| 研究生: |
李佩芸 Lee, Pei-Yun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
不同視覺訊息對年輕人和老年人向後行走表現之影響 Influence of different visual conditions on backward walking performance in young and older adults |
| 指導教授: |
李佩紜
Lee, Pei-Yun |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
醫學院 - 物理治療學系 Department of Physical Therapy |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 62 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 向後行走 、步態表現 、視覺情況 、年齡 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | backward walking, gait performance, visual information, age |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:61 下載:13 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
研究背景和目的:在行走的過程中,人們會利用來自周圍環境的視覺訊息對步態做出適當的調整。除了視覺訊息之外,年齡也是影響行走表現的因素之一,相較於年輕人,老年人更依賴視覺以維持行走時的姿勢控制與平衡。而向後行走是在日常生活中移動所需常見的動作,不同於向前行走,當向後行走時,看不到前進方向的環境,是否會如同向前行走時視覺所扮演的角色,根據視覺訊息調整步態,目前並不清楚,因此,本研究目的為探討健康年輕人和老年人在不同視覺情況下向後行走的表現。
方法:本研究招募20位健康年輕人(22.3 ±1.7歲)與健康老年人(69.2 ± 5.5歲)。所有受試者分別在三種不同視覺情況向後行走,分別是(1)一般視力向後行走、(2)看著置於前方的鏡子向後行走及(3)配戴模糊的眼鏡向後行走。在行走的過程中,使用SIMI MOTION® 動作分析系統及Delsys無線肌電感應系統分別記錄向後行走時的下肢動作及肌肉活動表現,並計算相關之步態參數、下肢關節活動角度及下肢肌肉活動情形。其中空間-時間步態參數包括速度、步長、步寬、跨步時間與步態週期百分比;下肢關節活動角度則包括髖關節、膝關節以及踝關節之角度變化; 與慣用腳之肌肉活動程度及大腿、小腿前後側肌肉同時收縮之時間長度。統計分析使用重複測量二因子變異數分析(Two-way repeated measure ANOVA),分析兩組受試者在三個不同視覺情況的步態表現差異。p值設小於0.05達到顯著差異。
結果:老年人向後行走的步行速度顯著比年輕人慢,步長也顯著短於年輕人,而老年人髖關節活動角度在腳離地期與站立時期的最大屈曲角度、髖關節活動度顯著比年輕人小。老年人在站立時期的膝關節活動度則是顯著小於年輕人;踝關節最大蹠曲角度在腳離地期與擺盪期與年輕人比起顯著較大。除此之外,老年人之股二頭肌、脛骨前肌和腓腸肌也比年輕人有顯著較大的肌肉活動程度,不論是大腿或小腿在單腳站立期,老年人的慣用側下肢前後側肌肉同時收縮時間皆顯著比年輕人長。比較三種視覺情況,年輕人在一般視力與配戴模糊眼鏡向後行走的跨步時間皆顯著比看著鏡子長,而老年人在則是在一般視力向後走比起其他兩個情況有較長的跨步時間。
結論:年齡與向後行走步態表現有關,除了步態產生改變,關節角度與肌肉活化程度也受到影響; 一般而言老年人比年輕人更小心地向後走,包括行走速度較慢,步長縮短,減少下肢關節活動度以及增加肌肉活動程度。此外當向後行走時,不同的視覺情況對年輕人與老年人的步態表現有些微影響,老年人會使用不同的策略適應不同的視覺情況。本研究提供老年人在向後走時適應不同視覺情況之步態表現,因此為老年人設計向後走運動時須考慮年紀與視覺的影響。
Background and Purpose: Visual information from the surrounding environment is essential during walking. The visual information is usually used to make appropriate modulation to gait pattern. In addition to the visual information, ageing might be another factor associated with changes of gait pattern. Elderly were found to rely more on visual information for postural control and balance than young adults during walking. Different from forward walking, during backward walking, a commonly seen movement in daily life, one could not see the environment of the heading direction. It is unclear whether one would modulate gait pattern during backward walking using visual information from the surrounding environment. No study has reported how visual information would influence backward walking performance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of different visual conditions on backward walking performance in healthy young and older adults.
Methods: Twenty healthy young (22.3 ±1.7 years) and older adults (69.2 ± 5.5 years) were recruited in the study. All subjects were asked to walk backward at self-selected speed on a walkway under three different visual conditions: (i) normal vision, (ii) looking at a mirror placing at the front to provide additional visual information, and (iii) wearing a pair of blurry goggles. SIMI MOTION® and Delsys wireless electromyography system were used to obtain gait parameters, and joint angles and muscle activities of the lower extremities during backward walking. Spatiotemporal gait parameters, including walking speed, stride length, step width, stride time and gait cycle percentage of each phase were measured. Joint angles of hip, knee and ankle joint during backward walking were recorded. Muscle activities of vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medialis of the dominant leg and muscle co-contraction duration of the dominant thigh and shank were measured. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare differences of all the parameters between the two groups and among the three visual conditions. Significance level was set at p<0.05.
