都市計畫成敗的關鍵在於計畫的嚴謹以及計畫的可施行性，隨著各地方發展節奏與需求的不同，加以公部門財政普遍吃緊，都市計畫已非公部門片面操作可以完成。吸引民間資金的投入成為都市計畫落實與否的重點。過往國內學界對於都市發展政策的探討多側重於公部門的獨斷執行，而本研究認為瞭解民間資金的流動傾向及企業的投資開發方式亦有其必要，是以興起研究建築開發商經營治理方式的動機。

　　在訊息不充分的背景下，建築開發商無法悉知他人行動、預測未來市場的變異，且難以詳實安排未來的投資計畫，不確定性使建築開發業具有風險以及龐大的交易成本；為了降低交易成本其企業組織結構精簡，須仰賴大量分包策略以完成開發活動。是以，開發商的行動並非單一企業的考量，而是鑲嵌於社會網絡之中。研究發現，不同規模開發商在財務運作的考量上有顯著差異，因而有差別經營慣例。大型開發商重視個案獲利，有固定投資的產品，多與相關上下游廠商長期合作、建立互信關係，行動網絡穩定；事實上，穩定的網絡構成牽制，使其行動具有高度一致性。小型開發商則傾向從土地思考產品內容，視個案策略性聯繫不同廠商或彈性建立差別契約，其網絡結構較不穩定，開發過程經常發生動態的調整，行動變異大。中型開發商雖有慣常生產的產品，但亦會將各種有利可圖的個案納入投資考量，其網絡穩定程度介於大型與小型之間。差別財務考量與差別經營慣例使開發商有差別投資模式，反映於產品類型、規模以及價格的制訂之上。

　The key to successful urban planning lies in the preciseness and practicability of the plan. With regards to the differences in the pace of development requirements in various localities, and the fact that the public sector is financially strained, urban planning can no longer be accomplished by the public sector single handedly. Attracting private investment has become crucial in the implementation of urban planning. The research in the past mostly focused on the single-handed implementation of the public sector, whereas this research found that understanding private capital flow tendency and corporate investment is also necessary. Therefore this research looks into the developers’ corporate governance.

　Against the backdrop of information asymmetry, developers cannot be fully informed of others’ activities, and hence cannot forecast future market changes or make specific future investment plans. Uncertainty creates risks and great transaction cost for the development industry. In order to lower transaction cost, the organizational structure of the developers has to be streamlined. The development projects in turn depend heavily on outsourcing. Therefore, the activities of a developer concern more than one single corporation; instead, its activities are embedded in the social network. The research found that the financial concerns of developers of different scales differ substantially, hence different operational conventions are formed. Large development companies focus on profitability of each case. They invest in a fixed range of products, and have commonly established long-term and trustworthy partnership with related vendors in the supply chain. Their activity network is stable. In fact, stable network creates containment, and results in highly consistent activity of the developers. Small-sized developers tend to come up with their product content based on the land slot, and strategically connect various vendors or flexibly draft suitable contracts. Their network structure is relatively less stable. There are usually dynamic adjustments during the development process, and the behavioral patterns vary greatly. Middle-sized developers, although having a stable product range, would still take various profitable cases into consideration when investing. The level of stability of their network ranks between that of large and small developers. The differences in financial considerations and operational conventions result in the different investment pattern of the developers. The differences in investment pattern are reflected in the product types, scale of the products and product pricing.

一、中文參考書目（按作者筆畫排列）
Deal, T. E. and Allan A. Kennedy著，1983，黃宏義譯，《企業文化》，台北：長河。
Furubotn, E. G. and Rudolf Richter著，2001，顏愛靜譯，《制度與經濟理論—新制度經濟學之貢獻》，台北：五南。
Fetterman. D. M.著，賴文福譯，2000，《民族誌學》，台北：弘智。
方世杰，1999，〈台灣中小企業之產業網絡構形與企業國際化關係研究〉，企業管理學報，45，9，pp.99-125.
米克。巴爾著，譚君強譯，1995，《敘述學：敘事理論導論》，北京：中國社會科學出版社。
林文琇、吳以苓、劉光卿編譯，1998，《企業風險管理》，台北：金融人員研究訓練中心。
高雄市建築開發商業同業公會，《高雄建築》，第192期至第202期，高雄建築會刊。
高雄市建築開發商業同業公會，2003、2004，《會員手冊》，未出版。
吳思樺，2000，《策略九說》，台北：臉譜。
吳家德，2003，《建築業經營策略分析》，國立中山大學高階經營碩士班論文，未出版。
吳依妮，2004，《上市建築開發業公司治理與開發決策過程之研究》，國立台北大學地政學系碩士論文，未出版。
洪裕勝、沈儀倩，2002，〈建設公司在不同推案策略下之財務績效研究〉，台灣土地金融季刊，第39卷第2期。
洪富峰，1995A〈都市基礎結構與經濟發展〉，高雄師大學報，3月號。
范淼，1999，《計畫風險事件之處置—分析模型之建立與運用》，台大商研所博士論文，未出版。
許戎聰，2003，《不動產投資評估指標建構之研究---以建設公司觀點》，台大管理學院知識管理組碩士論文，未出版。
黃炯瑜，2001，《營建業經營策略聯盟之運籌—以大型營造廠與建設公司為例》，國立台灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，未出版。
黃清玄，2004，《建築開發經營策略—以京城建設為例》，高雄第一科技大學營建工程所碩士論文，未出版。
黃聖偉，2004，《公私合夥參與都市更新開發財務風險評估模式之研究》，朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所碩士論文，未出版。
張金鶚，1991，《建築投資業與建築經理公司管理制度之研究》，內政部營建署。
張五常，1992，〈經濟組織與交易成本〉，約翰伊特瑋爾等編，《新帕爾格雷夫經濟學大辭典》，經濟科學出版社。
張谷光，2001，《都市更新地區建築投資財務可行性分析》，中華大學建築與都市計劃所碩士論文，未出版。
張力仁，2003，《民間參與都市更新事業財務規劃與籌措方式》，台北科技大學建築與都市設計碩士論文，未出版。
陳冠華，1998，《不確定市場下建商投資行為之研究》，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，未出版。
陳麗如，2004，《核心能力、網絡地位與組織變革對組織績效影響之研究—以汽車零件業為例》，大葉大學企業管理學所碩士論文，未出版。
劉文城，2003，《建設公司行銷策略之探討—以高雄地區為例》，國立中山大學高階經營所碩士論文，未出版。
謝宏昌，2004，《都市再發展政策中的主要參與者的差別目標與專業觀點之探討—以高雄市為例》，國科會（編號A92-0137），未出版。
謝文娟，2004，《都市更新獎助誘因財務模擬之研究》，國立成功大學都市計畫學系碩士論文，未出版。

二、中文雜誌期刊(按筆劃排列)
工商時報，2004/06~2005/04。
今週刊，2004/11~2005/04。
財訊雜誌，2004/06~2005/04。
經濟日報，2004/09~2005/04。

三、西文參考書目
Antwi, A. and J. Henneberry, 1995, “Developers, non-linearity and asymmetry in the development cycle”. Journal of Property Research, 12, pp.217-239.
Baker, S., Ponniah. D, and S. Smith, 1999, “Survey of risk management in major U.K. companies”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, July pp.94-102.
Ball, M., 1983,“Housing policy and economic power : the political economy of owneroccupation”, London: Methuen.
-----1998, “Institutions in British property research: a review”. Urban Studies 35, 1501-1517.
----- 2001, “The Organisation of property development professions and practices” in Development and Developers: perspectives on property, Simon Guy and John Henneberry (ed.), B. Blackwell.
------2003, “Markets and the Structure of the Housebuilding Industry: An International Perspective”. Urban Studies Vol. 40. No 5-6, 897-916.
Ball, R., 2001, “Developers in local property markets: assessing the implications of developer experiences and attitudes in the re-use of vacant industrial buildings in an old industrial area” in Development and Developers: perspectives on property, Simon Guy and John Henneberry (ed.), B. Blackwell.
Barkham, R., 2001, “Market research for office real estate” in Development and Developers: perspectives on property, Simon Guy and John Henneberry (ed.), B. Blackwell.
Barney, J., 1991, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”. Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.99-120.
Bigger, N. W. and R. Castanias, 2001, “Collateralizzed social relations”. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 60:471-500.
------ Bigger, T.W.andT.D. Beamish, 2003, “The Economic Sociology of Conventions: Habit, Custom Practice and Routine in Market Order”. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 29:443-64.
Blackley, D. M. and Edward M. Shepard, 1996, “The Diffusion of Innovation in Home Building”, Journal of housing economics 5, 303-322.
Blau, P.M., 1964, “Exchange and Power in Social Life”. New York:Wiley.
Bourdieu, P. 1977, “Outline of a theory of practice”. Cambridge University Press
Burt, R., 1992, “Structural Holes ,The Social Structure of Competition”. Cambridge, MA: Harverd University Press.
Cho, Y., 2002, “Economic efficiency of muliti-product structure: the evidence from Korean housebuilding firms”. Journal of Housing Economics 12, 337-355.
Coase, R. H., 1937, “The Nature of the Firm”. Economic 4:386-405.
Coleman, J.S., 1973, “The Mathematics of Collective Action”. London: Heinemann.
Cuff, D., 1991, “Architecture: the story of practice”. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
D’Arcy E. and Keogh G., 2001, “The market context of property development activity” in Development and Developers: perspectives on property, Simon Guy and John Henneberry (ed.), B. Blackwell.
Damodaran, A. Kose John and Crocker H. Liu, 1997, “The determinants of organizational form changes: evidence and implications from real estate”. Journal of financial economics 45, 169-192.
Daniel, K., D. Hirshleifer and A. Subrahmanyam, 1998, “A theory of Overconfidence, Self-attribution, and Security market under- and overreactions”. Journal of Finance 53, pp.1839-1886.
Durkheim, E., 1964, “The Rules of Sociological Method”. Transl. SA Solovay, JH Mueller. New York: Free Press.
Edwards, M., 2000, “Property Markets and Production of Inequality”, in A companion to the city, Bridge, Gary and Watson, Sophie ed., Blackwell publishers Ltd, 599-608.
Emirbayer, M. and J. Goodwin, 1994, “Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency”. American Journal of Sociology 99:1411-54.
Fainstein, S., 2001, “The City Builders”, 2nd ed., University Press of Kansas.
Favereau, O. and Emmanuel Lazega ed., 2002, “Convention and Structures in Economic Organization: market, networks, and hierarchies”. Edward Elgar .
Fried, C., 1981, “Contract as a Promise: ATheory of Contractual Obligations.” Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
Gomez, P.Y. and B. C. Jones, 2000, “Conventions: An Interpretation of Deep Structure in Organizations”. Organization Science 11:696.
Granovetter, M., 1985, “Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness” American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 481-510.
Guillen, M. F., Randall Collins, Paula England and Marshall Meyer ed., 2001, “New directions in Economic Sociology”. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Guy, S. and John Henneberry, (ed.) 2001, “Development and developers: perspectives on property”. B. Blackwell.
Guy, S. J. Hennerberry and S. Rowley, 2002, “Development Cultures and Urban Regeneration”. Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 7, 1181-1196.
Harvey, D., 1989, “The condition of post-modernity”. Oxford: Blackwell. B. Blackwell.
Hennerberry, J. and S. Rowley, 2001, “Developers’ decision and property market behaviour”. in Development and Developers: perspectives on property, Simon Guy and John Henneberry (ed.), B. Blackwell.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1979, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”. Econometrica Vol.47, No.2, March, pp.263-291.
Key, T., MacGregor, B., Nanthakumaran, N. and F. Zarkesh, 1994, “Understanding the Property Cycle: Economic Cycles and Property Cycles.” London: RICS.
Kinzy, S. A., 1991, “An analysis of the supply of housing characteristics by builders within the Rosen Framework”. Journal of urban economics 32, 1-16.
Krishnaswami, S. and V. Subramaniam, 1999, “Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporate spin-off decision”. Journal of Financial Economics 53:73-112.
Krugman, Paul (1998) What happened to Asia? Web home page: http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www
Labbs, J.J., 1993, “Successful Outsourcing Depend on Critial Factors”. Personal Journal, Oct, pp.51-60.
Latour, B., 1996, “On Interobjectivity”. Mind, Culture and Activity 3(4):228-45.
Lazega, E. and Lise Mounier, 2002,’Interdependent entrepreneurs and their displine’, in Olivier Favereau and Emmanuel Lazega (eds), Conventions and Structures in Economic Organization, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
Lewis, D., 1969, ”Convention: A Philisophical Study”. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Marinaccio, L., 1994, “Outsourcing: A Strategic Tool for Managing Human Resources”. Employ Benefits Journal, Mar, pp. 34-42.
Mills, A., 1996, “Redefining Core Capabilities: A Business Guide to Outsourcing”. KPMG Management Conulting.
Morley, S., 1988, “Financial appraisal-Senitivity and probabilityee analysis” in Valuation an Development Appraisal, C. Dralow (ed), Estates Gazette, London.
Morley, S., 2001, “The financial appraisal of development projects”in Development and Developers: perspectives on property, Simon Guy and John Henneberry (ed.), B. Blackwell.
Morrison, N., 1994, “The commercial development process in Glasgow” in Development and Planning 1994, pp.38-47. University of Cambridge, Department of Land Economy, Cambridge.
Needham, B. and George de Kam, 2004, “Understanding how land is exchanged: Co-ordination Mechanisms and transaction costs”. Urban Studies 4(10), 2061-2076.
Nicholls, D.C., D. M. Turner, R. Kirby-Smith and J. D. Cullen, 1982, “The Risk Business: Developers’ Perceptions and Prospects for Housebuilding in the Inner City”. Urban Studies 19, 331-341.
Panzar, J.C. and R. D Willing (1979), “Economies of Scope Product Specification and the Multiproduct Competitive Firm”. Bell Laboratories Economic Discussion Paper 152.
Quinn, J. B.,1992, ”Leveraging Knowledge and Service Based Strategies through Outsourcing”, Intelligent Enterprise, Free Press, pp.71-97.
Renaud, B, 2003, “Speculative Behaviour in Immature Real Estate Markets, Lesson of the 1997 Asia Financial Crisis”. Urban Policy and Research Vol. 21, No. 2 , 151-173.
Robison, B. V. and Linda C. Robinson, 1986, “Dimensions of residential developer decision making in a rapidly urbanizing region”. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 20 (1), 57-60.
Salancik, G. R. and J. Pfeffer, 1977, “Who gets power-and how they hold onto it: a strategic contingencymodel of power”. Organizational Dynamics, 5 , 3-21.
Schumpeter, J.A., 1934, “The Theory of Economic Development”. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Somerville, C. T.,1999, “The industrial organization of housing supply: market activity, land supply and the size of homebuilder firms”. Real Estate Economics 27 (4), 669-694.
Teece, DJ., 1986, “Profiting from technological innovation”. Research Policy 15:285-305.
Wang, K., Zhou, Y., Chan, S.H. and Chau, K.W. (2000) Over confidence and cycles in real estate markets: cases in Hong Kong and in Asia, International Real Estate Review, 3(1), pp. 93–106.
Wernerfelt, B., 1984, “A Resource-based View of the Firm”. Strategic Management Journal Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.171-181.
White, H. C., 1981, “Where do markets come from?” American Journal of Sociology, 87, 517-547.
Williamson, O. E., 1979, “Transaction-Cost Economics :The Covergance of Contractual Relations.” Journal of Law and Economics 22:233-61.
Williamson, O. E., 1985, “The economic institutions of capitalism”. New York: Free Press

四、相關法令（按筆畫排列）
1. 《公寓大廈管理條例》，民國92年12月31日修正。
2. 《公寓大廈管理條例施行細則》，民國85年10月2日公布。
3. 《成屋買賣契約書範本》，民國90年9月3日頒行。
4. 《預售屋買賣定型化契約應記載及不得記載事項》，民國90年9月3日頒行。
5. 《都市更新條例》，民國92年1月29日修正。
6. 《都市更新條例施行細則》，民國88年5月21日修正。
7. 《建築法》，民國93年1月20日修正。
8. 《建築技術規則建築設計施工編》，民國94年01月21日修正。
9. 《營建管理規則》，民國91年12月26日修正。

五、個人通訊（按通訊日期排列）
1. 高雄市安侯建業會計師事務所職員李雅淳，2004/12/15，個人通訊。
2. C建設公司業務部經理，2005/01/07、2005/03/20，個人通訊。
3. D建設公司董事長、副總經理，2005/01/13，個人通訊。
4. F建設公司副總經理，2005/01/14、03/30，個人通訊。
5. 前東帝士建設股份有限公司業務部經理張磐，2005/01/16，個人通訊。
6. B建設公司董事長，2005/01/18，個人通訊。
7. 台南市龍太建設業務部職員林誠浩，2005/01/18，個人通訊。
8. 專業地政士陳琬，2005/03/03，個人通訊。
9. A建設公司研展部經理，2005/03/15，個人通訊。
10. 高雄市建築師公會理事長蔡敏文，2005/03/27，個人通訊。
11. E建設公司總經理特助，2005/04/07，個人通訊。
12. C建設公司業務部職員，2005/04/26，個人通訊。
13. D建設公司會計小姐，2005/04/26，個人通訊。

六、中文資訊網站（按網站筆畫排列）
1. 全國法規資料庫（http://law.moj.gov.tw/）
2. 高雄市地政士公會網站（http://www.khland.org.tw/）
3. 高雄市建築師公會網站（http://www.kaa.org.tw）
4. 高雄市政府房地產億年旺網站（http://eland.kcg.gov.tw/land/home/）
5. 高雄縣建築開發公會網站（http://www.khcda.org.tw/）
6. 財團法人不動產資訊中心網站（http://www.realestate.org.tw）
7. 偉盟系統（http://www.wellan.com.tw/index.asp）
8. 經濟部公司登記資料查詢系統（http://210.69.121.50/~doc/ce/）
9. 建築資訊服務系統（http://archit.org.tw/）