| 研究生: |
蔡文龍 Tsai, Wen-Lung |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
福衛二號影像糾正及誤差探討 The Rectification and Error Investigation on the Formosat-2 Satellite Image |
| 指導教授: |
廖揚清
Liao, Yang-cheng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 測量及空間資訊學系 Department of Geomatics |
| 論文出版年: | 2005 |
| 畢業學年度: | 93 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 80 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 有理函數模式 、福衛二號影像 、影像糾正 、仿射轉換模式 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Rational Function Model(RFM), Formosat-2 Image |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:70 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
福衛二號已於2004年5月21日發射,國人可以更方便的取得其衛星影像,對於大比例尺的製圖而言具有相當的潛力。而本研究將會使用有理函數模式和仿射轉換模式對福衛二號衛星影像進行糾正,並以檢核點的方式分析其精度。另外,由於高階有理函數模式的法方程式需要使用一微小常數h以穩定計算,因此將會討論h值的影響,最後再分析與檢驗殘差。
測試的地區為台南市的福衛二號影像,影像的等級為Level 1A,影像大小為12000像元×16800像元,面積涵蓋範圍約175.6平方公里。並且會以分區測試以及不同分佈和數量的地控點進行測試,再改變每一次計算時的微小常數h,以得到最佳的h值。
實驗分析顯示,有理函數模式比仿射轉換模式具有較高的精度。使用周邊分布最少的7個地控點進行計算,檢核點E方向均方根誤差約±1.50像元,N方向均方根誤差約±1.75像元。使用19個地控點,檢核點的均方根誤差就會趨近於收斂。另外若地控點多於39點的時候,使用高階的有理函數模式可以得到較好的成果。由本研究的實驗,二階的有理函數模式可以得到h值的建議值為0.0002,三階得到的h值的建議值為0.00045。最後,使用5種統計測試檢驗殘差,由結果可說明在顯著水平α=5%的情況下,所使用的測試資料無顯著的系統誤差的存在。
Formosat-2 launched at 21th May 2004,we can get the Formosat-2 image more conveniently,it has a very high potential for large-scale topographic mapping.The research will use Rational Function Model(RFM) and Affine Projection Model to perform the correction for the Formosat-2 image,and use check points to analyze the precision of computation。Because it must use a minute constant h to stabilize the computation of normal equation at high degree RFM,this research would investigate the effect of h value。Finally,it would also check and analyze the residual.
The test area of Formosat-2 image is Tainan,image level is Level 1A,image size is 12000pixel×16800pixel,square measure is 175.6km2.the research would use different areas and different number of ground control points with different distribution to test,and change the constant h when every test to get the best constant h.
The experimental analysis demonstrate,RFM has higher precision than Affine Projection Model. When we use peripheral distributed at least 7 GCPs to compute,the RMSEe of check point is ±1.50(pixel) and RMSEn is ±1.75(pixel).As 19 GCPs are used,the RMSE of check points tend to converge. Further,if the number of GCPs is more than 39,we can get better precision by using high degree. According to the experiment of research,the proposed h value 0.0002 and 0.00045 will be obtained at second degree RFM and third degree RFM. Eventually,it would use five kinds of statistical test to test the residual of check points,the result demonstrate system error dosen’t significant in this test,when α=5%.
[1].李茂園(2001): “高解析度衛星影像之幾何處理與定位精度分析”,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文
[2].吳怡瑛(2000): “中華二號衛星影像幾何模擬及重建”,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文
[3].吳豐敏,吳岸明(2004): “中華衛星二號影像及應用”,2004台灣地理資訊學會年會暨學術研討會,2004/10/28-29
[4].武漢測繪科技大學測量平差教研室(1996):“測量平差基礎”,測繪出版社,北京
[5].陳裕鴻,吳豐敏(2004): “華衛二號影像產品格式介紹”,2004台灣地理資訊學會年會暨學術研討會,2004/10/28-29
[6].張智安(2002): “EROS A 衛星影像幾何改正之研究”,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文
[7].曾義星(2004): “數值攝影測量上課講義”,國立成功大學測量與空間資訊研究所
[8].羅秋月(2002): “IKONOS 衛星影像正射改正之研究”,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文
[9].Fraser C.S. & Yamakawa T. (2003):“Application of The Affine Model for IKONOS Image Orientation over Mountainous Terrain”, High resolution mapping from space 2003 joint workshop
[10].Fraser C.S. & Yamakawa T. (2004):“The Affine Projection Model for Sensor Orientation :Experience with High-Resolution Satellite Imagery”, XXth ISPRS Congress, 12-23 July 2004 Istanbul ,Turkey ,Commission I, WG V/5
[11].Hanley H.B., Fraser C.S. (2004): “Sensor Orientation for High-Resolution Satellite Imagery :Further Insights into Bias-Compensted RPCs”, XXth ISPRS Congress, 12-23 July 2004 Istanbul ,Turkey , Commission I , WG I/2
[12]. Kalchang Di, Ruijin Ma, and Rong Xing U.(2003): “Rational Functions and Potential for Rigorous Sensor Model Recovery”,
Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,Vol.69,No.1,pp.33-41
[13].Kruck E.(1987): “BINGO:Bundle Block Adjustment Program for SPOT Data”,Seminar on Photogrammetric Mapping From SPOT Imagery
Hannover, Sep.21~23
[14].Tao C.V., Hu Y. (2001): “A comprehensive study of the rational function model for photogrammetric processing”, photogrammetric Engineering & Remote sensing,67(12),1347-1357
[15].Tao C.V., Hu Y. (2001): “Use of the rational function model for imagery Rectification”, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(6),593-602
[16].Tao C.V., Hu Y. (2002): “3D Reconstruction methods based on the rational function model”, photogrammetric Engineering & Remote sensing,68(7),705-714
[17].Westin,T .,Forsgrne.J(2001), “Orthorectification of EROS A1 images” ,METRIA
[18].國家太空中心網頁(2004), http://www.nspo.org.tw/c60/home/