| 研究生: |
閻慶昌 Yen, Ching-Chang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
QFN構裝體錫球接點結構探討 A Study of Solder Joint Structure in QFN Package |
| 指導教授: |
陳榮盛
Chen, R. S. |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工程科學系碩士在職專班 Department of Engineering Science (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2006 |
| 畢業學年度: | 94 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 93 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 黏塑性 、亞蘭德模型 、疲勞壽命 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Viscoplastic, Fatigue life, Anand's model |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:105 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
QFN構裝體是由許多材料所組成,當受到溫度循環負載,由於各元件材料熱膨脹係數的不一致而導致構裝體結構變形,進而造成錫球產生疲勞破壞,因此本文針對QFN構裝體為對象,考慮兩種錫球材料與不同錫球高度,受到溫度循環變化的負載,探討錫球疲勞可靠度的影響。其分析模型係採用ANSYS有限元素分析軟體先建構1/4構裝體,並以亞蘭德模式描述錫球黏塑性行為模式,其它材料則視為線彈性。而溫度循環之變化範圍為-40℃~125℃,每循環的高低溫持平時間各為5分鐘、升降溫時間各為10分鐘;每循環為30分鐘。然後再計算最外側錫球(導線架與基板間)之變形、應力與應變及遲滯曲線等機械行為之變化情形,並將等效應變範圍值代入Coffin-Manson計算公式中,以預估錫球之疲勞壽命。
QFN package consists of various components. When the package suffers a temperature cycling load as the different coefficients of thermal expansion(CTE)of those components, it will tend to deform and lead to fatigue of solder joint. For this reason, the effects on fatigue life of QFN package when it is under temperature cycling load by means of two different kinds of solder at different altitudes will have a detail discussion in this paper. Applying finite element analysis software ANSYS for building a 1/4 model. To describe the material behavior of solder, Anand’s model were used in viscoplastic analysis respectively, but other components are assumed to be linear elastic. The temperature fluctuating cycle is between -40℃and 125℃. The package dwells at high temperature or low temperature for 5 minutes and is heated from room temperature to 125℃ in 10 minutes and cooled down from 125℃to -40℃ in 10 minutes. Each cycle is 30 minutes. This paper computed the deformation, stress, strain and hysterisis curve of the outermost solder joint (between leadframe and PCB). The equivalent strain range is substituted
into Coffin-Mansion formula to estimate the fatigue life of solder joint.
[1] Lau John H., “Solder Joint Reliability”, Van Nostrand Reinhold (1991)
[2] Bill stone, John M. Czaronwski, “High performance Flip Chip PBGA
Development”, IEEE, Components and Technology Conference,2001.
[3] Amagai M., “Chip Scale Package (CSP) Solder Joint Reliability and
Modeling”, Microelectronics Reliability, V39, 463-477(1999).
[4] Lee W. W., Nguyen L. T., Selvaduray G. S., “Solder Joint Fatigue Models:
Review and Applicability to Chip Scale Package”, Microelectronics
Reliability, V40, (2000)
[5] Pfeifer M. J., “Solder Bump Size and Shape Modeling and Experimental
Validation”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing
Technology-Part B, Vol. 20, No. 4,(1997)
[6] Tower S. C., Su B., and Lee Y. C., “Yield Prediction for Flip-Chip Solder
Assemblies Based on Solder Shape Modeling”, IEEE Transactions on
Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, Vol. 22, No.1,(1999)
[7] Solomon H. D., “Fatigue of 60/40 Solder,” IEEE Transactions on
Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, Vol. CHMT-9,(1986)
[8] Lau J. H., “Solder Joint Reliability of Flip Chip and Plastic Ball Grid
Array Assemblies Under Thermal, Mechanical, and Vibrational Conditions,
”IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology-
Part B, Vol. 19, No. 4,(1996)
[9] Darveaux R., “Effect of Simulation Methodology on Solder Joint Crack
Growth Correlation and Fatigue Life Prediction,” ASME Journal of
Electronic Packaging, Vol. 124, No3,(2002)
[10]Zhang L. Arora V., Nguyen L., and Kelkar N., “Numerical and Experimental
Analysis of Large Passivation Opening for Solder Joint Reliability
Improvement of Micro SMD Packages,” Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 44,
(2004)