成功大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	涂家營 Tu, Jia-Ying
論文名稱：	操作可見性與詮釋結構矩陣於高齡者輔具設計之應用研究 Applying Affordance and ISM to Optimize design of Elder Aids
指導教授：	蕭世文 Hsiao, Shih-Wen
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系 Department of Industrial Design
論文出版年：	2016
畢業學年度：	104
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	95
中文關鍵詞：	助行器、操作可見性、詮釋結構模式、層級程序分析、多變量分析
外文關鍵詞：	Walker, Affordance, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Interpretive structural model, Multivariate Analysis
相關次數：	點閱：134 下載：46
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

現今的台灣社會隱含許多問題，其中特別有一個問題是值得我們去深思，即為人口老化的問題，近年來台灣已經明顯的邁向人口老化的趨勢。為了輔助眾多高齡者更能夠自主、更方便的打理日常生活，許多高齡商品開始大量的流入市場以因應廣大的需求，其中又以醫療輔具和生活輔具兩者較為被依賴，在發展高齡輔具成為勢在必行的趨勢。本文以日常生活中最為常見的帶輪式助行器為探討題材。
在面對高齡化社會的來臨，老人照護的問題也伴隨著產生，因應長期照護的需求，外籍看護在台人數逐年提升。在使用高齡輔具的族群，除了本國高齡者外，對於語言以及文字都不甚相通的外籍看護在協助高齡者使用高齡輔具時也常會出現使用和操作上錯誤的認知。
本研究訂定一套完整的設計流程，首先問卷調查與受測者實際操作，紀錄操作助行器時的問題點，蒐集Affordance「操作可見性」之相關文獻透過多變量分析以彙整其特質為基礎定義出設計框架。將原助行器繪製成3D模型，運用詮釋結構模式(ISM)拆解成零組件並計算出最佳化模組，再以該模組為基底搭配「操作可見性」設計框架改良助行器設計。透過型態圖表法發展多樣化的造型設計，其後運用層級程序分析法(AHP)進行改良後助行器產品評價，並選定最佳的設計構想進行1:1實際打樣，為證明本研究所提方法之可用性，將改良前之助行器與經本系統所產生之改良後產品進行比較，以驗證經本系統的有效性。最終建立一組可跨國界，無需語言與文字的幫助，透過外型型態便可輕易操作的高齡助行器產品。

For the past few years, aging of population is an obvious trend in Taiwan. In order to help the elderly take care of their life autonomously, many elder aids come into the market to feed the growing demands. There are two aids that are especially important to be dependent on. One is medical aid. The other one is living aids. The development of elder aids becomes a necessary trend. The purpose of this study focuses on the subject of elder aids which have been used frequently.
To fix the requirement of Long-Term Care, the population of foreign nursing workers who live in Taiwan is still growing in these years. The group who uses elder aids not only contains elderly, but also foreign nursing workers. Foreign nursing workers who help the elderly use elder aids usually have lots of problem because of lacking the knowledge of Taiwanese language and Chinese characters.
The purpose of this study sets a complete design process. First of all, we collect related documents of affordance to organize the characteristics and delimit the design specification of affordance. Then, we draw the 3D model of original elder aid. Every part of 3D model has one number. We put these parts into ISM coding and calculate the best modular. We redesign the elder aid with the design specification of affordance and the best modular. We use AHP to evaluate which is the best concept in the end. At last, we make 1:1 model of the best concept and let elderly and foreign nursing workers try if the final model better than original aid. We hope we can make a no language and character elder aid which can be used easily by appearance.

摘要	I
SUMMARY	II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS	III
TABLE OF CONTENTS	IV
LIST OF TABLES	VII
LIST OF FIGURES	IX
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION	1
1 Research on motivation and background	1
2 Research purpose	4
3 Research framework	5
4 Research organization chart	6
5 The range and limitations of research	7
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW	8
1 Walker discussion	8
1.1 Walker species	8
1.2 The mechanics analysis of walker	10
2 Aging population society	13
2.1 Elderly definition	13
2.2 Foreign care workers	14
3 Modular design	16
3.1 The type of modular	16
4.2 Advantages of modular	17
4 Affordance	18
4.1 Affordance outline	18
4.2 The development of affordance	19
4.3 Affordance applied to the design	20
4.4 Product Evaluation Application field of affordance	22
CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY	23
1 Interpretive structural model, ISM	24
1.1 Interpretive structural model overview	24
1.2 ISM process step description	25
2 Multivariate Analysis	32
2.1 Multivariate analysis overview	32
2.2 The classification of multivariate analysis	32
2.2.1 Interdependence methods	33
2.3 Multidimensional scaling, MDS	34
2.4 Cluster Analysis, CA	36
2.4.1 The concept of cluster analysis	36
2.4.2 The steps of cluster analysis	37
3 Analytic Hierarchical Process, AHP	39
3.1 Analytic hierarchical process overview	39
CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH PROCESS AND METHODS	43
1 Exploring user need	45
1.1 The steps	45
1.2 Market survey wheeled walkers	45
1.2.1 Collecting commercial data of wheeled walkers on the internet	46
1.2.2 Specialist selected target product	51
1.3 The actual operation and questionnaire user demand	52
2 Establishing "Affordance" design framework	54
2.1 The steps	54
2.2 Collect "Affordance" characteristics elements	54
2.3 Screening of the "Affordance" characteristics elements	56
2.3.1 Experimental samples produced	57
2.3.2 Similar experiments	57
2.3.3 Multidimensional scaling	58
2.3.4 Cluster Analysis	60
2.3.5 Grouping results	61
2.4 Establishing "Affordance" design framework	61
3 Constructing product optimized module	62
3.1 The steps	62
3.2 3D model building and listing	62
4-3-3 Construction of decomposition	63
3.4 ISM Calculating	66
3.5 Build modular grouping	72
3.6 Product redesign	72
3.6.1 The design development of morphological analysis	73
3.6.2 The overall shape design	74
4 The evaluation of “Affordance” and mock-up	79
4.1 The steps	79
4.2 The conceptualization initial screening	79
4.3 AHP evaluation factors weight calculation	81
4.4 Best Model mock-up	85
CHAPTER 5 EXAMPLES OF VERIFICATION	87
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION	89
1 Analysis conclusion	89
2 Research review	90
3 Future directions	90
REFERENCES	91
APPENDLX	95




                                    

中華民國家庭照顧者關懷總會(2006)。從外籍看護工政策看家庭照顧者負擔與國家腳色。銀髮世紀，第28期。
行政院主計總處(2014)。國情統計通報，第175號。
吳思錡(2009)。高齡輔具筷之人因評估與設計。國立高雄第一科技大學。
李尹婷(2009)。建立產品「操作可見性」之線上評價模式。國立成功大學。
李傳房(2006)。高齡使用者產品設計之探討。設計學報第11卷第3期。
周孚茂(1996)。助行器設計之專家系統建立研究。國立成功大學。
邱盛湘(2013)。新式輪式助行器折疊機構的設計與開發。國立中山大學。
徐業良(2007)。高齡者科技輔具之趨勢與設計思考。輔具之友，第21期。
國家發展委員會(2014)。中華民國人口推計(103至150年)。
許皆清(2000)。老人生活需求之研究-以台南松柏育樂中心松柏學苑為例。國立中山大學。
郭辰嘉(2007)。高齡化社會居家生活產品設計之研究。國立雲林科技大學。
陳世和(2004)。以模組化設計與市場區隔發展產品族之研究-以自行車產業為例。國立成功大學。
陳秀惠(2010)。外籍看護工生活品質之相關因素探討。長庚大學。
陳輝宇(2009)。老年人常見的輔具，台灣老年學論壇，第3期。
葛宗陞(2012)。以「示能性」(Affordance)觀點探討傳統與數位閱讀之差異。國立中山大學。
歐忠明、梁銘華(2013)。東南亞籍看護工在台灣境內之生活品質現況與展望，東南亞區域研究年度研討會。
歐芝岑(2000)。模組產品創新策略類型之研究-台灣機械業的實證研究。東海大學。
鄭清霞(2014)。台灣外籍看護工政策之探討-以日本、德國、加拿大、美國為借鏡。國立中正大學。
蕭惠華(2009)。模組化模糊分類在產品開發之研究-以自行車內變速器為例。東海大學。
鍾靜蓉(2002)。詮釋結構模式於構造化教材設計之研究。淡江大學。
簡佩誼(2009)。高齡者對於消費性數位科技產品在操作認知與障礙上的探討。長庚大學。
Barry Deathe A., MD., Richard D. Pardo, MSc., David A.Winter, PhD., Keith C. Hayes, PhD., Jennifer Russell-Smyth (1996). BScCP,Stability of Walking Frames, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development.
Bolante K., Carrillo N., H. Tang, T. (2012). Takahashi,Adjustable Rollator with Dual Brake System to Enhance Stability,Stevens Institute of Technology.
Danford,G.S (2003). Universal Design People with Vision, Hearing and Mobility Impairments Evaluate a Model Building, Generations, Vol. 27, Issue 1, pp.91-94.
Gaver, W. (1991). Technology affordances, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Reaching Through Technology, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 79-84.
Gibon,J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances,In R.E.Shaw & J.Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving,Acting,and Knowing. Hillsdale,NJ;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibson,J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception,Boston : Houghton Mifflin.
Ioannis Xenakis,Argyris Arnellos (2012). The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances,Elsevier.
Jones,K. (2003). What Is an Affordance? Ecological Psychology, Vol.15, No.2, pp.107-114.
Joshua Finkel (1997). A Guideline for the Design of a Four-Wheeled Walker, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto.
Keiji Kawahara, Masafumi Narikawa (2013). The unigue achievements of Japanese industries in the super aged society,Applided Ergonomics,Vol.46,Part B,pp.258-266.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Masato Takanokura, Toshihiro Yamauchi (2012). Biomechanical Analysis of Four-Wheeled Walker for an Elderly Person,ISB XXth Congress-ASB 29th Annual Meeting.
Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York:Doubleday.
Norman, D.A (1999). Affordance, Conventions, and Design , Interaction, May- June,pp.38-42.
Norman, D.A. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things, Basic Books Inc, New York.
Norman, D.A. (1990). The Design of Everyday Things, Basic Books Inc, New York.
Norman,D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things，NY: Basic Books ontology Ecological Psychology,Vol.4, No.3, pp. 173-187.
Serge Thill, Daniele Caligiore, Anna M. Borghi, Tom Ziemke,Gianluca Baldassarre (2013). Theories and computational models of affordance and mirror systems: An integrative review,Elsevier.
Shih-Wen Hsiao, Chiao-Fei Hsu, Yin-Ting Lee (2012). Establishment of an online affordance evaluation model for product design. Design studies, p.126-159.
Syazwani Abdul Kadir, Mariam Jamaludin,Asiah Abdul Rahim (2011). Building Managers’Perception in Regards to Accessibility and Universal Design Implementation in Public Buildings: Putrajaya case studies, Famagusta.

校內：2021-06-30公開
校外：2021-06-30公開

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文