簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 維薩亞
Sayed Ahsaan Razvi
論文名稱: 中空鋼筋混凝土圓形柱在反覆載重下之結構行為模擬
Cyclic Behavior Modelling of Hollow Circular Reinforced Concrete Columns
指導教授: 洪崇展
Hung, Chung-Chan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 110
中文關鍵詞: 空心圓形鋼筋混凝土剪切強度塑性鉸空心柱
外文關鍵詞: Hollow circular Reinforced concrete, shear strength, plastic hinge, OpenSees, hollow column, pipe
相關次數: 點閱:181下載:12
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Hollow circular columns withstand higher flexural strength to mass, moment as compared to solid section columns due to their reduced mass. The behavior of hollow columns is mainly dependent upon the position of neutral axis. However, hollow columns are more shear critical due to their hollowness. No research has been done on predicting the impact of plastic hinge lengths calculated from already available plastic hinge equations of solid columns. The purpose of this research was to analyze the shear strength capacity from the previous models and equations. The study emphasized the formulation of a numerical model which predicted the cyclic behavior of hollow columns with limited computational effort. The impact of plastic hinge length equations for hollow columns on predicting their cyclic behavior was also investigated, and the optimal plastic hinge length equation was identified through OpenSees software. The proposed model was found to be sufficiently reasonable by comparing the cyclic response with the experimental result. The numerical model also showed that plastic hinge length calculated from Panagiotakos & Fardis equation predicted the cyclic behavior in a reasonable manner. Plastic hinge length of 15% of the shear span was more satisfactory for cyclic behavior prediction. However, UHPC columns need to be tested and extending of the proposed model for the UHPC columns.

    DEDICATION ii ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix LIST OF SYMBOLS xiii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Objectives 2 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 3 2.1 Normal concrete 3 2.1.1 Reinforcement in column 4 2.2 Confinement effect in column 4 2.2.1 Hollow section with a single layer of reinforcement 8 2.2.2 Hollow section with two layers of reinforcement 10 2.3 Column axial load capacity 11 2.4 Shear strength models 11 2.4.1 Kowalsky and Priestley (2000) 13 2.4.2 Ranzo and Priestley (2001) 15 2.4.3 Turmo et al. (2009). 17 2.4.4 ACI 318-19 19 2.5 Plastic hinge lengths 20 2.5.1 Priestley and Park (1987) 20 2.5.2 Paulay and Priestley (1992) 23 2.5.3 Berry et al. (2008) 24 2.5.4 Panagiotakos & Fardis (2001) 25 2.5.5 Bae & Bayrak (2008) 25 2.6 Failure modes of column 27 2.7 Cross-sectional geometry parameters 28 2.8 Flexural Capacity 30 2.9 Database of hollow columns 32 2.10 Deformations in column 34 2.10.1 Flexural deformation 34 2.10.2 Reinforcement slip deformation 35 2.10.3 Shear deformation 36 CHAPTER 3: MODELLING TECHNIQUE 37 3.1 Fiber section 37 3.2 Material Modeling 38 3.2.1 Normal concrete constitutive model 38 3.2.2 Steel constitutive model. 39 3.3 Force-based and displacement-based element. 40 3.4 Strain penetration effect 41 3.5 Proposed Model 43 3.5.1 Strain penetration effect by using element 45 3.5.2 Shear spring consideration 49 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 54 4.1 Shear strength evaluation 54 4.2 Consideration of force-based beam-column element. 58 4.2.1 HS1 column 59 4.2.2 HS2 column 64 4.2.3 HS3 column 68 4.2.4 S3 column 73 4.2.5 S4 column 77 4.3 Consideration of plastic hinge length. 81 4.3.1 HS1 column 81 4.3.2 HS2 column 85 4.3.3 HS3 column 89 4.3.4 S3 column 93 4.3.5 S4 column 96 4.4 Strain penetration effect by using element 102 4.5 Shear spring consideration 103 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION 106 CHAPTER 6: FUTURE WORK 108 REFERENCES 109

    1. 318, A.C., ACI 318-19 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19). 2019: American Concrete Institute.
    2. Jensen, U.G. and L.C. Hoang, Shear strength of reinforced concrete piers and piles with hollow circular cross section. Structural engineering international, 2010. 20(3): p. 260-267.
    3. Lignola, G.P., et al., Experimental performance of RC hollow columns confined with CFRP. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2007. 11(1): p. 42-49.
    4. Lignola, G.P., et al., Analysis of RC hollow columns strengthened with GFRP. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2011. 15(4): p. 545-556.
    5. Zahn, F., R. Park, and M. Priestley, Flexural strength and ductility of circular hollow reinforced concrete columns without confinement on inside face. Structural Journal, 1990. 87(2): p. 156-166.
    6. Ranzo, G. and M. Priestley. Seismic performance of large RC circular hollow columns. in Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. 2000.
    7. Mander, J., M.N. PRIESTLEY, and R. Park, Behaviour of ductile hollow reinforced concrete columns. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1983. 16(4): p. 273-290.
    8. Mervyn, J.K. and M.J.N. Priestley, Improved Analytical Model for Shear Strength of Circular Reinforced Concrete Columns in Seismic Regions. ACI Structural Journal. 97(3).
    9. Lee, J.-H., et al., Seismic performance of circular hollow RC bridge columns. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2015. 19(5): p. 1456-1467.
    10. Mander, J.B., M.J. Priestley, and R. Park, Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of structural engineering, 1988. 114(8): p. 1804-1826.
    11. Priestley, M.N., F. Seible, and G.M. Calvi, Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. 1996: John Wiley & Sons.
    12. Liang, X., R. Beck, and S. Sritharan, Understanding the confined concrete behavior on the response of hollow bridge columns. 2015.
    13. Li, Z.-X., et al., Flexural Behavior of Circular Hollow RC Piers with Reduced Amounts of Inner Hoops. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2020. 14(1): p. 1-15.
    14. MacGregor, J.G., et al., Reinforced concrete: Mechanics and design. Vol. 3. 1997: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
    15. Ranzo, G. and M.N. Priestley, Seismic performance of circular hollow columns subjected to high shear. 2001: Structural Systems Research Project, University of California, San Diego.
    16. Turmo, J., G. Ramos, and A. Aparicio, Shear truss analogy for concrete members of solid and hollow circular cross section. Engineering Structures, 2009. 31(2): p. 455-465.
    17. Ghee, A.B., M.N. Priestley, and T. Paulay, Seismic shear strength of circular reinforced concrete columns. Structural Journal, 1989. 86(1): p. 45-59.
    18. Priestley, M. and R. Park, Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading. Structural Journal, 1987. 84(1): p. 61-76.
    19. Berry, M.P., D.E. Lehman, and L.N. Lowes, Lumped-plasticity models for performance simulation of bridge columns. ACI Structural Journal, 2008. 105(3): p. 270.
    20. Panagiotakos, T.B. and M.N. Fardis, Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate. Structural Journal, 2001. 98(2): p. 135-148.
    21. Bae, S. and O. Bayrak, Plastic hinge length of reinforced concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal, 2008. 105(3): p. 290.
    22. Han, X.-l. and J. Ji, Failure mode classification of reinforced concrete column using Fisher method. Journal of Central South University, 2013. 20(10): p. 2863-2869.
    23. Setzler, E.J. and H. Sezen, Model for the lateral behavior of reinforced concrete columns including shear deformations. Earthquake Spectra, 2008. 24(2): p. 493-511.
    24. Sezen, H. and T. Chowdhury, Hysteretic model for reinforced concrete columns including the effect of shear and axial load failure. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009. 135(2): p. 139-146.
    25. Yeh, Y.-K., Y. Mo, and C. Yang, Seismic performance of hollow circular bridge piers. Structural Journal, 2001. 98(6): p. 862-871.
    26. Wang, Z., et al., Modeling seismic performance of high-strength steel–ultra-high-performance concrete piers with modified Kent–Park model using fiber elements. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2016. 8(2): p. 1687814016633411.
    27. Mazzoni, S., et al., OpenSees command language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, 2006. 264: p. 137-158.
    28. Hsu, T.T., Nonlinear analysis of membrane elements by fixed-angle softened-truss model. Structural Journal, 1997. 94(5): p. 483-492.
    29. Broujerdian, V. and M.T. Kazemi, Nonlinear finite element modeling of shear-critical reinforced concrete beams using a set of interactive constitutive laws. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016. 14(8): p. 507-519.
    30. Melo, J., H. Varum, and T. Rossetto, Numerical Modeling of RC Columns and a Modified Steel Model Proposal for Elements With Plain Bars. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2020. 6: p. 210.
    31. Scott, M.H. and G.L. Fenves, Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam–column elements. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006. 132(2): p. 244-252.
    32. Zhao, J. and S. Sritharan, Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based analysis of reinforced concrete structures. ACI Materials Journal, 2007. 104(2): p. 133.
    33. Kim, I.-H., C.-H. Sun, and M. Shin, Concrete contribution to initial shear strength of RC hollow bridge columns. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2012. 41(1): p. 43-65.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE