近年來，我國道路交通事故死亡與受傷人數持續受到社會高度關注，其中學生交通安全教育為建立安全用路文化的重要基礎。我國近年推動交通法規的修正以及深化交通安全教育的扎根，希望透過五階段的交通安全教育，來為校園教育扎根交通安全。因此，本研究以屏東縣國民中學為研究場域，透過教師的實務經驗，探討交通安全教育的推動現況、影響因素及執行困境。
本研究以屏東縣國民中學為範圍，透過深度訪談教師了解目前交通安全教育在國中階段的實施現況以及執行觀點，並運用主題分析法進行資料分析，同時以生態系統理論作為討論架構，探討交通安全教育在不同環境系統間的互動關係。
研究結果顯示，目前國中交通安全教育已建立相關政策及教材制度，但交通安全教育課程模組於教學現場的實際使用率仍不高，教師普遍認為教材需配合地方交通環境及學生需求調整，且教師專業知能與研習機制仍有精進空間。受限於國中課程安排、升學壓力及校園多元議題競合，交通安全教育多以融入課程及宣導方式實施，易產生邊緣化現象。此外，研究發現家庭交通文化及家長身教對學生交通安全觀念與行為的影響更甚於校園教育，而現行交通安全評鑑制度雖有助於政策推動，但評鑑亦增加學校行政負擔。整體而言，交通安全教育之推動除仰賴政府政策支持外，仍須兼顧地方差異、教師教學需求及家庭教育等多重因素，方能提升教育政策之落實成效。

Traffic safety education is fundamental to developing students' safe road-use behaviors. In recent years, Taiwan has strengthened traffic safety policies and promoted the Five-stage Traffic Safety Education Curriculum Modules to enhance traffic safety education in schools. This study explored the current implementation of traffic safety education, the influencing factors, and the challenges encountered in junior high schools in Pingtung County.
A qualitative research approach was adopted. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with junior high school teachers and analyzed using thematic analysis. Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory was employed as the analytical framework to examine the interactions among different environmental systems affecting traffic safety education.
The results showed that although related policies and curriculum resources have been established, the curriculum modules are not widely adopted in classroom teaching. Teachers considered that the teaching materials should be adapted to local traffic environments and students' needs, while teacher professional development and training opportunities require further improvement. In addition, traffic safety education is constrained by curriculum schedules and academic pressure, resulting in its implementation mainly through integrated instruction and promotional activities. Family traffic culture and parental role modeling were found to have a greater influence on students' traffic safety behaviors than school education, while the current evaluation system also increases schools' administrative workload. Overall, the effective implementation of traffic safety education requires government support while taking local contexts, teachers' instructional needs, and family education into consideration.

Assailly, J. (2017). Road safety education: What works? Patient education and counseling, 100, S24-S29.
Bojesen, A. B., & Rayce, S. B. (2020). Effectiveness of a school-based road safety educational program for lower secondary school students in Denmark: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 147, 105773.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). Thematic analysis. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 7187-7193). Springer.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American psychologist, 32(7), 513.
Catchpole, J., & DiPietro, G. (2003). Road safety education in schools: what to do, what not to do. Proceedings conference" Road safety research policing and education conference: From research to action", Sydney, Australia,
Chan, Y.-S., Chen, C.-S., Huang, L., & Peng, Y.-I. (2017). Sanction changes and drunk-driving injuries/deaths in Taiwan. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 107, 102-109.
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The journal of positive psychology, 12(3), 297-298.
Di Pietro, G., & Malaysia, G. (2009). Road Safety Education in Schools. Can we measure its success. Proceedings of the 4th IRTAD Conference, Seoul, Korea,
Dragutinovic, N., & Twisk, D. (2006). The effectiveness of road safety education: A literature review. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research.
Gregersen, N. P., Berg, H.-Y., Engström, I., Nolén, S., Nyberg, A., & Rimmö, P.-A. (2000). Sixteen years age limit for learner drivers in Sweden—an evaluation of safety effects. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 32(1), 25-35.
Gregersen, N. P., & Nolén, S. (1994). Children's road safety and the strategy of voluntary traffic safety clubs. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 26(4), 463-470.
