簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張晴雯
Chang, Ching-Wen
論文名稱: 以計畫行為理論探討消費者對電動機車之行為意圖
A Study of Consumer’s Behavioral Intention on Electric Scooters Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior
指導教授: 林佐鼎
Lin, Tzuoo-Ding
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 交通管理科學系
Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 78
中文關鍵詞: 計畫行為理論知覺節省知覺風險環保態度
外文關鍵詞: TPB, Perceived saving, Perceived risk, Environmental attitudes
相關次數: 點閱:106下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著全球暖化及高油價議題受到世界關注,各國體認到地球資源已不再是取之不竭,而目前國內也積極推動電動機車發展計畫以達節能減碳之目的。過去針對電動機車之研究多以產業策略、經濟效益分析進行探討,故本研究將以消費者對電動機車的知覺感受為基礎探討其對行為意圖之影響。
    電動機車係以電能為動力推動的一種運輸工具,因此該產品能夠達到能源及金錢上的節省,但其與傳統燃油機車最大的差異即性能不足,使一般民眾始終無法提升購買意願。本研究將透過Ajzen的計畫行為理論為基礎,結合「 知覺節省」、「知覺風險」及「環保態度」之概念,探討消費者對電動機車的行為意圖。
    研究結果顯示,知覺行為控制及行為態度對行為意圖有正向影響,環保態度對於行為態度有正向影響,知覺節省對於知覺行為控制及行為意圖有正向影響,知覺風險對於知覺行為控制及行為意圖有負向影響。然而環保態度及知覺行為控制對行為意圖則是在研究中沒有獲得支持。

    Due to the concerns of global warming and the increase of petroleum price, countries in the world has recognized that the earth's resources are no longer inexhaustible. Taiwan has also been actively promoting the electric locomotive development program in order to achieve the purpose of saving energy and reducing carbon. The past researches of electric locomotive are mainly on industrial policy and economic benefit analysis, so this paper is based on the consumer’s perceived responses on electric locomotive to analyze the influence of behavior intention.
    Electric locomotive is an electric-driven conveyance, so it can save the energy and money. Compared with traditional fuel motorcycle, electric locomotive has poor performance. The public has never been able to improve the willingness to buy. This paper would combine theory of planned behavior with perceived saving, perceived risk and environmental attitudes to analyze the behavior intention.
    The results indicate that perceived behavioral control and attitudes toward the behavior has a positive influence on behavioral intention, environmental attitudes has a positive influence on attitudes toward the behavior, perceived saving has a positive influence on perceived behavioral control and behavioral intention. Perceived risk has a negative influence on perceived behavioral control and behavioral intention, but it’s not has statistically significant on environmental attitudes and perceived behavioral control to behavioral intention.

    第一章 緒論1 1.1 研究背景1 1.2 研究動機2 1.3 研究目的4 1.4 研究流程與內容4 第二章 文獻回顧6 2.1 電動機車定義與發展6 2.2 計畫行為理論13 2.3 知覺節省17 2.4 知覺風險18 2.5 消費者環保態度21 第三章 研究方法25 3.1 研究架構25 3.2 研究假說26 3.3 研究變數與操作型定義27 3.4 研究設計31 3.5 資料分析方法32 第四章 實證分析37 4.1 基本敘述統計37 4.2 研究變數敘述分析40 4.3 信度分析42 4.4 驗證性因素分析44 4.4.1 驗證性因素分析校估44 4.4.2 收斂效度49 4.4.3 區別效度51 4.5 整體模式結構方程式分析結果52 4.5.1 結構方程式模式建立52 4.5.2 結構方程式分析與校估53 4.5.3 實證結果與假設檢驗58 4.6 小結 61 第五章 結論與建議63 5.1結論63 5.2建議64 5.2.1 實務上建議64 5.2.2 後續研究與建議66 參考文獻67 一、中文部分67 二、英文部分69 附錄一74

    一、中文部分
    1.王志傑(1998),「消費者對於電動機車重要屬性偏好結構之研究---聯合分析法之應用」,中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    2.王佳綾(2002),「促銷建構方式對消費者購買決策過程之影響」,逢甲大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    3.王明杰(2005) ,「影響餐飲業使用無線點餐系統之因素-結合計畫行為理論以及知覺風險理論」,國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    4.朱宴生(2000),「影響我國電動機車擴散因素之研究」,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    5.呂錦婷(2004),「涉入、知覺風險與降低風險策略關聯性之研究-以台北市行動電話消費者為例」,實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    6.李雪梅(2011),「消費者電動機車購買決策之探討-環保與非環保區隔之比較」,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理研究所碩士論文 。
    7.周奕君(2006),「消費者對綠色汽車之偏好結構及願付價格研究」,國立成功大學資源工程學系碩士論文。
    8.邱皓政(2005),結構方程式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用,台北:雙葉書廊。
    9.徐世同、王東昇(2009),「組合價格之價格訊息揭露方式對衝動性購買的影響-展望理論的驗證」,行銷科學學報,5(1),99-123。
    10.徐于婷(2010),「認知風險、認知可信賴度、信任、認知易用性、認知有用性對線上拍賣消費者購買意圖之影響」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文 。
    11.莊汝婕(2008),「以敘述性偏好法探討替代燃料汽車的消費者市場接受度」,國立嘉義大學運輸與物流工程研究所碩士論文。
    12.徐慧娟(2009),「消費者購買綠色產品之意願實證研究—計畫行為理論觀點」,國立成功大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    13.吳俊毅(2000),「科技接受模型之實徵研究—從動機角度」,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    14.梁世安、余國瑋(2005),「以科技接受模式探討二輪式電動代步車消費者接受程度」,行銷評論,2(2):135-148。
