駕駛人訓練班主要目的應以指導如何正確駕駛，駕訓班以培養優良之汽車駕駛人與保養車輛能力、瞭解交通法令、促進道路交通安全為目的，而非僅引導成功完成考駕照，引導考照的這個文化實為台灣駕訓業長久以來廣為人知之缺點，駕駛人訓練班也未導入正確駕駛邏輯而導致安全性不足。有鑑於國內道路交通事故頻繁，且不同性別的駕駛人如遇緊急狀況時的駕駛反應力亦有不同，即便未來自動駕駛車逐漸普及，在可見的未來駕駛自駕車仍需正式執照，還需要政府的相關法規及充足的保險制度才得以完全開放，倘若車輛電子系統故障，駕駛人也仍應具備基礎駕駛能力，否則駕駛人恐會直接或間接造成道路事故。本研究針對新手駕駛人進行實驗，探駕駛進行過彎轉向時中融入帶煞入彎之方法，進行深入研究探討及成效評估。本研究受測者為通過合格訓練已有駕駛執照及經驗者，測試駕駛者在未經過帶煞入彎(Trail Brake)訓練下的轉向穩定性，取得駕駛者的相關數據後，透過專業教練指導於轉向時使用帶煞入彎(Trail Brake)技巧，研究過程中使用QSTARZ儀器紀錄相關數據，測試轉向之穩定性與性別差異。測驗當天將由合格考驗員配合QSTRAZ儀器，記錄受測者的入彎最高時速、縱向G值、與轉向時的橫向G值，並由考驗員評斷受試者的體感穩定性，最後則進行統計分析檢定，用以了解帶煞入彎訓練對於轉向穩定性與性別差異的幫助，確保學員能在訓練時養成正確駕駛的身體肌肉記憶，並作為未來駕駛訓練修正訓練準則、及駕駛回訓制度之參考。

Teaching people to drive a right way and making them understand traffic rules is the main driving training principles. Every coach of driving training school should have a correct concept to create a friendly traffic environment. In Taiwan, the coach just teach students how to get the car license, which has formed a criticized driving training culture. In view of the frequent traffic accidents in Taiwan, we would like to know the stability and gender difference on turning. In this study, we will find a group of novice drivers who have a license and driving experience, testing them driver’s steering stability without trail braking training and obtain the driver’s relevant data. To compare with steering stability and gender differences, we will test novice drivers again after professional coaches teach testers trail braking techniques. During the research, we will use some instruments to record relevant data, including QSTARZ. When subjects enter the turning point we will record the subject’s maximum speed, longitudinal G value, and lateral G value. Additionally, the inspector will also record somatosensory stability. Finally, we are going to analyze verification, understanding the help of delayed braking training for steering stability and gender differences. Through this research to ensure braking training can develop body muscle memory for correct driving, and be a reference of driving retraining systems in the future.

1.Timo Lajunen and Heikki Summala, “Driving experience, personality, andskilland safety-motive dimensions in drivers’ self-assessments”, Personality and Individual Differences, 19 ,pp.307-318,2000.
2.Reason, J., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, J. and Campbell, K. (1990), “Errors and violations on the roads： a real distinction?” Ergonomics, Vol. 33, No. 10-11, pp.1315-1332.
3.Blockey, P. N. and Hartley, L. R. (1995), “Aberrant driving behavior： errors and violations,”Ergonomics, Vol. 38, No. 9, pp. 1759-1771.
4.Naito, A., Miyajima, C., Nishino. T, Kitaoka. N. and Takeda, K. (2009), “Driver evaluationbased on classification of rapid decelerating patterns,” IEEE International Conference onVehicular Electronics and Safety, pp. 108-112.
5.(Miyajima et al., 2011; Naito et al., 2009)。Miyajima, C., Ukai, H., Naito, A., Amata, H., Kitaoka. N. and Takeda, K. (2011), “Driver riskevaluation based on acceleration, deceleration, and steering behavior,” IEEEInternational Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 1829-1832.
6.Lonczak, H. S.,Neighbors, C.,and Donovan,D. M.,(2007),Predicting risky and angry driving as afunction of gender,Accident Analysis and preventuon ,Vol.40,No.2,pp.541-547
7.中文參考文獻-全國法規資料庫
8.交通部公路總局統計查詢網
9.內政部警政署統計查詢網
10.民營汽車駕駛人訓練機構管理辦法
11.藍三印，道路交通心理學，警察大學叢書，警察大學，民國 80 年。
12.潘偉南，影響國道客運駕駛績效與油耗因素之探討，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所，民國95年。
13.彭新勝，車輛底盤懸吊與傳動軸整體構建最佳化之振動分析，中央大學碩士論文，民國89年。
14.陳婉婷，駕訓教育評鑑問卷分析之研究，逢甲大學交通工程與管理學研究所碩士論文，民國96年。
15.張新立、游俊哲、王建仁，我國汽車駕駛人訓練機構派督考之實施績效評估，《九十一年道路交通安全與執法研討會論文集》，民國91年。
16.【Sébastien Loeb is the wildest teacher for my first ever tarmac test!】，Oliver solberg ：https：//youtu.be/_EaaygyhtVs