簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊唐憬
Yang, Tang-Jing
論文名稱: ESG對資本結構調整速度影響之實證研究
An Empirical Study of the ESG Impact on the Speed of Capital Structure Adjustment
指導教授: 廖麗凱
Liao, Li-Kai
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 41
中文關鍵詞: 行為代理理論ESGCSR資本結構調整速度(SOA)
外文關鍵詞: Behavioral agency theory, ESG, CSR, Speed of capital structure adjustment (SOA)
相關次數: 點閱:108下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文嘗試以行為代理理論解釋公司的ESG表現和公司資本結構間的關聯性,通過檢驗公司的ESG表現對資本結構調整速度的影響,來釐清ESG表現對公司營運效率的影響是正面或負面的兩派矛盾觀點。實證結果顯示,ESG表現排名差的公司,調整其資本結構至最適的速度比排名高的公司還快。此外,本研究額外測試槓桿不足及槓桿過度的子樣本,結果發現過度槓桿的公司,其ESG表現會顯著影響公司的資本結構。亦即,正面ESG表現評分越高的公司,其資本結構的調整速度會越快;爭議性ESG面向評分越高的公司,反而會降低其調整至最適資本結構的速度。

    This paper attempts to explain the correlation between a firm's ESG performance and the firm's capital structure by using behavioral agency theory to clarify the two contradictory views on whether ESG performance has a positive or negative impact on a firm's operational efficiency by examining the impact of a firm's ESG performance on the speed of adjusting its capital structure. The empirical results show that firms with poor ESG performance rankings adjust their capital structure to the optimal level faster than firms with high rankings. In addition, this study additionally tested the under-leverage and over-leverage sub-samples and found that the ESG performance of over-leverage firms significantly affects the capital structure of the firms. That is, companies with higher positive ESG performance scores will adjust their capital structure faster; companies with higher controversial ESG scores on the contrary will reduce the speed of adjusting to the optimal capital structure.

    Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Literature Review 7 2.1、Behavior agency theory 7 2.2、ESG and Agency Problem 8 2.3、Agency Problem and SOA 11 2.4、ESG’s Dark Side 13 3. Methods 16 3.1、Target Leverage and Adjustment Model 16 3.2、Effect of ESG on SOA 17 3.2.1、Independent Variable 18 3.2.2、Control Variable 19 3.3、Data 19 4. Results 23 4.1、Summary Statistics 23 4.2、ESG Score and Leverage 26 4.3、Robustness Test 31 5. Additional Tests 33 6. Conclusion 35 7. Appendix: Heckman Procedure's First-Stage Estimation 37 8. Reference 38

    Adeneye, Y. B., Kammoun, I., & Ab Wahab, S. N. A. (2022). Capital structure and speed of adjustment: the impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, (ahead-of-print).
    Aflatooni, A., & Khazaei, M. (2020). Information asymmetry, leverage deviation, and leverage adjustment speed. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 13(1).
    Allman, E., & Won, J. (2021, November). The effect of ESG disclosure on corporate investment efficiency. In Proceedings of Paris December 2021 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-ESSEC.
    Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.
    Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87-103.
    An, Z., Li, D., & Yu, J. (2015). Firm crash risk, information environment, and speed of leverage adjustment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 31, 132-151.
    Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., & Tarelli, A. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 642-664.
    Aybar-Arias, C., Casino-Martínez, A., & López-Gracia, J. (2012). On the adjustment speed of SMEs to their optimal capital structure. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 977-996.
    Bae, K. H., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility reduce the costs of high leverage? Evidence from capital structure and product market interactions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 100, 135-150.
    Rubin, A. (2005). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between owners.
    Ben-Nasr, H., & Ghouma, H. (2018). Employee welfare and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 700-725.
    Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82-113.
    Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279.
    Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
    Boivie, S., Lange, D., McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. (2011). Me or we: The effects of CEO organizational identification on agency costs. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 551-576.
    Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2016). Agency theory and bounded self-interest. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 276-297.
    Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. 2003. Strategy and human resource management. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Bratton, W. 2005. The academic tournament over executive compensation. California Law Review, 93(5): 1557-1584. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. 2004. Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
    Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325-1343.
    Bruna, M. G., Loprevite, S., Raucci, D., Ricca, B., & Rupo, D. (2022). Investigating the marginal impact of ESG results on corporate financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102828.
    Carroll, A. B., & Brown, J. A. (2018). Corporate social responsibility: A review of current concepts, research, and issues. Corporate Social Responsibility.
    Cavaco, S., & Crifo, P. (2014). CSR and financial performance: Complementarity between environmental, social and business behaviours. Applied Economics, 46(27), 3323-3338.
    Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23.
    Cheng, H., Hong, H., & Shue, K. (2013). Do managers do good with other people's money? (No. w19432). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Cui, V., Ding, S., Liu, M., & Wu, Z. (2018). Revisiting the effect of family involvement on corporate social responsibility: A behavioral agency perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 291-309.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109-134.
    Devos, E., Rahman, S., & Tsang, D. (2017). Debt covenants and the speed of capital structure adjustment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45, 1-18.
    Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
    Do, T. K., Huang, H. H., & Lo, T. C. (2023). Does corporate social responsibility affect leverage adjustments?. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 60(4), 1569-1604.
    Eccles, R. G., Kastrapeli, M. D., & Potter, S. J. (2017). How to integrate ESG into investment decision‐making: Results of a global survey of institutional investors. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 29(4), 125-133.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2002). Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Review of Financial Studies, 1-33.
    Faulkender, M., Flannery, M. J., Hankins, K. W., & Smith, J. M. (2012). Cash flows and leverage adjustments. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(3), 632-646.
    Fernando, C. S., Sharfman, M. P., & Uysal, V. B. (2017). Corporate environmental policy and shareholder value: Following the smart money. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(5), 2023-2051.
    Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549-2568.
    Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889.
    Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.
    Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Hoskisson, R. E., Makri, M., Sirmon, D. G., & Campbell, J. T. (2011). Innovation and the preservation of socioemotional wealth: The paradox of RandD investment in family controlled high technology firms. Unpublished manuscript, Mays Business School, Texas A&M University.
    Greiner, M., & Sun, J. (2021). How corporate social responsibility can incentivize top managers: A commitment to sustainability as an agency intervention. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1360-1375.
    Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Clarendon Press.
    Hall, B. J. (2000). What you need to know about stock options. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 121-121.
    Jalilvand, A., & Harris, R. S. (1984). Corporate behavior in adjusting to capital structure and dividend targets: An econometric study. The Journal of Finance, 39(1), 127-145.
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, October, 1976, V. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
    Jin, M., Zhao, S., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2020). Information asymmetry and leverage adjustments: a semiparametric varying‐coefficient approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 183(2), 581-605.
    Kavadis, N., & Thomsen, S. (2022). Sustainable corporate governance: A review of research on long‐term corporate ownership and sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review.
    Kraemer, H. C., & Blasey, C. M. (2004). Centring in regression analyses: a strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13(3), 141-151.
    Liao, L. K., Mukherjee, T., & Wang, W. (2015). Corporate governance and capital structure dynamics: An empirical study. Journal of Financial Research, 38(2), 169-192.
    Lin, H. P., Pujiastuti, A., & Hsieh, T. Y. (2021). CSR, Adjustment Speed of Capital Structure, and Firm Performance: Evidence from ASEAN Nations with ESG Performance Data. International Review of Accounting, Banking & Finance, 13(3).
    Liu, S., & Sickles, R. (2021). The agency problem revisited: a structural analysis of managerial productivity and CEO compensation in large US commercial banks. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 391-418.
    Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 592-636.
    McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
    Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
    Morellec, E., Nikolov, B., & Schürhoff, N. (2012). Corporate governance and capital structure dynamics. The Journal of Finance, 67(3), 803-848.
    Mukherjee, T., & Wang, W. (2013). Capital structure deviation and speed of adjustment. Financial Review, 48(4), 597-615.
    Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.
    Nyberg, A. J., Fulmer, I. S., Gerhart, B., & Carpenter, M. A. (2010). Agency theory revisited: CEO return and shareholder interest alignment. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1029-1049.
    Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K., & Kim, T. Y. (2018). Complementary or substitutive effects? Corporate governance mechanisms and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2716-2739.
    Pepper, A., & Gore, J. (2015). Behavioral agency theory: New foundations for theorizing about executive compensation. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1045-1068.
    Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421-1460.
    Richardson, S. (2006). Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2), 159-189.
    Rubin, A. (2005). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between owners.
    Ryan, T. P. (2008). Modern regression methods (Vol. 655). John Wiley & Sons.
    Sanders, W. G., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1055-1078.
    Woo, H. (2019). The effect of CEO compensation structure on the early internationalization of newly public firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(12), 1977-1996.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2028-08-11公開
    校外:2028-08-11公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE