簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 侯雅元
HOU, YA-YUAN
論文名稱: 心理經驗與調適歷程的檢視:自殺者遺族的複雜性悲傷、辯證思維及創傷後成長之關聯分析
Examining Psychological Experiences and Adjustment Processes: The Relationship between Complicated Grief, Dialectical Thinking, and Posttraumatic Growth in Individuals Bereaved by Suicide
指導教授: 徐欣萍
Hsu, Hsin-Ping
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 心理學系
Department of Psychology
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 108
中文關鍵詞: 自殺者遺族複雜性悲傷辯證思維創傷後成長
外文關鍵詞: Survivors of Suicide, Complicated Grief, Dialectical Thinking, Posttraumatic Growth
相關次數: 點閱:5下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 研究背景與目的:自殺者遺族(suicide-bereaved individuals)常因親人驟逝及社會汙名而經歷獨特的複雜性悲傷(Complicated Grief, CG),然而,國內針對此族群之研究多以質性敘事為主,缺乏量化實證支持。因此,本研究旨在探討自殺者遺族之複雜性悲傷、辯證思維(Dialectical Thinking, DT)與創傷後成長(Posttraumatic Growth, PTG)之關聯,並進一步檢視辯證思維在悲傷與成長歷程中的可能角色。
    研究方法:本研究採用混合方法設計(Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Design)。第一階段為量化研究,透過網路招募與相關機構合作,共蒐集 51 位年滿 20 歲且親人自殺離世滿 6 個月以上之遺族有效問卷,使用複雜性悲傷量表(ICG)、創傷後成長量表(PTGI)及辯證自我量表(DSS)進行測量,並採用無母數統計方法進行分析。創傷後成長另依題項反應重新操作化為「是否達標」之二元變項(以多數題項呈現非零反應作為判準)。第二階段為質性研究,邀請 9 位遺族進行半結構式深度訪談,並以主題分析法探討其心理歷程與意義建構。
    研究結果:量化分析結果顯示,複雜性悲傷、辯證思維與創傷後成長之間未呈現顯著線性關聯。進一步以創傷後成長達標與否進行群組比較,結果顯示,不論辯證思維高低或複雜性悲傷高低,各組在創傷後成長達標比例上皆未達統計顯著差異(p > .05)。此外,樣本中創傷後成長達標比例偏高(約88.2%),可能壓縮組間差異,使統計效果未能呈現。然而,質性分析呈現不同層面的理解:遺族的悲傷經驗常呈現「矛盾並存」的情緒結構(如愛與憤怒、自責與解脫),顯示悲傷與成長可能在同一歷程中共存;辯證思維則多被經驗為一種逐步發展的心理調節與整合歷程,而非穩定不變的人格特質。研究結論:本研究在量化層面未能支持辯證思維與複雜性悲傷對創傷後成長「是否達標」之顯著區辨效果;然而,質性結果顯示辯證思維可能在悲傷與成長的整合歷程中具有關鍵意涵,其影響較可能展現在經驗整合與意義建構層面,而非直接決定創傷後成長的出現,未來研究建議擴大樣本數,並進一步探討辯證思維如何影響創傷後成長的型態、歷程與深度。

    Suicide-bereaved individuals often face complicated grief (CG) following sudden loss and social stigma, yet research in Taiwan has relied mainly on narratives with limited quantitative evidence. This study examined relationships among CG, dialectical thinking (DT), and posttraumatic growth (PTG), with emphasis on the potential role of DT in integrating grief and growth. A sequential explanatory mixed-method design was used. In the quantitative phase, 51 adults who had lost a loved one to suicide at least six months earlier completed the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG), Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI), and Dialectical Self Scale (DSS). Given sample size and distributional assumptions, nonparametric analyses were conducted. Results showed no significant linear associations among CG, DT, and PTG. When PTG was operationalized as a dichotomous attainment variable based on non-zero responses across most items, Fisher’s exact tests likewise indicated no differences in PTG attainment across high versus low CG or DT groups (p > .05). The high overall PTG attainment rate (88.2%) may have limited group discrimination. In the qualitative phase, nine participants took part in semi-structured in-depth interviews. Thematic analysis indicated that CG involved coexisting emotional contradictions, while DT emerged as a gradually cultivated psychological regulatory process rather than an innate trait. Overall, DT appeared to influence the integration process and expression patterns of growth rather than directly determining PTG occurrence. Future studies with larger samples are needed to further clarify how DT shapes the forms, timing, and depth of PTG after suicide loss.

    第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 一、 我國的自殺防治策略 1 二、 什麼是自殺者遺族 2 三、 自殺者遺族的心理調適與關懷難題 2 四、 辯證思維與自殺者遺族之創傷調適 4 第二節 研究目的 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 複雜性悲傷及其研究現況 6 一、 複雜性悲傷的定義與特徵 6 二、 複雜性悲傷產生的心理影響 6 第二節 創傷後成長及其研究現況 7 一、 創傷後成長的理論基礎 7 二、 創傷後成長的促發因素 8 三、 創傷後成長與心理健康的關係 9 第三節 辯證思維 10 一、 辯證思維的理論與文化背景 10 二、 辯證思維的心理學意涵與在創傷處理中的角色 11 第三章 研究方法 14 第一節 研究問題 14 第二節 研究設計 14 一、 人類研究倫理審查 15 二、 量化資料蒐集:招募參與者與問卷調查 15 第三節 研究參與者 16 一、 量化研究參與者 16 二、 質性研究參與者 16 第四節 研究工具 17 一、 量化研究 17 二、 質化研究 17 第五節 分析方法 18 一、 量化資料分析 19 二、 質性資料分析 19 三、 量化與質性資料整合方式 20 第六節 研究倫理 20 一、 參與者權益與安全保障措施 20 二、 資料保密與處理方式 21 第四章 研究結果 23 第一節 量化研究結果 23 一、 研究對象基本資料 23 二、 主要變項之描述性統計 28 三、 信度分析 32 四、 群組差異 33 五、 相關分析 37 六、 研究變項分組與創傷後成長達標情形之無母數分析 38 第二節 質性訪談結果 40 一、 受訪者概況與個案主軸描述 40 二、 主題一:事件初始衝擊與延宕的悲傷經驗 50 三、 主題二:複雜性悲傷中的矛盾情緒與內在衝突 53 四、 主題三:辯證思維的形成與運作 57 五、 主題四:調適歷程:矛盾到邁向成長的轉折機制 60 六、 主題五:創傷後成長的具體展現與未展現的情況 64 七、 主題六:社會與制度的辯證 68 第五章 綜合討論 71 第一節 主要發現 71 第二節 複雜性悲傷與創傷後成長:共存而非線性關係 71 第三節 辯證思維作為痛與成長之間的關鍵角色 73 第四節 實務意涵:對遺族關懷與心理工作者的啟示 75 一、 實務工作者:從解決悲傷轉向培養辯證容納力 75 二、 制度與服務:建立被動選擇的支持系統 76 三、 關係與文化:從走出悲傷的社會期待,轉向與悲傷共存的文化理解 78 第五節 研究限制與未來研究建議 79 一、 研究限制 79 二、 未來研究建議 81 參考文獻 84 一、 中文 84 二、 英文 84 附 錄 89 附錄一 問卷知情說明頁 89 附錄二 問卷量表題目 90 附錄三 個別訪談知情同意書 96 附錄四 審查通過證明 98

    一、 中文
    呂欣芹、方俊凱、林綺雲(2007)。〈自殺者遺族悲傷調適之任務-危機模式初步建構〉。中華輔導學報,(22),185-221。https://doi.org/10.7082/CARGC.200709.0185
    廖士程、李明濱、龍佛衛、張家銘、吳佳儀(2015)。台灣自殺防治十年回顧檢討與展望。 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 34(3) ,227-239。
    徐欣萍(2016):《華人社會關係中的緣觀認知運作歷程:理論建構與實徵研究》,臺北: 索引數位股份有限公司。
    周昕韻(2017)。〈自殺者遺族複雜性悲傷之心理治療〉。諮商與輔導,(380),8-12。
    報導者 The Reporter(2017)。 〈你並不孤單──自殺者遺族的團體治療模式〉。https://www.twreporter.org/a/survivor-of-suicide-group-treatment。2023/11/05檢索。
    許玲瑄 (2022)。〈被遺忘的族群!24萬自殺者遺族無安全網援助 民團疾呼「建獨立支持系統」〉。https://rwnews.tw/article.php?news=4351。2024/06/01 檢索。
    衛生福利部 (2022)。〈自殺防治系列34:自殺關懷訪視員教育手冊〉。
    方俊凱(2022)。活得像一個人—以辯證思維調整認知來活出自己。生死靈性與全人照顧,(38),38–40。
    謝國樑(2022)。論生命智慧之證成-以邏輯性弔詭、辯證性詭辭為核心。鵝湖月刊,48(4),28–41。
    蔡佩靜、林梅鳳、陳宇平、盧怡任(2023)。〈夫妻壓力與情感表露之相關性研究:對偶分析〉。中華心理衛生學刊,36(1),1-28。https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.202303_36(1).0001

    二、 英文
    American Psychological Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition.
    An, S., Cruwys, T., Lee, H., & Chang, M. X. (2020). Cultural Differences in Reactions to Suicidal Ideation: A Mixed Methods Comparison of Korea and Australia. Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research, 24(3), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2019.1624668
    Basseches, M. (1980). Dialectical schemata: A framework for the empirical study of the development of dialectical thinking. Human Development, 23(6), 400-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000272600
    Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Suicide as escape from self. Psychological review, 97(1), 90.
    Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    Brown, A. C., Sandler, I. N., Tein, J. Y., Liu, X., & Haine, R. A. (2007). Implications of parental suicide and violent death for promotion of resilience of parentally-bereaved children. Death studies, 31(4), 301-335.
    Bellet, B. W., Jones, P. J., Neimeyer, R. A., & McNally, R. J. (2018). Bereavement Outcomes as Causal Systems: A Network Analysis of the Co-Occurrence of Complicated Grief and Posttraumatic Growth. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(6), 797-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618777454
    Fruzzetti, A. E. (2022). Dialectical thinking. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(4), 567–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.004
    Gori, A., Topino, E., Sette, A., & Cramer, H. (2021). Pathways to post-traumatic growth in cancer patients: moderated mediation and single mediation analyses with resilience, personality, and coping strategies. Journal of affective disorders, 279, 692-700.
    Henson, C., Truchot, D., & Canevello, A. (2021). What promotes post traumatic growth? A systematic review. European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 5(4), Article 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejtd.2020.100195
    Ho, G. W., Chan, A. C. Y., Shevlin, M., Karatzias, T., Chan, P. S., & Leung, D. (2021). Childhood adversity, resilience, and mental health: A sequential mixed-methods study of Chinese young adults. Journal of interpersonal violence, 36(19-20), NP10345-NP10370.
    Huh, H. J., Huh, K. H., Kim, H.-K., & Lee, J.-H. (2020). Attachment Style, Complicated Grief and Post-Traumatic Growth in Traumatic Loss: The Role of Intrusive and Deliberate Rumination. Psychiatry Investigation., 17(7), 636–644. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2019.0291
    Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field methods, 18(1), 3-20.
    Jordan, J. R. (2001). Is suicide bereavement different? A reassessment of the literature. Suicide and life-threatening behavior, 31(1), 91-102.
    Kirmayer, L. J. (2022). Suicide in cultural context: An ecosocial approach. Transcultural psychiatry, 59(1), 3-12.
    Levi-Belz. (2022). Longitudinal intercorrelations between complicated grief and posttraumatic growth among suicide survivors. Archives of Suicide Research., 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2020.1820412
    Levi-Belz, Y., & Lev-Ari, L. (2023). Thinking for healing: The role of mentalization deficits as moderator in the link between complicated grief and suicide ideation among suicide-loss survivors. Death studies, 47(3), 360-369.
    Leung, K., Lam, B. C. P., Bond, M. H., Conway, L. G., Gornick, L. J., Amponsah, B., Boehnke, K., Dragolov, G., Burgess, S. M., Golestaneh, M., Busch, H., Hofer, J., Espinosa, A. del C. D., Fardis, M., Ismail, R., Kurman, J., Lebedeva, N., Tatarko, A. N., Sam, D. L., … Zhou, F. (2012). Developing and Evaluating the Social Axioms Survey in Eleven Countries: Its Relationship With the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(5), 833-857.
    Muhammed, A., Dodd, A., Guerin, S., Delaney, S., & Dodd, P.(2023). Complicated grief knowledge and practice: a qualitative study of general practitioners in Ireland. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 40(3), 330-335.
    Nalipay, M. J. N., Bernardo, A. B., & Mordeno, I. G. (2016). Social complexity beliefs predict posttraumatic growth in survivors of a natural disaster. Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy, 8(5), 559.
    Neimeyer, R. A. (2019). Meaning reconstruction in bereavement: Development of a research program. Death Studies, 43(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2018.1456620
    Prigerson, H. G., Maciejewski, P. K., Reynolds III, C. F., Bierhals, A. J., Newsom, J. T., Fasiczka, A., ... & Miller, M. (1995). Inventory of Complicated Grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry research, 59(1-2), 65-79.
    Salloum, A., Bjoerke, A., & Johnco, C. (2019). The Associations of Complicated Grief, Depression, Posttraumatic Growth, and Hope Among Bereaved Youth. Omega: Journal of Death &Dying, 79(2), 157–173.https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222817719805
    Spencer-Rodgers, J., Srivastava, S., Boucher, H. C., English, T., Paletz, S. B., & Peng, K. (2015). Dialectical Self Scale (DSS) [Database record]. APA PsycTests.https://doi.org/10.1037/t75704-000
    Stokar, Y. N., & Pat-Horenczyk, R. (2022). Effects of end-of-life care on medical health professionals: A dialectical approach. Palliative & Supportive Care, 20(1), 76-83.
    Stroebe, M., & Schut, H. (2010). The Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement: A Decade on. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 61(4), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.61.4.b
    Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of traumatic stress, 9, 455-471.
    Waters, L., & Strauss, G. (2016). Posttraumatic growth during unemployment: A qualitative examination of distress and positive transformation. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(1).
    World Health Organization. (2025). Suicide worldwide in 2021: Global health estimates. Geneva: Author. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240110069
    Wilson, D. M., Darko, E. M., Kusi-Appiah, E., Roh, S. J., Ramic, A., & Errasti-Ibarrondo, B. (2022). What Exactly Is “Complicated” Grief? A Scoping Research Literature Review to Understand Its Risk Factors and Prevalence. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 86(2), 471-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222820977305
    World Health Organization. (2018). ICD-11: International classification of diseases 11th revision. https://icd.who.int/en
    Wong, P. T., & McDonald, M. (2002). Tragic optimism and personal meaning in counselling victims of abuse. Pastoral Sciences, 20(2), 231-249.
    Yang, X., Liu, D., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, W., Yang, C., ... & Zhang, X. (2020). Effectiveness of Zhong‐Yong thinking based dialectical behavior therapy group skills training versus supportive group therapy for lowering suicidal risks in Chinese young adults: A randomized controlled trial with a 6‐month follow‐up. Brain and behavior, 10(6), e01621.
    Young, I. T., Iglewicz, A., Gloruso, D., Lanouette, N., Seay, K., Iliscu, M., & Zisook, S. (2012). Suicide bereavement and complicated grief. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(2), 177-186.
    Zhang, X., Deng, X., Mo, Y., Li, Y., Song, X., & Li, H. (2021). Relationship between infertility-related stress and resilience with posttraumatic growth in infertile couples: gender differences and dyadic interaction. Human Reproduction, 36(7), 1862-1870.
    Zoellner, T., & Maercker, A. (2006). Posttraumatic growth in clinical psychology—A critical review and introduction of a two component model. Clinical psychology review, 26(5), 626-653.

    QR CODE