本研究旨在結合夥伴網絡關係、技術能力和技術特性融入價值創新的議題，來探討供應商參與製造商價值創新活動參與程度之影響因素和協同價值創新參與所帶來之績效關係。以供應鏈網絡關係、技術能力、技術特性對協同價值創新參與程度以及績效關係為主要架構，從供應商的觀點來探討有關協同供應鏈之產品價值創新活動之參與。

　　本研究以台灣製造業為研究對象，以問卷調查進行實證分析，共計回收106份有效樣本，經樣本回收驗證結果，發現當網路關係之信任或互惠程度愈高時，協同價值創新參與程度也愈高；因此製造商和供應商維持信任和互惠關係將有助於促成供應商參與價值創新活動。另一方面，當供應商的技術能力愈高時，則協同價值創新之參與程度也愈高；因此製造商可慎選技術能力較佳的供應商來參與本身之價值創新活動以發揮較大之效益。而當技術之不確定性或複雜性愈高時，則供應商協同價值創新的參與程度也愈高，表示透過協同合作將有助於分散風險而形成資源互補。研究中也發現當參與程度愈高時，有助於提昇新市場之開發能力、形成規模經濟等方面之市場價值和顧客價值。

　　由本研究的分析結果，可提供製造商了解如何提高供應商協同價值創新參與程度之決策建議，同時也使供應商了解在面對不同之技術特性下，以本身之技術能力積極參與製造商之價值創新活動將有助於本身績效之提升。

　　The object of this study is to link the different constructs, such as partnership networking, technology capability and technology characteristics with the subject of value innovation. From the suppliers’ points of view, this study aims to discuss the influence factors and associated the performance resulting from value innovation involvement activities with manufacturers. The research issues focus on network relationship, technology capability and technology characteristics; with each dimension associated with collaborative value innovation involvement and the involvement performance. Based on the concept of supply chain and value network, this study aims to the suppliers’ involvement in the client’s product value innovation activities within the supply chain.

　　This study focuses on the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Questionnaire was used to do the empirical study. Total 106 effective samples were collected. After analyzing the data; we find that the more trust or mutual benefit in the network relationship, the more will the suppliers involve in the value innovation activities. Besides, a supplier’s technology capability has the positive influence in the involvement of the value innovation activities. A manufacturer can choose a supplier with the better technology capability to collaborate the value innovation activities more effectively. When the uncertainty or complexity is high, a supplier will involve more in the value innovation activities. It shows the collaboration will help for risk diversification and the resources complementary. This study also finds that the more involvement in the value innovation, the more it will help a supplier to create the ability to develop the new market or the economic scale effect with the maket and the client value.

　　From the result of our study, we can give the manufacturers the suggestions about how to promote the degree of the suppliers’ involvement in collaborative value innovation .Furthermore; a supplier can use his technology capability to join the value innovation activities with the manufacturers to promote his performance when facing with the various technology characteristics.

參考文獻
中文部份
1. 大前言一，創新者的思考：看見生意與創意的源頭 (謝育容 譯) 。台北市：商周出版 (2006)。
2. 王健安，供應商參與協同設計的動機與參與程度之研究。國立中央大學資訊管學系碩士論文，未出版，中壢市 (民92)。
3. 方世杰，「科技專案產研技術合作研發聯盟動機類型、互動機制與績效之研究」，中山管理評論，第七卷第二期，pp.325-356 ，(1999) 。
4. 司徒達賢，「策略管理新論」，台北：智庫 (2001)。
5. 江建良， 統計學 (二版)。台北市：高立圖書 (民 89)。
6. 楊振富，潘勛 (譯) ,世界是平的。台北市：雅言文化 (民 94)。
7. 吳萬益 , 企業研究方法(二版) 。台北市：華泰文化 (民 94)。
8. 吳思華 ,策略九說 。台北市：臉譜 (民85年)。
9. 何安邦,供應商涉入角色與新產品開發專案績效關係研究。國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版，中壢市(民89)。
10. 林傑毓，王源欽 余孟行 “技術特性對技術取得意願之影響—以Wal-Mart之供商為例”，第四屆兩岸產業發展與經營管理學術研討會，(2005)。
11. 林文隆, 協同產品開發流程之模式建構-以TFT-LCD產業為例,明新科技大學工程管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹縣，(2004)。
12. 邱世寬，高科技產業新產品 開發之控制機制設計與績效關係之研究，台灣大學國際企業研究所博士班，(2003) 。
13. 孫善政 (譯) ， 科技管理 。 台中市: 滄海書局 (民 94)。
14. 黃秀媛 (譯) ， 藍海策略。台北市： 天下文化(民 94)。
15. 徐作聖 邱奕嘉 (合譯) ， 創新管理 。 台北市：華泰文化 (民 79)。
16. 曾如螢 “做主流中的非主流產品” 台灣商業週刊946期，P 88-90， 2006.01.09 。
17. 劉真如(譯) ，梅迪奇效應 。 台北市： 商周出版 (民 94)。
18. 楊君琦，“技術移轉互動模式失靈及重塑之研究-以研究機構與中小企業技術合作為例”，碩士論文，台灣大學商學研究所 (2000)。

英文部份
1. Acha, V.: The role of technological capabilities in determining performance: The case of the upstream petroleum industry. . In The DRUID Conference on Industrial Dynamics, Hillerfd. Edited, 2000.
2. Afuah, A.: Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation , and Profits. Edited, Oxford University Press, 1998.
3. Anderson, J. C., and J. A. Narus: A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturing Firm Working Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1): 42-58, 1990.
4. Anderson, J. C., and J. A Narus.: Partnering as a Focused Market Strategy. California Management Review, 33: 95–113, 1991.
5. Ansoff, I. H.: The New Corporate Strategy. Edited, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1988.
6. Barney, J. B.: Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120, 1991.
7. Benson, J. K.: The Interorganizational Network as a Political Economy. Administrative Science Quarterly,, 20(229-249), 1975.
8. Bidault, F.; C. Despres. and C. Butler,.: The Drivers of Cooperation between Buyers and Suppliers for Product Innovation. Research Policy, 26: 719-732, 1998.
9. Bill, M., and M. Alfred .: Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11): 1033-1055, 2005.
10. Birley, S.: The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1): 107-117, 1985.
11. Bonaccorsi, A., and A. Lippaini.: Strategic Partnerships in New Product Development: an Italian Case Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1(11): 134-145, 1994.
12. Bordogna "based on Kash and Rycroft," Technology Policy in the 21st Centuny". 1997.
13 Botha , Gerrit ; Potgieter , Christo and Tinus de Wet ,exploring the perspective of
“value innovation” ,2001
14. Brass, D. J.: Power in organizations: A social network perspective. Research in politics and society: 295-323, 1992.
15. Brown, R.: Managing the “S” Curves of Innovation. The Journal of Consumer Marketing: 61-72, 1992.
16. Carayannis, E. G., and J. Alexander,.: Is technological learning a firm core competence, when, how and why? A longitudinal multi-industry study of firm technological learning and market performance. Technovation, 22(625-643), 2002.
17. Castells, M.: The Rise of the Network Society. Edited, Oxford：Balckwell, 1997.
18. Chung , S., and G.. M. Kim.: Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: the supplier's standpoint. Research Policy, 32(4): 587-603, 2003
19. Coase, RH , : The Nature of the Firm , Economica 4: 386-405 ,1937
20. Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. : Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152, 1990.
21. Dasgupta, P., and P. A. David: Toward a new economics of Science. Research Policy, 23: 487-521, 1994.
22. Dickson, P. R.: Toward a general theory or competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 56: 69–83., 1992.
23. Dillon , T. A.; R. K. Lee and D. Matheson.: Value innovation :passport to wealth creation. Research Technonlogy Management, 48(2): 22, 2005.
24 Dodds WB & KB Monroe. The Effect of Brand and Price Information on Subjective ProductEvaluations. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 12, 87–90 ,1985
25. Doney, P. M., and J . P. Cannon: An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-sellerRelationships. Journal of Marketing, 61: 35-51, 1997.
26. Dubois, A., and A. Pedersen.: Why relationships do not fit into purchasing portfolio models-a comparison between the portfolio and industrial network approaches. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8: 35, 2002.
27. Duysters, G., and J. Hagedoorn.: Core competencies and company performance in the worldwide computer industry. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(1): 75-91, 2000.
28. Drucker PF. Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles. London: William Heinemann.,1985
29. Dyer, J. H.: Effective Interfirm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Their Transaction Costs and Maximize Transaction Value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 535-556, 1997.
30. Dyer , J. H., and H. C. Singh.: The relational view : Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660-679, 1998.
31. Ellram, L. M.: The Supplier Selection Decision in Strategic Partnership. Journal of Purchasing & Materials Management, 26: 8-14, 1991.
32. Emirbayer, M., and J. Goodwin.: Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99: 1411-1454, 1994.
33. Figueiredo, P. N.: Does technological learning pay off ? Inter-firm differences in technological capability: Accumulation path and operational performance improvement. Research Policy, 31(1): 73-94, 2002a.
34. Figueiredo, P. N.: Learning processes features and technological capability-accumulation: Explaining inter-firm differences. Technovation, 22(11): 685-698, 2002b.
35. Frazier G.L. ; R.E., S.; and C.R., O. e.: Just-in-time exchange relationships in industrial markets. Journal of Marketing, 52: 52-67, 1988.
36. Gary L. Ragtaz ; R. B Handfield.; and K. J Petersen.: Benefits assocaiated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 55: 389-400, 2002.
37. Glaister, K., and P Buckley.: Strategic motives for international alliance formation. Journal of Management Studies, 33(3): 301-332, 1996.
38. Granovetter, M. S.: Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology. Edited, 25-26, Harvard Business School Press,, 1992.
39. Granovetter, M. S.: The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380, 1973.
40. Grewal D, KB Monroe, R Krishnan. . The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perception of acquisition value: transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing 62:45-59 ,1998
41. Gulati, R., N. Nohria; and A Zaheer.: Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 203-215, 2000.
42. Hagedoorn, J., and J. Schakenraad..: The Effect of Strategic Technology Alliances on Company Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15(4): 291-309, 1994.
43. Håkan, H. J. J.: The Network as a Governance Structure: Interfirm Cooperation beyond Markets and Hierarchies. Edited, 35-51, NY: Routledge, 1993.
44. Harrigan, K. R.: Joint ventures and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 141-158, 1988.
45. Hartley, J. L.; B. J. Zirger; and, R. R Kamath.: Managing The Buyer-supplier Interface On-time Performance in Product Development. Journal of Operations Management,, 15: 57-70, 1997.
46. Helfat, C.: Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal 18: 339-360, 1997.
47. Helper, S.: Incentives for supplier participation in product development: evidence from US auto industry: Nishiguchi,T. (Ed.), Managing Product Development. Edited, 195-189, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996.
48. Henderson, R. M., and I. M. Cockburn,: Measuring competence: Exploring firm-effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 63-84, 1994.
49. Hippel, E. V.: Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. Research Policy, 16: 291-302, 1987.
50. Hoegl, M. a. W., SM: Buyer-Supplier Collaboration in Product Development Projects. Journal of Management, 31(4): 530-548, 2005.
51 Hutt, M., P Reingen., & Jr. JR Ronchetto "Tracing Emergent Processes in Marketing Strategy Formation" Journal of Marketing , Vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 4-19 ,1988
52. Johanson, J., and L. G. Mattson: Interorganizational Relations in Industrial System: A Network Approach Compared with the Transaction-Cost Approach,. International Studies of Management and Organization,, 17: 34-48, 1987.
53. Jones, C., WS Hesterly, & SP Borgatti,: A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 911-945, 1997.
54. Kalwani, M. U., and N. Narayandas: Long-Term Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships: Do They Pay Off for Supplier Firms? Journal of Marketing, 59(January): 1-16, 1985.
55 Kamath, Rajan; Liker, K. Jeffrey, "A Second Look at Japanese Product Development" Harvard Business Review November-December,: 154-173 ,1994
56. Keohane, R.: Reciprocity in International Relations. International Organization, 40(1): 1-27, 1986.
57. Kim , W. C., and Renée Mouborgne: Value innovation: The strategic logic of high growth. In Harvard Business Review. Edited, 1997.
58. Kogut, B.: Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(319-332), 1988.
59. Kotabe, M., and K. S Swan.: The role of strategic alliances in high-technology new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 624-623, 1995.
60. LaBahn, D. W., and R Krapfel.: Commitment and Trust in Cross-National ChannelRelationships: An Investigation of U.S-Mexican Trade Relationships. Journalof Marketing Channel, 7(1): 121-156, 1999.
61. LaBahn, D. W., and R. Krapfel.: Early Supplier Involvement in Customer New Product Development – A contigency model of Componet Supplier Intesnsions. Journal Of Business Research, 47(3): 173-190, 2000.
62. LaLonde, B. J., and M. C .Cooper.: Partnerships in Providing Customer Service: A N Third-party Perspective. In Oak Brook, IL: Council of Logistics Management. Edited, 1989.
63. Lambe, C., and R. Spekman: Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change. J PROD INNOV MANAG, 14: 102-116, 1997.
64. Lambert, D. M.; M. A. Emmelhainz; and J. T. Gardner,: Developing and Implementing Supply Chain Partnerships. The International Journal of Logistics Management 7(2), 1996.
65. Lane, P. J., and M Lubatkin.: Relative absorptive capacity and interogranizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 461-477, 1988.
66 Liker, J. K.; R.R Kamath.; S. N Watsi,.; and M Nagamachi.: Supplier Involvement in Automotive Component Design: Are There Really Large US Japan Differences ? Research Policy, 25: 59-89, 1996.
67 Lovelock, CH, Services Marketing, 4rd ed. Prentice Hall, International Editions. Lusch, R. F., T., 2001
68. MacDonald, S.: Formal collaboration and informal information flow. International Journal of Technology Management, 7(1/2/3): 49-60, 1994.
69. Marcos, A. M. P., and . S. D Amundson.: An Exploratory Study of The Effects of Supplier Relationships on New Product Development Outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, 20(33-52), 2002.
70. Marsden, P. V.: Introducing Influence Processes into a System of Collective Decisions. American Journal of Sociology, 86: 1203-1235, 1981.
71. Matthyssens ,Paul ; Vandenbemp , Koen and Berghman ,Liselore, Value innoation in business market:reconceiving industry models, Paper for the 19th Annual IMP Conference , September 4-6 ,2003
72. McCutcheon, D. M.: Determinants of New Product Designers' Satisfaction with Suppliers' Contributions. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14(3): 273-290, 1997.
73. McEvily B, A. Zeaher , Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12):1133-1156.,1999
74. Mckhight, D. H., and L. L. Coming,.: Initial Trust Formation in NewOrganizational Relationships. Academy of ManagementReview, 23(2): 473-490, 1998.
75. Merrifield , B.: Strategic alliances in the global Marketplace. Research Technology Management: 15, 1989.
76. Miyazaki, K.: Complex system-toward a new paradigm in technology management. In 7th International Forum on Technology Management. Edited, Tokyo,Japan, 1997.
77. Mohanty, RP , “Value Innovation Perspective in Indian Organizations ”, Participation & Empowerment, 7(4), pp.88-103 ,1999
78. Moore,J.T.,”Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition”,Harvard
Business Review,May-June,pp.75-86 ,1993
79. Morgan, R. M., and S. D Hunt.: The Commitment-trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58: 20-38, 1994.
80. Morrman, C., Zaltman G. and Deshpande R.: Relationships Between Providerand Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29: 314-328, 1992.
81. Mowery, D.: Collaborative ventures between US and foreign Manufacturing firms: An overview nternational collaborative ventures in US manufacturing Allinger Publishing Company 1-22. Edited, 1988.
82. Narayanan, V., K: Management technology and innovation for competitive advantage. Edited, Prentice Hall, 2000.
83. Nishiguchi, T., M. Ikeda,.,: Suppliers’ innovation: understated aspects of Japanese industrial sourcing. In: Nishiguchi, T. (Ed.),Managing Product Development. Edited, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 206–23, 1996.
84. Oliver , C.: Determinants of interorganization relationships : Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2): 241-265, 1990.
85 Pfeffer, J. and P. Nowak,., Joint Ventures and Interorganizational Interdependence,Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.21, pp.398~418, 1976
86. Petersen, K. J. H., B. Robert.; Gary L Ragatz : Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design Journal of Operations Management 23(3-4): 371-388, 2005.
87. Powell, W.: Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network forms of Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-336, 1990.
88. Prahalad, C. K.: The Role of Core Competencies in the Corporation. Research Technology Review, 36: 40-47, 1993.
89. Primo, M. a. A., S. D: An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Supplier Relationships on New Product Development Outcomes. Journal of Operation Management, 20: 34-36, 2002.
90 Ragatz, G. L.; Handfield, R. B.; and Petersen, K. J.: Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty. Journal of Business Research Volume:, 55(5): 389-400, 2002.
91 . Reed, F. M., and K. Walsh.: Enhancing technological capability through supplier development: A study of the UK aerospace industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(3): 231-242, 2002.
92. Rosen, A.: Knowledge use in direct practice. Social Service Review, 68: 561-577, 1994.
93. Rothwell, R., & Robertson AB: The Role Of Communications In Technological Innovation. Research Policy, 2(3): 204-225, 1973.
94. Sakakibara, M.: Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: An empirical examination of motives. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 143-164, 1997.
95. Sanchez, R., and J.Mahoney: Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 63-76, 1996.
96. Schumann, P. A., D. C Prestwood., A. H. Tong, and J. H Vanston,.: Innovate: Straight Path to Quality Customer Delight & Competitive Advantage. Edited, McGraw-Hill, Newf techno-economic policy analysis. Science and Public Policy, 15(4): 217-229, 1988.
97. Simon, H.: "The architecture of complexity", in The Science of the Artificial. Edited, 467-482, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979.
98 Sitkin, S. B., and N.L Roth,: Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic remedies for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4: 367-392, 1993.
99. Spekman, R.: Strategic supplier selection: understanding long-term buyer relationships. Business Horizons, 31 :75-81, 1988.
100. Spital, F. C. and D. J. Bickford,.: Successful Competitive and Technology Strategies in Dynamic and Stable Product Technology Environments,. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 9: 29-60, 1992.
101. Staropoli, C.: Cooperation in R&D in the pharmaceutical industry -The network as an organizational innovation governing technological innovation. Technovation, 18(1): 13-23, 1998.
102. Swink, M.: Threats to New Product Manufacturability and the Effects of Development Team Integration Processes. Journal of Operations Management, 17: 691-709, 1999.
103. Teece, D.: Competition, cooperation, and innovation organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18: 1-25, 1992.
104. Teece, D., G Pisano, A. Shuen: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533, 1997.
105. Teece, D. J.: Profiting from Technology Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy, 15: 285-305, 1986.
106. Teece, D. J., & G. Pisano : The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3: 537–556., 1994.
107 Thorelli.H.B: Network:Between Markets and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1): 37-51, 1986.
108 Tichy, N. M.; M. L Tushman.; and C Fombrun,.: Social Network Analysis for Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4): 507-519, 1979.
109. Tiralap, A.: Technology measurement: Searching for a useful framework. TDRI Quarterly Review, 7(3): 30-33, 1992.
110. Tripsas, M., S., Schrader, M Sobrero.: Discouraging opportunistic behavior in collaborative R&D: A new role for government. Research Policy, 24: 367-389, 1995.
111. Tsai, K.-H.: The impact of technological capability on firm performance in Taiwan’s electronics industry. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15: 183-195, 2004.
112. Turner, R. H.: Family interaction. Edited, New York, John Wiley, 1970.
113. Tyre, M.: Managing the Introduction of New Process Technology: International Differences in a Multi-Plant Network. Research Policy, 20: 57-76, 1991.
114. Ulrich, D., and J. B Barney,.: Perspectives in organizations: Resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management Review, 9(3): 471-481, 1984.
115. Utterback, J. M.: Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Edited, M. A.: Harvard Business Review Book, 1994.
116. Uzzi, B.: Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35-67, 1997.
117. Uzzi, B.: The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for The Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. American Sociological Review, 61: 674-698, 1996.
118. Walter, A.; T. Ritter,; and H. G. Gemünden,.: Value creation in buyer-seller relationships -theoretical considerations and empirical results from a supplier's perspective. Industrial Marketing Management 30(4): 365-377, 2001.
119. Wasti, S. N., and J. K. Liker ,.: Collaborating with Suppliers in Product Development: A U.S. and Japan Comparative Study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46(4): 444-461, 1999.
120. Wasti, S. N., and J. K. Liker,.: Risky Business or Competitive Power ? Supplier Involvement in Japanese Product Design. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 14(5): 337-355, 1997.
121. Water , A.: Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development. Journal of Business Research, 56: 721-733, 2003.
122. Williamson, Olver. . “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives.” Administrative Science Quarterly 36:269-296 ,1991
123. Wilson, R. E.: The Effect of Technological Environment and Product Rivalry on R&D Effort and Licensing of Inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 59: 171-178, 1977.
124. Wong, J. K.: Technology Transfer in Thailand: Descriptive Validation of a Technology Transfer Model. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7/8): 788-796, 1995.
125. Wyk, R. V.: Management of Technology : New Frameworks. Technovation, 7: 341-351, 1988.
126. Wynstra, F., and E. T. Pierick: Managing Supplier Involvement in New Product Development: a Portfolio Approach. European Journal of purchasing & Supply Management, 6, 49-57 , 2000.
127. Wynstra, F., A.Weele, M. Weggemann: Managing Supplier Involvement in Product Development: Three Critical Issues. European Management Journal, 19(2): 157-166, 2001.
128. Zahra, S., and D. Neubaum.: Environmental Adversity and the Entrepreneurial Activities of Low Versus High Technology New Ventures. Journal of Developmental Enterpreneurship, 3(2): 123-140, 1998.
129. Zeithaml, VA . Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, 2-22 ,1988
130. Zsidisin, G. A., and M. E. Smith..: Managing Supply Risk with Early Supplier Involvement: A Case Study and Research Propositions. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(4): 44, 2005.