    15.陳勻耀(2008),「組合價格之價格訊息揭露方式對衝動性購買的影響-展望理論的驗證」,國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理研究所碩士論文。
    16.許貞、張世其、鄭心琳、沈真宇(2008),「消費者對油電混合車之使用態度及行為意圖之研究」,臺灣銀行季刊,61(1):272-292。
    17.張彥淳(2006),「影響消費者採用行動付款因素之研究」,國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
    18.張超銘(2012),「替代能源車輛產品涉入、產品知識對消費者購買意願影響之研究」,樹德科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
    19.郭柏成(2010),「台灣電動機車的消費者購買行為之研究」,國立成功大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
    20.楊淑斐(2005),「線上學習系統使用意向之模式建構與比較分析研究」,台灣管理學刊,5(2):311-338。
    21.楊美滿(2008),「影響消費者使用3G加值服務行為意圖之因素研究」,國立成功大學工業與資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    22.楊雅婷(2009),「以理性行為理論和科技接受模型來探討消費者對創新科技智慧型手機的購買意願行為之研究」,南華大學企業管理系管理科學碩士論文。
    23.廖偉初(2009),「組合產品特性與手機門號補貼對消費者知覺節省與續約意願之影響:以台灣大哥大公司為例」,國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理研究所碩士論文。
    24.賴筱婷(2009),「建構汽機車傳統車型及替代能源車型之顯示性與陳述性偏好整合型選擇模式」,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
    25.顏士能(2007),「消費者 3G 行動加值服務採用行為之研究」,國立高雄大學經濟管理研究所碩士論文。

    二、英文部分
    1.Ajzen, I. (1985), “From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior,” New York: Springer, Heidelberg, 11-39.
    2.Ajzen, I. & Schifter, D. E. (1985), “Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 843-851.
    3.Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior, organizational behavior & human,” Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
    4.Ajzen, I. & Driver, B. L. (1991), “Prediction of leisure participation from behavior, normative and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior,” Leisure Sciences, 13, 185-204.
    5.Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1992), “Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice,” Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 207-224.
    6.Ahn, T., Ryu, S. & Han, I. (2007), “The impact of web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing,” Information & Management, 44 (3), 263-275.
    7.Balderjahn, I. (1988), “Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictor of ecologically responsible consumption patterns,” Journal of Business research, 17(1), 51-57.
    8.Bassellier, G.(2001), “Information technology competence of business managers: A definition and research model”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 159 -182.
    9.Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003), “Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action,” Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 175-188.
    10.Boksberger, P. E., Bieger, T. & Laesser, C. (2007), “ Multidimensional analysis of perceived risk in commercial air travel,” Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(2), 90-96.
    11.Bianchi, C. & Andrews, L. (2012), “Risk, trust, and consumer online purchasing behaviour: a Chilean perspective,” Internat ional Marketing Review, 253-275.
    12.Caron, J. A. (1989), “Environmental perspectives of blacks: Acceptance of the new environmental paradigm,” Journal of Environmental Education, 20(3), 21-26.
    13.Chiua, Y. C. & Tzengb, G. H. (1999), “The market acceptance of electric motorcycles in Taiwan experience through a stated preference analysis,” Transportation Research Part D, 4, 127-146.
    14.Crespo, A. H. & Bosque, I. R. D. (2008), “The effect of innovativeness on the adoption of B2C e-commerce: A model based on the theory of planned behaviour,” Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2830–2847.
    15.Carla, R. M., Silvia, S. B. & Joaquin, A. M. (2009), “Drivers and barriers to online airline ticket purchasing,” Journal of Air Transport Management, 15(6), 294-298.
    16.Chen, W. Y. & Jim, C. Y. (2011), “Resident valuation and expectation of the urban greening project in Zhuhai, China,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(7), 851-869.
    17.Chen, Y. S. & Chang, C. H. (2012), “Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust,” Management Decision, 50(3), 502 - 520.
    18.Dunlap, R. E. & Van Liere, K. D. (1978), “The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results,” Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
    19.Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G. & Jones, R. E. (2000), “Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale,” Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.
    20.Dagsvik, J. K., Wennemo, T., Wetterwald, D. G. & Aaberge, R. (2002), “Potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles,” Transportation Research Part B, 36, 361–384.
    21.D'Souza, C., Taghian, M. & Khosla, R. (2007), “Examination of environmental beliefs and its impact on the influence of price, quality and demographic characteristics with respect to green purchase intention,” Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 69-78.
    22.Dunlap, R. E. (2008), “The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use,” Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 3-18.
    23.Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I.(1975), “Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior:An introduction to theory and research,” Addison-Wesley.
    24.Fryxell, G. E. & Lo, W. H. (2003), “The influence of environmental knowledge and values on managerial behaviours on behalf of the environment: An empirical examination of managers in China,” Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 45-59.
    25.Featherman, M. S. & Pavlou, P. A. (2003), “Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk perspective,” International Journal of Human-computer Study, 59(4), 451-474.
    26.Forsythe, S. M. & Shi, B. (2003), “Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in internet shopping,” Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 867-875.
    27.Garretson, J. A. & Clow, K. E. (1999), “ The influence of coupon face value on service quality expectation, risk perceptions and purchase intentions in the dental industry,” The Journal of Service Marketing, 13(1), 59-72.
    28.Hines, J., Hungerford, H. R. & Tomera, A. N. (1986), “Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis,” The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
    29.Jacoby, J. & Kaplan, L. B. (1972), “The components of perceived risk,” in proceedings of 3rd Annual Conference, Association for Consumer Research, 382-393.
    30.Jen, W. & Hu, K. C. (2003), “Application of perceived value model to identify factors affecting passenger's repurchase intentions on city bus: A case of the Taipei metropolitan area,” Transportation, 30(3), 307-327.
    31.Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979), “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,” Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
    32.Kopalle, P. K. & Lehmann, D. R. (2006), “Setting quality expectations when entering a market: What should the promise be?” Marketing Science, 25(1), 8-24.
    33.Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L. & Rao, H. R. (2008), “A trust-based consumer making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents,” Decision Support Systems, 44(4), 544-564.
    34.Laroche, M., Bergeron, J. & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001), “Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503-520.
    35.Liebermann, Y. & Stashevsky, S. (2002), “Perceived risks as barriers to internet and e-commerce usage,” Qualitative Market Research, 5(4), 291-300.
    36.Lee, B. C. Y. (2012), “The determinants of consumer attitude toward service innovation- the evidence of ETC system in Taiwan,” Journal of Services Marketing, 26(1), 9-19.
    37.Lin, P. C. & Huang, Y. H. (2012), “The influence factors on choice behavior regarding green products based on the theory of consumption values,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 22(1), 11-18.
    38.Mostafa, M. M. (2006), “Antecedents of egyptian consumer’s green purchase intentions: A hierarchical multivariate regression model,” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 19(2).
    39.Martin, E., Shaheen, S. A., Lipman, T. E. & Lidicker, J. (2009), “Behavioral response to hydrogen fuel cell vehicle and refueling: results of California drive clini,” Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 8670-8680.
    40.Majumdar, S., Deng, J., Zhang, Y. & Pierskalla, C. (2011), “Using contingent valuation to estimate the willingness of tourists to pay for urban forests: A study in Savannah,” Georgia, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 10(4), 275-280.
    41.Pavlou, P. A. (2003), “Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134.
    42.Pavlou, P. A. & Gefen, D. (2004), “Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust,” Information Systems Research, 15, 37-59.
    43.Roselius, T. (1971), “Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods,” Journal of Marketing, 35, 56-61.
    44.Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J. & Warshaw P. R. (1998), “The theory of reasoned action: A meta analysis of past research with recommendation for modifications in future research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325-343.
    45.Stone, R. N. & Gronhaug, K. (1993),”Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline,” European Journal of Marketing, 27, 39-50.
    46.Taylor, J. W. (1974), “The role of risk in consumer behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 54-60.
    47.To P. L., Liao, C. & Lin, T. H. (2007), “Shopping motivations on Internet: A study based on utilitarian and hedonic value,” Technovation, 27(12), 774-787.
    48.Urbany, J. E., Bearden, W. O. & Weilbaker, D. C. (1988), “The effect of plausible and exaggerated reference prices on consumer perceptions and price search,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 95-110.
    49.Widegren, O. (1998), “The new environmental paradigm and personal norms,” Environment and Behavior, 30, 75-100.
    50.Westaby, J. D. (2005), “Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98, 97-120.
    51.Yadav, M. S. & Monroe, K. B. (1993), “How buyers evaluate product bundles: A model of anchoring and adjustment,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 342-353.
    52.Yang, C. J. (2010), “Launching strategy for electric vehicles: Lessons from China and Taiwan,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 831–834.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2018-07-31公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE