簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 洪佩均
Hong, Pei-Chun
論文名稱: 以服務主導邏輯觀點探討內部稽核活動之價值共創
Value Co-creation of Internal Auditing Activity:The Perspective of Service-Dominant Logic
指導教授: 方世杰
Fang, Shih-Chieh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系碩士在職專班
Department of Business Administration (on the job class)
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 96
中文關鍵詞: 內部稽核服務主導邏輯價值共創
外文關鍵詞: Internal Audit, Service-Dominant Logic, Value Co-creation
相關次數: 點閱:179下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 內部稽核活動在公司治理扮演重要的角色,但是資源有限的情況下,內部稽核的範圍變得更擴大,由傳統的財務稽核擴大到營運稽核;內部稽核的角色變得更多元,稽核報告的使用者也擴大到內部利害關係人及外部利害關人;內部稽核活動變得更複雜化,由消極的防弊功能轉變成積極的為公司提供興利功能,所以有效的評估及改善風險管理、控制及治理過程,以達成組織的目標,變得更為重要。
    內部稽核活動主要目的係增加價值及改善組織營運,但內部稽核人員在組織中是一個充滿衝突與矛盾的角色,在資源有限的情況下又如何能創造更大的價值是困難及重要的,故本研究探討以服務主導邏輯(Service dominant logic)的觀點進行內部稽核活動互動與價值創造的關聯性。
    本研究透過問卷的設計及調查,研究對象聚焦於內部稽核人員與受查人員,受查人員回收有效問卷227份,內部稽核人員回收有效問卷103份,在本研究驗證下,得到(1)內部稽核人員以服務主導邏輯之觀點進行稽核活動之互動對價值共創-稽核活動滿意度有正相關;(2)受查人員以服務主導邏輯之觀點進行稽核活動之互動對價值共創-稽核活動滿意度有正相關;(3)內部稽核人員與受查人員均以服務主導邏輯之觀點進行稽核活動之互動對價值共創-稽核活動滿意度有正相關。
    由實證結果可說明,內部稽核活動可以係以服務的觀點,即以服務主導邏輯的觀點進行,推翻以往進行內部稽核活動係以監督的觀點及內部稽核人員與受查單位人員是對立的角色,內部稽核人員可為服務提供者;受查人員為服務接受者,且價值創造非由一方主導而是需要參與者雙方共同參與互動產生,所以在稽核活動過程中,內部稽核人員與受查人員,以互相合作產生一加一大於二的效果共同創造價值。

    In this research, a questionnaire whose study objects were concentrated on the internal auditors and auditees was crafted for investigation. The perspective of service-dominant logic was adopted to probe into the association between the interactions and value creation in an internal auditing activity. The empirical results explicated the internal auditing activity can be carried out from the perspective of service or the service-dominant logic. It was overthrown that the internal auditor and auditees were opponents from the perspective of the supervision. The internal auditors can be the service providers when the auditees can be the service recipients. The value co-creation is no longer predominated by one side but requires the collective participation and interactions for both involving sides. Therefore, in the process of an internal auditing activity, the internal auditors and auditees collaborate to create the synergy of value co-creation.

    目 錄 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 3 第三節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 內部稽核 5 第二節 服務主導邏輯 12 第三節 價值共創 16 第四節 以服務主導邏輯觀點進行內部稽核活動互動 19 第三章 研究方法 24 第一節 研究架構 24 第二節 研究架構與研究假設 25 第三節 操作性定義及問卷設計 29 第四節 樣本來源及專家效度 38 第五節 資料分析方法 39 第四章 資料分析與實證研究 41 第一節 敘述性統計分析 41 第二節 因素分析 49 第三節 信度分析 55 第四節 平均數差異性分析 59 第五節 相關分析 68 第六節 迴歸分析 69 第五章 研究結果 75 第一節 研究假說結果 75 第二節 研究結論 75 第三節 研究貢獻與限制 79 第四節 未來研究方向 81 參考文獻 82

    1.Abdel-khalik, A. R., Snowball, D.,& Wragge, J. H.(1983).The Effects of Certain Internal Audit Variables on The Planning of External Audit Programs.The Accounting Review,18(2),215-227.
    2.Albrecht, W. S., Howe, K.R. & Stocks, K.D. (1988). What Makes an Internal Audit Department. Internal Auditor(April), 45-49.
