面臨全球化與劇烈的科技競爭，絕大多數的國家與企業都認為不斷地追求創新才是維持競爭力與持續成長的唯一途徑。在享有政府各種的優惠措施與研發資源之下，新竹與台南科學園區已成為我國重要的高科技產業群聚，以及比其他國家更適合高科技產業的研發。
　　這兩個科學園區結合了產官學研等的研發資源，其所形成的群聚效應正逐漸發酵，對於群聚內的高科技廠商來說，群聚效應有利於各園區廠商獲得創新的知識與資訊，並建構企業的創新能力，保持競爭優勢。
　　本研究將實證以社會資本觀點來探討知識流通對創新績效之關聯性。將以新竹與台南科學園區521家進駐廠商為研究對象，採用問卷方式，以企業中高階專業經理人為問卷發放對象。並針對185份有效回收樣本，透過SPSS統計分析軟體，運用敘述統計、因素分析、信度檢定、典型相關與複迴歸分析等方法。
　　研究結果全都部份性地支持下列七個假設，包括（一）知識流通與組織學習傾向具有正向相關性；（二）知識流通與知識創造條件具有正向相關性；（三）組織學習傾向與知識創造條件具有正向相關性；（四）公司社會資本對知識流通有顯著的正向影響；（五）知識流通程度對創新績效有顯著的正向影響；（六）組織學習傾向對創新績效有顯著的正向影響；（七）知識創造條件對創新績效有顯著的正向影響。

　　Facing globalization and violent changes of technology, most countries and companies entirely agree that pursuing innovation constantly is the only way to keep competitive advantages and grow unceasingly. Because the government offers many preferential policies and resources of research and development(R&D), Hsin-Chu and Tainan Science-Based Parks have already been Taiwan’s important high-tech industrial clusters and more adaptable to the research and development of high-tech industrial than other countries.
　　These two science-based parks combine industrial, governmental, academic and institutional R&D resources, and the cluster synergy is taking effect gradually. For high-tech companies, cluster synergy will benefit these companies to acquire innovative knowledge and information, to build innovative capability and to keep competitive advantages.
　　This research will study effects of knowledge flow on innovative performance in perspectives of social capital. Using questionnaire investigation to sample from 521 companies in Hsin-Chu and Tainan Science-Based Parks and inviting mid to high-grade managers to be interviewee. 185 valid samplings are analyzed by SPSS software, such as Descriptive statistics, Factor analysis, Canonical Correlation analysis, and Regression analysis.
　　The analysis results partially support the following seven hypotheses：
1.Knowledge flow is related positively to organizational learning tendancy.
2.Knowledge flow is related positively to knowledge creation conditions.
3.Organizational learning tendancy is related positively to knowledge creation conditions.
4.The effects of social capital on knowledge flow is positive.
5.The effects of knowledge flow on innovative performance is positive.
6.The effects of organizational learning tendancy on innovative performance is positive.
7.The effects of knowledge creation conditions on innovative performance is positive.

一、網站
台南科學園區：http://www.stsipa.gov.tw/ (參考日期：2004年11月8日)
新竹科學園區：http://www.sipa.gov.tw/ (參考日期：2004年11月8日)

二、中文部份
彼得聖吉，(1994)，第五項修鍊：學習型組織的藝術與實務，郭進隆譯，天下文化出版。
波特（Porter, M. E.），（1998），競爭策略：產業環境及競爭者分析，周旭華譯，天下文化出版。
施鴻志，解鴻年，(1993)，科技產業環境規劃與區域發展,台北:胡氏圖書。

三、英文部分
Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S.-W. (2000), “ Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, in Lesser E. L.”, Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications, pp.89-115. Oxford: Butterworth - Heinemann press.
Adler, P.S. and Kwon, S.-W. (2002), “ Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept”, Academy of Management Review, 27, pp.17-40.
Allee, V. (1997), The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Organizational Intelligence, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA, pp.6-69.
Allee, V. (2002), “ A Value Network Approach for Modeling and Measuring Intangibles”, paper presented at the conference, pp.25-26.
Allred, B. B. (2001), “ Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation”, The Academy of Management Executiv, 15(1), pp.161-162.
Betz, F. (1993), Strategy Technology Management, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Birkinshaw, J., Nobel, R. & Ridderstrale, J. (2002), “ Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure?”　Organization Science, 13(3), pp.274-289.
Blyler, M. & Coff, R. W. (2003), “ Dynamic Capabilities, Social Capital, and Rent Appropriation: Ties That Split Pies”, Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), pg.677.
Brown, P. (1999), Industrial Clusters and Marketing Externalities: The Impact of Co-Location on the Marketing Activities of the Firm, Commerce, University of Otago.
Burt R. S. (1992), “ The Social Structure of Competition. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds)”, Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, pp.57-91. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Burt, R. S. (1997), “ The Contingent Value of Social Capital”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp.339-365.
Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T. & Zhao, Y. (2002), “ Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance”, Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), pp.515-524.
Carlile, P. R. (2002), “ A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development”, Organization Science, 13(4), pp.442-455.
Chew, Y. & Yeung, H. W. (2001), “ The SME Advantage: Adding Local Touch to Foreign Transnational Corporations in Singapore”, Regional Studies, 35, pp.431-448.
Coleman, J. S. (1988), “ Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”, American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp.S95-S120.
Collis, D. J. & Montgomery, C. A. (1995), “ Competing on Resources”, Harvard Business Review, 73(4), pp.118-128.
Daft, R. L. (1978), “ A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation”, Academy of Management Joural, 21, pp.193-210.
Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know.Harvard Business School Press.
Dougherty, D. & Bowman, E. H. (1995), “ The Effect of Organizational Downsizing of Product Innovation”, California Management Review, 37(4), pp.28-44.
Dyer J.H. & Singh H. (1998), “ The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 23, pp.660-679.
Gabby, S. & Leenders, R. (1999), Corporate Social Capital and Liability, pp.197-216 London: Kluwer Academic Press.
Grant, R. M. (1996a), “ Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp.109-122.
Grant, R. M. (1996b), “ Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organization Capability as Knowledge Integration”, Organization Science, 7(4), pp. 375-387.
Gulati, R. (1998), “ Alliances and Networks”, Strategic Management Journal, 19, pp.293–317.
Gulati, R., Nohria, N. & Zaheer, A. (2000), “ Strategic Networks”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.203-215.
Gupta, A. K. & Govindarajan V. (2000), “ Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations”, Strategic Management Journal , 21(4), pp.473-496.
Hamel, G. (1991), “ Competition for Competence and Interpartner Learning within International Strategic Alliances”, Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.83-103.
Hawawini, G. & Subramanian, V. (2003), “ Is Performance Driven by Industry-or Firm-specific Factors? A New Look at the Evidence”, Strategic Management Journal , 24(1), pp.1-16.
Holtshouse D. (1998), “ Knowledge Research Issues”, California Management Review, 40(3), pp.277-280.
Huber, G. P. (1991), “Organization Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literature”, Organization Science, February, pp.88-115.
Kale, P., Singh H. & Perlmutter H. (2000), “ Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.217-237.
Kim, D.H. (1998), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital, Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA, pp.41-62.
Knight, K. E. (1967), “ A Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process”, Joural of Business, 14, pp.478-496.
Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1992), “ Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities and the Replication of Technology”, Organization Science, 3, pp.383–397.
Koka, B. R. & Prescott, J. E. (2002), “ Strategic Alliances as Social Capital: A Multidimensional View”, Strategic Management Journal, 23(9), pg.795.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1995), Wellsprings of Knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Lumpkin, G.. T. & Dess, G. G. (1996), “ Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance”, Academy of Management Review, 21(1), pp.135-172.
Madhavan, R. & Grover, R. (1998), “ From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management”, Journal of Marketing, 62(Oct.), pp.1-12.
Marti, J. V. (2004), “ Social Capital Benchmarking System: Profiting from Social Capital When Building Network Organizations”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(3), pp.426-442.
McDonald, F. & Vertova, G. (2001), “ Geographical Concentration and Competitiveness in the European Union”, European Business Review, 13(3), pp.157-165.
Meyers P. W. (1990), “ Non-linear Learning in Large Technological Firm: Period Four Implies Chaos”, Research Policy, 19, pp.97-115.
Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998), “ Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp.242-266.
Nicholson, G. J., Alexander, M. & Kiel, G. C. (2004), “ Defining the Social Capital of the Board of Directors: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, 10(1), pp.54-72.
Nonaka, I. (1994), “ A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science, 5(1), pp.14-37.
Nonaka, I. & Takuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge-Creating company, pp.70-85,Oxford University Press, New York.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. & Konno, N. (2000), “ SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation”, Long Range Planning, 33, pp.5-34.
Ottaviano, G. I.P. (2003), “ Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage-Industrial Districts: Evolution and Competitiveness in Italian Firms”, Journal of Economic Geography. 3(4), pg.455.
Persaud, A., Kumar, U. & Kumar, V. (2001), “ Harnessing Scientific and Technological Knowledge for the Rapid Deployment of Global Innovations”, Engineering Management Journal, 13(1), pp.12-18.
Pinch, S., Henry, N., Jenkins, M. & Tallman, S. (2003), “ From 'Industrial Districts' to 'Knowledge Clusters': A Model of Knowledge Dissemination and Competitive Advantage in Industrial Agglomerations”, Journal of Economic Geography, 3(4), pg.373.
Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.
Porter, M.E. (1998), “ Clusters and the New Economics of Competition”, Harvard Business Review, 76(6), pp.77-90.
Portes A. & Sensenbrenner J. (1993), “ Embedeness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action”, American Journal of Sociology, 98, pp.1320-1350.
Poyhonen, A. & Smedlund, A. (2004), “ Assessing Intellectual Capital Creation in Regional Clusters”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(3), pp.351-365.
Scheel, C. (2002), “ Knowledge Clusters of Technical Innovation Systems”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 6, pp.356-367.
Schulz, M., (2001), “ The Uncertain Relevance of Newness: Organizational Learning and Knowledge Flow”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), pp.661–681.
Senge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline-The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization, New York: Currency Doubleday Press.
Sharkie, R. (2003), “ Knowledge Creation and Its Place in the Development of Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), pp.20-31.
Simon C. (1993), “ Managing Product Innovation at Sony: The Development of the Data Discman”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 5(3), pp.285-306.
Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E. & Noordewier, T. (1997), “ A Framework for Maker-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge, and Bahavior”, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 25(4), pp.305-317.
Smith, K., (1995), “ Interactions in Knowledge Systems, Foundations, Policy Implications and Empirical Methods”, STI Review, 16, pp.69–102.
Song, S. M. & Parry, M. E. (1996), “What Separates Japanese New Product Winners From Losers”, Journal of Product Innovate Management, 13, pp.422-439.
Stahle, P. & Hong, J. (2002), “ Dynamic Intellectual Capital in Global Rapidly Changing Industries”, Joural of Knowledge Management, 6(2), pp.177-189.
Therin, F. (2003), “ Organizational Learning and Innovation in High-Tech Small Firms”, Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Tidd, J. (1995), “ Development of Novel Product Through Intraorganizational and Interorganizationa; Networks: The Case of Home Automation”, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, pp.307-322.
Tidd, J., Bessant, J. & Pavitt, K. (1997), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, Chichester, West Sussex, England; New York: John Wiley.
Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. (1998), “ Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrarfirm Networks”, Academy of Management Journal, 41, pp. 464-476.
Uzzi, B. (1996), “ The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect”, American Sociological Review, 61, pp.674-698.
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E. & Sapienza, H.J. (2001), “ Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-based Firms”, Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp.587-613.
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Tontti, V. (2002), “ Social Capital, Knowledge, and the International Growth of Technology-based New Firms”, International Business Review, 11, pp.279-304.