Results: The older adults walked backward with significantly slower speed and shorter stride length than the young adults did in all visual conditions. The angular displacement of hip flexion at foot off, and maximal hip flexion and range of motion during stance phase were significantly smaller in the older adults than the young adults. The significantly smaller range of motion of knee joint was found in the older adults than the young adults during stance phase. Ankle plantar flexion at foot off and ankle plantar flexion during swing phase were significantly greater in the older adults compared to the young adults. Muscle activities of the biceps femoris, tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius of the dominant leg during single limb support phase and swing phase showed significant greater activities in the older adults than the young adults. Muscle co-contraction duration of the dominant thigh and shank during single limb support phase was significantly longer in the older adults than the young adults. Comparing different visual conditions, the young adults exhibited longer stride time in normal vision and wearing blurry goggles condition than looking at the mirror condition. The older adults showed significantly longer stride time in normal vision than the other two conditions.
Conclusion: Ageing is associated with altered gait pattern during backward walking. In general, older adults walked backward with more cautious gait pattern than young adults including slower walking speed, shorter stride length and decreased range of motion of lower extremities. In addition, different visual conditions might have a subtle influence on gait pattern during backward walking in both young and older adults. Older adults would use different strategy to adapt to different visual conditions. This study provided important information on how older adults would respond to different visual conditions during backward walking. This information should be considered when designing backward walking related exercise for older adults.
[1] Patla AE. Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion. Gait & posture. 1997;5:54-69.
[2] Higuchi T. Visuomotor Control of Human Adaptive Locomotion: Understanding the Anticipatory Nature. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013;4:277.
[3] Huang C-K, Chien J-H, Siu K-C. The reduced lighting environment impacts gait characteristics during walking. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2017;61:126-30.
[4] Moe-Nilssen R, Helbostad JL, Akra T, Birdedal L, Nygaard HA. Modulation of gait during visual adaptation to dark. Journal of motor behavior. 2006;38:118-25.
[5] Hallemans A, Beccu S, Van Loock K, Ortibus E, Truijen S, Aerts P. Visual deprivation leads to gait adaptations that are age- and context-specific: I. Step-time parameters. Gait & posture. 2009;30:55-9.
[6] Saucedo F, Yang F. Effects of visual deprivation on stability among young and older adults during treadmill walking. Gait & posture. 2017;54:106-11.
[7] Laufer Y. Age- and gender-related changes in the temporal-spatial characteristics of forwards and backwards gaits. Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy. 2003;8:131-42.
[8] Schmitz A, Silder A, Heiderscheit B, Mahoney J, Thelen DG. Differences in lower-extremity muscular activation during walking between healthy older and young adults. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology. 2009;19:1085-91.
[9] Franz JR, Francis CA, Allen MS, O’Connor SM, Thelen DG. Advanced age brings a greater reliance on visual feedback to maintain balance during walking. Human movement science. 2015;40:381-92.
[10] Patla AE. How Is Human Gait Controlled by Vision. Ecological Psychology. 1998;10:287-302.
[11] Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, Biochemistry Do, Jessell MBT, Siegelbaum S, et al. Principles of neural science: McGraw-hill New York; 2000.
[12] Hallemans A, Ortibus E, Meire F, Aerts P. Low vision affects dynamic stability of gait. Gait & posture. 2010;32:547-51.
[13] Anson E, Jeka J. Perspectives on Aging Vestibular Function. Frontiers in neurology. 2015;6:269.
[14] Patel M, Magnusson M, Kristinsdottir E, Fransson PA. The contribution of mechanoreceptive sensation on stability and adaptation in the young and elderly. European journal of applied physiology. 2009;105:167-73.
[15] Boyer KA, Johnson RT, Banks JJ, Jewell C, Hafer JF. Systematic review and meta-analysis of gait mechanics in young and older adults. Experimental gerontology. 2017;95:63-70.
[16] Hayashida I, Tanimoto Y, Takahashi Y, Kusabiraki T, Tamaki J. Correlation between muscle strength and muscle mass, and their association with walking speed, in community-dwelling elderly Japanese individuals. PloS one. 2014;9:e111810.
[17] Whittle M. Gait Analysis: An Introduction: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2007.
[18] Kang HG, Dingwell JB. Effects of walking speed, strength and range of motion on gait stability in healthy older adults. Journal of biomechanics. 2008;41:2899-905.
[19] Begg RK, Sparrow WA. Ageing effects on knee and ankle joint angles at key events and phases of the gait cycle. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology. 2006;30:382-9.
[20] Uiga L, Cheng KC, Wilson MR, Masters RS, Capio CM. Acquiring visual information for locomotion by older adults: a systematic review. Ageing research reviews. 2015;20:24-34.
[21] Yelnik AP, Tasseel Ponche S, Andriantsifanetra C, Provost C, Calvalido A, Rougier P. Walking with eyes closed is easier than walking with eyes open without visual cues: The Romberg task versus the goggle task. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2015;58:332-5.
[22] Poulain I, Giraudet G. Age-related changes of visual contribution in posture control. Gait & posture. 2008;27:1-7.
[23] Iwasaki S, Yamasoba T. Dizziness and Imbalance in the Elderly: Age-related Decline in the Vestibular System. Aging and disease. 2015;6:38-47.
[24] Figueiro MG, Plitnick B, Rea MS, Gras LZ, Rea MS. Lighting and perceptual cues: effects on gait measures of older adults at high and low risk for falls. BMC geriatrics. 2011;11:49.
[25] Grasso R, Bianchi L, Lacquaniti F. Motor patterns for human gait: backward versus forward locomotion. Journal of neurophysiology. 1998;80:1868-85.
[26] Flynn TW, Soutas-Little RW. Patellofemoral joint compressive forces in forward and backward running. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. 1995;21:277-82.
[27] Fritz NE, Worstell AM, Kloos AD, Siles AB, White SE, Kegelmeyer DA. Backward walking measures are sensitive to age-related changes in mobility and balance. Gait & posture. 2013;37:593-7.
[28] Lee M, Kim J, Son J, Kim Y. Kinematic and kinetic analysis during forward and backward walking. Gait & posture. 2013;38:674-8.
[29] Thorstensson A. How is the normal locomotor program modified to produce backward walking? Experimental brain research. 1986;61:664-8.
[30] Bernardin D, Kadone H, Bennequin D, Sugar T, Zaoui M, Berthoz A. Gaze anticipation during human locomotion. Experimental brain research. 2012;223:65-78.
[31] Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology. 2000;10:361-74.
[32] Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
[33] Laufer Y. Effect of age on characteristics of forward and backward gait at preferred and accelerated walking speed. The journals of gerontology Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2005;60:627-32.
[34] Boyer KA, Andriacchi TP, Beaupre GS. The role of physical activity in changes in walking mechanics with age. Gait & posture. 2012;36:149-53.
[35] Kerrigan DC, Todd MK, Della Croce U, Lipsitz LA, Collins JJ. Biomechanical gait alterations independent of speed in the healthy elderly: evidence for specific limiting impairments. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1998;79:317-22.
[36] Maki BE, McIlroy WE. Postural control in the older adult. Clinics in geriatric medicine. 1996;12:635-58.
[37] Kang HG, Dingwell JB. Dynamics and stability of muscle activations during walking in healthy young and older adults. Journal of biomechanics. 2009;42:2231-7.
[38] Hortobágyi T, Solnik S, Gruber A, Rider P, Steinweg K, Helseth J, et al. Interaction between age and gait velocity in the amplitude and timing of antagonist muscle coactivation. Gait & posture. 2009;29:558-64.
[39] Lee H-J, Chang WH, Choi B-O, Ryu G-H, Kim Y-H. Age-related differences in muscle co-activation during locomotion and their relationship with gait speed: a pilot study. BMC geriatrics. 2017;17:44.
[40] Peterson DS, Martin PE. Effects of age and walking speed on coactivation and cost of walking in healthy adults. Gait & posture. 2010;31:355-9.
[41] Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T, Siegelbaum S, Hudspeth A. Principle of Neural Science. Ch. 60, 65. USA: McGraw-Hill; 2013.
[42] Garcia-Masso X, Pellicer-Chenoll M, Gonzalez LM, Toca-Herrera JL. The difficulty of the postural control task affects multi-muscle control during quiet standing. Experimental brain research. 2016;234:1977-86.
[43] Helbostad JL, Vereijken B, Hesseberg K, Sletvold O. Altered vision destabilizes gait in older persons. Gait & posture. 2009;30:233-8.
[44] Lord SR, Dayhew J. Visual risk factors for falls in older people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2001;49:508-15.
[45] Wang J, Yuan W, An R. Effectiveness of backward walking training on spatial-temporal gait characteristics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human movement science. 2018;60:57-71.
[46] Uiga L, Capio CM, Ryu D, Young WR, Wilson MR, Wong TWL, et al. The Role of Movement Specific Reinvestment in vIsuo-motor Control of Walking by Older Adults. The journals of gerontology Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences. 2018.