高科技業為滿足顧客對於品質與多功能的要求，需提升積體電路產品供應鏈設計能力與製程技術以縮短產品開發週期時間。但是隨著產品不斷的進化，產品的設計日趨複雜化，現行企業廠房產線的能力往往已經不足以跟上腳步，使得新產品開發的過程十分困難，可能會遭遇的問題包括設計與建立廠房機台製程流程，評估材料與產品結構，定義製程參數作業規範等等都與以往有很大的不同。
尤其在封裝產業更能突顯市場上的效應，封裝產品是所有科技產業基本的元件，科技化的客戶需求引領精緻複雜的設計，越是多功能的產品也代表著封裝技術精細與複雜的結構，使得封裝邁入技術複合化。封裝產業的技術交流與協力合作成為目前重要的新產品發展趨勢。
本研究之目的在於延伸應用精實系統的五個原則：價值、價值溪流、暢流、後拉與完善建構精實產品開發模式，以改善新產品開發流程，降低不必要的浪費與縮短時間使得開發過程有效率的執行。此外，亦應用同步工程與協同設計工具協助新產品開發過程中整合客戶和開發團隊，避免新產品開發過程的溝通阻礙。由於在半導體封裝業此方面之研究仍付之闕如，故由模式之構建至成效之驗證，本文將以個案之方式進行探討。
藉由封裝產業個案研究，新產品進入了封裝技術複合化的狀況，必須組織新產品團隊進行垂直式的專案管理，以及橫向跨組織領域的協同設計溝通。此外，透過不斷的資訊分享使得開發團隊知識與考量獲得交流，才能使得新產品順利量產上市，達到客戶滿意與市場獲利雙贏的局面。本研究之模式未來可發展數量化之模式以評估其精實之程度與成效。

For satisfying customers’ quality and multi-function needs, high-technology enterprise improves design capability and process technology of integrated circuits supply chain in order to reduce product development cycle time. However, the product designs become more complex due to consistent evolution of products. Most of the enterprise plant manufacturing was unable to keep up with the pace of capability and making the process of new product development very difficult. Problems encountered subject to manufacturing plant in design and rebuilding process flows, re-evaluate materials and products structure, re-defined on operational parameter standards, since these are very different from the past.
Especially in the packaging industry, highlights the fact that the effects of the market. Assembled product is the basic component of all technology industries. Science and technology brings the needs of clients with complex and sophisticated package design. The more versatile products on behalf of the packaging technology and structural complicity, has lead to the composite packaging technology. Technological exchanges, cooperation and collaboration in packaging industry, is an important new product trends.
The purpose of this study is to extend and apply five principles including value, value stream, flow, pull and perfection for building lean product development model. The proposed model could reduce unnecessary waste and time, and makes the development more efficiently. Meanwhile, using concurrent engineering and collaborative design to integrate customers and design team in the product development process for preventing the communication barrier during the new product development process. For semiconductor assembly, the study was just few. Hence, the study applies case study to discuss the lean development model which was built and verified effective result.
Based on packaging company case study, it is necessary to reorganized new product team to perform vertical project management and horizontal inter-organization communication and information sharing in the complex packaging status. Unlimited sharing of information would maximize the knowledge and consideration and lead new products to smooth production, a win-win situation to satisfy customers and earn market profits. The proposed model will be developed quantity model to evaluate the degree and result of lean product development.

1.Abdulmalek, F. A., & Rajgopal, J. (2007). Analyzing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value stream mapping via simulation: A process sector case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 107(1), 223-236.
2.Choi, Y., Kang, D., Chae, H., & Kim, K. (2008). An enterprise architecture framework for collaboration of virtual enterprise chains. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35(11-12), 1065-1078.
3.Cooper, R. G. (1994). Perspective - 3rd-generation new product processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(1), 3-14.
4.Crawford, C. M., & Di Benedetto, A. (2008). New Products Management (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.Duguay, C. R., Landry, S., & Pasin, F. (1997). From mass production to flexible/agile production. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(11-12), 1183-1195.
6.Dwyer, L. M. (1990). Factors affecting the proficient management of product innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 5(6), 721-730.
7.Feld, W. M. (2001). Lean Manufacturing: Tools, Techniques, and How to Use Them. Florida: St. Lucie Press.
8.Fliess, S., & Becker, U. (2006). Supplier integration - controlling of co-development processes. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(1), 28-44.
9.Gao, J. X., Manson, B. M., & Kyratsis, P. (2000). Implementation of concurrent engineering in the suppliers to the automotive industry. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 107(1-3), 201-208.
10.George, M. (2003). Lean Six Sigma for Service: How to Use Lean Speed and Six Sigma Quality to Improve Services and Transactions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.Haque, B., & James-Moore, M. (2004). Applying lean thinking to new product introduction. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(1), 1-31.
12.Hartley, J. L., Meredith, J. R., McCutcheon, D., & Kamath, R. R. (1997). Suppliers' contributions to product development: An exploratory study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 258-267.
13.Hauck, W. C., Bansal, A., Allan, P. E., & Hauck, A. J. (1997). Simultaneous engineering - correlates of success. International Journal of Production Economics, 52(1-2), 83-90.
14.Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004). Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 994-1011.
15.Hoerl, R. (2004). One perspective on the future of six sigma. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), 112-119.
16.James-Moore, S. M., & Gibbons, A. (1997). Is lean manufacture universally relevant? An investigative methodology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(9-10), 899-911.
17.Jun, H. B., & Suh, H. W. (2008). A modeling framework for product development process considering its characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(3), 524-524.
18.Karlsson, C., & Ahlstrom, P. (1996). The difficult path to lean product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(4), 283-295.
19.Koners, U., & Goffin, K. (2007). Learning from postproject reviews: A cross-case analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(3), 242-258.
20.Krishnan, V., & Ulrich, K. T. (2001). Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science, 47(1), 1-21.
21.Laseter, T. M., & Ramdas, K. (2002). Product types and supplier roles in product development: An exploratory analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(2), 107-118.
22.Liker, J. K. (2003). The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer. New York: McGraw Hill.
23.Littler, D., Leverick, F., & Bruce, M. (1995). Factors affecting the process of collaborative product development - a study of Uk manufacturers of information and communications technology products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(1), 16-32.
24.Locher, D. A. (2008). Value Stream Mapping for Lean Development: A How-to Guide for Streamlining Time to Market (1st ed.). New York: Productivity Press.
25.Lyu, J., & Chang, L. Y. (2007). Early involvement in the design chain - a case study from the computer industry. Production Planning & Control, 18(3), 172-179.
26.McManus, H. L., & Millard, R. (2002). Value stream analysis and mapping for product development. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences 23rd ICAS Congress, Toronto Canada.
27.Monden, Y. (1998). The Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-In-Time (3rd ed.). Portland: Productivity Press.
28.Nave, D. (2002). How to compare six sigma, lean and the theory of constraints: a framework for choosing what' s best for your organization. Quality Progress, 35(3), 73-78.
29.Ohno, T. (1998). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production Portland: Productivity Press.
30.Perona, M., & Saccani, N. (2004). Integration techniques in customer-supplier relationships: An empirical research in the Italian industry of household appliances. International Journal of Production Economics, 89(2), 189-205.
31.Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management, 23(3-4), 371-388.
32.Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V. (1997). Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(3), 190-202.
33.Riezebos, J., Klingenberg, W., & Hicks, C. (2009). Lean production and information technology: Connection or contradiction? Computers in Industry, 60(4), 237-247.
34.Rother, M., & Shook, J. (1999). Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate MUDA. Massachusetts: Lean Enterprise Institute.
35.Sanchez, A. M., & Perez, M. P. (2001). Lean indicators and manufacturing strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(11), 1433-1451.
36.Serrano, I., Ochoa, C., & De Castro, R. (2008). Evaluation of value stream mapping in manufacturing system redesign. International Journal of Production Research, 46(16), 4409-4430.
37.Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 129-149.
38.Sher, P. J., & Yang, P. Y. (2005). The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan's semiconductor industry. Technovation, 25(1), 33-43.
39.Shyamsundar, N., & Gadh, R. (2002). Collaborative virtual prototyping of product assemblies over the Internet. Computer-Aided Design, 34(10), 755-768.
40.Sullivan, W. G., McDonald, T. N., & Van Aken, E. M. (2002). Equipment replacement decisions and lean manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 18(3-4), 255-265.
41.Sun, H. Y., & Chung, W. C. (2005). Critical success factors for new product development in the Hong Kong toy industry. Technovation, 25(3), 293-303.
42.Swink, M. L. (1998). A tutorial on implementing concurrent engineering in new product development programs. Journal of Operations Management, 16(1), 103-116.
43.Tang, D. B. (2004). An agent-based collaborative design system to facilitate active die-maker involvement in stamping part design. Computers in Industry, 54(3), 253-271.
44.Tsai, K.-H. (2004). The impact of technological capability on firm performance in Taiwan's electronics industry. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(2), 183-195.
45.Wang, J., & Lin, H. Y. (2006). A fuzzy hybrid decision-aid model for selecting partners in the design chain. International Journal of Production Research, 44(10), 2047-2069.
46.Womack, J. (2004). A Letter to Lean Thinker. Massachusetts: Lean Enterprise Institute.
47.Womack, J., & Jones, D. (1996). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. New York: Free Press.
48.Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The Machine that Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates.
49.Xu, X. W., & Liu, T. (2003). A web-enabled PDM system in a collaborative design environment. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 19(4), 315-328.
50.Yassine, A., & Braha, D. (2003). Complex concurrent engineering and the design structure matrix method. Concurrent Engineering-Research and Applications, 11(3), 165-176.
51.Yesilbas, L. G., & Lombard, M. (2004). Towards a knowledge repository for collaborative design process: focus on conflict management. Computers in Industry, 55(3), 335-350.