Hong, J. S., & Eamon, M. K. (2012). Students’ perceptions of unsafe schools: An ecological systems analysis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(3), 428-438.
Kitamura, Y. (2014). The possibility of holistic safety education in Japan: From the perspective of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). IATSS research, 38(1), 40-47.
Lee, S. M., & Al-Mansour, A. I. (2020). Development of a new traffic safety education material for the future drivers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, 32(1), 19-26.
Malan, L., Van Dijk, G., & Fourie, D. (2016). The strategy to align road safety education to the further education and training band curriculum. Africa Education Review, 13(2), 132-146.
Miskolczi, M., Déri, A., Bauer, B., & Krizsik, N. (2023). Road safety in public education-how to teach children to travel safely? Transportation research procedia, 72, 4089-4095.
Mulisa, F. (2019). Application of bioecological systems theory to higher education: Best evidence review. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 1(2), 104-115.
Nakao, S., Katayama, Y., Kitamura, T., Hirose, T., Tachino, J., Ishida, K., Ojima, M., Kiguchi, T., Umemura, Y., & Noda, T. (2022). Assessing the impact of the national traffic safety campaign: a nationwide cohort study in Japan. BMJ open, 12(2), e054295.
Navarro, J. L., & Tudge, J. R. (2023). Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: neo-ecological theory. Current Psychology, 42(22), 19338-19354.
Odame, P. K., Sam, E. F., & Fiangor, A. (2024). Exploring the Nature of Road Safety Education in Basic Schools and School Children’s Travel Mode Options in Winneba, Ghana. Ghana Journal of Geography, 16(1), 128-161.
Organization, W. H. (2023). Global status report on road safety 2023: summary. World Health Organization.
Poulter, D. R., & McKenna, F. P. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of a road safety education intervention for pre‐drivers: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. British journal of educational psychology, 80(2), 163-181.
Raftery, S., & Wundersitz, L. (2011). The efficacy of road safety education in schools: A review of current approaches. Criminology, 50(March), 88-100.
Roberts, I. G., Kwan, I., & Group, C. I. (1996). School‐based driver education for the prevention of traffic crashes. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010(1).
Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner's theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of family theory & review, 5(4), 243-258.
Stanley, K., & Kuo, N.-C. (2022). “It Takes a Village”: approaching the development of school-family-community partnerships through bronfenbrenner’s socio-ecological perspectives. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 10(1), 13.
Woo, T. H., & Jawkuan, L. (2001). Influence of mobile phone use while driving: The experience in Taiwan. IATSS research, 25(2), 15-19.
Xia, M., Li, X., & Tudge, J. R. (2020). Operationalizing Urie Bronfenbrenner’s process-person-context-time model. Human Development, 64(1), 10-20.
何昀芝. (2026). 邁向支持型學校: 生態系統理論在國中階段全校社會情緒學習中的應用. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 15(3), 211-232.
吳繼虹, & 何侑庭. (2020). 探討安全過路口教案教學對國小學生交通安全認知之效果 [Effect of Pedestrian Crossing Curriculum on Traffic Safety Cognition for Elementary School Students]. 都市交通, 35(1), 55-77.
李佩珊. (2019). Bronfenbrenner 生態系統理論的近期發展與應用. 輔導季刊, 55(3), 14-24.
許聖英. (2012). 國小交通安全教育管理制度建構之研究─以台中市立大安國小為例 中華大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 新竹市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3cg2jx
曾文毅. (2000). 國民小學交通安全教育之探討研究 國立交通大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 新竹市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s82yrj
劉錦鴻. (2007). 高雄地區國小交通安全教育實施現況之研究 國立臺南大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台南市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/95xccm
歐陽惠玉. (2005). 國民小學交通安全教育實施內容之檢討研究 國立交通大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 新竹市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/m26y4n
龔心怡, & 李靜儀. (2016). 應用 Bronfenbrenner 之生態系統取向探究 臺灣國中學生英語學習成就之影響因素. Journal of Educational Practice & Research, 29(1).
交通部.(2010) 第10期院頒「道路交通秩序與交通安全改進方案」. 臺北市：交通部.
交通部.(2023) 第14期院頒「道路交通秩序與交通安全改進方案」. 臺北市：交通部.