本研究挑選五個台灣薄膜太陽能電池新創業公司，來了解創業的過程，我們利用深度訪談輔以故事敘述法，並且參考多重資料來源，就機會、資源、團隊、與創業家等四方面進行個案研究(Timmons, 2007)，並根據成功企業的指標(Fred L. Fry, 2001)，來判斷個案公司的現況，並做為預估未來表現的基礎。

台灣薄膜太陽能電池創業過程中，在創業機會上，非常仰賴技術與業務上的「專業判斷」，尤其是技術上的專業判斷更是有決定性的影響，來發現創業機會。在創業資源上，取得關鍵性的資源與建立具有價值性、稀少性、難以模仿性與無可取代性等特性資源是在創業資源上的重點。在創業團隊上，優秀技術的創業團隊核心是在創業團隊的關鍵重點。在創業整合上，創業者或是「母公司」的特質決定了創業機會、資源、與團隊的整合方式、平衡、或是效率。

台灣薄膜太陽能電池產業創業，又有其不同於歐美社會的台灣在地特有與特殊的模式，於「個案綜合分析與研究命題」的章節之中，本研究提出與說明所新發現的模式。分別有「創業機會主要是技術與業務市場上專業的判斷，但是技術面上的判斷需優先於業務市場面的判斷」、「集體決策是薄膜太陽能電池公司創業成功的重要條件，但是特定人決策模式，係台灣企業相對於歐美的不同特有現象」、與「對於大型的台灣薄膜太陽能電池公司，創業者個人的特質所佔的整合比重降低，取而代之的是母公司特質」。

Five Taiwan newly created thin film solar cell companies are chosen to understand the process of entrepreneur at this research thesis. The chance, resource and team are case_studied with the multiple data resource by the method of deep interview and story telling.

During the entrepreneur process of Taiwan thin film solar cell, the discovering of entrepreneur chance is highly dependent on the “professional judgment” of technic and business. Especially, there is decisive impact by technical judgment. The key point of entrepreneur resource is the retrieving of critical and external resource creatively. The decisive point of entrepreneur team is the excellently technical team. The entrepreneur integration did rely on the characteristics of an entrepreneur or “mother company”. And these characteristics would dominate the way for integration, balance, and efficiency of chance, resource, and team.

Most models of entrepreneship characteristics are the same between Taiwan and Western society. However! There were some locally unique and special features or models from Taiwan entrepreneeship. They are “Professinally, technical judgement is superior to business one for chance acquirement.”, “Team decision is the necessay condition to success of entreprenure. However! Specific people make decision is a uniquse feature in Taiwan.”, and “For large companies, integration by characteristics of entreprenure is less important than that of mother-company.”

一、網站部分
http://www.digitimes.com.tw/，電子時報。

http://www.tpvia.org.tw/，臺灣太陽光電產業協會。

http://solarpv.itri.org.tw/memb/main.aspx，臺灣光電資訊網。

http://www.semi.org/ch/Committee/PVCommittee/index.htm，SEMI臺灣光電委員會。

http://www.hbrtaiwan.com/Main/index.aspx，哈佛商業評論。

http://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/，經濟部能源局。

http://www.nrel.gov/，National renewable energy laboratory。

http://www.solarbuzz.com/，solarbuzz。

http://www.photon-magazine.com/，Photo international。

http://www.firstsolar.com/en/corporate.php，First solar corporate。

http://www.showa-shell.co.jp/english/index.html，Showa shell。

L光電股份有限公司、S股份有限公司、H科技股份有限公司、I科技股份有限公司、與T科技股份有限公司各家公司官網。

二、中文部分
李瑞麟，2006，不用數字的研究：鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究，台北市，台灣培生教育出版社。

陳明哲，2008，動態競爭策略探微：理論、實證與運用，台北市，智勝文化事業有限公司。

陳炳志，2005，企業進行產品品牌再造之探索性研究，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

吳再益，2009，環保署哥本哈根會議趨勢展望高峰論壇圓桌會議，2009/12/7。

楊振甫，2007，跨領域內隱知識移轉過程之探索性研究，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

李政賢，譯.2005，質性研究設計與計劃撰寫，台北市，五南初版股份有限公司。

高宜君，2003，高科技創業行為研究，國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。

劉子歆，2004，策略創業與價值創造：一個比較性的個案研究，國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所博士論文。

麥可波特，1985，競爭優勢。

麥可波特，1990，國家競爭優勢。

麥可波特，1990，綠色競爭力。

麥可波特，1996，策略是什麼。

麥可波特，2000，競爭論。

Fred L. Fry, Charles R. Stoner and Richard E. Hattwick原著，胡國強審閱，企業概論 - Business 2/e，台北市，美商麥格羅、希爾。

Jay B. Barney原著，黃營杉、楊景傅、汪志堅、梁富梅編譯，2003，高等策略管理，台北市，華泰文化。

Scott A. Shane原著，徐永宜譯，2005，科技創業聖經—如何找到下一個微軟，台北市，台灣培生教育出版社。

蔡進耀，薄膜太陽能電池的未來，2008台灣太陽光電設備產業論壇，2008/5/29。

陳忠瑞，薄膜太陽能各擅其長，工商時報，大師看市， 2009/05/31。

三、英文部分
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.

Bernasconi, B., 2006.High-tech entrepreneurship: managing innovation, variety and uncertainty, p1-9..

Chandler Gaylen N., 2007. New venture teams. Entrepreneurship: the engine of growth, volume 2, process. 63-85. Fraeger Perspectives, Westport Connecticut, London.

Clayton James, Gambill Bradley, and Harned Douglass, 1999. The curse of too much capital: building new businesses in large corporation. Mckinsey Quarterly 4, 48-59.

Cooper Arnold C., Dunkelberg William C., and Woo Carolyn Y., 1986. Optimists and pessimists: entrepreneurs and their perceived chance for success, in Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley, MA: Babson college.

Cooper Arnold C., and Daily Catherine M., 2000. Entrepreneurial team, in Entrepreneurship 2000, eds. 127-150.

Crossan M.M., and Dutta D., 2005. The nature of entrepreneurial opportunities: understanding the process using the 4I organizational learning framework. Entrepreneurship theory and practice 29, no.4: 425-449.

Dimo Dimov, 2007. Beyond the single-person, single-insight attribution in understanding entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship theory and pratice, September 2007, 713-731.

Doig Jameson and Hargrove Erwin C. eds., 1987. Leadership and innovation: a biographical perspective on entrepreneurs and government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University press.

Eisendart, K. M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy management review 14(4):532-550.

Fred L. Fry, Charles R. Stoner and Richard E. Hattwick, 2001. Business: an integrative approach, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill, New York.

Golden-Biddle, K., and Locke K., 1993. Appealing work：An investigation of how ethnographic texts convince, Organization science 4: 595-616.

Granovertter Mark S., 1982. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited, in Social structure and network analysis, eds. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.

Gulati, R., Nohria, N., and Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 203-215.

Hayek, F., 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American economics review, 35: 519-530.

Hill Gerald E., Shrader Rodney C., 1998. Successful entrepreneur’s insights into opportunity recognition, in Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

Hite, J. M. and Hesterly, W. S. 2001. The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm, Research notes and commentaries. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 275-286.

Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., and Sexton, D. L., 2001. Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 479-491.

Kamm, Judith B. et al., Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: a reach agenda. Entrepreneurship theory and practice 14, no 4: 7-17.

Kirzner, Israel, 1973. Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press)

Kirzner, Israel, 1973. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press)

Moensted, M., 2006. High-tech, uncertainty and innovation: the opportunity for high-tech entrepreneurship. High-tech entrepreneurship: managing innovation, variety and uncertainty, p15-32.

Nachimias, D., and Nachimias, C., 1992. Research method in the social sciences, New York: St.Martin’s, 77-78.

Patton, M. Q., 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed., Newbury park, CA: sage.

Porter, Michael. 1991. towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, 12: 95-117.

Porter, Michael. 1994. toward a dynamic theory of strategy. In Fundamental Issues in Strategy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 423-461.

Porter, Michael. 2008. The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, January 2008, p78-93.

Rumelet, Richard. P., Schendel, Dan E., and Teece, David J., 1994. Fundamental issue in strategy. Hardvard Business School Press. P9-47.

Shane, Scott., 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. Organization science 11, no. 4: 448-469.

Stevenson Howard, Robert Michael, and Grousbeck Irving, 1989. New business venture and the entrepreneur, 3rd ed. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.

Timmons, Jeffery A., and Spinelli, Stephen Jr., 2006. New venture creation for 21st century, 7th ed. McGraw Hill, New York.

Timmons, Jeffery A., Spinelli, Stephen Jr. and Neck, Heidi M., 2007. The Timmons model of the entrepreneurial process. Entrepreneurship: the engine of growth, volume II, Process. Fraeger Perspectives, Westport Connecticut, London. P1-18.

Yin, Robert K. 2003. Case study research: design and method. 3rd ed. London, CA: Sage.

Zacharakis, Andrew and Spinelli, Stephen Jr., 2007. Entrepreneurship: the engine of growth, volume 2, Process. Fraeger Perspectives, Westport Connecticut, London.

四、註釋
註1：林江財，2006/08。工研院產業學院-人才培訓課程 太陽光電技術應用與未來發展探討，工研院太陽光電科技中心。

註2：Dr. Diester Schmid, Centrotherm, Photovlatic AG，2008/06。PV Industry Forum June 10-11, 2008 Munich.

註3：Oerlikon Solar AG, http://www.oerlikon.com/ecomaXL/index.php site=SOLAR_EN_thin_film_si_solar_moduls.

註4：工研院太陽光電科技中心(2008/03)，2008年台灣太陽光電設備產業論壇。