簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李俊
Lanson Ly
論文名稱: 物聯網之同步廣告對使用者的寒蟬效應影響:綜合物聯網特色與隱私問題視角
The Effects of IoT-Enabled Synchronized Advertisements on the Chilling Effect of IoT Users: An Integrated Perspective of IoT Features and Privacy Concern
指導教授: 王維聰
Wang, Wei-Tsong
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 資訊管理研究所
Institute of Information Management
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 41
外文關鍵詞: Synchronized Advertisement, Internet of Things, Chilling Effect, Privacy, Security, Perceived Surveillance
相關次數: 點閱:104下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • With the increasing availability of user data, comes opportunities for marketers to employ new techniques to attract consumer’s attention. Among them is a technique called synchronized advertisements, advertisements that are tailored based on the user's current online and offline media consumptions rather than past behaviors. IoT plays an important role not only as a medium for these advertisements, but effectively collecting user’s real time data. Previous studies have explored the effects of synchronized advertisements on the chilling effect, the self-restriction of digital communication, however, there have been little studies that address how IoT specifically plays a role in this phenomenon. This paper investigated the functionality of IoT devices alongside privacy and security and its impact on user's trust. It also examined fatigue as a moderating factor affecting privacy and security on trust. Furthermore, the research explored the relationship between trust, perceived surveillance, and its influence on the chilling effect. To examine these relationships, a questionnaire was employed and structural equation modeling utilizing the partial least squares (PLS) method served as the primary data analysis for hypothesis testing.

    Our study found that IoT diversity and connectivity, along with users’ perceptions of privacy and security, positively affect users’ trust in IoT devices. However, scalability was found to be insignificant in influencing users’ trust in IoT devices. Users' trust negatively impacts perceived surveillance, particularly when they experience synchronized advertisements, which in turn decreases the chilling effect. Lastly, the moderating effect fatigue was found to be insignificant on privacy and security

    INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 2 Synchronized Advertisement 2 IOT Devices 3 Privacy 4 Security 4 Fatigue 5 Trust 5 Perceived surveillance 6 Chilling Effect 6 RESEARCH MODEL AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPEMENT 8 Hypothesis Development 8 Research Methodology 11 Data Collection 12 Data Analysis 13 DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 15 Evaluation of Measurement Model 15 Hypothesis Testing 17 Examination of Moderating Effect 20 Multigroup Analysis 21 CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION 22 Discussion 22 Research Implications 23 Practical Implications 24 Conclusion 26 REFERENCES 27 APPENDIX A: QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONS 32

    Acikgoz, F., & Vega, R. P. (2021). The role of privacy cynicism in consumer habits with voice assistants: A technology acceptance model perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(12), 1138–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1987677

    Agarwal, R., & Dhingra, S. (2023). Factors influencing cloud service quality and their relationship with customer satisfaction and Loyalty. Heliyon, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15177

    Aiolfi, S., Bellini, S., & Pellegrini, D. (2021). Data-driven digital advertising: Benefits and risks of online behavioral advertising. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(7), 1089–1110. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-10-2020-0410

    Aksu, H., Babun, L., Conti, M., Tolomei, G., & Uluagac, A. S. (2018). Advertising in the IOT ERA: Vision and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(11), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2017.1700871

    Alansari, Z., Anuar, N. B., Kamsin, A., Soomro, S., Belgaum, M. R., Miraz, M. H., & Alshaer, J. (2018). Challenges of internet of things and Big Data Integration. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95450-9_4

    Alhogail, A. (2018). Improving IOT technology adoption through improving consumer trust. Technologies, 6(3), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6030064

    Bhattacherjee, A. (2002). Individual Trust in online firms: Scale Development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045715

    Borgia, E. (2014). The internet of things vision: Key features, applications and open issues. Computer Communications, 54, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2014.09.008

    Büchi, M., Festic, N., & Latzer, M. (2022). The chilling effects of digital Dataveillance: A theoretical model and an empirical research agenda. Big Data & Society, 9(1), 205395172110653. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211065368

    Chang, Y., & Thorson, E. (2004). Television and Web advertising synergies. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 75–84. 10.1080/00913367.2004.10639161

    Chang, YaPing, Dong, X., & Sun, W. (2014). Influence of characteristics of the internet of things on consumer purchase intention. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(2), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.2.321

    Choi, H., Park, J., & Jung, Y. (2018). The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.001

    De Keyzer, F., Dens, N., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2015). Is this for me? How consumers respond to personalized advertising on social network sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 15(2), 124–134. doi:10.1080/15252019.2015.1082450

    Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for E-Commerce Transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080

    Dinev, T., Xu, H., Smith, J. H., & Hart, P. (2013). Information privacy and correlates: An empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.23

    Dong, X., Chang, Y., & Fan, X. (2017). Effects of the characteristics of online multimedia synergy on consumers’ message acceptance and message response. Online Information Review, 41(5), 710–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-11-2016-0328

    Duffy, B.E., and N.K. Chan. 2019. “You Never Really Know Who’s Looking: Imagined Surveillance Across Social Media Platforms.” New Media & Society 21 (1): 119–138. doi:10.1177/ 1461444818791318.

    Edell, J. A., and K. L. Keller. 1989. “The Information Processing of Coordinated Media Campaigns.” Journal of Marketing Research 26 (2): 149–163. doi:10.1177/002224378902600202.

    Emami-Naeini, P., Dixon, H., Agarwal, Y., & Cranor, L. F. (2019). Exploring how privacy and security factor into IOT device purchase behavior. 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300764

    Falcone, R., & Sapienza, A. (2018). On the users’ acceptance of IOT Systems: A theoretical approach. Information, 9(3), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9030053

    Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Gurrea, R. (2006). The role played by perceived usability, Satisfaction and Consumer Trust on website Loyalty. Information &Management, 43(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.002

    Fornell, C.R. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50.

    Furnell, S., & Thomson, K.-L. (2009). Recognising and addressing ‘security fatigue.’ Computer Fraud & Security, 2009(11), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-3723(09)70139-3

    Frick, N. R. J., Wilms, K. L., Brachten, F., Hetjens, T., Stieglitz, S., & Ross, B. (2021). The perceived surveillance of conversations through Smart Devices. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 47, 101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101046

    Geisser, S., "The predictive sample reuse method with applications," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1975, 70, pp. 320–328.

    Gironda, J. T., & Korgaonkar, P. K. (2018). ISpy? tailored versus invasive ads and consumers’ perceptions of personalized advertising. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 29, 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.007

    Guo, J., Chen, I.-R., & Tsai, J. J. P. (2017). A survey of trust computation models for service management in internet of things systems. Computer Communications, 97, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2016.10.012

    Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1981). The multiple source effect in persuasion: The effects of distraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(4), 627–635. doi:10.1177/014616728174019

    Hsu, C.-L., & Lin, J. C.-C. (2016). An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: Network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 516–527. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.023

    Kappeler, K., Festic, N., & Latzer, M. (2023). Dataveillance imaginaries and their role in Chilling effects online. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 179, 103120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103120

    Koohang, A., Sargent, C. S., Nord, J. H., & Paliszkiewicz, J. (2022). Internet of things (IOT): From Awareness to continued use. International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102442

    Kowalczuk, P. (2018). Consumer acceptance of smart speakers: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(4), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-01-2018-0022

    Lee, K., Lee, K.Y., Sheehan, L., 2020. Hey Alexa! A magic spell of social glue? Sharing a smart voice assistant speaker and its impact on users’ perception of group harmony. Information System Frontiers 22, 563–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09975-1

    Lim, J. S., Ri, S. Y., Egan, B. D., & Biocca, F. A. (2015). The cross-platform synergies of Digital Video Advertising: Implications for cross-media campaigns in television, internet and Mobile TV. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.001

    Luo, X., Andrews, M., Fang, Z., & Phang, C. W. (2014). Mobile targeting. Management Science, 60(7), 1738–1756. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1836

    Lutz, C., & Newlands, G. (2021). Privacy and smart speakers: A multi-dimensional approach. The Information Society, 37(3), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1897914

    Nasereddin, H. H. O., & Faqir, M. J. M. (2019). The impact of internet of things on customer service: A preliminary study. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 7(1), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen

    Ng, I. C. L., & Wakenshaw, S. Y. L. (2017). The internet-of-things: Review and Research Directions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.003

    Segijn, C. M. (2019). A new mobile data driven message strategy called synced advertising: Conceptualization, implications, and future directions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1576020

    Segijn, C. M., Kim, E., Sifaoui, A., & Boerman, S. C. (2021). When you realize that big brother is watching: How informing consumers affects synced advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Communications, 29(4), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2021.2020149

    Segijn, C. M., & van Ooijen, I. (2020a). Differences in consumer knowledge and perceptions of personalized advertising: Comparing online behavioural advertising and synced advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications, 28(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2020.1857297

    Segijn, C. M., & van Ooijen, I. (2020b). Perceptions of techniques used to personalize messages across media in Real time. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(5), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0682

    Segijn, C.M. and Voorveld, H.A. (2020) ‘A first step in unraveling synced advertising effectiveness’, International Journal of Advertising, 40(1), pp. 124–143. doi:10.1080/02650487.2020.1778279.

    Segijn, C. M., Voorveld, H. A., & Vakeel, K. A. (2021). The role of AD sequence and privacy concerns in personalized advertising: An eye-tracking study into synced advertising effects. Journal of Advertising, 50(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1870586

    Seliem, M., Elgazzar, K., & Khalil, K. (2018). Towards privacy preserving IoT Environments: A survey. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2018, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1032761

    Strycharz, J., Kim, E., & Segijn, C. M. (2022). Why people would (not) change their media use in response to perceived corporate surveillance. Telematics and Informatics, 71, 101838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101838

    Tang, J., Akram, U., & Shi, W. (2020). Why people need privacy? the role of privacy fatigue in App Users’ intention to disclose privacy: Based on personality traits. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(4), 1097–1120. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-03-2020-0088

    Taylor, M., Reilly, D. and Wren, C. (2018) ‘Internet of things support for marketing activities’, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 28(2), pp. 149–160. doi:10.1080/0965254x.2018.1493523.

    Ooijen, I., Segijn, C. M., & Opree, S. J. (2022). Privacy cynicism and its role in privacy decision-making. Communication Research, 009365022110609. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211060984

    Wang, W.-T., Wang, Y.-S., & Chang, W.-T. (2019). Investigating the effects of psychological empowerment and interpersonal conflicts on employees’ knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1039–1076. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2018-0423

    Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J., & Hart, P. (2011). Information privacy concerns: Linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 798–824. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00281

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE