『二零一四年五月十三日越南排華暴動事件』造成台商約一千一百家停工，超過兩百多家台資企業受損，有十八家台資企業遭縱火。在這樣的事件因素下是否對於台資企業繼續增資越南為本研究主要動機，探討『二零一四年五月十三日越南排華暴動事件』之後台資企業增資越南以及不增資越南區位選擇建議為本研究之目的。
研究採線性機率模型（LPM），透過問卷調查所得之初級資料使用E-View統計分析軟體分析並得出最適配的模型，之後在透過深度訪談佐證本研究問卷統計分析之結果，問卷數共發出110份回收104份，扣除無效問卷4份因此最後總份數為100份，回收率94.5%，研究對象為有在越南投資的台資企業以及尚未在越南投資的台資企業。
本研究結論發現因素人力成本低（顯著正向）、當地政府政策支持外資進駐（顯著負向）、當地政府提供便利融資低利貸款以及稅賦（顯著正向）、加入跨太平洋戰略經濟夥伴關係協議TPP以及區域全面經濟伙伴關係及東協RCEP（顯著負向）、公司階段任務考量即使受損仍會繼續投資越南（顯著正向）、產業群聚效應（顯著正向）、在越南當地有許多自身公司供應商於越南設廠（顯著正向）、越南有設廠（顯著正向）以及年齡35歲以下（顯著正向），以上條件成立將是台資企業增資越南的關鍵的決定性因素。本研究盼能有實質貢獻給予後續研究台資企業投資越南的學者一個方向以及有意願前去越南設廠的台資企業投資策略的考量方向。

Factors Affecting the Willing of Taiwanese Firms to Increase the Capital Investment in Vietnam：After the Anti-Chinese Incidents on May Thirteenth, 2014
Author Name: Yu-Cheng Huang
Advisor Name: Hsin-Hong Kang
National Cheng Kung University
Department & College: Advanced Master Business Administration
SUMMARY
The purpose of this study are to analyze Factors Affecting the Willing of Taiwanese Firms to Increase the Capital Investment in Vietnam：After the Anti-Chinese Incidents on May Thirteenth, 2014,by using Linear Probability Model (LPM) analysis. The subjects including Taiwanese Firms that invested in Vietnam, or interesting but not yet invested in Vietnam Taiwanese Firms.According to survey results and interview evidence, the factors which affect Taiwanese Firms to invest are low labor costs (significantly forward), Vietnam government policies support foreign presence (significantly negative), Vietnam government to facilitate the financing of low-interest loans and tax (significant forward), join Trans-Pacific Partnership and Regional Com-prehensive Economic Partnership (significantly negative), company considerations will continue to invest in Vietnam, even if damaged (significantly forward), Industrial Clusters effects -Taiwanese Firms have many suppliers to set up factories in Vietnam (significantly forward), Taiwanese Firms have set up factories in Vietnam (significantly positive) and under 35 years of age (significantly positive). The conclusion of this study is due to limit of Taiwan’s resources and Taiwanese policy, mindset of Globalization is a trend, Taiwanese Firms should be consider their own strengths and foreign direct investment, through this study It found that the primary consideration of Taiwanese Firms overseas investment will still be cost-oriented.
INTRODUCTION
After the Anti-Chinese Incidents on May Thirteenth, Taiwanese Firms Suffered a major blow, more than 200 Taiwanese Firms are damaged, and there are eighteen Taiwanese Firms was be arson.probe such as an event factor for Taiwanese Firms invest Vietnam or not is this study motivation, the purposes of this study is After the Anti-Chinese Incidents on May Thirteenth, Taiwanese Firms consider about invest Vietnam’s locateon factor.this study using foreign direct investment theory to establish this research framework, and divided into market factors, demand factors, political side factors, event factors, strategy factors, impaired condition factor six facets, this study was to investigate " After the Anti-Chinese Incidents on May Thirteenth " Taiwanese Firms invest in Vietnam's willingness, and what is the considerations about invest Vietnam, finally given other Taiwanese Firms invest in Vietnam's recommendations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this study, using linear probability model LPM, and based on literature review divided into six facets of factors, market factors, demand factors, political side factors, event factors, strategy factors, impaired condition factor, otheise inclouding dummy variables, industry, does Taiwanese Firms have factories in Vietnam or not, is considered anti-Chinese incidents continue to increase after Vietnam, and age total have Twenty two variables, after the initial regression equation found no significant factor, then using Nested Hypothesis method delete some factors which is does’t significant, using Multicollinearity method delete some factors which is does’t significant, finaly get the best regression equation.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Factors Affecting the Willing of Taiwanese Firms to Increase the Capital Investment in Vietnam： After the Anti-Chinese Incidents on May Thirteenth, 2014,base on optimal regression equation found to affect Taiwanese Firms invest in Vietnam decision factor is low labor costs (significantly forward, p=0.049), Vietnam government policies support foreign presence (significantly negative, p=0.023), Vietnam government to facilitate the financing of low-interest loans and tax (significant forward p=0.0109), join Trans-Pacific Partnership and Regional Com-prehensive Economic Partnership (significantly negative, p=0.1013), company considerations will continue to invest in Vietnam, even if damaged (significantly forward, p=0), Industrial Clusters effects -Taiwanese Firms have many suppliers to set up factories in Vietnam (significantly forward, p=0.0023), Taiwanese Firms have set up factories in Vietnam (significantly positive, p=0) and under 35 years of age (significantly positive, p=0.0095), as shown in Table one.
CONCLUSION
In Vietnamese local government Provide tax breaks and relate economic behavior support, but also because Vietnam to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership and Regional Com-prehensive Economic Partnership have trade tariff reduction benefits for Taiwanese Firms are more willing because of these geographical factors continue to increase Vietnam, in Vietnam, there are many Taiwanese Firms because the cluster effect, its own business-related supply chain are production in Vietnam there are more convenient and can savings more costs resulting in economies of scale, overall Vietnam's economic environment remains unchanged, Vietnam is still very worthwhile to continue invest and set up factories, Taiwanese Firms have invest before the Anti-Chinese Incidents on May Thirteenth, 2014,will not easily withdraw even if there are shocks before, and Taiwanese Firms decision-makers getting closer to the second generation of entrepreneurs
About this study suggests that you can pick more industrys, to increase the number of samples questionnaire, adding other variables (such as: capital variables and variables MNE).

一、 中文部分
1.張揚隆（2001），『產業群聚原因、廠商行為與組織績效之關聯性研究-以台灣高科技產業為例』，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
2.毛立青（2001），『由國際經驗論我國創新政策與產業升級轉型的關係』，元智大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
3.郭建廷(2002)，台灣紡織業對大陸投資策略之研究，國立成功大學管理學院EMBA碩士論文。
4.林冶蒔（2002），國際企業供應鏈營運面匯率避險之研究，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
5.鄭伊伶（2005），TFT-LCD產業群聚之研究-以台灣、日本、韓國為例，中華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
6.馮怡心（2004），群聚化策略帶動紡織業發展 -以絲織專業區為例，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
7.楊智盛（2004），臺灣地區製造業產業群聚之研究，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
8.李振文(2004)，台南科學工業園區液晶顯示器產業群聚現象研究，國立中山 大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
9.吳秉哲(2005)，台灣地區產業群聚及其空間分布之研究，國立成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文。
10.王惠汝（2006），楠梓加工出口區 IC 封測業群聚現象之研究，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
11.陳柏均(2007)，『臺灣半導體產業群聚與空間演化分析』，國立交通大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
12.傅綉茹（2008），群聚效應下關鍵成功因素之研究–以台灣扣件產業為例，國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班EMBA碩士論文。
13.黃進發(2008)，台灣紡織業赴中國大陸與越南投資持股比例及經營績效之研究，國立成功大學經營管理碩士論文。
14.黃榮華(2008)，企業海外投資區位選擇之研究 –以輪胎翻新產業為例，國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文。
15.游可欣(2008)，台灣製造業赴越南與東協五國投資之區位選擇因素，東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
16.賴惠君(2008)，台商赴大陸投資額與投資區位因素之實證研究-以海峽西 岸經濟區為例，中原大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。
17.郁德欣(2009)，台商對亞洲國家直接投資的區位選擇分析空間自我相關之應用，國立台北大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
18.沈承豐(2009)，台商赴大陸投資之區位選擇及其與績效之關聯性研究，國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所碩士論文。
19.劉純光（2009），可量化群聚效應之研究 - 鑽石模型，國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
20.楊龍士（2009），以產業群聚理論建構台中縣市驅動產業空間特性之研究，逢甲大學土地管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
21.黃偉明（2010），台商赴大陸『環渤海地區』投資之影響因素分析，國立台灣大學社會科學院國家發展研究所碩士論文。
22.陳玉蘋（2013），探討台商製造業赴廈門設廠與回流台灣之區位選擇，國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班EMBA碩士論文。
二、 英文部分
1.Anderson, E. and Gatignon, H. (1986), “Mode of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Proposition”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.17 (3), p.1-26.
2.Anderson, G. (1994), “Industry clustering for economic development,” 
Economic Development Review, Vol.12, Iss.2, pp. 26-32.
3.Baptista, R. and P. Swann (1998), “Do Firms in Cluster Innovate More,” 
Research Policy, Vol.27, No. 6, pp.525-540. 

4.Czamanski, S. and L. A. Ablas (1979), “Identification of Industrial Clusters 
and Complexes ：A Comparison of Methods and Findings, ”Urban Studies, Vol. 
16, Iss. 1, pp. 61-80.
5.Charles W.L. Hill Peter Hwang & W. Chan Kim (1990), “A Eclectic Theory of The Choice of international Entry Mode”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.11, pp.117-128.
6.Dahmen, E. (1952). Development blocks in industrial economics. 
Scandinavian Economics History Review, Vol. 36, pp. 3-14.
7.Dunning, J. H. (1980). “Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests.” Journal of International Business Studies 11(1): 9-31.
8.D’cruz, J. R. and Rugman A. M. (1993), “Developing International Competitiveness: The Five Partners Model,” Business Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 
2, pp. 60-72.
9.Fester, E. J. & Bergman E. M. (2000), “National Industry Cluster 
Templates: A Framework for Applied Regional Cluster Analysis,” Regional 
Studies, Vol. 34, Iss 3, pp. 1-19. 

10.Hoover, E. M. (1948), The Location of Economic Activity, and New York: 
McGraw-Hill Press. 

11.Joseph, D. C. and A. M. Rugman (1993), “Business Network for International 
Competitiveness, “Business Quarterly, Vol.56, Iss.4, pp.101-107. 

12.Kojima, K., (1978), “Direct Foreign Investment: A Japanese Model of Multinational 
Business Operations”, New York: Praeger Press.
13.Krugman, P., (1991), “Geography and Trade. Cambridge, Massachusetts”. 
14.Kim, W.C. and P. Hwang (1992), “Global Strategy and Multinationals Entry 
Mode Choice,” Journal of International Business Studies, pp. 29-53.
15.Li, Y. and Hu, J. (2002). Technical Efficiency and Location Choice of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Small Business Economics, 19, 1-12.
16.Marshall, A., (1890), “Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume”, New York: Free Press.
17.Mercedes Delgado, Michael E. Porter, Scott Stern (2014), “DEFINING CLUSTERS OF RELATED INDUSTRIES”, NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
August 2014, pp. 3-8. 

18.Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, 
New York.
19.Ragazzi, G. (1973). Theories of determinants of direct foreign investment. IMF Staff Papers. 20 pp.468-471
20.Redman, J.M. (1994), “Understanding State Economic Through Industry 
Studies”, Council of Governors Policy Advisors, Washington, DC.
21.Rosenfeld, S. (1995), “Industrial Strategies: Regional Business Cluster and Public Policy,” Aspen Institute, Washington, DC.
22.Ren Lu, Torger Reve (2015), Relations among Clusters, European Planning Studies, 23:4, 828-845, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2014.984661, pp.7-16.
23.Stigler, G.J (. 1951),“The Division of Laber is Limited by the Extent of the Market”, Journal of Political Economy, Volume 59, No.3, pp.185-193.
24.Sergio J. Rey (2000), Identifying Regional Industrial Clusters in California, California Employment Development Department, January.
25.Weber (1929), A Theory of the Location of Industries, J. Friend rich, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
26.Wei, Yingqi, Liu, Xiaming, Parker, David, Vaidya, Kirit（1999）,”The regional distribution of foreign direct investment in China”, Regional Studies , Vol.33, Iss.9, pp.857-868.
27.Yla-Anttila, P. (1994), “Industrial Cluster -A key to new industrialization,” Kansallis-Osake-Pankki Economic Review, Iss.1, pp. 4-11.
28.Zhang, Kevin H. (February 2005), “Why Does so Much FDI From Hong Kong and Taiwan Go to Mainland China?” China Economic Review, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 293~307.
三、 參考書籍及期刊
1.商業周刊 第1384期
2.越南投資環境簡介 Investment Guide to Vietnam － 台灣經濟部投資業務部 編印
3.陳建勳(1994)，中國大陸外商直接投資區位選擇之實證分析。台北，中華經濟研究院。
4.李文瑞(1995)，『海外直接投資與市場不完全—內部化理論與折衷理論之評析』，銘傳學刊，第六卷，pp.15-24.
5.康信鴻、邱麗娟(1997)，影響國際投資進入模式之實證研究：以台灣石化產業為例，管理評論 Vol.16(2), pp.3-6、pp.30-33、pp.161-165。
6.高登斯、李明軒譯(2001)，Michael E. Porter著『競爭論<下>』，天下遠見。
7.王緝慈(2001)，創新的空間：企業集群與區域發展，北京：北京大學出版社。
8.顧瑩華、巫和懋、劉大年(2001/12)，二十一世紀產業競爭優勢之策略與規劃-企業國際化與國內工業發展之研究，經濟部工業局委託中華經濟研究院研究報告。
9.周志龍(2002)，「第六章─工業小區與新區域經濟及其政策」。收於全球化、知識與區域，臺北:詹氏書局。
10.吳青松 (2002)。國際企業管理理論與實務。台北:智勝出版社，pp.67-91。
11.康信鴻(2005)，國際貿易原理與政策，第四版，台北:三民書局，pp. 60-92，pp. 282-296。
12.康信鴻、廖婉孜(2006)，影響台商赴大陸投資額與投資區位因素之實證研究，交大管理學報，第26卷第1期，pp.15-38。
13.李城忠、謝素靜(2007)，『台灣運動鞋廠商海外直接投資區位選擇策略之研究』，運動休閒管理學報，第 4 卷第 2 期(2007 年 12 月)，pp.33~53。
14.黃智聰、李世聰(2007)，『中國三資企業增值稅率對地方吸引外資之影響』，遠景基金會季刊，第 8 卷第 2 期(2007 年 4 月)，pp.1~39。
15.李小建(2008)，經濟地理學，第二版，高等教育出版社，pp.1-14。
16.張紘炬、曹海濤、張心怡(2009)，中國大陸企業海外投資進入模式影響因素之研究-基於企業層級資料的實證研究，2009年金融創新與科際整合學術研討會，pp.3-15。
17.吳萬益(2011)，企業研究方法，台北:華泰文化事業。
18.吳濟華、李亭林、陳協勝、何柏札(2012)，產業群聚與區域創新-聚集經濟理論實證，前程文化，出版日期：2012-04-10
19.王薇婷、張國益、林晉禾(2012)，台商對中國大陸直接投資的決定性因素分析：1998-2007，中國大陸研究 ； 55 卷 2 期 ， P105 – 130。
20.蕭文龍(2012)，多變量分析最佳入門實用書，台北：碁峰出版社。 

21.許文堂(2014)，台灣與越南雙邊關係的回顧與分析，Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 75-111 Autumn 2014
四、 參考網站
1.天下雜誌 http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5058154
2.外交部領事事務局全球資訊網 http://www.boca.gov.tw/mp?mp=1
3.越南統計局 http://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=491
4.台灣省經濟部 http://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/populace/home/Home.aspx
5.中華民國統計資訊網 http://www.stats.gov.cn
6.駐越南辦事處 http://www.teco.org.vn/
7.臺灣地區製造業產業群聚之研究 http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/35855/6/25700506.pdf
8.台灣經貿網，越南計畫投資部http://210.241.128.119/CH/bizsearch/10/1/-1/100/?keyword=越南%20計畫%20投資部&keyword0=%20越南%20計畫%20投資部