在數位參與時代，參與式平台被應用在各領域，網路與地理空間技術結合民眾 參與也成為新趨勢。對規劃過程中民眾參與以及應用數位工具於決策討論的重視提 高，為專業者與民眾在規劃過程凝聚共識。應用數位工具與參與式平台於規劃過程 中，成為民眾與專業者共享資訊與討論交流的空間。特別是注重地方知識與多元詮 釋的參與式遺產，強調透過數位化保存遺產資料，並提供在地社群分享地方經驗的 管道，促進數位遺產概念以及參與式遺產規劃平台的建置。
臺灣近來對民眾參與及文化遺產的重視提高，促成文化部將原為地方倡議的湯 姆生馬雅各之路，正名為臺灣多元文化路徑，納為國家五大文化路徑之一。該路徑 大部分為無形文化遺產，因此在路徑規劃上，特別關注於當地文化脈絡、在地故事 與常民經驗。深厚的文化底蘊及強烈的地方行動力，集結了在地知識和專業知識， 一同促進該路徑的遺產規劃，回應了參與式遺產的精神，以及對數位平台的需求。
文化路徑之規劃建構倚重於在地居民生活經驗與專業學術知識的結合、各式資 料的保存，以及使其能提供各方使用者後續加值應用的介面，凸顯平台在協助遺產 規劃之重要性。但過往參與式平台多以設計者的角度設計，缺乏對參與者的考量， 容易導致無法回應使用者的需求，對平台可用性產生影響。故本研究欲了解參與式 遺產規劃平台是否能協助權益關係人參與遺產規劃過程，促進知識的積累與在地應 用。並藉由地方倡議發起之臺灣多元族群文化路徑為研究對象，透過參與式行動研 究與設計思考流程，討論參與式遺產規劃中，參與者面臨的需求與難題。
透過分析權益關係人，確定目標使用者，並將參與者依規劃過程中的定位區分 四種使用者角色，分別為推動者、驗證者、中介者和貢獻者，對應不同的行為能力 與目標。從使用者角色分類參與者的需求，將需求分成功能、內容及介面面向，對 應四種使用者角色的需求。通過使用者角色的人物誌建立平台原型。經由符合使用 者角色的對象實際測試平台後，依照測試結果修正平台原型。透過使用者體驗設計 方法，分析參與者在參與式遺產規劃的使用者角色下，平台設計回應使用者的需求 的方式，及平台如何協助參與者在規劃過程中的參與行動。
本研究最後提出結合使用者需求思維的參與式遺產規劃平台原型，研究過程所 採用之方法與架構，可作為參與式遺產規劃平台之設計框架。經使用者實際測試結 果表明，以使用者體驗元素設計的平台原型，能被使用者認同，且可透過平台協助 使用者在文化遺產的研究發展及觀光推廣面向的應用，在參與式規劃的各階段，結 合數位參與形式協助遺產的跨域協作。

Recently, digital participation and the use of geospatial technology have become a new trend. The utilization of participatory platforms gradually appeared in the planning process. Especially the planning of the Cultural path relies on the combination of residents' experience in their life and professional knowledge. It provides users with an interface for adding value to heritage data and planning information, highlighting the importance of digital platforms in assisting heritage planning. In particular, participatory heritage, which focuses on local knowledge and multiple interpretations, emphasizes the preservation of heritage data through digitization and provides a channel for sharing local experiences, which promotes the concept of digital heritage and the use of participatory platforms. However, the participatory media were mainly designed from the designers' perspective, without consideration for users, which could easily lead to failure to respond to users' needs and affect the platform's usability. This article aims to understand the roles of stakeholders when they participate in participatory heritage planning, and the needs of the stakeholders for the participatory heritage planning platform, as well as to discuss whether a participatory heritage planning platform can assist stakeholders in the heritage planning process and facilitate the application of knowledge.
We take the Taiwan Multi-ethnic Cultural Route as the case study. And using the methods of participatory action research and the design thinking process to discuss the needs and difficulties faced by participants in participatory heritage planning. We provide a participatory heritage planning platform design based on user needs. The user test result shows that the platform prototype designed with user experience design is usable and recognized by users. Users indicate that they can use platforms to assist in the research of cultural heritage and the application of cultural heritage in tourism planning and development. The methods and construction process used in the study can be used as a framework of participatory heritage planning platform design to provide a reference for future research on related topics.

一、中文文獻
文化部（2021年11月17日）。國家文化記憶庫啟用壹週年，未來以優化主題與數位服務為首要。國家文化記憶庫。https://memory.culture.tw/Home/NewsDetail?id=44
文化部（無日期）。數位建設。文化部業務說明前瞻基礎建設計畫專區。2022年11月15日，取自https://www.moc.gov.tw/content_419.html
方偉達（2018）。人文社科研究方法：藝術、人文與社會學科，研究生完全達陣祕技。五南。
王俊人（2021）。數據為王學會洞察數據, 才是行銷之王。墨刻出版股份有限公司。
任德寬、林海珍（2019）。以使用者為中心運用數位工具優化多元參與操作手冊。財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。
地球公民基金會 （2021年7月7日）。全組織無痛「數位轉型」可能嗎？導入新工具有學問，連麻瓜都能上手／地球公民基金會。Right Plus 臺灣公民對話協會－多多益善。https://rightplus.org/2021/07/07/work-from-home/
呂智惠、謝建成、黃琬姿、黃毓絜 （2016）。 網站資訊架構之使用者經驗研究: 以臺師大科普閱讀網建置與使用性測試為例。大學圖書館， 20（1），63-87。
李光中、王鑫 （2004）。 建立和評估自然保護區社區參與論壇之研究── 以櫻花鉤吻鮭野生動物保護區為例。地理學報，（36），1-22。
李長晏（2020）。臺中市地方創生社會責任與聯合國sdgs-協作治理機制規劃研究（計畫編號：109RRE05）。臺中市政府研究發展考核委員會。https://rdnet.taichung.gov.tw/1696057/post
李政賢 （2006）。質性研究：設計與計畫撰寫。五南。
林禹欣（2022）。從參與式遺產觀點建立文化路徑數位平台之規劃架構-以湯姆生, 馬雅各與臺灣多元族群文化路徑為例（系統編號：110NCKU5347002）[碩士論文，國立成功大學]。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。
林曉薇（2022）。文化部文化資產局臺灣文化路徑整合推動平台執行計畫（第二期）成果報告書。中原大學文化資產保存研究中心。
姜美全、陳天宇（2018）。 社區規劃參與式設計的數據平台搭建及應用 [論文發表]。共享與品質——2018 中國城市規劃年會，杭州，中國。https://wap.cnki.net/touch/web/Conference/Article/ZHCG201811005061
柯于璋 （2009）。 從公民治理的觀點論台灣參與式社區規劃之課題與展望。臺灣土地研究，12（1），125-151。
洪嘉妙（2021）。 提升照顧服務員工作能力與服務態度介入研究 （計畫編號：TPVH109-001）國軍退除役官兵輔導委員會；臺北榮家。https://www.vac.gov.tw/dl-51497-38a83603-4416-4585-904c-58b8496869f7.html
張秀慈 （2020）。 古道地景重構作為區域協同規劃策略之行動研究-以西南惡地為例 （計畫編號：MOST109-2410-H006-058 ）[補助]。科技部。
張淑華 （2020）。 雙鑽石模型導入地方創生之探討: 慢城鳳林個案。設計學報 (Journal of Design)，25（4），1-18。
陳耀東（2020）。 從民眾參與論我國都市更新後續修法方向之研析（計畫編號：A01548）。立法院法制局。https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=~/File/Attach/204675/File_281372.pdf
游永福 （2014）。 照見臺灣的容顏-1871 年英國攝影家約翰‧ 湯姆生南臺灣驚豔 (上)。高雄文獻，4（3），166-182。
游永福 （2015）。 照見臺灣的容顏-1871 年英國攝影家約翰. 湯姆生南臺灣驚豔 (下)。高雄文獻，5（1），140-161。
游永福（2019）。尋找湯姆生：1871臺灣文化遺產大發現。遠足文化。
萬文隆 （2004）。 深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊， 37（4），17-23。
臺灣農村社會文化調查計畫（2022年10月20日）。「臺灣農村社會文化調查計畫」直播[影片]。YouTube， https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7389qDv58g
潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用。心理出版社。
蔡清田（2000）。教育行動研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
鄧東波（2017年6月27日）。科學月刊: 知識發掘與資料探勘— 自願性地理資訊的價值。 科學月刊。http://scimonth.blogspot.com/2017/06/blog-post_27.html
玉飼真一、村上竜介、佐藤哲、太田文明、常盤晋作、Corporation, I. M. J.（2018）。WEB 設計職人必修：UX Design 初學者學習手冊（吳嘉芳譯）。旗標。（原著出版於2016年）
武井由紀子、遠藤直紀、中島克彥（2012）。網站使用者中心策略：從觀念到實務最完整的操作聖經＋企業實例。商業周刊。（原著出版於2006年）
Garrett, J. J. (2018)。使用者經驗的要素：跨屏時代的使用者導向設計 第二版（吳秉勳譯）。碁峰。（原著出版於2010年）
John Thomson (2019) 。十載遊記：現代西方對古東亞的第一眼: 麻六甲海峽、中南半島、臺灣與中國（顏湘如、黃詩涵、黃逸涵譯）。網路與書出版。（原著出版於1875年）

二、英文文獻
Affleck, J., & Kvan, T. (2008). A virtual community as the context for discursive interpretation: A role in cultural heritage engagement. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 14(3), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250801953751
Aguilar, R., Calisto, L., Flacke, J., Akbar, A., & Pfeffer, K. (2021). OGITO, an Open Geospatial Interactive Tool to support collaborative spatial planning with a maptable. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 86, 101591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101591
Aguilar, R., Flacke, J., & Pfeffer, K. (2020). Towards supporting collaborative spatial planning: Conceptualization of a maptable tool through user stories. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9010029
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Ataman, C., & Tuncer, B. (2022). Urban Interventions and Participation Tools in Urban Design Processes: A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis (1995–2021). Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103462
Bäcklund, P. (2007). Tietämisen politiikka: Kokemuksellinen tieto kunnan hallinnassa. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki]. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/21178
Baek, J. S., Manzini, E., & Rizzo, F. (2010). Sustainable collaborative services on the digital platform: Definition and application. In Durling, D., Bousbaci, R., Chen, L, Gauthier, P., Poldma, T., Roworth-Stokes, S. and Stolterman, E (Eds.), Design and Complexity - DRS International Conference 2010, 7-9 July, Montreal, Canada. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2010/researchpapers/5
Ballatore, A., McClintock, W., Goldberg, G., & Kuhn, W. (2019). Towards a usability scale for participatory GIS. In P, Kyriakidis., D, Hadjimitsis., D, Skarlatos., & A, Mansourian. (Eds), Geospatial Technologies for Local and Regional Development. AGILE 2019. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, (pp. 327–348). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14745-7_18
Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
Berman, T. (2015). Public participation as an instrument for incorporating local knowledge into planning processes[paper presentation]. 7th State of Australian Cities Conference, 9-11 December 2015, Gold Coast, Australia. https://apo.org.au/node/63228
Boland, P., Durrant, A., McHenry, J., McKay, S., & Wilson, A. (2021). A ‘planning revolution’or an ‘attack on planning’in England: Digitization, digitalization, and democratization. International Planning Studies, 27(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1979942
Brook, J. (1996). SUS: a" quick and dirty" usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry. 189(194), 4-7. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35
Brooke, J. (2013). SUS: a retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies, 8(2), 29–40. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2817912.2817913
Brown, G., & Raymond, C. M. (2014). Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007
Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722
Bugs, G., Granell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., & Painho, M. (2010). An assessment of Public Participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities, 27(3), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.11.008
Butt, M. A., Mahmood, S. A., Sami, J., Qureshi, J., Nazir, M. K., Masood, A., Waheed, K., & Khalid, A. (2019). Architectural design and prototyping of Co-PPGIS: A groupware-based online synchronous collaborative PPGIS to support municipality development and planning management workflows. In: R. Abdalla (Ed.), Trends in Geomatics-An Earth Science Perspective (pp.5-31). IntechOpen Limited. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.80091
Campese, C., & Mascarenhas, J. (2021). Enhancing the process of medical products users’ identification: Proposal of the Users Broadening Map method. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 2021, 03(02), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2021.3.2.0071
Casey, M. A., & Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus group interviewing. In: MacFie, H.J.H., Thomson, D.M.H. (Eds.), Measurement of food preferences (pp. 77–96). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2171-6_4
Chasanidou, D., Gasparini, A. A., & Lee, E. (2015). Design thinking methods and tools for innovation. In A, Marcus. (Ed.), Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Discourse: 4th International Conference, DUXU 2015, Held as Part of HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 2–7, 2015, Proceedings, Part I (pp. 12-23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20886-2_2
Chassin, T., Ingensand, J., Christophe, S., & Touya, G. (2022). Experiencing virtual geographic environment in urban 3D participatory e-planning: A user perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 224, 104432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104432
Chee Khoon, L., Ramaiah, C. K., & Foo, S. (2003). The design and development of an online exhibition for heritage information awareness in Singapore. Program, 37(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330330310472876
Cho, S., Mossberger, K., Swindell, D., & Selby, J. D. (2021). Experimenting with public engagement platforms in local government. Urban Affairs Review, 57(3), 763–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419897821
Dahl-Jørgensen, T. C., & Parmiggiani, E. (2020). Platformization of the public sector: Assessing the space of possibility for participation. In C, Del Gaudio., L, Parra-Agudelo., R,Clarke., J, Saad-Sulonen. A, Botero., F. C, Londoño., & P, Escandón. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020-Participation(s) Otherwise-Volume 2 (pp. 35-39). https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385154
Dambruch, J., & Krämer, M. (2014). Leveraging public participation in urban planning with 3D web technology.In P, Nicholas F., C, Alain., C, Program., G, Enrico., & D, Jürgen. (Eds.), Web3D '14: Proceedings of the 19th International ACM Conference on 3D Web Technologies (pp.117–124). https://doi.org/10.1145/2628588.2628591
De Filippi, F., Coscia, C., & Cocina, G. G. (2020). Digital participatory platforms for urban regeneration: A survey of Italian case studies. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 9(3), 47–67. https://doi.org/ 10.4018/IJEPR.2020070103
De Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-%20016-0033-3
Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21(1), 1–25. https://asset-pdf.scinapse.io/prod/5048401/5048401.pdf
Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998). Making strategy: the journey of strategic management. Sage.
Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Beyond technology: Identifying local government challenges for using digital platforms for citizen engagement. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.007
Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2019). Digital participatory platforms for co-production in urban development: A systematic review. Crowdsourcing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 663–690. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8362-2.ch033
Flacke, J., Shrestha, R., & Aguilar, R. (2020). Strengthening participation using interactive planning support systems: A systematic review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9010049
Forbes, N., & Colella, S. (2019). Embedding engagement: Participatory approaches to cultural heritage. SCIRES-IT-SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology, 9(1), 69–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v9n1p69
Gallou, E., & Fouseki, K. (2022). Managing participatory heritage for enhancing social well-being. In K, Fouseki., M, Cassar., G, Dreyfuss., & K. A. K, Eng. (Eds), Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Heritage (pp. 87-103). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003038955
Garcia, X., Gottwald, S., Benages-Albert, M., Pavón, D., Ribas, A., & Vall-Casas, P. (2020). Evaluating a web-based PPGIS for the rehabilitation of urban riparian corridors. Applied Geography, 125, 102341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102341
Ghose, R. (2007). Politics of scale and networks of association in public participation GIS. Environment and Planning A, 39(8), 1961–1980. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38247
Golumbic, Y. N., Fishbain, B., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2019). User centered design of a citizen science air-quality monitoring project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 9(3), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1597314
Goodman, E., & Kuniavsky, M. (2012). Observing the user experience: A practitioner’s guide to user research. Elsevier.
Gordillo, A., Barra, E., Aguirre, S., & Quemada, J. (2014). The usefulness of usability and user experience evaluation methods on an e-Learning platform development from a developer's perspective: A case study. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044340.
Gottwald, S., Laatikainen, T. E., & Kyttä, M. (2016). Exploring the usability of PPGIS among older adults: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(12), 2321–2338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1170837
Grimble, R., & Wellard, K. (1997). Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems, 55(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1
Gün, A., Demir, Y., & Pak, B. (2019). Urban design empowerment through ICT-based platforms in Europe. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 24(2), 189–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2019.1604250
Haklay, M., Jankowski, P., & Zwoliński, Z. (2018). Selected Modern Methods and Tools for Public Participation in Urban Planning – A Review. Quaestiones Geographicae, 37(3), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0030
Haklay, M., & Tobón, C. (2003). Usability evaluation and PPGIS: Towards a user-centred design approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17(6), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/1365881031000114107
Hanzl, M. (2007). Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: A review of experiments and potentials. Participatory Design, 28(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.003
Hassenforder, E., Pittock, J., Barreteau, O., Daniell, K. A., & Ferrand, N. (2016). The MEPPP Framework: A Framework for Monitoring and Evaluating Participatory Planning Processes. Environmental Management, 57(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0599-5
Healey, P. (1999). Institutionalist analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9901900201
Hofmann, M., Münster, S., & Noennig, J. R. (2020). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of massive digital participation systems in urban planning. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 4(1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-019-0040-3
ICA Associates Inc. (2015). Community Development Intensive. The Canadian Institute of Cultural Affairs. https://wedgeblade.net/files/archives_assets/22831.pdf
Ingensand, J., & Golay, F. (2010). Task-oriented usability evaluation of a WebGIS for a real-world community. URISA Journal, 22(1), 41–53. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/151700
Janes, S. (2017). Participatory Heritage ed. By Henriette Roued-Cunliffe and Andrea Copeland (review). Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 41(3), 230–231. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/686192.
Jankowski, P., Forss, K., Czepkiewicz, M., Saarikoski, H., & Kahila, M. (2021). Assessing impacts of PPGIS on urban land use planning: Evidence from Finland and Poland. European Planning Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1882393
Jansen, B. J., Jung, S., Salminen, J., Guan, K. W., & Nielsen, L. (2021). Strengths and weaknesses of persona creation methods: Guidelines and opportunities for digital innovations. In Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp.4971–4980). http://hdl.handle.net/10125/71222
Jeffrey, S., Jones, S., Maxwell, M., Hale, A., & Jones, C. (2020). 3D visualisation, communities and the production of significance. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(9), 885–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1731703
Jesus, E. G. V. de, Brito, P. L., & Oliveira Fernandes, V. de. (2017). Interaction Problems Found Through Usability Testing on Interactive Maps. In: Peterson, M. (Eds) Advances in Cartography and GIScience. ICACI 2017. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57336-6_18
Jones, P., Layard, A., Speed, C., & Lorne, C. (2015). MapLocal: Use of smartphones for crowdsourced planning. Planning Practice & Research, 30(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1052940
Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). The methodology of participant observation. 2003). In M, Pogrebin. (Ed), Qualitative Approaches to Criminal Justice: Perspectives from the Field, (pp.12–26). Sage.
Jost, F., Newell, R., & Dale, A. (2021). CoLabS: A collaborative space for transdisciplinary work in sustainable community development. Heliyon, 7(2), e05997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05997
Juujärvi, S., & Pesso, K. (2013). Actor roles in an urban living lab: What can we learn from Suurpelto, Finland? Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11), 22-27. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2018061313707
Kahila-Tani, M. (2015). Reshaping the planning process using local experiences: Utilising PPGIS in participatory urban planning [Doctoral dissertation, University of Aalto]. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/19347
Kahila-Tani, M., Kytta, M., & Geertman, S. (2019). Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 186, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.019
Khan, Z., Dambruch, J., Peters-Anders, J., Sackl, A., Strasser, A., Fröhlich, P., Templer, S., & Soomro, K. (2017). Developing knowledge-based citizen participation platform to support Smart City decision making: The Smarticipate case study. Information, 8(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/info8020047
Khan, Z., Ludlow, D., & Saad-Sulonen, W. (2013). Applying the CoReS requirements development method for building IT tools for urban management systems: The UrbanAPI project. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 8(4), 25. https://um.ase.ro/no84/2.pdf
Kleinhans, R., Falco, E., & Babelon, I. (2022). Conditions for networked co-production through digital participatory platforms in urban planning. European Planning Studies, 30(4), 769–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1998387
Koukopoulos, Z., & Koukopoulos, D. (2016). A participatory digital platform for cultural heritage within smart city environments. In 2016 12th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS) (pp. 412-419). IEEE.
Koukopoulos, Z., Koukopoulos, D., & Jung, J. J. (2017). A trustworthy multimedia participatory platform for cultural heritage management in smart city environments. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76(24), 25943–25981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4785-8
Kramers, E. R. (2008). Interaction with maps on the internet–a user centred design approach for the atlas of Canada. The Cartographic Journal, 45(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1179/174327708X305094
Kunze, A., Halatsch, J., Vanegas, C., Jacobi, M. M., Turkienicz, B., & Schmitt, G. (2011). A Conceptual Participatory Design Framework for Urban Planning. In Proceedings of eCAADe 2011 (pp. 895-903).
Levy, J. (2015). UX strategy: How to devise innovative digital products that people want. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Liang, X., Lu, Y., & Martin, J. (2021). A review of the role of social media for the cultural heritage sustainability. Sustainability, 13(3), 1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031055
Lieven, C., Lüders, B., Kulus, D., & Thoneick, R. (2021). Enabling digital co-creation in urban planning and development. In Zimmermann, A., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (Eds) Human Centred Intelligent Systems. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 189 (pp. 415-430) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5784-2_34
Liu, Y., Jin, X., & Dupre, K. (2022). Engaging stakeholders in contested urban heritage planning and management. Cities, 122, 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103521
Marsh, J. (2015). UX for beginners: A crash course in 100 short lessons. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Matusiak, K. K., Polepeddi, P., Tyler, A., Newton, C., & Rist, J. (2017). Giving Voice to the Community: Digitizing JeffCo Oral Histories. In H, Roued-Cunliffe & A. Copeland (Eds). Participatory Heritage (pp. 117–128). Facet
McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012). Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’governance? Geoforum, 43(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.007
Meneghello, S., & Mingotto, E. (2020). Local Active Engagement As An Effective Tool For Sustainable Tourism Development: First Considerations From The European Cultural Routes Case. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 248, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2495/ST200011
Meng, Y., & Malczewski, J. (2010). Web-PPGIS usability and public engagement: A case study in Canmore, Alberta, Canada. URISA Journal, 22(1), 55. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A253845094/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=d89bc085
Meyerson, J., Galloway, P., & Bias, R. (2012). Improving the user experience of professional researchers: Applying a user‐centered design framework in archival repositories. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901208
Milyana, N. A. N. (2021). Designing User Experience (UX) to Support Public Participation in Spatial Planning: Case study: Indonesia [Master thesis, University of Delft]. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:b0876cc2-d8b8-4286-8b3f-1888a5f45d97
Moreno, M., Ortiz, R., Cagigas-Muñiz, D., Becerra, J., Martin, J. M., Prieto, A. J., Garrido-Vizuete, M. A., Macías-Bernal, J. M., Chávez, M. J., & Ortiz, P. (2022). ART-RISK 3.0 a fuzzy—Based platform that combine GIS and expert assessments for conservation strategies in cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 55, 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.03.012
Mougiakou, E., Christaki, A., Athousaki, G., Vakkas, T., Velegrakis, G., Mitropoulos, P., Andritsos, T., Poulios, D., Vourekas, K., & Tsadari, S. (2020). Participatory urban planning through online webGIS platform: Operations and tools. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 831-834). https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428633
Müller, J. (2021). Evaluation Methods for Citizen Design Science Studies: How Do Planners and Citizens Obtain Relevant Information from Map-Based E-Participation Tools? ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10020048
Murphy, P., Pritchard, M. P., & Smith, B. (2000). The destination product and its impact on traveller perceptions. Tourism Management, 21(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00080-1
Nabatchi, T. (2012). Putting the “public” back in public values research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02544.x
Nared, J., & Bole, D. (2020). Participatory research and planning in practice. Springer Nature.
Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.
Nielsen, J. (2000, March 18). Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/
Nummi, P. (2018). Crowdsourcing local knowledge with PPGIS and social media for urban planning to reveal intangible cultural heritage. Urban Planning, 3(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i1.1266
Nur An Nisa Milyana, N. A., van Loenen, B., Korthals Altes, W. K., & Ploeger, H. D. (2021). 4D Musrenbang: Designing User Experience (UX) to Support Public Participation in Spatial Planning for Indonesia. In E. Kalogianni, A. Abdul-Rahman, & P. van Oosterom (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International FIG Workshop on 3D Cadastres (Virtual/online event) (pp. 95-112). [16] International Federation of Surveyors (FIG). https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:b00ca7b9-a480-4752-b12b-f7337b62e262
ODA. (1995). Guidance Note on how to do Stakeholder Analysis of AID Projects and Programmes. Overseas Development Administration.
Omidipoor, M., Jelokhani-Niaraki, M., Moeinmehr, A., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., & Choi, S.-M. (2019). A GIS-based decision support system for facilitating participatory urban renewal process. Land Use Policy, 88, 104150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104150
Panagiotopoulou, M., Somarakis, G., & Stratigea, A. (2018). Smartening up participatory cultural tourism planning in historical city centers. Journal of Urban Technology, 27(4), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1528540
Panagiotopoulou, M., & Stratigea, A. (2017). Spatial data management and visualization tools and technologies for enhancing participatory e-planning in smart cities. In: Stratigea, A., Kyriakides, E., Nicolaides, C. (eds), Smart Cities in the Mediterranean: Coping with Sustainability Objectives in Small and Medium-sized Cities and Island Communities (pp. 31-57). Progress in IS. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54558-5_2
Pánek, J. (2019). Mapping citizens’ emotions: Participatory planning support system in Olomouc, Czech Republic. Journal of Maps, 15(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2018.1546624
Papadopoulou, C.-A., & Stratigea, A. (2014). Traditional vs. Web-based participatory tools in support of spatial planning in ‘lagging-behind’peripheral regions. In G. M. Korres, E. Kourliouros, G. O. Tsobanoglou & A. Kokkinou (Eds), Socio-Economic Sustainability, Regional Development and Spatial Planning: European and International Dimensions & Perspectives (pp. 164-170), Mytilene.
Poorazizi, M. E., Steiniger, S., & Hunter, A. J. (2015). A service-oriented architecture to enable participatory planning: An e-planning platform. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(7), 1081–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2015.1008492
Rahaman, H. (2018). Digital heritage interpretation: A conceptual framework. Digital Creativity, 29(2–3), 208–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2018.1511602
Rambaldi, G., Kyem, P. A. K., McCall, M., & Weiner, D. (2006). Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 25(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00162.x
Raynor, K. E., Doyon, A., & Beer, T. (2017). Collaborative planning, transitions management and design thinking: Evaluating three participatory approaches to urban planning. Australian Planner, 54(4), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2018.1477812
Repette, P., Sabatini-Marques, J., Yigitcanlar, T., Sell, D., & Costa, E. (2021). The Evolution of City-as-a-Platform: Smart Urban Development Governance with Collective Knowledge-Based Platform Urbanism. Land, 10(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10010033
Resch, B., & Zimmer, B. (2013). User experience design in professional map-based geo-portals. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2(4), 1015–1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi2041015
Reynante, B., Dow, S. P., & Mahyar, N. (2021). A Framework for Open Civic Design: Integrating Public Participation, Crowdsourcing, and Design Thinking. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487607
Roued-Cunliffe, H., & Copeland, A. (2017). Participatory heritage. Facet Publishing.
Rzeszewski, M., & Kotus, J. (2019). Usability and usefulness of internet mapping platforms in participatory spatial planning. Applied Geography, 103, 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.01.001
Saad-Sulonen, J. (2012). The role of the creation and sharing of digital media content in participatory e-planning. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 1(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2012040101
Saad-Sulonen, J. (2014). COMBINING PARTICIPATIONS. Expanding the Locus of Participatory E‐Planning by Combining Participatory Approaches in the Design of Digital Technology and in Urban Planning. [Doctoral Dissertations, University of Aalto]. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-5543-5
Salter, J. D., Campbell, C., Journeay, M., & Sheppard, S. R. J. (2009). The digital workshop: Exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(6), 2090–2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.023
Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
Sauro, J., & Kindlund, E. (2005). A method to standardize usability metrics into a single score. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055028
Simonofski, A., Hertoghe, E., Steegmans, M., Snoeck, M., & Wautelet, Y. (2021). Engaging citizens in the smart city through participation platforms: A framework for public servants and developers. Computers in Human Behavior, 124,106901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106901
Smith, D. A. (2016). Online interactive thematic mapping: Applications and techniques for socio-economic research. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 57, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.01.002
Soria-Lara, J. A., Zúñiga-Antón, M., & Pérez-Campaña, R. (2015). European spatial planning observatories and maps: Merely spatial databases or also effective tools for planning? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 42(5), 904–929. https://doi.org/10.1068/b130200p
Srivastava, P., & Mostafavi, A. (2018). Challenges and opportunities of crowdsourcing and participatory planning in developing infrastructure systems of smart cities. Infrastructures, 3(4), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures3040051
Staffans, A., Rantanen, H., & Nummi, P. (2010). Online environments shake up urban planning. In Wallin S, Horelli L, Saad-Sulonen J (Eds), Digital tools in participatory planning (pp. 59–78). Aalto University.
Steiniger, S., Poorazizi, M. E., Bliss-Taylor, C. A., Mohammadi, E., & Hunter, A. J. (2012). PlanYourPlace: Merging social networks and participatory GIS for participatory planning [paper presentation]. FIG working week 2012. Knowing to manage the territory, protect the environment, evaluate the cultural heritage, Rome, Italy. https://fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2012/papers/ts03e/TS03E_hunter_steiniger_et_al_5850.pdf
Steiniger, S., Poorazizi, M. E., & Hunter, A. J. (2016). Planning with citizens: Implementation of an e-planning platform and analysis of research needs. Urban Planning, 1(2), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i2.607
Steinmann, R., Krek, A., & Blaschke, T. (2004). Analysis of online public participatory GIS applications with respect to the differences between the US and Europe [paper presentation]. Proceedings of Urban Data Management Symposium '04,Chioggia, Italy.
Stelzle, B., & Noennig, J. R. (2017). A database for participation methods in urban development. Procedia Computer Science, 112, 2416–2425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.173
Stratigea, A., Papadopoulou, C.-A., & Panagiotopoulou, M. (2015). Tools and technologies for planning the development of smart cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(2), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1018725
Sweetnam, M. S., Agosti, M., Orio, N., Ponchia, C., Steiner, C. M., Hillemann, E.-C., Ó Siochrú, M., & Lawless, S. (2012). User needs for enhanced engagement with cultural heritage collections. In P, Zaphiris., G, Buchanan., E, Rasmussen., & F, Loizides. (Eds), Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries : Second International Conference, TPDL 2012, Paphos, Cyprus, September 23-27, 2012. Proceedings 2 (pp. 64-75). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33290-6_8
Swensen, G., Jerpåsen, G. B., Sæter, O., & Tveit, M. S. (2012). Alternative perspectives? The implementation of public participation in local heritage planning. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 66(4), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2012.707988
Tullis, T., & Albert, B. (2013). Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics (Second edition). Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann.
Turillazzi, B., Leoni, G., Gaspari, J., Massari, M., & Boulanger, S. O. M. (2021). Cultural heritage and digital tools: The ROCK interoperable platform. International Journal of Environmental Impacts, 4(3), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.2495/EI-V4-N3-276-288
UNESCO. (2019, March 28). Concept of Digital Heritage. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/themes/information-preservation/digital-heritage/concept-digital-heritage
Wadsworth, Y. (1998). What is participatory action research? Action research international, paper 2. Available online: http://www.aral.com.au/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html
Wallin, S., & Horelli, L. (2012). Playing with the glocal through participatory e-planning. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v8i3.3029
Wallin, S., Horelli, L., & Saad-Sulonen, J. (2010). Digital tools in participatory planning. Aalto University.
Walter, M. (2009). Participatory Action Research. Social Research Methods. In A. Bryman (Ed.), Social Research Methods (pp. 151-158). The Falmer Press.
Wimalasuriya, R., Alexander KM, K. M., & Ranasinghe, G. (2022). Conceptual Framework for On-site Digital Interpretation Developments in Cultural Heritage Sites. Vidyodaya Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (VJHSS)(2022), 7(01). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3998515
Young, G. W., Kitchin, R., & Naji, J. (2020). Building city dashboards for different types of users. Journal of Urban Technology, 28(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1759994
Zahidi, Z., Lim, Y. P., & Woods, P. C. (2014). Understanding the user experience (UX) factors that influence user satisfaction in digital culture heritage online collections for non-expert users. In 2014 Science and Information Conference (pp. 57-63). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAI.2014.6918172.
Zhao, Y., Qin, H., & Ge, X. (2020). An Analysis of the Roles of Stakeholders in Industrial Cultural and Creative Product Design. Design Engineering (Toronto), 2020(8), 821–831. https://doi.org/10.17762/de.vi.817

三、圖片資料來源
（一）人物誌
Callmetak. (n.d.). People avatar vector line drawing collection set of old men and women flat simple illustration. Freepik. Retrieved January 23, 2023, https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/people-avatar-vector-line-drawing-collection-set-old-men-women-flat-simple-illustration_19509100.htm?query=persona">Image by callmetak</a> on Freepik
Callmetak. (n.d.). Set of female avatars vector illustration simple line drawings isolated on a white background. Freepik. Retrieved January 23, 2023, https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/set-female-avatars-vector-illustration-simple-line-drawings-isolated-white-background_19509080.htm#query=persona&position=20&from_view=search&track=sph">Image by callmetak</a> on Freepik
Callmetak. (n.d.) Set of male avatars vector illustration simple line drawings isolated on a white background. Freepik. Retrieved January 23, 2023, from https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/set-male-avatars-vector-illustration-simple-line-drawings-isolated-white-background_19509089.htm?query=persona#from_view=detail_alsolike#position=9&query=persona">Image by callmetak</a> on Freepik
（二）平台原型
中央研究院人社中心GIS專題中心（2020）。臺南百年歷史地圖。[online] 臺灣百年歷史地圖。2022年6月23日，取自https://gissrv4.sinica.edu.tw/gis/tainan.aspx
中央研究院社區故事地圖協作平台（2018）。社區故事地圖協作平台。社區故事地圖協作平台。2022年7月18日，取自 https://story.map.net.tw/
台灣基督教長老教會歷史檔案館（無日期）。活動回顧。台灣基督教長老教會歷史檔案館。2022年7月18日，取自http://archives.pct.org.tw/PastArchives.aspx
游永福（2014）。照見臺灣的容顏─1871 年英國攝影家約翰 ̇湯姆生南臺灣驚艷(上)。日照甲仙埔。https://puumen2727.pixnet.net/blog/post/41824120
潘稀祺（打必里．大宇）(2004)。台灣醫療宣教之父 馬雅各醫生傳。財團法人台灣基督長老教會新樓醫院。
貳參玖柒映像2397 FILM STUDIO（2022年3月16日）。踏勘痕跡為何有你有我-故事補遺原來是你是我 [影片]。YouTube，https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7ktDyQnGso
Charles W. Le Gendre. (2013)。李仙得臺灣紀行（費德廉譯）。國立臺灣歷史博物館。（原著出版於1875年）。
John Thomson (2020)。湯姆生鏡頭下的晚清中國-十九世紀末的中國與中國人影像（葉伶芳譯）。網路與書出版。（原著出版於1873年）。
Eric Miller Design, Inc. (n.d.). Website Flowchart & Sitemap Architecture and flow for websites. UX KITS. Retrieved January 26, 2023, from https://uxkits.com/products/website-flowchart-and-sitemap.
Wellcome (n.d.). Collections. Wellcome collection. Retrieved October 13, 2021, from https://wellcomecollection.org/images?source.contributors.agent.label=%22John+Thomson%22