    3.Allen, B. L. (1978). Can the Participative Audit Approach Improve Job Satisfaction?. The Internal Auditor, 59-64.
    4.Baker, G.P.,(1993). Growth, Corporate Policies, and the Investment Opportunity Set.Journal of Accounting and Economics,(16).161-165
    5.Barr, S. (1993). Is There a Consultant in the House?. CFO:The Magazine for Senior Financial Executives, 9(9), 79-84.
    6.Beck, P. J., Frecka, T. J., & Solomon, I. (1988). A Model of the Market for MAS and Audit Services: Knowledge Spillovers and Auditor-Auditee Bonding. Journal of Accounting Literature, 7(1), 50-64.
    7.Bies, S.S .(2004). Current Issues in Corporate Governance:Effective Risk Management. Vital Speeches Delivered to the Bank Administration Institute’s Fiduciary Risk management conference, Las Vegas:Nevada.
    8.Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value Creation Versus Value Capture: Towards a Coherent Definition of Value in Strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1-15.
    9.Braun, G. P., Haynes, C. M., Lewis, T. D., & Taylor, M. H. (2015). Principles-Based vs. Rules-Based Accounting Standards: The Effects of Auditee Proposed Accounting Treatment and Regulatory Enforcement on Auditor Judgments and Confidence. Research in Accounting Regulation, 27(1), 45-50.
    10.Brown, P. R. (1983). Independent Auditor Judgment in the Evaluation of Internal Audit Functions. Journal of Accounting Research, 444-455.
    11.Cafferky, J. J. (1980). Internal and Operational Audit. The Internal Auditor, 53-57.
    12.Chambers, A. D. (1984). Internal Auditing: Theory and Practice. Chicago: Commerce Clearing House.
    13.Chan, K. W., Yim, C. K., & Lam, S. S. (2010). Is Customer Participation in Value Creation a Double-Edged Sword? Evidence from Professional Financial Services Across Cultures. Journal of marketing, 74(3), 48-64.
    14.Choi, J. H., Kim, C., Kim, J. B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Audit Office Size, Audit Quality, and Audit Pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 73-97.
    15.Constantin, J.A., Lusch, R.F. (1994).Understanding Resource Management: How to Deploy Your People, Products, and Processes for Maximum Productivity:Oxford,Ohio and Burr Ridge:The Planning Forum.
    16.Crumroy, O. J. (1987). Communicating the Audit Approach. Retail Control, 55(No.6), 28-35.
    17.DeMarco, V. F. (1980). Recruiting and Developing Internal Auditors. The Internal Auditor, 53-57.
    18.Didis, S. K. (1997). Communication Audit Results. Internal Auditor, 54(5), 36-38.
    19.Dubis, G. S., Jain, P., Manchanda, A., & Thakkar, R. (2011). Measuring Internal Audit Effectiveness and Efficiency. The Institute of Internal Auditors.
    20.Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical Service Logic: Making Sense of Value Creation and Co-Creation. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 41(2), 133-150.
    21.Holttinen, H. (2013).Contextualizing Value Propositions:Examining How Consumers Experience Value Propositions in Their Practices. Australasian Markering Journal.
    22.IIA(2014). The IIA’s Global Internal Audit Competency Framework. The Institute of Internal Auditors.
    23.IIA(2013). International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. The Institute of Internal Auditors.
    24.IIA(2011). Value of Internal Auditing. The Institute of Internal Auditors.
    25.IIA(2010). What’s Next for Internal Auditing?. The Institute of Internal Auditors.
    26.IIA(2009). Code of Ethics. The Institute of Internal Auditors.
    27.Jenny, P. K. (2004).Factors Affecting the Voluntary Us of Internal Audit. Working Paper NO.2004-001
    28.Johnson, Mark W., Clayton M. Christensen & Henning Kagermann (2008). Reinventing Your Business Model. Harvard business review 86.12: 57-68.
    29.Joseph V. Carcello, Dana R. Hermanson & K. Raghunandan (2005). Factors Associated with U.S. Public Companies' Investment in Internal Auditing. Accounting Horizons: June 2005, 19(2), 69-84.
    30.Kambil, A., Friesen, G. B., & Sundaram, A. (1999). Co-Creation: A new Source of Value. Outlook Magazine, 3(2), 23-29.
    31.Kotler, P. (1996). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning Implementation and Control 9th ed, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    32.Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M., & Zhang, P. (2011). Can Big 4 Versus non-Big 4 Differences in Audit-Quality Proxies be Attributed to Client Characteristics?.The Accounting Review, 86(1), 259-286.
    33.LeRoy E. ,Bookal.(2002).Internal auditors: Integral to Good Corporate Governance.Internal Auditor,12(3),78-84
    34.Mohr, Jakki, and Robert Spekman. (1994). Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques. Strategic management journal 15.2: 135-152.
    35.Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the Co-Creation of Value. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 68(1), 83-96.
    36.Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co‐Creation Experiences: The Next Practice in Value Creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
    37.Prawitt, D. F., Smith, J. L., & D.A.Wood. (2009). Internal Audit Quality and Earnings Management. Accounting Review, 84(spring), 1255-1280.
    38.Priem, R. L. (2007). A Consumer Perspective on Value Creation. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 219-235.
    39.Rackham, Neil, Lawrence G. Friedman, & Richard Ruff.(1996). Getting Partnering Right: How Market Leaders Are Creating Long-Term Competitive Advantage. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    40.Ramaswamy, V., & Gouillart, F. (2010). Building the Co-Creative Enterprise. Harvard business review, 88(10), 100-109.
    41.Ramirez, R. (1999). Value Co-Production: Intellectual Origins and Implications for Practice and Research. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 49-65.
    42.Schneider, A. (1970).Selecting and Developing Internal Auditors, The Internal Auditor.51-59.
    43.Tokman, M., Davis, L. M., & Lemon, K. N. (2007). The WOW Factor: Creating Value Through Win-Back Offers to Reacquire Lost Customers. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 47-64.
    44.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
    45.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-Dominant Logic: Reactions, Reflections and Refinements. Marketing theory, 6(3), 281-288.
    46.Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to A New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
    47.Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2009). Service-Dominant Logic as A Foundation for Service Science: Clarifications. Service Science, 1(1), 32-41.
    48.Voldnes, G., Grønhaug, K., & Nilssen, F. (2012). Satisfaction in Buyer–Seller Relationships—Influence of Cultural Differences. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(7), 1081-1093.
    49.Wong, A., Tjosvold, D., & Liu, C. (2009). Innovation by Teams in Shanghai, China: Cooperative Goals for Group Confidence and Persistence. British Journal of Management, 20(2), 238-251.
    50.Woodworth, B. M., & Said, K. E. (1996). Internal Auditing in A Multicultural Environment: the Saudi Arabia Experience. Managerial Auditing Journal, 11(2), 20-27.
    51.Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 33-46.
    52.Zimbelman, M. F., & Waller, W. S. (1999). An Experimental Investigation of Auditor-Auditee Interaction Under Ambiguity. Journal of Accounting Research, 135-155.
    53.王煥文(2014),「公司內部稽核服務品質與稽核績效研究-以C公司為例」,國立中山大學管理學院碩士論文。
    54.吳弘仁(2011),「提升企業價值的稽核功能」,內部稽核季刊,第76期,頁44-46。
    55.吳萬益、林清河(2005) ,「企業研究方法」
    56.李建華、茅境蘭(1995) ,「企業內部控制與稽核實務」,財團法人省屬行庫中小企業聯合輔導基金,頁5-105。
    57.李思壯(2013),「價值主張契合度與價值共創行為關係之研究」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所博士論文。
    58.林柄滄(2013)、中華民國內部稽核協會編修,內部稽核理論與實務第六版,台北:內部稽核協會。
    59.周靜幸(2012),「增進內部稽核價值」,內部稽核季刊,第78期,頁32-37。
    60.林錦豐(2003),「內部稽核人員專業能力內涵之研究」,靜宜大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    61.侯富堂(2012),「提升稽核績效實現價值主張」,內部稽核季刊,第78期,頁38-42。
    62.張火燦(1998),策略性人力資源管理,台北:揚智文化。
    63.陳錦烽(2011),「勇於改變-內部稽核主管應採取的十項行動」,內部稽核季刊,第76期,頁21-29。
    64.薛明玲(2006) ,「內部稽核的最佳實務」,內部稽核季刊,第55期,頁30-33。

    無法下載圖示 校內:2020-08-25公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE