「地方永續發展」已成為21世紀都市及區域規劃工作上重要的基本目標，為了促進地方永續發展，歐洲委員會即在其「地方永續行動計畫」中，特別要求規劃師應在市區內規劃建立一個綠色開放空間網，彼此間並用綠色廊道來連結。但以目前都會區域發展的情況來看，土地多已發展為都市用地，難以找尋大量且適當之未發展土地來劃設都會區域的綠道系統。因此，實務上，新設之綠道系統可能多必須與其他既有或計畫道路系統共用，無法單純只依傳統綠道設置之單一目標來全新規劃，而必須考慮改採多目標共用廊道之觀點來評估劃設綠道系統。因此，本研究除嘗試生態保育、休閒遊憩及交通運輸等多目標的角度來發展個別綠道評估劃設方法外，期使個別綠道共構後之多目標綠道系統，更能發揮計畫加乘之效果。

　　本研究以景觀生態學為基礎，首先經由相關文獻回顧，研擬都會區綠資源及多目標綠道系統之評估因子項目和準則，以作為建立評估架構之依據。其次利用地理資訊系統建立空間、屬性資料庫等，作為分析之基礎，以疊圖法及情境分析法等，探討生態保育性、休閒遊憩性、交通運輸性及多目標等四種劇本之多目標綠道系統劃設之結果，給予決策者規劃時視環境背景及需求等自行調整的彈性。

　　本研究以台中都會區為實證研究對象，研究結果顯示：

1.　綠資源價值結果方面得知，由空間分布發現離核心發展地區越遠之土地則具較高的綠資源價值，越靠近者則越低，且破碎化之程度也相對提高。
2.　依據多目標的使用衍生出生態保育性、休閒遊憩性、交通運輸性及多目標等四種網絡結構，生態保育劇本中共選取26條路段，休閒遊憩劇本中共選取32條路段，交通運輸劇本共選取24條路段，多目標劇本則選取28條路段。
3.　在路段的評選部分，在台中市區內以文心路、文心南路、雙十路、健行路、林森路、台12線 (台中港路)、育才北路、永春東路、英才路等九條，和台中縣的台63線、台3線、台17線、台1線、台10線、中86、台1乙、台12線及國土景觀道路等省縣道共同構成台中都會區的多目標綠道系統。並且都市地區的道路較非都市地區具發展成多目標綠道的潛能。

　“ Local Sustainability Development” has already become 21 centuries, the city and district planning work up theimportant and basic target. For promoting local sustainability development, the European committee is in “Local Sustainability Development project”, requesting to the planner particularly should build up a green open space nets inside the downtown, each other also link with the green corridors.

　But currently the condition of the metropolis area development to see, the land has almost already developed, and is hard to search a great deal of and appropriate undeveloped land to design a greenways system of the metropolis area.

　Therefore, on the actual situation, a greenways system that establish lately is probably many have to with current or the project roads system uses totally, can’t pure to only depend on single target of a constitution to come to all-new programming, and have to consider to change to adopt multi-purpose to use the standpoint to evaluate and design a greenways system.

　So, this research is in addition to trying the ecosystem conservation, recreation and transportation etc. It takes the view ecology as the foundation, looking back through the related research and papers first, drawing up green resource in metropolis and multi-purpose greenways system evaluation factors and standards, to be the basis of the establishment valuation structure. Make use of the GIS establishment database, be the foundation of analysis, to fold the map overlaps and scenario analysis method etc., study four kinds results of ecosystem conservation, recreation, transportation and multi-purpose greenways system to give decision maker planning the flexibility that sees the environment background and need.

　This research takes the metropolis in Taichung as the substantial evidence the research object, studying the result manifestation:

1. The worth result aspect of the green resource knows, distributes to find by the space more far in region of leaving the core development then has the higher and green resource value, closing to more low, and the degree that fall in pieces to turn is also opposite to raise.
2. According to four kinds networks structure of ecosystem conservation, recreation, transportation and multi-purpose. The ecosystem conservation scenario selects 26 the road segment, the recreation scenario selects 32 the road segment, the transportation scenario selects 24 the road segment, the multi-purpose scenario selects 28 the road segment.
3. Judge and decide the part in the road segment, in the downtown of Taichung with ten roads, and there has nine roads in the Taichung county, are common to constitute multi-purpose greenways system in Taichung metropolis region. And to compare with the potential of greenways that the non-city region has the development multi-purpose greenways system.

參考文獻
一、英文部分
1. Arendt, R, (1994), Rural By Design, American　Planning Association, Chicago.　
2. Bennett, G, Wit, (2001), The Development and Application of Ecological Networks. A review of Proposals, Plans and Programmes, AID Enviroment, Amesterdam, pp.131.
3. Conine, A. , Xiang , W.N., Young, J.,Whitley, D., (2004). Planning for multi-purpose　greenways in Concord, North Carolina , Landscape and urban planning , Vol. 68, pp. 271-287.
4. Cook, E. A., (1991), Urban Landscape　networks: An ecological planning framework, Landscape Res. Vol.16(3), pp.7-15.
5. Cook, E. A., (2002), Landscape structure indices for assssing urban ecological networks, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 58. pp.269-180.
6. Cook, E.A., van Lier, H.N. (Eds.), (1994), Landscape Planning and Ecological Networks.　Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.354.
7. Delaration, L., (2000), In Rener/Amno Project. Greenways for Europe, Bruxelles.
8. Diamond, H, Noonan, P.,(1996), Land Use in America, Island Press, Washington DC.
9. Duerkson, C.J.,Elliot, D.L.,Hobbs,N.T.,Johnson E.,Miller,J.R.,(1997), Habitat Protection Planning Where the Wild Thing Are. American Planning Association, Washington, DC.P.82.
10.Fabos, J.G., (1995), Introduction and overview: the greenway movement, uses and
potentials of greenways, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.33, pp.1-13.
11.Fabos, Julius Gy., Jack, A., (1995), Greenway (special issue), Landscape and Urban　Planning, Vol.33, pp.1-480.
12.Flink, C.A. and Searns, R.M., with Schwarz, L.L. (Editor), (1993) Greenways：A Guild to　Planning, Design and Develop. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 351
13.Forman, R,T.,(1983),Corridors in a landscape: Their ecological structure and function　, Ekologiya, Vol.2, pp.375-385.
14.Forman, R. T. T.(1995), Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. New York: Camgridge University Press.
15.Freeman, C., Buck, O., (2003), Development of an ecological mapping methodology for urban areas in New Zealand, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.63, pp.161-173.
16.Fry,J.M., Steiner, Frederick R., Green, Douglas M.,(1994), Riparian evalution and site assessment in Arizon. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.28, pp.179-199.
17.Jack A., (1995),Greenways as a planning　strategy. Landscape and Urban Planning,　Vol 33, pp.131-155.
18.Jongman, R.H.G., Kristiansen, I., (2001), National and Regional Approaches for Ecological Networks in Europe. Natural and Enviorment no.110, Counciil of Europe Publishing, Strasbourh, pp.88.
19.Julius Gy. Fabos (1995) , Introduction and overview : the greenway movement, uses　and potentials of greenways, Landscape and urban planning, Vol. 33, pp.1-13.
20.Knaapen,J.P.,Scheffer, M., Harms, W.B.,　(1992), Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning . Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.23, pp.1-16.　
21.Little C.E.,(1990),Greenway for America.The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore　and London, pp.237.
22.MacArthur,R.H. and Wilson, E.O.,(1967), The theory of island biogeography, Princeton 　University Press: Princeton NJ.
23.Malczewski, J.,(1999), GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
24.Massam, B.H.,(1998), Multi-criteria decision making techniques in planning. Program Planning, Vol.30, pp.1-80
25.McMahon, E.T.,(1993), Foreward. In: Flink, C.A. Searns,R.M. (Eds.), Greenways: A Guide to Planning Design and Development. Island Press, Washington, DC.　
26.Miller, W., Collins, M.G., Steiner, F.R.,Cook, E., (1998), An approach for greenway suitability analysis., Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 42, pp.91-105.
27.Perry, E.C., Miller, W.H.,(1995), A habitat model for pronghorn antelope in North Central
Arisona utilizing GIS and remote sensing techniques,GIS/LIS Proceedings, Vol.1, Nashville,Tennessee．
28.Register, R, (1987) Eco-city Berkeley：Building Cities for a Healthy Future, North Atlantic Books, Berkeley, CA.　
29.Rob H.G. Jongman , Kulvik, M., Kristiansen, Ib., (2004), European ecological networks and greenways, Landscape and urban planning , Vol. 68, pp.305-319.
30.Roosaare, J. , (1994), Physical geography in Estonia: bridging Western and Eastern School for Landscape Synthesis ,Geo-Journal, Vol.33 　(1),pp.27-36.
31.Ryan, K.-L. (Editor), (1993), Trails for the Twenty First Century, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp.213.
32.Schwarz, L.L.,(1993), Preface. In: Flink,C.A., Searns,R.M. (Eds.), Greenways: A Guideto Planning Design and Development. Island Press, Washington, DC. 　
33.Smith, D.S. and Hellmund, P.L.,(1993) Ecology of Greenways. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp.222.
34.Stephens, R,B,(1988), Soil survey of Cabarrus Country, USDA soil Conservation Service,Raleigh, NC.　
35.Tkach, R.J., Simonovic , S.P.,(1997), A new approach to multi-criteria decision making in water resources. J. Geographic Information Decision Analyze, Vol.1, pp.25-43.
36.Toccoloni, A., Fumagalli, N., Senes, G., (2004), Greenways planning in Italy: the
Lambro River Valley Greenways System, Landscape and Urban Planning,
37.Urban Ecology, (1996), ’Mission Statement and Accomplishments’, World Wide Web site
38.Vuilleumier, S., Prelaz-Droux, R., (2002), Map of ecological networks for landscape planning, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.58, pp.157-170
39.Walmsley, A., (1995),Greenways and the making of urban form, Landscape and Urban Planning , Vol33, p.81-127.
40.Whyte, W.H., (1970), The Last Landscape. Doubleday Anchor, New York.

二、中文部分
1.內政部營建署，1999，＜全國公園綠地發展綱領之研討-全國綠正發展策略際實施方案＞，內政部營建署，　pp.2-10。　
2.王小璘、涂芳美，2001，由景觀生態學觀點探討都市公元生物多樣性—以臺北市大安森林公園為例，東海　學報，第42期，pp.115-127。　
3.王智聖，2002，都市公園生態空間特性之研究—以台南市公園鳥類為例，碩士論文，國立成功大學都市計　畫系，台南。　
4.王嘉梁，1998，農地保護利用與土地使用管制，人與地，第178期，pp. 49-57。　
5.王蕙怡，2003，閒置農地永續利用之研究，碩士論文，東海大學景觀學系研究所，台中。　　
6.何欣怡，1999，以景觀生態學觀點探討都市綠園道評估因子之研究—以台中市經國園道為例，東海大學景　觀學系研究所，台中。　
7.吳守從、陳永寬，2002，結合航測資訊與地景指數探討南仁山生態保護區之干擾因子—以得子溪口流域平　原為例，都市與計畫，第7期，pp.3-22。　
8.吳綱立、許芳毓、許獻彰，2004，永續城鄉發展理念下都會區綠資源規劃與管理政策之研究—以台南都會　區為例，「中華建築學會第十六屆第二次建築研究成果發表會論文集」。　
9.吳慧儀，2000，都市廊道景觀生態功能評估架構之研究－以台中市東光園道為例，碩士論文，東海大學景　觀學系研究所，台中。　
10.周傑，1986，都市公園遊憩效益之研究—以植物園為例，碩士論文，中興大學都市計畫研究所，台中。　
11.林志融，2004，棲地適宜性分析應用於生態廊道規劃之研究—以山羌及有勝溪流域為例，碩士論文，國立　東華大學自然資源管理研究所，花蓮。　
12.林沛毅，2002，以景觀生態學探討棲地模擬模型—以台中市大坑地區為例，碩士論文，東海大學景觀學系，台中。　
13.林進益，1977，＜公園計畫與設計＞。台北：正中書局。　
14.林裕彬，2001，從景觀生態學觀點探討都市綠地—以台北市信義計劃區為例，碩士論文，中國文化大學地學研究所，台北。　
15.林裕彬、林怡君，1999，以景觀生態觀點探討蘆竹地區之農田景觀結構，私立中國文化大學地理報告。　
16.林憲德，1999，＜城鄉生態＞，台北：詹氏書局
17.俞孔堅，1998，景觀、文化、生態與感知，田園城市文化事業，pp.53-66。　
18.高雅力，2004，都會區生態廊道規劃之研究—以台南市為例，碩士論文，成功大學都市計劃研究所，台　南。　　
19.涂芳美，1999，都市公園生物多樣性之研究—以臺北市大安森林公園為例，碩士論文，東海大學景觀研究所，台中。　　
20.曼紐爾 包德、博拉 弗雷德 勞森著；唐子穎 吳必虎等譯校，2004，中國建築工藝出版社，北京。
21.張俊彥，2000，以塊區形狀進行公園綠地評估之應用研究，造園學報，第6期，pp.117-131。　
22.曹正，1987，東北角海岸風景特定區全線景觀計畫規劃報告，交通部觀光局東北角海岸風景特定區管理處委託。　　
23.郭瓊瑩，1995，台灣地區綠資源政策規劃，永續發展，第7期，pp.24-28。
24.郭瓊瑩，2003，＜水與綠網絡規劃理論與實務＞，台北：詹氏書局。
25.郭瓊瑩、王秀娟，1994，＜台北的綠資源＞。中國文化大學景觀學系編著。　
26.陳彥良，2002，以景觀生態學探討都市網絡之研究—以台中市為例，碩士論文，東海大學景觀學系，台中。
　　
27.陳琦維，2004，英國都市棲地經驗及其引入台灣空間規劃體系之探討，碩士論文，成功大學都市計劃研究所，台南。　　
28.彭國棟，1997，棲地類型及生態地理區之分類與評估，自然保育季刊，第20期，pp.6-11。
29.曾曉琳，2004，大學校園生態網絡系統評估模式建構之研究，碩士論文，中華大學營建管理所，新竹。
30.游振祥，2002，都市生態廊道系統評估模式建立之研究，碩士論文，朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所，台中。
31.黃美純，1999，＜都市綠地系統的建立＞，人與地，第184期，pp.26-35。
32.黃書偉，1998，區域成長管理監測評估支援系統之研究，碩士論文，成功大學都市計劃研究所，台南。
33.趙羿、賴明洲、薛怡珍，2003，＜景觀生態學理論與實務＞。台北：地景。
34.劉保廷，2004，以景觀生態學廊道理論探討都市道路生態評估因子之研究—以台中市西區為例，碩士論文，朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所，台中。
35.劉若瑜，2000，由生態設計觀點評估都市基質之研究—以台中市東區及南屯區為例，碩士論文，東海大學景觀學系，台中。
36.蔡佩真，2003，都市綠網評估體系之建構與應用，碩士論文，逢甲大學/土地管理所，台中。
37.蔡厚男、羅宏銘、呂慧穎，2003，農地景觀生態廊道建構之研究—以得子口溪流域平原為例，都市與計畫，第30卷 第2期，pp.157-180。　
三、網站
1.資料來源：http://lsdpg.rdec.gov.tw/歐洲永續發展行動手冊.htm#
2.資料來源：http://www.cepd.gov.tw/land/21agenda/21agenda.htm#1