| 研究生: |
張元皓 Zhang, Yuan-Hao |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
都會城區防救災體系及效率指標之建構—臺北都會區及江浙滬地區之案例分析 Constructing the Efficiency Indicators of Disaster Prevention and Response Systems in Urban Areas - Case studies of Taipei metropolitan area and Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai regions |
| 指導教授: |
陳彥仲
Chen, Yen-Jong |
| 共同指導教授: |
黃泰霖
Huang, Tai-Lin |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 都市計劃學系 Department of Urban Planning |
| 論文出版年: | 2022 |
| 畢業學年度: | 110 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 85 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 防救災體系 、防救災效率 、臺北都會區 、江浙滬地區 、資料包括分析法(DEA) |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Disaster Prevention and Response Systems, Disaster Prevention Efficiency, Taipei metropolitan area, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai regions, Data Envelopment Analysis |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:109 下載:8 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
伴隨近年全球氣候變遷、極端氣候所帶來的突發性幹擾事件頻發。太平洋與歐亞大陸交界地帶,深受海洋與大氣交互影響,加上緯度、季風與島內地形垂直變遷度大,氣候變遷對該區域影響甚為顯著,其中尤以颱風夾帶龐大水氣引發洪患使台灣地區與大陸沿海地區之經濟、環境、生命安全數度面臨嚴重損失。如何針對城市減災措施,近年來強調從工程治理到與非工程措施協同防災,但無論是何種治理方法,政府本質上都是希望實現防災資源的優化配置和高效利用,以減少災害損失,並提升政府災害防災的投入決策能力和防災管理。
本研究從都市颱風災害的防治效率角度切入,選取兩個地區,包括臺北都會區和江浙滬地區,進行防救災投入及災害損失資料之收集。並針對兩都市防災組織、都市發展環境、社會經濟人口數據進行收集比較。以此為基礎建構防災效率指標。再运用資料包括分析法(Data Envelopment Analysis,DEA)進行兩地區針對各自防災效率指標之效率比較,並就前述資源防救災組織、都市發展環境、社經屬性條件之投入因素面向與防災相關損失產出之關係,進行解析。
With the global climate change in recent years, sudden disturbances caused by extreme climate occur frequently. The border area between the Pacific Ocean and the Eurasian continent is deeply influenced by the interaction between the ocean and the atmosphere, coupled with the large vertical changes in latitude, monsoon and island topography, climate change has a significant impact on the region, especially the flooding caused by typhoons with huge water, which has caused serious losses to the economy, environment and life safety in Taiwan and the coastal areas of China. However, regardless of the management methods, the government essentially wants to achieve the optimal allocation and efficient use of disaster prevention resources in order to reduce disaster losses and enhance the government's disaster prevention input decision making capability and disaster prevention management.
In this study, data on disaster prevention and relief inputs and losses were collected from two regions, Taipei and Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai, from the perspective of urban typhoon disaster prevention and control efficiency. The data on disaster prevention organizations, urban development environment, and socioeconomic and demographic data were also collected and compared between the two cities. The data were used as the basis for constructing disaster prevention efficiency indicators. The data were then analyzed by using Data Envelopment Analysis to compare the efficiency of the disaster prevention efficiency indicators of the two regions, and to analyze the relationship between the input factors of the disaster prevention and relief organizations, urban development environment, and socioeconomic attributes, and the disaster prevention-related loss output.
[1] UNISDR (2015). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2015, United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.
[2] Aven, T. (2012). Foundations of Risk Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119945482
[3] Aven, T. (2015). Risk Analysis (Second edition. ed.). Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057819
[4] Blaikie, P., et al. (2014) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.
[5] Dulac, N. (2007). A Framework for Dynamic Safety and Risk Management Modeling in Complex Engineering Systems. Doctoral Degree, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[6] Gardoni, P., Murphy, C., and Rowell, A. (Eds.). (2015). Risk Analysis of Natural Hazards: Interdisciplinary Challenges and Integrated Solutions. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22126-7
[7] Boin, A. (2005). 11. From Crisis to Disaster: Towards An Integrative Perspective. What Is a Disaster? New Answers to Old Questions. R. W. Perry and E. L. Quarantelli. Philadelphia, PA, Xlibris: 153-172.
[8] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2019). Supply Chain Resilience Guide. Retrieved from: https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/supply-chain-resilience-guide.pdf.
[9] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2006). Principles of Emergency Management(IS230).Washington DC.
[10] Trist, E.L. (1981). The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program. Ontario Quality of Working Life Center, Occasional Paper No. 2.
[11] Oosthuizen, R., & Pretorius, L. (2016). Assessing the Impact of New Technology on Complex Sociotechnical Systems. 2016, 27(2), 15.
[12] Leveson, N.G. (2003). A New Approach to Hazard Analysis for Complex Systems. International Conference of the System Safety Society. Denver, CO.
[13] Dulac, N. (2007). A Framework for Dynamic Safety and Risk Management Modeling in Complex Engineering Systems. Doctoral Degree, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[14] Leveson, N. G. (2004). A New Accident Model for Engineering Safer Systems. Safety Science, 42(4), 34.
[15] Svedung, I., Rasmussen, J., 2002. Graphic representation of accident scenarios: mapping system structure and the causation of accidents. Safety Science 40 (5), 397–417.
[16] Leveson, N.G. (2011). Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
[17] Rasmussen, J.; Pejtersen, A. & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: Wiley.
[18] Vicente, K.J. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[19] Jenkins, D. P., Stanton, N. A., Sallu ban jaunga, P. M. Walker, G. H. (2009). Cognitive work analysis: coping with complexity. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
[20] Bisantz, A.; Burns, CM (2008). Applications of Cognitive Work Analysis. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
[21] Leveson, Nancy G. & Thomas, John P. 2018. STPA Handbook. STAMP Safety and Security Consulting. https://stamp-consulting.com/online-materials/
[22] Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Walker, G., & Jenkins, D. P. (2018). Cognitive work analysis: applications, extensions and future directions. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
[23] Naikar, N., Moylan, A., and Pearce, B. 2006. Analysing activity in complex systems with
[24] cognitive work analysis: Concepts, guidelines, and case study for control task analysis. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7(4), 371–394.
[25] Ahlstrom, U. 2005. Work domain analysis for air traffic control weather displays. Journal of Safety Research, 36, 159–169.
[26] Ford, A. (2010) Modeling the Environment. (2nd edn) Washington DC: Island Press.
[27] Tönnies, Ferdinand, 1855-1936. (1957). Community & society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). East Lansing :Michigan State University Press.
[28] White, L. J. (2011). Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the crisis in US mortgage finance. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230226203
[29] OsterRom, E. (1990). Governing The Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York: Cambridge University Press.
[30] Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
[31] Benbasat, I., D. K. Goldstein, and M. Mead, (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly,11(3), 369-386.
[32] Neuman, W. L.(2000)。社會研究方法:質化與量化取向(Social research methods: qualitativeand quantitative approaches)。朱柔若(譯)。臺北:揚智。(原著於1997出版)。
[33] Yin, R. K(2001)。個案研究法(Case study research: Design and methods)尚榮安(譯)。臺北:弘智。(原著於1994出版)
[34] 曾梓峰主持(2012)。因應氣候變遷都市水患問題探討與因應對策(行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告,RDEC-RES-100-010)。高雄市,國立高雄大學都市發展與建築研究所。
[35] 經濟部(2017)。水災災害防救策進計畫(100-108年)(第2次修正版)。臺北市,行政院經濟部。
[36] 陳亮全、林李耀、李維森、謝龍生、李欣輯、陳聯光(2010)。莫拉克颱風之災情勘查與分析。國家災害防救中心成果報告。新北市,國家災害防救中心。
[37] 王筱雯(2010)。面對水患新思維。科學發展2010年3月,447期,66 ~ 71頁。
[38] 經濟部水利署(2019)。水旱災整備及應變科技之研究。臺北市,經濟部水利署。
[39] 臺北市政府工務局(2019)。臺北市政府工務局災害防救業務執行計畫。臺北市,臺北市政府工務局。
[40] 吳明淏(2011)。災害風險管理。生活防災通識課程講義,高雄市立空中大學。
[41] 葉克家、葉森海、黃成甲、張駿暉、傅金城、江申(2012)。淹水境況模擬工作之展望。新北市,國家災害防救科技中心。
[42] 國家災害防救科技中心(2020)。災害潛勢圖資說明手冊。新北市,國家災害防救科技中心。
[43] 經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2020)。淹水潛勢圖第二次更新計畫。臺北市,經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所。https://www.wrap.gov.tw/pro41_main.aspx?type=0404000000&id=51
[44] 經濟部水利署(2017)。淹水潛勢圖製作及應用。臺北市,經濟部水利署
[45] 氣候天氣災害研究中心(2021)。淹水災害與防災。取自
http://www.wcdr.ntu.edu.tw/28153277002879723475332873845028797.html
[46] 臺北市防災資訊網。災害防救體系介紹。取自
https://www.eoc.gov.taipei/Org/SystemIntroduction
[47] 全國法規資料庫(2019)。災害防救法。取自
https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=D0120014
[48] 尹秋怡(2018)。面向社區防災的社區治理體系整合策略研究。南京大學建築與城市規劃學院碩士班。
[49] 新北市災害防救組織架構圖。新北市災害防救辦公室。取自https://www.fire.ntpc.gov.tw/home.jsp?id=af102a54b9d49c43
[50] 基隆市政府(2019)。基隆市地區災害防救計畫108年。基隆市
[51] 上海市統計局。歷年上海統計年鑒。上海市
[52] 上海市政府(2010)。上海市土地利用總體規劃(2010-2030)。上海市
[53] 上海市政府(2014)。上海市防汛防颱專項應急預案。上海市
[54] 郭靜晃(2007)。社會行為研究法。臺北:洪葉。
[55] 全球災害事件簿。台灣颱風事件災害記錄。取自https://den.ncdr.nat.gov.tw
[56] 中國民政部(2000)。關於在全國推進城市社區建設的意見。北京市,中國民政部。
[57] 張繼權、劉興朋、嚴登華(2012)。綜合災害風險管理導論。北京市,北京大學出版社。
[58] 劉敏、王軍、殷傑等(2016)。上海城市安全與綜合防災系統研究。上海市,上海城市規劃。DOI:CNKI:SUN:HCSG.0.2016-01-003。
[59] 上海市人民政府(2016)。上海市災害管理應急預案體系。上海市,上海市人民政府。
[60] 上海市政府(2014)。上海市突發事件應急處置流程。上海市,上海市人民政府。
[61] 尹秋怡、甄峰、閆欣(2018)。面向社區防災的社區治理體系整合策略研究。南京市,南京大學建築與城市規劃學院。
[62] 新北市消防局(2015)。新北高齡「Home Safe all in one」服務。新北市,新北市消防局。
[63] 佛山市人民政府(2020)。佛山市養老服務體系建設提升三年行動計畫。佛山市,佛山市人民政府。