211-230.
Steffens, P. R., Baker, T., & Senyard, J. M. (2010). Betting on the underdog: Bricolage as an engine of resource advantage. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management 2010.
Steyaert, C. (2007). ‘Entrepreneuring’as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship and regional development, 19(6), 453-477.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5): sage.