簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林宗毅
Lin, Zong-Yi
論文名稱: 以畜殖場放流水部分替代肥料栽培硬質玉米之可行性及其對土壤微生物組成之影響
Feasibility of Partially Substituting Fertilizers with Swine Farm Effluent for Flint Corn Cultivation and Its Effects on Soil Microbial Composition
指導教授: 黃兆立
Huang, Chao-Li
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 生物科學與科技學院 - 熱帶植物與微生物科學研究所
Institute of Tropical Plant Sciences and Microbiology
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 72
中文關鍵詞: 放流水 、硬質玉米 、土壤微生物 、FAPROTAX 、永續農業
外文關鍵詞: swine farm effluent, flint corn, soil microbiome, FAPROTAX, sustainable agriculture
相關次數: 點閱:106  下載:3 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 放流水是一種富含氮的資源,具有替代化肥用於永續農業的潛力。雖然氮能夠促進植物生長和微生物活動,但使用不當會導致土壤鹽鹼化和植物逆境。本研究評估了放流水作為硬質玉米追肥的可行性及其對土壤微生物的影響。第一年於畜殖場D進行盆栽試驗,設置三種不同濃度之放流水處理組及一個地下水對照組。結果顯示,隨著放流水濃度提升,玉米表現型有逐漸變好之趨勢。然而,高濃度未稀釋放流水施用會增加葉片丙二醛(malondialdehyde, MDA)含量,顯示可能對植物造成氧化逆境。微生物分析結果顯示,假單孢菌門(Pseudomonadota)為主要優勢菌門,非度量多維尺度分析(non-metric multidimensional scaling, NMDS)顯示各處理組間微生物群落結構無顯著差異。進一步透過濃度相關性分析,共篩選出 14 個與放流水濃度呈正相關之 ASVs。將所有放流水處理組合併後與對照組利用火山圖比較,共有 117 個 ASVs 於放流水處理組中顯著富集。進一步利用Functional Annotation of Prokaryotic Taxa(FAPROTAX)功能預測分析顯示,富集菌群多與碳、氮循環功能相關。第二年於畜殖場 S進行硬質玉米田間試驗,透過植物表型、光合色素及土壤性質分析,評估放流水部分替代化學肥料之可行性。結果顯示,在氮源供應相近且適當施用放流水之條件下,放流水處理組與傳統化肥組間並無顯著差異,顯示放流水具有部分替代化學肥料之潛力。綜合盆栽與田間試驗結果,適當施用放流水具有部分替代化學肥料之潛力,可維持玉米正常生長,並改變土壤細菌群落組成,富集具有預測碳、氮循環功能之細菌類群。其中,Cellvibrio於多項分析中皆與放流水施用具有一致關聯,推測可作為放流水施用之潛在微生物指標。本研究結果可作為放流水農業再利用及永續農業發展之參考。

    Swine farm effluent is a nitrogen-rich resource with potential as an alternative fertilizer source for sustainable agriculture. This study evaluated its feasibility as a topdressing fertilizer for flint corn and its effects on soil bacterial communities. In the first year, a pot experiment showed that corn growth improved with increasing effluent concentration, whereas undiluted effluent significantly increased leaf malondialdehyde (MDA) content, indicating oxidative stress. Although no significant differences in overall bacterial community structure were observed, effluent application enriched bacterial taxa associated with carbon and nitrogen cycling functions. In the second year, a field experiment demonstrated that, under comparable nitrogen inputs and appropriate application rates, swine farm effluent partially replaced chemical fertilizers without significantly affecting corn growth. Cellvibrio was consistently associated with effluent application across multiple microbial analyses, suggesting its potential as a microbial indicator of effluent application. Overall, appropriate application of swine farm effluent showed potential to partially replace chemical fertilizers while enriching bacterial taxa involved in nutrient cycling, supporting its agricultural reuse for sustainable agriculture.

    摘要 I Extended abstract II 致謝 VI 表目錄 XI 圖目錄 XII 壹、前言 1 一、明豐3號 1 二、畜牧廢水放流水 2 三、16S全長定序 3 四、ASV (Amplicon Sequence Variant)3 五、研究動機 4 貳、材料與方法 6 一、畜殖場D玉米盆栽試驗設計 6 二、放流水離子含量檢測 7 三、土壤化學性質及離子含量檢測 7 四、測量玉米表現型 8 五、土壤DNA抽取、16S全長定序 8 六、畜殖場S田間試驗 8 七、統計分析 9 參、結果 11 一、畜殖場D放流水及灌溉用地下水離子組成 11 二、各處理組氮、磷、鉀含量以及肥料施加量 12 三、各處理土壤物化性質變化、植物表現型及產量 13 四、各處理葉片光合色素及MDA含量 13 五、各處理微生物相的變化及功能預測 13 六、放流水施用對微生物群落之影響(合併分析)15 七、畜殖場S田間試驗 15 肆、討論 17 一、放流水離子組成及不同放流水濃度對於硬質玉米生長及土壤性質的影響 17 二、不同濃度放流水對於硬質玉米根際土壤微生物之影響 18 三、放流水施用對根際土壤微生物組成與功能潛勢之影響 19 四、畜殖場S放流水性質及對於替代傳統化肥的能力 20 五、放流水對於種植玉米之潛在危害性 21 伍、結論 23 陸、參考文獻 24

    余德發和游之穎。(2014)。活化休耕地-硬質玉米品種介紹。花蓮區農業專訊,89,2-5。
    林家玉。(2025)。播種期及氮肥施用量對硬質玉米之影響。苗栗區農業專訊,110,22–24。
    游之穎、余德發和詹庭筑。(2015)。栽培密度對硬質玉米生育與產量之影響。花蓮區農業改良場研究彙報,33,23-32。
    臺南區農業改良場。(2016)。臺灣硬質玉米栽培管理技術。臺南區農業改良場技術專刊,105-2(No. 163)。
    行政院農業委員會。(2016)。硬質玉米良好農業規範(TGAP)。臺南區農業改良場編撰。
    衛生福利部。(2024)。食品中污染物質及毒素衛生標準。
    謝禮臣。(2024)。硬質玉米生育期需水量之研究。臺南區農業改良場研究彙報,85,28–42。
    謝禮臣和游添榮。(2022)。硬質玉米栽培管理技術。臺南區農業專訊,121,10-12。
    農業部農業試驗所。(2023)。土壤酸鹼值(pH值)測定方法-電極法(TARI S501.1B)。
    農業部農業試驗所。(2023)。土壤電導度測定方法(TARI S101.1B)。
    陳鴻堂。(2000)。設施土壤肥料問題解決對策。合理化施肥技術,45–64。
    AbdElgawad, H., Zinta, G., Hegab, M. M., Pandey, R., Asard, H., & Abuelsoud, W. (2016). High salinity induces different oxidative stress and antioxidant responses in maize seedlings organs. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 276.
    Ahmadi-Jouibari, T., Ahmadi Jouybari, H., Sharafi, K., Heydari, M., & Fattahi, N. (2023). Assessment of potentially toxic elements in vegetables and soil samples irrigated with treated sewage and human health risk assessment. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 103, 2351-2367.
    Al-Hazmi, H. E., Mohammadi, A., Hejna, A., Majtacz, J., Esmaeili, A., Habibzadeh, S., Saeb, M. R., Badawi, M., Lima, E. C., & Mąkinia, J. (2023). Wastewater reuse in agriculture: Prospects and challenges. Environmental Research, 236, 116711.
    Anderson, M., & Habiger, J. (2012). Characterization and identification of productivity-associated rhizobacteria in wheat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78, 4434-4446.
    Bernstein, N., Meiri, A., & Zilberstaine, M. (2004). Root growth of avocado is more sensitive to salinity than shoot growth. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 129, 188-192.
    Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., & Holmes, S. P. (2017). Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. The ISME Journal, 11, 2639-2643.
    Christou, A., Beretsou, V. G., Iakovides, I. C., Karaolia, P., Michael, C., Benmarhnia, T., Chefetz, B., Donner, E., Gawlik, B. M., & Lee, Y. (2024). Sustainable wastewater reuse for agriculture. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 5, 504-521.
    Conde-Barajas, E., Negrete-Rodríguez, M. d. l. L. X., Álvarez-Bernal, D., Gámez-Vázquez, F. P., Lastiri-Hernández, M. A., Patiño-Galván, H., Silva-Martínez, G. A., Tristán-Flores, F. E., & Bedolla-Rivera, H. I. (2025). Corn cultivation and its relationship with soil quality: A focus on soil quality index methodologies. Land, 14, 861.
    DeBoy, R. T., Mongodin, E. F., Fouts, D. E., Tailford, L. E., Khouri, H., Emerson, J. B., Mohamoud, Y., Watkins, K., Henrissat, B., & Gilbert, H. J. (2008). Insights into plant cell wall degradation from the genome sequence of the soil bacterium Cellvibrio japonicus. Journal of Bacteriology, 190, 5455-5463.
    Deshwal, V., Singh, S., Kumar, P., & Chubey, A. (2013). Rhizobia unique plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a review. International Journal of Life Sciences, 2, 74-86.
    Djemiel, C., Maron, P.-A., Terrat, S., Dequiedt, S., Cottin, A., & Ranjard, L. (2022). Inferring microbiota functions from taxonomic genes: a review. GigaScience, 11, giab090.
    Ershov, A. P., Babich, T. L., Grouzdev, D. S., Sokolova, D. S., Semenova, E. M., Avtukh, A. N., Poltaraus, A. B., Ianutsevich, E. A., & Nazina, T. N. (2023). Genome analysis and potential ecological functions of members of the genus Ensifer from subsurface environments and description of Ensifer oleiphilus sp. nov. Microorganisms, 11, 2314.
    Gazdag, O., Takács, T., Ködöböcz, L., Krett, G., & Szili-Kovács, T. (2019). Alphaproteobacteria communities depend more on soil types than land managements. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B—Soil & Plant Science, 69, 147-154.
    Gómez Expósito, R., Postma, J., Raaijmakers, J. M., & De Bruijn, I. (2015). Diversity and activity of Lysobacter species from disease suppressive soils. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 1243.
    Hajjami, K., Ennaji, M., Fouad, S., Oubrim, N., Khallayoune, K., & Cohen, N. (2012). Assessment of helminths health risk associated with reuse of raw and treated wastewater of the Settat City (Morocco). Resources and Environment, 2, 193-201.
    Hashem, M. S., & Qi, X. (2021). Treated wastewater irrigation—A review. Water, 13, 1527.
    Hozzein, W. N., Abuelsoud, W., Wadaan, M. A., Shuikan, A. M., Selim, S., Al Jaouni, S., & AbdElgawad, H. (2019). Exploring the potential of actinomycetes in improving soil fertility and grain quality of economically important cereals. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 2787-2798.
    Iqbal, S., Tak, H. I., Inam, A., Inam, A., Sahay, S., & Chalkoo, S. (2015). Comparative effect of wastewater and groundwater irrigation along with nitrogenous fertilizer on growth, photosynthesis and productivity of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Journal of Plant Nutrition, 38, 1006-1021.
    Jankauskienė, J., Laužikė, K., & Kaupaitė, S. (2024). The use of anaerobic digestate for greenhouse horticulture. Agronomy, 14, 2437.
    Jaramillo, M. F., & Restrepo, I. (2017). Wastewater reuse in agriculture: A review about its limitations and benefits. Sustainability, 9, 1734.
    Jo, J.-H., Kennedy, E. A., & Kong, H. H. (2016). Research techniques made simple: bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing in cutaneous research. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 136, e23-e27.
    Kama, R., Liu, Y., Song, J., Hamani, A. K. M., Zhao, S., Li, S., Diatta, S., Yang, F., & Li, Z. (2023). Treated livestock wastewater irrigation is safe for maize (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) intercropping system considering heavy metals migration in soil–plant system. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20, 3345.
    Khin, T., & Annachhatre, A. P. (2004). Novel microbial nitrogen removal processes. Biotechnology Advances, 22, 519-532.
    Li, F., Chen, L., Zhang, J., Yin, J., & Huang, S. (2017). Bacterial community structure after long-term organic and inorganic fertilization reveals important associations between soil nutrients and specific taxa involved in nutrient transformations. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 187.
    Lladó, S., & Baldrian, P. (2017). Community-level physiological profiling analyses show potential to identify the copiotrophic bacteria present in soil environments. PLoS One, 12, e0171638.
    Louca, S., Parfrey, L. W., & Doebeli, M. (2016). Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome. Science, 353, 1272-1277.
    Menegat, S., Ledo, A., & Tirado, R. (2022). Greenhouse gas emissions from global production and use of nitrogen synthetic fertilisers in agriculture. Scientific Reports, 12, 14490.
    Morales, M., & Munné-Bosch, S. (2019). Malondialdehyde: facts and artifacts. Plant Physiology, 180, 1246-1250.
    Muscarella, S. M., Alduina, R., Badalucco, L., Capri, F. C., Di Leto, Y., Gallo, G., Laudicina, V. A., Paliaga, S., & Mannina, G. (2024). Water reuse of treated domestic wastewater in agriculture: Effects on tomato plants, soil nutrient availability and microbial community structure. Science of the Total Environment, 928, 172259.
    Nagarajan, D., Mariappan, N., Chen, C.-Y., Chen, J.-H., Dong, C.-D., Lee, D.-J., & Chang, J.-S. (2024). Biological treatment of swine wastewater—Conventional methods versus microalgal processes. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 177, 105645.
    Navas-Molina, J. A., Peralta-Sánchez, J. M., González, A., McMurdie, P. J., Vázquez-Baeza, Y., Xu, Z., Ursell, L. K., Lauber, C., Zhou, H., & Song, S. J. (2013). Advancing our understanding of the human microbiome using QIIME. Methods in Enzymology, 531, 371–444.
    Nleya, T., Chungu, C., & Kleinjan, J. (2016). Corn growth and development. In D. E. Clay, C. G. Carlson, S. A. Clay, & E. Byamukama (Eds.), iGrow Corn: Best Management Practices (Chapter 5). South Dakota State University.
    Rahman, T. U., Roy, H., Islam, M. R., Tahmid, M., Fariha, A., Mazumder, A., Tasnim, N., Pervez, M. N., Cai, Y., & Naddeo, V. (2023). The advancement in membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology toward sustainable industrial wastewater management. Membranes, 13, 181.
    Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., & Benson, G. O. (1993). How a Corn Plant Develops (Special Report No. 48). Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Cooperative Extension Service, Ames, IA.
    Segata, N., Izard, J., Waldron, L., Gevers, D., Miropolsky, L., Garrett, W. S., & Huttenhower, C. (2011). Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biology, 12, R60.
    Singh, S. K., Bharose, R., Nemčić-Jurec, J., Rawat, K. S., & Singh, D. (2021). Irrigation water quality appraisal using statistical methods and WATEQ4F geochemical model. In Agricultural Water Management: Theories and Practices (pp. 101–138). Academic Press.
    Suarez, C., Ratering, S., Kramer, I., & Schnell, S. (2014). Cellvibrio diazotrophicus sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of salt meadow plants and emended description of the genus Cellvibrio. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 64, 481-486.
    Talwar, C., Nagar, S., Kumar, R., Scaria, J., Lal, R., & Negi, R. K. (2020). Defining the environmental adaptations of genus Devosia: insights into its expansive short peptide transport system and positively selected genes. Scientific Reports, 10, 1151.
    Teklić, T., Lončarić, Z., Kovačević, V., & Singh, B. R. (2013). Metallic trace elements in cereal grain–a review: how much metal do we eat? Food and Energy Security, 2, 81-95.
    Velho, V. F., Mohedano, R. A., Filho, P. B., & Costa, R. H. (2012). The viability of treated piggery wastewater for reuse in agricultural irrigation. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 1, 10.
    Walters, W. A., Jin, Z., Youngblut, N., Wallace, J. G., Sutter, J., Zhang, W., González-Peña, A., Peiffer, J., Koren, O., & Shi, Q. (2018). Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 7368-7373.
    Zayed, O., Hewedy, O. A., Abdelmoteleb, A., Ali, M., Youssef, M. S., Roumia, A. F., Seymour, D., & Yuan, Z.-C. (2023). Nitrogen journey in plants: From uptake to metabolism, stress response, and microbe interaction. Biomolecules, 13, 1443.
    Zhang, X., Bashir, M., Liu, X., Luo, J., Zhao, Y., Lei, Q., Muhammad, H., Rehim, A., Geng, Y., & Liu, H. (2023). Evaluating the effects of sustainable chemical and organic fertilizers with water saving practice on corn production and soil characteristics. Phyton, 92, 1349.
    Zhou, Y., Zhu, Y., Zhu, J., Li, C., & Chen, G. (2023). A comprehensive review on wastewater nitrogen removal and its recovery processes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20, 3429.

    下載圖示
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE