簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李心萱
LEE, HSIN-HSUAN
論文名稱: 歷史街區中的環境設計、城市形象、歷史性知覺、情感評價與地方認同關聯性研究:以臺南歷史街區為例
Exploring the Relationships among Environmental Design, Urban Image, Historical Perception, Affective Appraisal, and Place Identity in Tainan’s Historical Districts
指導教授: 張珩
Zhang, Heng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 建築學系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 155
中文關鍵詞: 歷史街區環境設計歷史性知覺城市形象情感評價地方認同結構方程模式
外文關鍵詞: Historic District, Environmental Design, Historical Perception, Urban Image, Affective Appraisal, Place Identity, Structural Equation Modeling
相關次數: 點閱:17下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 歷史街區不只是城市的遺緒,更是地方認同與文化延續的場域。其價值不僅存在於建築的物質性保存,更體現在居民與空間之間日常互動所生成的情感記憶與心理歸屬。臺南自1624年建城以來,歷經荷治、明鄭、清領、日治與民國之時代更迭,至今已逾400年。作為臺灣古都之一,臺南所展現的城市紋理與空間經驗,構成一個理解歷史空間與地方認同相互建構過程的觀察場域。
    本研究以府城赤崁、安平、五條港與孔廟四個歷史街區為實證範圍,探討歷史街區環境設計如何透過歷史性知覺、城市形象與情感評價影響人們的地方認同。研究設計為一具中介變項的結構方程模型(SEM),並收集432份實際訪客樣本進行分析。並進一步採用多群組分析(MGA),比較臺南市民與非市民在地方認同建構歷程上的差異,以驗證模型在不同群體間的適用性與結構恆等性。
    結果顯示,歷史街區的環境設計(如景觀植栽、空間配置)能有效喚起居民的情感連結,而歷史性知覺則成為非市民產生認同的關鍵橋樑。城市形象與情感評價的中介作用,在不同使用者群體間呈現顯著差異,反映地方認同並非單一形式建構,而是高度依賴個體與環境互動經驗的過程。
    本研究回應過往較少關注不同使用者主觀感受與心理歷程的缺口,並呼應歷史街區振興政策中「社區參與」與「文化延續」的價值導向。研究結果不僅提供環境設計與文化治理的重要參考,也主張歷史街區應從靜態保存轉化為動態生活場域,透過在地詮釋與居民參與形塑跨群體的情感基礎。尤其在面對鐵路地下化與都市更新等都市發展挑戰下,更應將使用者感知納入設計核心,落實歷史資產與城市生活融合的永續策略。

    Historic districts are not merely remnants of the past, but vital arenas where place identity and cultural continuity are shaped. This study explores how environmental design in Tainan’s historic districts influences place identity through the mediating roles of historical perception, urban image, and affective appraisal. Focusing on four key areas—Chikan, Anping, the Old Five Channels, and the Confucius Temple district—this research collected 432 valid responses from visitors and analyzed the data using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Multi-Group Analysis (MGA).
    The findings reveal that elements of environmental design, such as spatial layout and landscape features, can evoke emotional connections among users. For non-local visitors, historical perception plays a critical mediating role in forming place identity. Furthermore, the mediation effects of city image and affective appraisal differ between Tainan residents and non-residents, suggesting that place identity is not constructed uniformly but is contingent on users’ experiences and interactions with space.
    By addressing the gap in research regarding users' subjective perceptions and psychological processes, this study aligns with current revitalization policies emphasizing community participation and cultural continuity. The results offer implications for heritage conservation and urban design, advocating a shift from static preservation toward dynamic, experience-oriented environments. Especially amid large-scale transformations such as railway undergrounding and regeneration, incorporating users’ perceptions into planning is essential for fostering sustainable, culturally resonant historic environments.

    摘要 I 致謝 VI 目錄 VII 圖目錄 XI 表目錄 XII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 一、研究動機 1 二、研究目的 3 第二節 研究範圍與對象 4 第三節 研究方法與流程 4 一、文獻回顧 4 二、研究設計 4 三、資料蒐集 4 四、研究結果分析 4 五、結果與討論 4 六、結論與建議 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 歷史遺產保存與文化價值的演變 6 一、國際歷史遺產保存憲章的發展與核心精神 6 二、文化遺產的多維價值與分類 6 三、臺灣歷史文化資產保存的發展與挑戰 7 第二節 臺南歷史街區發展脈絡與再生 8 一、臺南舊城發展脈絡 8 二、舊城發展後續影響 10 三、歷史街區保護與經營 12 第三節 歷史街區環境設計的空間特質 15 一、歷史空間的感知與詮釋 15 二、空間特徵與情感連結 16 三、歷史街區發展策略與設計實踐 16 第四節 歷史街區中的歷史性知覺 18 一、真實性與完整性的再思考 18 二、歷史可讀性與詮釋行為 19 三、集體記憶與地方認同的建構 19 第五節 城市形象與價值的感知 20 一、形構城市形象的社會基礎 20 二、城市的空間品質與機能 20 第六節 城市空間的情感評價 22 一、愉悅:從美感體驗到地方依附 22 二、喚起:刺激、活力與空間參與 22 三、主導:控制、預期與心理安全 23 第七節 地方認同與歷史街區的參與行動 24 一、地方認同的理論與核心意涵 24 二、地方認同的構成要素 24 三、空間紋理與文化意涵的場所實踐 25 四、地方認同於城市治理與永續發展中的角色 25 第八節 研究架構五構面綜合關係 26 第三章 研究設計 27 第一節 研究架構與假設 27 一、研究架構 27 二、研究假設 28 第二節 問卷設計 29 一、歷史街區環境設計 29 二、歷史性知覺 31 三、城市形象 32 四、情感評價 33 五、地方認同 34 六、背景屬性 35 第三節 研究場域與對象 36 一、研究場域界定與選定 36 二、研究樣本與抽樣方法 42 第四節 統計分析方法 43 一、描述性統計(Descriptive Statistics)43 二、項目分析與信度分析(Item Analysis & Reliability Analysis)43 三、探索性因素分析(Exploratory Factor Analysis, EFA)43 四、相關分析(Correlation Analysis)44 五、結構方程模式分析(Structural Equation Modelling, SEM)44 六、獨立樣本t檢定(t-test)44 七、單因子變異數分析(One-Way ANOVA)44 八、多群組分析(Multiple Group Analysis, MGA)45 第四章 研究結果 46 第一節 描述性統計分析 46 一、受訪者背景屬性 46 二、歷史街區環境設計 49 三、歷史性知覺 51 四、城市形象 52 五、情感評價 53 六、地方認同 54 第二節 項目分析、信度分析與因素分析 55 一、歷史街區環境設計 55 二、歷史性知覺 59 三、城市形象 61 四、情感評價 63 五、地方認同 65 第三節 相關分析―研究架構構面關係驗證 67 一、五構面間的關聯性驗證 67 第四節 結構方程模式 68 一、測量模式分析 68 二、結構模式分析 74 第五節 獨立樣本t檢定與單因子變異數分析 80 一、不同背景屬性對各構面評價之差異 80 二、不同背景屬性對歷史街區環境設計評價之差異 84 三、不同背景屬性對歷史性知覺評價之差異 88 四、不同背景屬性對城市形象評價之差異 90 五、不同背景屬性對情感評價評價之差異 92 六、不同背景屬性對地方認同評價之差異 94 第六節 多群組分析 97 一、個別群組的結構模式適配度評估 97 二、模式參數恆等性的檢測 98 三、變項路徑影響與群組調節效果的探討 100 第五章 結果與討論 104 第一節 歷史街區環境設計影響地方認同之結構方程模型 104 一、構面間因果關係之路徑估計(H1~H9)104 二、構面間中介效果之檢驗(H10)109 三、構面中各因子之因素負荷值 110 第二節 不同背景屬性與研究場域對各構面之評價差異(H11)111 一、不同背景屬性對各構面之評價差異 111 第三節 臺南市民身份與否對研究模型的調節效果(H12)115 一、分群模式的建立 115 二、分群路徑係數影響效果 115 三、背景屬性評價差異與分群模型之比較 118 四、整體模型與非臺南市民分群模型之比較 119 第六章 結論與建議 120 第一節 結論 120 一、構面及因子核心發現 120 二、歷史街區中的社區營造與地方認同實踐 121 三、歷史性知覺與地方認同的互動關係 121 四、都市更新脈絡下的良性循環 122 五、理論貢獻 122 第二節 建議 123 一、研究限制 123 二、後續研究建議 123 第七章 參考文獻 124 附錄 問卷內容 138

    Abdurahiman, S., Kasthurba A. K., & Nuzhat, A. (2022). Impact of Urban Heritage on Social Values in Historic Urban Precincts—Public Perception of the Kuttichira Community, Kerala. SCIRES-IT, 12(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v12n1p19

    Aiello, A., Ardone, R. G., & Scopelliti, M. (2010). Neighbourhood planning improvement: Physical attributes, cognitive and affective evaluation and activities in two neighbourhoods in Rome. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(3), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.10.004

    Alberts, H. C., & Hazen, H. D. (2010). Maintaining Authenticity and Integrity at Cultural World Heritage Sites. Geographical Review, 100(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2010.00006.x

    Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

    Argento, D., Imre, Ö., Johansson, M., & Rönkkö, K. (2024). Facing sustainable city challenges: The quest for attra-chment. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-024-00355-4

    Australia ICOMOS. (2013). Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Guidelines for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance. https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Burra-Charter-2013-Adopted-31.10.2013.pdf

    Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0

    Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

    Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

    Birdsall, C., Halauniova, A., & Van De Kamp, L. (2021). Sensing Urban Values: Reassessing Urban Cultures and Histories Amidst Redevelopment Agendas. Space and Culture, 24(3), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312211000654

    Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179

    Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1990). Direct and Indirect Effects: Classical and Bootstrap Estimates of Variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/271084

    Breakwell, G. M. (1986). Coping with threatened identities. London, UK: Methuen.

    Bronson, S. D., & Jester, T. C. (1997). Conserving the Built Heritage of the Modern Era: Recent Developments and Ongoing Challenges. APT Bulletin: The Journal of Preservation Technology, 28(4), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1504588

    Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.

    Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological bulletin, 105(3), 456.

    Campagnaro, T., Vecchiato, D., Arnberger, A., Celegato, R., Da Re, R., Rizzetto, R., Semenzato, P., Sitzia, T., Tempesta, T., & Cattaneo, D. (2020). General, stress relief and perceived safety preferences for green spaces in the historic city of Padua (Italy). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 52, 126695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126695

    Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Sage Publications.

    Chau, P. Y. K. (1997). Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01313.x

    Chen, J. L., Lin, Y. J., Huang, I. H., & Yeh, M. L. (2022). The study of city color imagery, affective appraisal and place attachment. In P. L. P. Rau (Ed.), Cross-cultural design. Product and service design, mobility and automotive design, cities, urban areas, and intelligent environments design (Vol. 13314, pp. 311–325). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06053-3_22

    Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255.

    Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii-xvi.

    Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic press.

    Conzen, M. R. G. (1960). Alnwick, Northumberland: A Study in Town-Plan Analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27, 21-42.

    Dai, T., & Zheng, X. (2021). Understanding how multi-sensory spatial experience influences atmosphere, affective city image and behavioural intention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106595

    Deghati Najd, M., Ismail, N. A., Maulan, S., Mohd Yunos, M. Y., & Dabbagh Niya, M. (2015). Visual preference dimensions of historic urban areas: The determinants for urban heritage conservation. Habitat International, 49, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.003

    Deng, Z., Chen, D., Qin, X., & Wang, S. (2021). Comprehensive assessment to residents’ perceptions to historic urban center in megacity: A case study of Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, China. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 20(5), 566–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.1942000

    Diao, J., & Lu, S. (2022). The Culture-Oriented Urban Regeneration: Place Narrative in the Case of the Inner City of Haiyan (Zhejiang, China). Sustainability, 14(13), 7992. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137992

    Elsorady, D. A. (2014). Assessment of the compatibility of new uses for heritage buildings: The example of Alexandria National Museum, Alexandria, Egypt. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(5), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.10.011

    Evans, D. R. (1994). Enhancing quality of life in the population at large. Social Indicators Research, 33(1), 47–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078958

    Farhad, S., Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J., & Hedayati Marzbali, M. (2021). Architectural identity and place attachment in historic neighbourhoods: An empirical study in Sanandaj, Iran. Journal of Place Management and Development, 14(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-02-2020-0018

    Field, A. (2013) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics: And Sex and Drugs and Rock “N” Roll (4th ed.). Sage, Los Angeles; London, New Delhi.

    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

    Fransiska Febriati Anwar, W., Said, I., & Hisyam Rasidi, M. (2025). Making Sustainable Historical River City Through Place Attachment. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.13.1_209

    Games, P.A. and Howell, J.F. (1976) Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures with Unequal N’s and/or Variances: A Monte Carlo Study. Journal of Educational and Behavioural Statistics, 1, 113-125. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986001002113

    Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A Space for Place in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 463–496. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463

    Grenni, S., Horlings, L. G., & Soini, K. (2020). Linking spatial planning and place branding strategies through cultural narratives in places. European Planning Studies, 28(7), 1355–1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1701292

    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

    Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson. https://www.drnishikantjha.com/papersCollection/Multivariate%20Data%20Analysis.pdf

    Ho, T. P., Stevenson, M., Thompson, J., & Nguyen, T. Q. (2021). Evaluation of Urban Design Qualities across Five Urban Typologies in Hanoi. Urban Science, 5(4), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci5040076

    Hu, F., Liu, W., Lu, J., Song, C., Meng, Y., Wang, J., & Xing, H. (2020). Urban Function as a New Perspective for Adaptive Street Quality Assessment. Sustainability, 12(4), 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041296

    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

    ICOMOS. (1964). The Venice Charter: International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites. https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/venice_e.pdf

    ICOMOS. (1994). The Nara Document on Authenticity. https://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/386-the-nara-document-on-authenticity-1994

    ICOMOS. (1996). The Declaration of San Antonio. https://www.icomos.org/en/resources/charters-and-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/188-the-declaration-of-san-antonio

    ICOMOS. (2011). The Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments – 1931. https://web.archive.org/web/20210508071639/https://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/167-the-athens-charter-for-the-restoration-of-historic-monuments

    James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Sage Publications.

    Jive´n, G., & Larkham, P. J. (2003). Sense of Place, Authenticity and Character: A Commentary. Journal of Urban Design, 8(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480032000064773

    Jones, S. (2017). Wrestling with the Social Value of Heritage: Problems, Dilemmas and Opportunities. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 4(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/20518196.2016.1193996

    Jones, S., Bonacchi, C., Robson, E., Broccoli, E., Hiscock, A., Biondi, A., Nucciotti, M., Guttormsen, T. S., Fouseki, K., & Díaz-Andreu, M. (2024). Assessing the dynamic social values of the ‘deep city’: An integrated methodology combining online and offline approaches. Progress in Planning, 187, 100852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2024.100852

    Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.

    Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Scientific Software International.

    Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

    Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

    Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press. https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files4/befc0f8521c770249dd18726a917cf90.pdf

    Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R. (2005). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environment and Behavior, 37(2), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504269654

    Li, J., Luo, J., Deng, T., Tian, J., & Wang, H. (2023). Exploring perceived restoration, landscape perception, and place attachment in historical districts: Insights from diverse visitors. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1156207. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1156207

    Lin, C., & Cheng, H. (2008). Renaissance of the Old Town District in Tainan:Research on Aesthetic Zoning in Historic Districts. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 7(2), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.7.317

    Lyu, Y., Abd Malek, M. I., Ja`afar, N. H., Sima, Y., Han, Z., & Liu, Z. (2023). Unveiling the potential of space syntax approach for revitalizing historic urban areas: A case study of Yushan Historic District, China. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(6), 1144–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.08.004

    MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130

    MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84

    Malhotra, N. K., & Dash, S. (2011). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391

    Matan, A., Newman, P., Trubka, R., Beattie, C., & Selvey, L. A. (2015). Health, Transport and Urban Planning: Quantifying the Links between Urban Assessment Models and Human Health. Urban Policy and Research, 33(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2014.990626

    Matthew Hardy. (2008). The Venice Charter Revisited: Modernism, Conservation and Tradition in the 21st Century. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Motoyama, Y., & Hanyu, K. (2014). Does public art enrich landscapes? The effect of public art on visual properties and affective appraisals of landscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.04.008

    Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430

    Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

    Orbasli, A. (2000). Tourists in Historic Towns: Urban Conservation and Heritage Management (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203479001

    Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57–83.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8

    Razem, M., & El Kaftangui, M. (2020). Place Attachment and Sustainable Communities. Architecture_MPS, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.amps.2020v17i1.003

    Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London, UK: Pion.

    Ren, J. Y. (2024). Landscape visual evaluation and place attachment in historical and cultural districts: A study based on semantic differential scale and eye tracking experimental methods. Multimedia Systems, 30(5), 306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-024-01514-6

    Ries, M., & Schwan, S. (2023). Experiencing places of historical significance: A psychological framework and empirical overview. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 92, 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102179

    Rossi, A. (1982). The Architecture of the City. UK: MIT Press.

    Russell, J. A., & Mehrabian, A. (1977). Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. Journal of Research in Personality, 11(3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-X

    Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human resource management review, 18(4), 210-222.

    Septianto E., Poerbo H. W., Firmansyah, & Martokusumo W. (2024). Understanding the attractiveness of types of historic districts in Bandung: Implementing heritage conservation based on public perception. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2397111

    Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007

    Shen, X., Chen, M., Hsu, W.-L., Dong, Z., Lan, K., Luo, H., & Lin, S. T.-H. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Evaluating Historic Sites in Huai’an Ancient Cities. Buildings, 13(6), 1385. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061385

    Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4

    Strandberg, C., & Ek Styvén, M. (2024). The multidimensionality of place identity: A systematic concept analysis and framework of place-related identity elements. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 95, 102257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102257

    Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(2), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00834.x

    Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. U of Minnesota Press.Umut Pekin, T. (2013). Urban Waterfront Regenerations. In Ö. Murat (Ed.), Advances in Landscape Architecture (pp. Ch. 7). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/55759

    Ujang, N. (2016). Affective Perception of Place: Attachment to Kuala Lumpur Historical Urban Places. Open House International, 41(2), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2016-B0012

    Umut Pekin Timur. (2013). Urban Waterfront Regenerations. IntechOpen

    UNESCO. (1972). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/

    UNESCO. (2005). Hội An Protocols for Best Conservation Practice in Asia. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000182617

    Vandenberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational research methods, 5(2), 139-158.

    Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational research methods, 3(1), 4-70.

    Ward, L. M., Snodgrass, J., Chew, B., & Russell, J. A. (1988). The role of plans in cognitive and affective responses to places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(88)80019-7

    Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2019). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. John Wiley & Sons.

    Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 84–136). Jossey-Bass.

    Yang, S., Dane, G., van den Berg, P., & Arentze, T. (2024). Influences of cognitive appraisal and individual characteristics on citizens’ perception and emotion in urban environment: Model development and virtual reality experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 96, 102309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102309

    Zhang, H., & Lin, S.-H. (2011). Affective appraisal of residents and visual elements in the neighborhood: A case study in an established suburban community. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.010

    王華琪(2008)。近代都市計畫道路開發對台南歷史市區發展之影響─以大銃街與米街沿線市區為例。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n56zpz

    文化部文化資產局(2025)。海山館。國家文化資產網。https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/assets/advanceSearch/monument/19851127000071

    文化部文化資產局(2025)。臺南水仙宮。國家文化資產網。https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/assets/overview/monument/19851127000056

    文化部文化資產局(2025)。臺南景福祠。國家文化資產網。https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/assets/overview/monument/19851127000054

    文芸、傅朝卿(2011)。重思文化遺產的真實性概念-從過去到現在的理解。建築學報,(76),23-46。https://doi.org/10.6377/JA.201106.0008

    文芸、傅朝卿(2013)。當代社會中遺產價值的保存與維護。建築學報,(84),77-96。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10163212-201306-201308300024-201308300024-77-96

    內政部統計處(2025)。社會經濟資料服務平臺。社會經濟統計地理資訊網。https://moisagis.moi.gov.tw/moiap/gis2010/pro/index.cfm

    行政院內政部(2021)。城鎮風貌及地方創生計畫—讓臺灣小鎮愈變愈美麗。重要政策。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/877748e4-cab0-4771-9eef-b7ac9f20b351

    吳明隆、張毓仁(2010)。結構方程模式—實務應用秘笈。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

    吳明隆(2007)。SPSS 操作與應用: 問卷統計分析實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

    吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式:方法與實務運用。麗文文化。

    吳怡璇(2020)。從文資法修法歷程看臺灣古蹟保存歷史變遷。﹝碩士論文。國立臺北科技大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/h3ppfb

    吳建昇(2007)。河川與疆域—曾文溪與臺江內海的變遷。臺灣學通訊,(73),10-12。https://wwwacc.ntl.edu.tw/public/Attachment/3118956125.PDF

    李亭萱(2020)。探討居民對府城歷史街區施策之社會價值認同。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n8mq2v

    李俊緯(2012)。近代都市規劃對晚清臺南府署周邊市區的衝擊。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rfhahg

    李俊賢、黃芳銘、李孟芳(2016)。年輕族群男女在消費型態量表的測量恆等性研究。管理與系統, 23(2), 273-302。

    林會承(2014)。戰後臺灣文化資產保存法制與氛圍的形塑。文資學報,(8),27-55。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18143121-201412-201503200012-201503200012-27-55

    法務部(2023)。文化資產保存法。全國法規資料庫https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0170001

    施俊名、吳裕益(2008)。「大學生身心健康量表」概念效度驗證之究。教育研究與發展期刊。4(4),201-230。https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A09010707

    洪嘉呈(2024)。日治時期臺南都市計畫與西化改造。臺灣學通訊,(137),18-20。https://wwwacc.ntl.edu.tw/public/Attachment/45171651546.pdf

    高禎澤(2013)。建構文化遺產綠地網絡評價體系-以臺南市舊城歷史區域為例。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3r23ba

    夏鑄九(1998)。臺灣的古蹟保存:一個批判性回顧。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,(9),1-9。https://doi.org/10.6154/JBP.1998.9.001

    陳正昌、陳新豐、程炳林、劉子鍵(2005)。多變量分析方法:統計軟體應用。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

    陳寬裕(2023)。結構方程模型:運用AMOS分析(2版)。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

    傅朝卿(2001)。臺南市古蹟與歷史建築總覽。臺灣建築與文化資產出版。

    曾憲嫻(2011)。日治時期市區改正到都市計畫。臺灣學通訊,(60),6-7。https://www.ntl.edu.tw/public/Attachment/112221795688.PDF

    黃一中(2010)。地區組織參與歷史環境再生規劃之研究-以臺南市舊城區域的學校為例。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ax5uks。

    黃一中(2021)。臺南市舊城歷史區域再生的參與式規劃與實踐-以社區及學校的參與操作經驗為例。﹝博士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/59sn7e。

    黃芳銘(2015)。結構方程模式-理論與應用。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

    黃翔瑜(2017)。戰後臺灣《文化資產保存法》的早期形構及其發展(1945-1984)。博物館學季刊,31(4)。https://doi.org/10.6686/MuseQ.2017.31.4.1

    廖姵棋(2017)。住商共存的歷史區域街區經營—以臺南市中西區銀同里為例。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/svr732。

    廖瓊華(2004)。臺灣地方政府建築的風格及演變之研究。﹝碩士論文。淡江大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qn5hkf

    臺南市政府(2009)。擬定赤崁舊市區更新地區都市更新計畫案-計畫書。https://reurl.cc/xNvp7Z

    臺南市政府文化局(2017)。臺南市府城歷史街區(緩衝區)計畫書。https://reurl.cc/qGmygE

    臺南市政府文化局(2017)。臺南市府城歷史街區計畫書。https://reurl.cc/M3ZrZK

    臺南市政府文化局(2020)。通報-臺南市古蹟概況。https://culture.tainan.gov.tw/df_ufiles/071/109%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E5%8F%A4%E8%B9%9F%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81%20(1).pdf

    臺南市政府文化局(2022)。臺南市安平暨鯤喜灣歷史街區計畫。https://culture.tainan.gov.tw/form/Details?Parser=28,8,60,,,,772

    臺南市政府文化局(2025)。市定古蹟『盧經堂厝』。古蹟營運科。https://historic.tainan.gov.tw/index.php?option=module&lang=cht&task=pageinfo&id=96&index=7

    臺南市政府文化局(2025)。市定古蹟原德商東興洋行。古蹟營運科。https://historic.tainan.gov.tw/index.php?option=module&lang=cht&task=pageinfo&id=515&index=6

    臺南市政府文化局(2025)。好舊。好-臺南市歷史街區振興補助計畫。https://oldisgood.tainan.gov.tw/index.php?option=module&lang=cht&task=pageinfo&id=1&index=1

    臺南市政府文化局(2025)。赤崁樓。古蹟營運科。https://historic.tainan.gov.tw/index.php?option=module&lang=cht&task=pageinfo&id=46&index=3

    臺南市政府觀光旅遊局(2025)。孔廟文化園區「臺南孔子廟」。臺南旅遊網。https://www.twtainan.net/zh-tw/attractions/detail/800/

    臺南市政府觀光旅遊局(2025)。安平市仔街何旺厝。臺南旅遊網。https://www.twtainan.net/zh-tw/attractions/detail/732/

    臺南市政府觀光旅遊局(2025)。安平海頭社魏宅。臺南旅遊網。https://www.twtainan.net/zh-tw/attractions/detail/733/

    臺南市政府觀光旅遊局(2025)。祀典大天后宮(明寧靖王府邸)。臺南旅遊網。https://www.twtainan.net/zh-tw/attractions/detail/675/

    臺南市政府觀光旅遊局(2025)。祀典臺灣祀典武廟。臺南旅遊網。https://www.twtainan.net/zh-tw/attractions/detail/678/

    臺南市政府觀光旅遊局(2025)。金華府。臺南旅遊網。https://www.twtainan.net/zh-tw/attractions/detail/745/

    臺南市政府觀光旅遊局(2025)。風神廟。臺南旅遊網。https://www.twtainan.net/zh-tw/attractions/detail/697/

    臺南市政府觀光旅遊局(2025)。原臺南州廳-臺灣文學館。臺南旅遊網。https://www.twtainan.net/zh-tw/attractions/detail/1142/

    臺南市政府觀光旅遊局(2025)。臺灣城殘蹟(安平古堡內牆)。臺南旅遊網。https://www.twtainan.net/zh-tw/attractions/detail/729/

    劉為光、盧紀邦、陳世明(2013)。臺南市舊城邊緣帶空間型態在當代都市生活中的文化意涵。建築學報,(85),227-244。 https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10163212-201309-201312050041-201312050041-227-244

    蕭文龍(2016)。統計分析入門與應用:SPSS中文版+SmartPLS 3(PLS_SEM)。碁峰資訊出版社。

    蕭紋安(2013)。近代都市計畫對臺南府城道署南側市區的影響。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s53hw5

    蘇怡帆(2011)。臺南城內地區空間結構之變遷(1625-1929)。﹝碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/56na7n

    無法下載圖示 校內:2030-06-06公開
    校外:2030-06-06公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE